# 01 - 15 Psychological Disorders

# 15 Psychological Disorders

CHAPTER 15
PSYCHOLOGICAL
DISORDERS
© ELENA RAY | DREAMSTIME.COM
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

M
arc Summers had a lot of worries as a child. These were not the usual
worries children have about big dogs or doing well in school, however, as he describes in his autobiography, Everything in Its Place (Summers,
2000, p. 42):
I thought my parents would die if I didn’t do everything in exactly the
right way. When I took my glasses off at night I’d have to place them
on the dresser at a particular angle. Sometimes I’d turn on the light and
get out of bed seven times until I felt comfortable with the angle. If the
angle wasn’t right, I felt that my parents would die. The feeling ate up my
insides.
If I didn’t grab the molding on the wall just the right way as I entered
or exited my room; if I didn’t hang a shirt in the closet perfectly; if I didn’t
read a paragraph a certain way; if my hands and nails weren’t perfectly
clean, I thought my incorrect behavior would kill my parents.
Most of us have concerns, but Marc Summers’ concerns seem extreme.
Some people might say they are so extreme as to be abnormal, even crazy.
In this chapter, we explore the concept of abnormality. We will see that
sometimes the line between normal and abnormal is clear, but most of the time
it is fuzzy. We will investigate in detail several specific types of abnormality
and theories of why some people develop psychological disorders and others
do not.
A word of warning may be appropriate before we proceed. It is common for
students studying abnormal psychology for the first time to diagnose mental
disorders in themselves, just as medical students diagnose themselves as suffering from every new disease they read about. Most of us have had some of
the symptoms we will be describing, and that is not cause for alarm. However,
if you have been bothered by distressing feelings for a long time, it never hurts
to talk to someone about them – perhaps someone in your school’s counseling
service or student health service.
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
CHAPTER OUTLINE
DEFINING ABNORMALITY
Deviation from cultural norms
Deviation from statistical norms
Maladaptive behavior
Personal distress
What is normality?
Classifying mental health problems
Perspectives on mental health problems
ANXIETY DISORDERS
Panic disorders
Understanding panic disorder and
agoraphobia
Phobias
Understanding phobias
Obsessive-compulsive disorder
Understanding obsessive-compulsive
disorder
MOOD DISORDERS
Depression
Bipolar disorder
Understanding mood disorders
CUTTING EDGE RESEARCH:
UNDERSTANDING SUICIDE
SCHIZOPHRENIA
Characteristics of schizophrenia
Motor symptoms and withdrawal from
reality
Culture and the progression of
schizophrenia
Understanding schizophrenia
PERSONALITY DISORDERS
Antisocial personality disorder
Understanding antisocial personality
disorder
Borderline personality disorder
Understanding borderline personality
disorder
PERVASIVE DEVELOPMENTAL
DISORDERS
Diagnosis of autism
Asperger’s syndrome and other
pervasive developmental disorders
Understanding pervasive developmental
disorders
SEEING BOTH SIDES: IS ATTENTION
DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER
(ADHD) OVERDIAGNOSED?
537

538
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
DEFINING ABNORMALITY
What do we mean by ‘abnormal’ behavior? By what
criteria do we distinguish it from ‘normal’ behavior? In
this age of rapid technological advances, you might think
that there would be some objective test – a blood test or
brain scan – that could determine whether an individual
has a mental disorder. There is no such test currently,
however. Instead, we must rely on signs and symptoms,
and on subjective criteria for deciding when those symptoms constitute abnormality. A number of different types
of criteria for defining abnormality have been proposed.
Deviation from cultural norms
Every culture has certain standards, or norms, for
acceptable behaviors and ways of thinking, and deviations from those norms may be considered abnormal.
Proponents of a cultural relativist perspective argue that we
should respect each culture’s definitions of abnormality
for the members of that culture. By doing so, we do not
impose one culture’s standards on another. Opponents of
this position point to a number of dangers, however
(Szasz, 1971). Throughout history, societies have labeled
individuals as abnormal to justify controlling or silencing
them, as Hitler branded the Jews abnormal to justify the
Holocaust. Another problem is that the concept of
abnormality changes over time within the same society.
Fifty years ago, many Europeans would have considered
men wearing earrings abnormal. Today, such behaviors
ª BETTMANN CORBIS
ª IMAGEBROKER / ALAMY
Fashions change over time – just as definitions of abnormality do.
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
tend to be viewed as differences in lifestyle rather than as
signs of abnormality. Thus, ideas of normality and
abnormality differ from one society to another and over
time within the same society.
Deviation from statistical norms
The word abnormal means away from the norm. Many
characteristics, such as height, weight, and intelligence,
cover a range of values when measured over an entire
population. Most people, for example, fall within the middle range of height, and a few are unusually tall or unusually
short. One definition of abnormality therefore is based on
deviation from statistical norms: Abnormal behaviors,
thoughts, or feelings are statistically infrequent or deviant
from the norm. But according to this definition, a person
who is extremely intelligent or extremely happy would be
classified as abnormal. Thus, in defining abnormality, we
must consider more than statistical frequency.
Maladaptive behavior
Rather than defining abnormality in terms of deviance
from either statistical or societal norms, many social scientists believe that the most important criterion is how the
behaviors, thoughts or feelings affect the well-being of the
individual or the social group. According to this criterion,
experiences raise concern if they are maladaptive – that is, if
they have adverse effects on the individual or on society.
Some kinds of behavior interfere with the welfare of the
individual (a man who is so fearful of crowds that he
cannot ride the bus to work,
individuals who drink alcohol so
heavily that they cannot hold a
job, a woman who attempts suicide). Other forms of behavior
are harmful to society (an adolescent who has violent aggressive
outbursts,
a
paranoid
individual who plots to assassinate national leaders). If we use
the criterion of maladaptiveness,
all of these behaviors would be
considered of concern.
Personal distress
A
fourth
criterion
considers
abnormality in terms of individuals’ subjective feelings of
distress – their feelings of anxiety, depression, or agitation, or
experiences such as insomnia,
loss of appetite, or numerous
aches and pains. Most people
who
are
diagnosed
with
a

mental disorder feel acutely miserable. Sometimes personal distress may be the only symptom of the disorder,
and the individual’s behavior may appear normal to the
casual observer.
None of these definitions provides a completely satisfactory description of abnormality. In most instances, all
four criteria – social deviation, statistical frequency,
maladaptive behavior, and personal distress – are considered in diagnosing mental health problems.
What is normality?
Normality is even more difficult to define than abnormality, but most psychologists would agree that the characteristics in the following list indicate emotional wellbeing. (Note that these characteristics do not make sharp
distinctions between the health and the lack of health.
Rather, they represent traits that a normal person possesses to a greater degree than an individual who has
mental health problems.)
1. Appropriate perception of reality. Healthy individuals
are fairly realistic in appraising their reactions and
capabilities and in interpreting what is going on in the
world around them. They do not consistently
misperceive what others say and do, and they do not
consistently overrate their abilities and tackle more
than they can accomplish, nor do they underestimate
their abilities and shy away from difficult tasks.
2. Ability to exercise voluntary control over behavior.
Healthy individuals feel fairly confident about their
ability to control their behavior. Occasionally they
may act impulsively, but they are able to restrain their
sexual and aggressive urges when necessary. They
may fail to conform to social norms, but in such
instances their decisions are voluntary rather than
the result of uncontrollable impulses.
3. Self-esteem and acceptance. Well-adjusted people
have some appreciation of their own worth and feel
accepted by those around them. They are comfortable
with other people and are able to react spontaneously
in social situations. At the same time, they do not
feel obligated to completely subjugate their opinions
to those of the group. Feelings of worthlessness,
alienation, and lack of acceptance are prevalent among
individuals who are diagnosed as abnormal.
4. Ability to form affectionate relationships. Healthy
individuals are able to form close and satisfying
relationships with other people. They are sensitive
to the feelings of others and do not make excessive
demands on others to gratify their own needs. Often,
people with mental health problems are so concerned
with protecting their own security that they become
extremely self-centered. Preoccupied with their own
feelings and strivings, they seek affection but are
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
DEFINING ABNORMALITY
ª VLADIMIR WRANGEL j DREAMSTIME.COM
Healthy individuals are able to form close and satisfying
relationships with other people.
unable to reciprocate. Sometimes they fear intimacy
because their past relationships have been destructive.
5. Productivity. Well-adjusted people are able to channel
their abilities into productive activity. They are
enthusiastic about life and do not need to drive
themselves to meet the demands of the day. Chronic
lack of energy and excessive susceptibility to fatigue
are often symptoms of psychological tension resulting
from unsolved problems.
Classifying mental health problems
Some mental health problems are acute and transitory,
resulting from particularly stressful events, whereas others
are chronic and lifelong. Each person’s behavior and emotionalproblemsareunique,andnotwoindividualsbehavein
exactly the same manner or share the same life experiences.
Still, for the purposes of diagnosis and research, mental
health professionals have developed systems to classify
maladaptive and distressing symptoms into disorders.
A good classification system has many advantages. If
the various types of mental health problems have different causes, we can hope to uncover them by grouping
individuals according to similarities in symptoms and
then looking for other ways in which they may be similar. A diagnostic label also enables those who work with
individuals with mental health problems to communicate information more quickly and concisely. The diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder indicates quite a
bit about a person’s behavior. Knowing that an individual’s symptoms are similar to those of other persons
with the diagnosis is also helpful in deciding how to treat
the individual. Disadvantages arise, however, if we allow
a diagnostic label to carry too much weight. Labeling
induces us to overlook the unique features of each case
and expect the person to conform to the classification.
We may also forget that a label for maladaptive behavior

is not an explanation of that behavior. The classification
does not tell us how the symptoms originated or what
causes them to continue. Finally, being diagnosed with a
mental health problem can carry stigma in many
societies.
The classification of mental disorders published by the
World Health Organization is the International Classification of Diseases (known as ICD-10). It corresponds
generally to the system used in the United States, the
Diagnostic
and
Statistical
Manual
of
Mental
Disorders,
4th edition (DSM-IV for short). The major categories of
mental disorders classified by ICD-10 are listed in the
Concept Review Table. ICD-10 provides an extensive list
of subcategories under each of these headings, as well as a
description of the symptoms that must be present for the
diagnosis to be applicable.
A distinction that is traditionally made in classifying
mental health problems is between neuroses and psychoses. Neuroses tend to be characterized by anxiety,
unhappiness, and maladaptive behavior that are rarely
serious enough to require hospitalization. The neurotic
individual can usually function in society, though not at
full capacity. Psychoses are more serious mental disorders. The individual’s behavior and thought processes
are so disturbed that he or she is out of touch with reality,
cannot cope with the demands of daily life, and sometimes has to be hospitalized. Older diagnostic systems
used the terms neuroses and psychoses to refer to a wide
range of mental disorders, leading to significant imprecision in diagnosis. The ICD-10 and DSM-IV have defined
mental disorders more narrowly, and consequently allow
for more precision in diagnosis and agreement between
CONCEPT REVIEW TABLE
Categories of mental disorders
Listed here are the main diagnostic categories of mental disorders in the ICD-10. Each category includes numerous
subclassifications.
Category
Description
Organic, including symptomatic, mental
disorders
Cognitive impairment due to brain disease or injury, such as Alzheimer’s disease, delirium,
and organic amnesia.
Mental and behavioral disorders due to
psychoactive substance use
Misuse of, and dependence on, psychoactive substances, including alcohol, illicit drugs, and
prescription drugs.
Schizophrenia, schizotypal and
delusional disorders
Disorders characterized by distortions of thought and perception and emotions that are
inappropriate or blunted. At some phase, delusions and hallucinations usually occur.
Mood (affective) disorders
Disturbances of normal mood; the individual may be extremely depressed, abnormally
elated, or may alternate between periods of elation and depression.
Neurotic, stress-related and
somatoform disorders
Disorders characterized by excessive anxiety, extreme and persistent reactions to stress,
and alterations in consciousness and identity due to emotional problems, and presentation
of physical symptoms that appear to have no medical basis.
Behavioral syndromes associated with
physiological disturbances and physical factors
Eating disorders, sleep disorders, sexual disorders, and disorders occurring during the
postpartum period.
Disorders of adult personality and behavior
Long-standing patterns of maladaptive behavior that constitute immature and inappropriate
ways of coping with stress or solving problems. Examples are antisocial personality disorder
and paranoid personality disorder.
General learning disability
Arrested or incomplete development of mind, resulting in impairment of skills.
Disorders of psychological development
Disorders with onset in childhood resulting in impairment or delay of language, visual-spatial,
and motor skills.
Behavioral and emotional disorders with onset
usually occurring in childhood and adolescence
Hyperkinetic disorders (difficulties in persistence and attention, hyperactivity), conduct disorders (antisocial behavior), emotional disorders, difficulties in attachment, tic disorders, and
various other problems first occurring in childhood or adolescence.
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

clinicians as to what mental disorder might apply in a
given case.
In this chapter, we will examine anxiety disorders,
mood disorders, schizophrenia, two types of personality
disorder and pervasive developmental disorders. Alcoholism and drug dependence (both classified as psychoactive substance use disorders) are covered in Chapter 6.
Table 15.1 indicates the likelihood of experiencing
some major mental health problems during one’s lifetime.
These data come from interviews with over 20,000 people
in six European countries. Men and women tend to be
vulnerable to different types of problems. For example,
men are much more likely than women to misuse alcohol
or other drugs, but many more women than men suffer
from mood or anxiety disorders.
Many cultures recognize mental health problems that
do not correspond to any disorders listed in the ICD-10 or
DSM-IV (see Table 15.2). Some of these problems may
have the same underlying causes as certain disorders
recognized by the ICD-10 and DSM-IV but are manifested by different symptoms in other cultures. Others
may be truly unique to the cultures in which they are
found. The presence of such culture-bound syndromes
suggests that the diagnoses listed in the ICD-10 and
DSM-IV represent only the disorders that occur in
mainstream European and American cultures rather than
a universal list of disorders to which all humans are
susceptible. This supports the views of those who argue
that we cannot define abnormality without reference to
the norms of a particular culture.
Perspectives on mental health problems
Attempts to understand the causes of mental health
problems generally fall under one of the three broad
perspectives we have discussed throughout this book. The
biological perspective, also called the medical or disease
model, suggests that mental health problems are due to
brain disorders. Researchers using this approach look for
Table 15.2
Culture-bound syndromes Some cultures have syndromes or mental disorders that are found only in that culture and that do not
correspond to any ICD-10 or DSM-IV categories. (Based on APA, 2000)
Syndrome
Cultures where found
Symptoms
amok
Malaysia, Laos, Philippines,
Papua New Guinea, Puerto
Rico, Navajos
Brooding, followed by violent behavior, persecutory ideas, amnesia,
exhaustion. More often seen in men than in women.
ataque de nervios
Latin America
Uncontrollable shouting, crying, trembling, heat in the chest rising to the
head, verbal or physical aggression, seizures, fainting.
ghost sickness
American Indians
Nightmares, weakness, feelings of danger, loss of appetite, fainting,
dizziness, hallucinations, loss of consciousness, sense of suffocation.
koro
Malaysia, China, Thailand
Sudden and intense anxiety that the penis (in males) or the vulva and nipples
(in females) will recede into body and cause death.
latah
East Asia
Hypersensitivity to sudden fright, trance-like behavior. Most often seen in
middle-aged women.
susto
Mexico, Central America
Appetite disturbances, sleep disturbances, sadness, loss of motivation,
feelings of low self-worth following a frightening event. Sufferers believe that
their soul has left their body.
taijin kyofusho
Japan
Intense fear that one’s body displeases, embarrasses, or is offensive to others.
Table 15.1
Lifetime prevalence rates of selected disorders Listed
here are the percentage of individuals in six European
countries who have experienced one of these mental disorders during their lifetime. These percentages are based on
interviews with a sample of 21,425 individuals, over the age of
18. (From J. Alonso and colleagues (2004). Prevalence of
mental disorders in Europe: Results from the European Study
of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 109 (Supl. 420), 21–27.)
Disorder
Percent
Women
Percent
Men
Total
Anxiety disorders
17.5
9.5
13.6
Mood disorders
18.2
9.5
14.0
Alcohol use disorder
1.4
9.3
5,2
DEFINING ABNORMALITY
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

542
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
genetic irregularities that may predispose a person to
develop a particular mental health problem by affecting
the functioning of the brain. They also look for abnormalities in specific parts of the brain and dysfunction in
neurochemical systems in the brain and other parts of the
body. Proponents of this perspective generally favor the
use of drugs to treat mental health problems.
There
are
a
number
of
specific
psychological
perspectives that see mental health problems as problems
in the functioning of the mind. The
psychoanalytic
perspective emphasizes unconscious conflicts, usually
originating in early childhood, and the use of defense
mechanisms to handle the anxiety generated by the
repressed impulses and emotions. Bringing the unconscious conflicts and emotions into awareness presumably
eliminates the need for the defense mechanisms and alleviates the disorder.
The
behavioral
perspective
investigates
how
fears
become conditioned to specific situations and the role of
reinforcement in the origin and maintenance of inappropriate behaviors. This approach looks at mental health
problems from the standpoint of learning theory and
assumes that maladaptive behaviors are learned.
The cognitive perspective suggests that some mental
problems stem from maladaptive cognitive processes and
can be alleviated by changing these biased cognitions. The
way we think about ourselves, the way we appraise
stressful situations, and our strategies for coping with
them are all interrelated.
Cultural or sociological perspectives take the view that
mental health problems are not situated in the brain or
mind of the individual but in the social context in which
the individual lives. Proponents of this perspective look
to stresses in the physical and social environment, such
as discrimination and poverty, that can interfere with
people’s functioning. They also pay attention to how
culture shapes the types of mental health problems
people are most susceptible to and how they manifest
their distress.
The ideas embodied in these brief summaries will
become clearer as we discuss them in relation to specific
mental health problems. One way of integrating these
factors is the vulnerability-stress model, which considers
the interaction between a predisposition, which makes a
person vulnerable for developing a particular mental
health problem, and stressful environmental conditions
encountered by that person. At the biological level, vulnerability might stem from genetic factors. This is evident
in problems in which having a close relative with the same
problems increases a person’s risk of developing them. At
the psychological level, a chronic feeling of hopelessness
and inadequacy might make an individual vulnerable to
depression. Having a predisposition for a particular
mental health problem does not guarantee that the person
will develop it. Whether the predisposition leads to an
actual problems often depends on the kinds of stressors,
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
including poverty, malnutrition, frustration, conflicts,
and traumatic life events, that the individual encounters.
The key point of the vulnerability-stress model is that
both vulnerability and stress are necessary. It helps
explain why some people develop serious psychological
problems when confronted with a minimum of stress
while others remain healthy regardless of how difficult
their lives may become.
INTERIM SUMMARY
l The labeling of behaviors, thoughts and emotions
as abnormal is based on social norms, statistical
frequency, maladaptiveness of behavior, and personal
distress.
l Characteristics of good mental health include efficient
perception of reality, control of behavior, self-esteem,
ability to form affectionate relationships, and
productivity.
l ICD-10 and DSM-IV are the classification systems used
for mental health problems. Such classification systems
help communicate information and provide a basis
for research.
l Theories about the causes of mental health problems
and proposals for treating them can be grouped
according to those that focus on the brain and other
biological factors; those that focus on the mind,
including psychoanalytic, behavioral, and cognitive
perspectives; and those that focus on sociocultural
and environmental factors.
l The vulnerability-stress model emphasizes the
interaction between a predisposition (biological and/or
psychological) that makes a person vulnerable to a
particular health problem and stressful environmental
conditions encountered by the individual.
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
1 Studying any mental health problem from one
theoretical perspective holds the danger that the
investigator will be biased to look for particular causes
of the problem and to ignore other causes. But is it
possible to study mental health problems from a totally
atheoretical perspective – that is, to approach them
with no presumptions about their likely causes? Why or
why not?
2 People who are diagnosed with a mental disorder often
say it is a relief to have a label for their distress. Why
might this be true?

ANXIETY DISORDERS
Most of us feel anxious and tense in the face of threatening or stressful situations. Such feelings are normal
reactions to stress. Anxiety is considered unhealthy only
when it occurs in situations that most people can handle
with little difficulty. Anxiety disorders include a group of
disorders in which anxiety either is the main symptom
(generalized anxiety and panic disorders) or is experienced when the individual attempts to control certain
maladaptive behaviors (phobic and obsessive-compulsive
disorders). (Post-traumatic stress disorder, which involves
anxiety following a traumatic event, was discussed in
Chapter 14.) The following passage describes a person
suffering from an anxiety disorder:
Hazel was walking down a street near her home one
day when she suddenly felt flooded with intense and
frightening physical symptoms. Her whole body
tightened up, she began sweating and her heart was
racing, and she felt dizzy and disoriented. She thought,
‘I must be having a heart attack! I can’t stand this!
Something terrible is happening! I’m going to die.’
Hazel just stood frozen in the middle of the street
until an onlooker stopped to help her.
There are four types of symptoms of anxiety, and Hazel
was experiencing symptoms of each type. First, she had
physiological or somatic symptoms: Her heart was racing,
she was perspiring, and her muscles tensed. You may
recognize these symptoms as part of the fight-or-flight
response discussed in Chapter 14. This is the body’s
natural reaction to a challenging situation – the physiological changes of the fight-or-flight response prepare the
body to fight a threat or to flee from it.
Second, Hazel had cognitive symptoms of anxiety: She
was sure she was having a heart attack and dying. Third,
Hazel had a behavioral symptom of anxiety: She froze,
unable to move until help arrived. Fourth, she had the
sense of dread and terror that make up the emotional
symptoms of anxiety.
All of these symptoms can be highly adaptive when
we are facing a real threat, such as a saber-toothed tiger
in prehistoric times or a burglar today. They become
maladaptive when there is no real threat to fight against
or flee from. Hazel’s symptoms were not triggered by a
dangerous situation but came ‘out of the blue’. Even
when these symptoms do arise in response to some
perceived threat, they can be maladaptive when they are
out of proportion to the threat or persist after the threat
has passed. Many people with anxiety disorders seem to
view situations as highly threatening that most of us
would consider benign, and they worry about those
situations even when they are highly unlikely to occur.
For example, people with social phobias are terrified of
the possibility that they might embarrass themselves in
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
ANXIETY DISORDERS
Table 15.3
Generalized anxiety The statements listed in this table
are self-descriptions by individuals who have chronically
high levels of anxiety. (From Abnormal Psychology The
Problem of Maladaptive Behavior, 7/e, by I. G. Sarason &
B. R. Sarason. Copyright © 1993 by I. G. Sarason and
B. R. Sarason. Adapted by permission of Prentice-Hall,
Upper Saddle River, NJ.)
I am often bothered by the thumping of my heart.
Little annoyances get on my nerves and irritate me.
I often become suddenly scared for no good reason.
I worry continuously, and that gets me down.
I frequently get spells of complete exhaustion and fatigue.
It is always hard for me to make up my mind.
I always seem to be dreading something.
I feel nervous and high-strung all the time.
I often feel I cannot overcome my difficulties.
I feel constantly under strain.
public, and they therefore go to great lengths to avoid
social situations.
In one form of anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety
disorder, the person experiences a constant sense of tension and dread. Inability to relax, disturbed sleep, fatigue,
headaches, dizziness, and rapid heart rate are the most
common physical complaints. In addition, the individual
continually worries about potential problems and has
difficulty concentrating or making decisions. When the
individual finally makes a decision, it becomes a source of
further worry (‘Did I foresee all the possible consequences?’). Some self-descriptions provided by people
with
chronically
high
levels
of
anxiety
appear
in
Table 15.3. Other anxiety disorders, such as panic disorder, phobias, and obsessive-compulsive disorder, are
characterized by more focused anxiety and are discussed
in more detail in the rest of this section.
Panic disorders
Hazel’s symptoms suggest that she experienced a panic
attack – an episode of acute and overwhelming apprehension or terror. During panic attacks, the individual
feels certain that something dreadful is about to happen.
This feeling is usually accompanied by such symptoms as
heart palpitations, shortness of breath, perspiration,
muscle tremors, faintness, and nausea. The symptoms
result from excitation of the sympathetic division of the
autonomic nervous system (see Chapter 2) and are the
same reactions that an individual experiences when
extremely frightened. During severe panic attacks, the
person fears that he or she will die.

544
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
As many as 28 percent of adults have occasional panic
attacks, especially during times of stress (Kessler, Chiu,
Jin, Ruscio, Shear, & Walters, 2006). For most of these
people, the panic attacks are annoying but isolated events
that do not change how they live their lives. When panic
attacks become a common occurrence and the individual
begins to worry about having attacks, he or she may
receive a diagnosis of panic disorder. Panic disorder is
relatively rare: Only about 2.1 percent of European adults
will ever develop a panic disorder (Alonso et al., 2004).
Usually panic disorder appears sometime between late
adolescence and the mid-30s. Without treatment, panic
disorder tends to become chronic.
Panic-like symptoms may take a different form across
cultures. People from Latino cultures, particularly in the
Caribbean, sometimes experience a sudden rush of anxiety symptoms known as ataque de nervios. The symptoms
of ataque include trembling, feelings of out of control,
sudden crying, screaming uncontrollably, verbal and
physical aggression, and sometimes seizure-like or fainting episodes and suicidal gestures (Lopez & Guarnaccia,
2000). When ataque de nervios comes out of the blue, it is
often attributed to the stresses of daily living or to spiritual causes. A study of Puerto Ricans after the 1985
floods found that 16 percent of the victims reported
experiencing an ataque (Guarnaccia, Canino, RubioStipec, & Bravo, 1993).
People with panic disorder may believe that they have
a life-threatening illness, such as heart disease or susceptibility to stroke, even after such illnesses have been ruled
out by medical examinations. They may go from one
physician to another, searching for the one who can
diagnose their ailments. They may also believe that they
are ‘going crazy’ or ‘losing control’. If their symptoms go
untreated, they may become depressed and demoralized.
About 20 percent of people with panic disorder also
develop agoraphobia (Kessler et al., 2006). People with
agoraphobia fear any place where they might be trapped
or unable to receive help in an emergency. The emergency
they most often fear is having a panic attack. The term
agoraphobia
comes
from the ancient Greek words
meaning ‘fear of the marketplace’. People with agoraphobia fear being in a busy, crowded place such as a
shopping mall. They may also fear being in tightly
enclosed spaces from which it can be difficult to escape,
such as a bus, elevator, or subway, or being alone in wideopen spaces such as a meadow or a deserted beach. All of
these places are frightening for people with agoraphobia
because if a panic attack or some other emergency
occurred, it would be very difficult for them to escape or
get help. They may also fear that they will embarrass
themselves when others see that they are having a panic
attack, even though other people usually cannot tell when
a person is having a panic attack.
People with agoraphobia avoid all the places they fear.
They significantly curtail their activities, remaining in a
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
few ‘safe’ places, such as the area within a few blocks of
home. Sometimes they can venture into ‘unsafe’ places if a
trusted family member or friend accompanies them. If
they attempt to enter ‘unsafe’ places on their own, however, they may experience a great deal of general anxiety
beforehand and have a full panic attack when in the
unsafe place. Hazel, whom we met earlier in the chapter,
provides an example:
Hazel continued to have panic attacks every few days,
sometimes on the same street where she had the first
panic attack, but increasingly in places where she’d
never had a panic attack before. It seemed she was
especially likely to have a panic attack if there were
lots of people standing around her, and she became
confused about how she would get out of the crowd
if she began to panic. The only place Hazel had not
had any panic attacks was in her apartment. She
began to spend more and more time in her apartment
and refused to go anyplace where she had previously
had a panic attack. After a few months, she had
called in sick to work so often that she was fired.
Hazel could not bring herself to leave her apartment
at all. She had her groceries delivered to her so she
wouldn’t have to go out to get them. She would see
friends only if they would come to her apartment.
Hazel’s savings were becoming depleted, however,
because she had lost her job. Hazel began looking for
a job that she could do from her apartment.
Although people can develop agoraphobia without
panic attacks, the vast majority of people with agoraphobia do have panic attacks or panic-like symptoms in
social situations (Alonso et al., 2004). Agoraphobia
usually develops within a year of the onset of recurrent
panic attacks. Obviously, the symptoms of agoraphobia
can severely interfere with the ability to function in daily
life. People with agoraphobia often turn to alcohol and
other drugs to cope with their symptoms. Fortunately, we
have learned a great deal about the causes of panic and
agoraphobia in recent years.
Understanding panic disorder and agoraphobia
Many people who develop panic disorder probably have
a genetic or other biological vulnerability to the disorder.
Panic disorder runs in families (Foley et al., 2001; van den
Heuvel, van de Wetering, Veltman, & Pauls, 2000). This
does not mean, of course, that panic disorders are entirely
hereditary, in that family members live in the same environment. However, the results of twin studies provide
firmer evidence for an inherited predisposition for panic
disorder. Recall that identical twins share the same
heredity; thus, if a disorder is transmitted entirely genetically, when one identical twin suffers from the disorder,
the other twin should be highly likely to suffer from the
disorder. In contrast, fraternal twins are no more alike

genetically than ordinary siblings, so that when one twin
suffers from the disorder, the other twin should not be at
greatly increased risk for the disorder. Twin studies have
shown than an identical twin is twice as likely to suffer
panic disorder if the other twin does than is true for
fraternal twins (Hettema, Neale, & Kendler, 2001).
People who are prone to panic attacks may have an
overreactive fight-or-flight response. A full panic attack
can be induced easily by having such individuals engage
in activities that stimulate the initial physiological changes
of the fight-or-flight response. For example, when people
with panic disorder purposely hyperventilate, breathe into
a paper bag, or inhale a small amount of carbon dioxide,
they experience an increase in subjective anxiety, and
many will experience a full panic attack (see Figure 15.1;
Craske & Waters, 2005). In contrast, people without a
history of panic attacks may experience some physical
discomfort while performing these activities, but they
rarely experience a full panic attack.
Percent reporting panic
Percent reporting panic
60
47%
20
8%
Panic disorder
patients
Controls
a) After hyperventilating
80
65%
40
12%
Panic disorder
patients
Controls
b) After inhaling carbon dioxide
Figure 15.1 Panic Attacks of Patients and Controls. People
with panic disorder are much more likely than people without
panic disorder to have a panic attack when made to hyperventilate or inhale small amounts of carbon dioxide in laboratory
experiments. (Adapted from R. M. Rapee, T. A. Brown, M. M. Anthony,
& D. H. Barlow (1992), ‘Response to hyperventilation and inhalation of
5.5% carbon-dioxide-enriched air across the DSM-III-R anxiety disorders’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 538–552. Copyright ©
1992 by the American Psychological Association. Adapted with
permission.)
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
ANXIETY DISORDERS
This overreactive fight-or-flight response may be the
result of abnormal functioning in areas of the brain that
regulate this response. Some studies show that people
with panic disorder have reduced metabolism in the
amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, and brain-stem area,
which are important in regulating responses to fear
(Roy-Byrne, Craske, & Stein, 2006). People with panic
disorder also show functioning in neurotransmitter systems critical to the fear response, including gammaaminobutyric acid (GABA) and serotonin. These brain
and neurotransmitter abnormalities could cause hyperactivation and poor regulation of fear responses.
An overreactive fear response may not be enough to
create a full panic disorder, however. Some people who
have occasional panic attacks associate slight changes in
bodily functioning that occur during a panic attack, such
as a change in heart rate, with the full-blown terror of
a panic attack, a process known as interoceptive conditioning (Bouton, Mineka, & Barlow, 2001). Thus,
when these slight bodily changes occur, even if the individual is not consciously aware of them, they elicit a
conditioned fear and panic because of previous pairings
with the terror of panic, and the individual is on his or her
way into a full-blown panic attack.
In addition, people who develop panic disorder tend to
pay very close attention to their bodily sensations, misinterpret bodily sensations in a negative way, and engage in
catastrophic thinking (Clark, 1988; Craske & Waters,
2005). In the case described earlier, when Hazel felt her
muscles tightening, she began thinking, ‘I’m having a heart
attack! I’m going to die!’ Not surprisingly, these thoughts
increased her emotional symptoms of anxiety, which in
turn made her physiological symptoms worse – her heart
rate increased even more, and her muscles felt even tighter.
Interpreting these physiological changes catastrophically
led to a full panic attack. Between attacks, Hazel is
hypervigilant, paying close attention to any bodily sensation. Her constant vigilance causes her autonomic nervous
system to be chronically aroused, making it more likely
that she will have another panic attack.
How does agoraphobia develop out of panic disorder?
According to the cognitive-behavioral theory, people with
panic disorder remember vividly the places where they
have had attacks. They greatly fear those places, and that
fear generalizes to all similar places. By avoiding those
places, they reduce their anxiety, and their avoidance
behavior thus is highly reinforced. They may also find
that they experience little anxiety in particular places,
such as their own homes, and this reduction of anxiety is
also highly reinforcing, leading them to confine themselves to these ‘safe’ places. Salkovskis (1991) has labeled
such avoidance safety behaviors. Thus, through classical
and operant conditioning, their behaviors are shaped into
what we call agoraphobia. As we will see, many of the
anxiety disorders are characterized by the kinds of safety
behaviors that contribute to agoraphobia.

546
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
What evidence is there for this cognitive-behavioral
theory of panic and agoraphobia? Several laboratory
studies support the contentions that cognitive factors play
a strong role in panic attacks and that agoraphobic
behaviors may be conditioned through learning experiences (Craske & Waters, 2005). In one study, researchers
asked two groups of individuals with panic disorder to
wear masks through which they would inhale slight
amounts of carbon dioxide. Both groups were told that,
although inhaling a slight amount of carbon dioxide was
not dangerous to their health, it could induce a panic
attack. One group was told that they could not control
the amount of carbon dioxide that came through their
masks. The other group was told that they could control
how much carbon dioxide they inhaled by turning a
knob. Actually, neither group had any control over the
amount of carbon dioxide they inhaled, and both groups
inhaled the same small amount. Eighty percent of the
individuals who believed that they had no control experienced a panic attack, but only 20 percent of those who
believed that they could control the carbon dioxide had
an attack. These results clearly suggest that beliefs about
control over panic symptoms play a strong role in panic
attacks (Sanderson, Rapee, & Barlow, 1989).
In a study focusing on agoraphobic behaviors, researchers examined whether people with panic disorder
could avoid having a panic attack, even after inhaling
carbon dioxide, by having a ‘safe person’ nearby. Panic
patients who were exposed to carbon dioxide with their
safe person present were much less likely to experience
the emotional, cognitive, and physiological symptoms of
panic than panic patients who were exposed to carbon
dioxide without their safe person present (see Figure 15.2;
Carter, Hollon, Caron, & Shelton, 1995). These results
show that the symptoms of panic become associated with
certain situations and that operant behaviors such as
sticking close to a ‘safe person’ can be reinforced by the
reduction of panic symptoms.
The biological and cognitive-behavioral theories of
panic disorder and agoraphobia thus can be integrated
into a vulnerability-stress model (Roy-Byrne et al., 2006;
see Figure 15.3). People who develop panic disorder may
have a genetic or biochemical vulnerability to an overreactive fight-or-flight response, so that even with only a
slight triggering stimulus, their bodies experience all the
physiological symptoms of the response. For a full panic
disorder to develop, however, it may be necessary for
these individuals to develop a fear of bodily changes,
through interoceptive conditioning, and also be prone to
catastrophizing these symptoms and worrying excessively
about having panic attacks. Interoceptive conditioning
and misappraisals further heighten their physiological
reactivity, making it even more likely that they will
experience a full fight-or-flight response. Agoraphobia
develops when they begin to avoid places that they associate with their panic symptoms and confine themselves
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
With a safe person
Without a safe person
8
Mean panic symptoms
4
0
Emotional
symptoms
Cognitive
symptoms
Physiological
symptoms
Figure 15.2 Panic Symptoms in Panic Patients With and
Without a Safe Person Available. Panic patients were much
more likely to show symptoms of panic when a safe person was
not with them. (After Carter, Hollon, Caron, & Shelton, 1995)
Biological predisposition to overreactive
fight-or-flight response
+
Cognitive predisposition to catastrophizing cognitions
Excessive fight-or-flight response easily triggered
Frequent panic attacks
Person avoids places associated with panic
Avoidance reinforced by reduction of anxiety
Agoraphobia develops
Figure 15.3 A Vulnerability-Stress Model of Panic and
Agoraphobia. A combination of biological vulnerability to an
overreactive fight-or-flight response plus cognitive vulnerability to
catastrophizing cognitions may begin a chain of processes
leading to panic and agoraphobia.

to places where they experience less anxiety. This
vulnerability-stress model has led to exciting breakthroughs in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia, which we will discuss in Chapter 16.
Phobias
A phobia is an intense fear of a stimulus or situation that
most people do not consider particularly dangerous. The
individual usually realizes this fear greater than what
most people experience but still feels anxiety (ranging
from strong uneasiness to panic) that can be alleviated
only by avoiding the feared object or situation.
Many of us have one or two significant fears – of snakes,
insects, and heights, for example. However, a fear is usually
not diagnosed as a phobic disorder unless it interferes
considerably with the person’s daily life. Examples might
include a woman whose fear of enclosed places prevents her
from entering elevators or a man whose fear of crowds
prevents him from attending the theater or walking along
congested sidewalks.
The ICD-10 and DSM-IV divide phobic disorders into
three broad categories: simple phobias, social phobias,
and agoraphobia. We have already discussed agoraphobia. A simple phobia is a fear of a specific object, animal,
or situation. Intense fears of snakes, germs, enclosed
places, and darkness are examples. Some people may
develop a simple phobia but be normal in other respects.
In more serious cases, the individual has a number of
phobias that interfere with many aspects of life and may
be intertwined with obsessive or compulsive behavior.
Simple phobias are quite common, with nearly 8 percent
of the population in Europe having a diagnosable simple
phobia at some time in their lives (Alonso et al., 2004).
People with social phobia feel extremely insecure in social
situations and have an exaggerated fear of embarrassing
themselves. Often they are afraid that they will betray their
anxiety by such signs as hand tremors, blushing, or a
quavering voice. These fears are usually unrealistic:
ªISTOCKPHOTO.COM/JIM JURICA
One of the most common phobias is a snake phobia.
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
ANXIETY DISORDERS
Individuals who fear that they might shake do not do so;
those who fear that they will stutter or quaver actually
speak quite normally. Fear of public speaking or of eating in
public are the most common complaints of socially phobic
individuals.
People with social phobias will go to great lengths to
avoid situations in which others might evaluate them.
They may take jobs that are solitary and isolating to
avoid other people. If they find themselves in a feared
social situation, they may begin trembling and perspiring,
feel confused and dizzy, have heart palpitations, and
eventually have a full panic attack. They are sure that
others see their nervousness and are judging them as
inarticulate, weak, stupid, or ‘crazy’.
Social phobia is less common than specific phobias,
with about 2.4 percent of individuals in Europe qualifying
for a diagnosis at some time in their lives (Alonso et al.,
2004). Social phobia typically begins in adolescence and
tends to be a chronic problem if it is not treated (Kessler
et al., 1998).
Understanding phobias
Historically, phobias have been the subject of a major
clash between psychodynamic theories and behavioral
theories. Freud’s theory of the development of phobias
was one of his most famous and controversial. Freud
argued that phobias result when people displace anxiety
over unconscious motives or desires onto objects that
symbolize those motives or desires. His classic example
was the case of Little Hans, a 5-year-old who developed
an intense fear of horses. Freud interpreted the boy’s
phobia in terms of Oedipal fears (see Chapter 13) through
the following analysis: Hans was in love with his mother,
jealously hated his father, and wanted to replace him (the
Oedipal conflict); he feared that his father would retaliate
by castrating him; the anxiety produced by this conflict
was enormous because the wishes were unacceptable to
the child’s conscious mind; the anxiety was displaced
onto an innocent object (a large horse that Hans had seen
fall down and thrash about violently in the street).
Freud’s evidence for his explanation of Hans’s horse
phobia consisted of Hans’s answers to a series of rather
leading questions about what he was ‘really’ afraid of,
along with the fact that Hans appeared to lose his horse
phobia after his conversations with Freud. Freud suggested that Hans had gained insight into the true source of
his phobia and that this insight had cured the phobia.
Critics pointed out, however, that Hans never provided
any spontaneous or direct evidence that his real concern
was his father rather than the horse. They also noted that
Hans’s phobia diminished gradually over time rather than
abruptly in response to some sudden insight.
Some of the severest critics of Freud’s analysis of phobias were behaviorists (Watson & Raynor, 1920). They
argued that phobias do not develop from unconscious

548
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
ª RAMUNAS BRUZAS j DREAMSTIME.COM
Some people develop phobias of water after frightening
encounters with water.
anxieties but rather from classical and operant conditioning. Many phobias emerge after a traumatic experience – a child nearly drowns and develops a phobia of
water, another child is bitten by a dog and develops a
phobia of dogs, an adolescent who stumbles through a
speech in class is laughed at by peers and develops a phobia
of public speaking. In these cases, a previously neutral
stimulus (water or dogs or public speaking) is paired with a
traumatic event (drowning or biting or embarrassment)
that elicits anxiety. Through classical conditioning, the
previously neutral stimulus now is able to elicit the anxiety
reaction. In addition, many people with such fears avoid
the phobic object because avoidance helps reduce their
anxiety, and the phobic behavior is maintained through
operant conditioning.
Although some phobias appear to result from actual
frightening experiences, others may be learned vicariously
through observation (Muris, Steerneman, Mercklebach, &
Meesters, 1996). Fearful parents tend to produce children
who share their fears. A child who observes parents react
with fear to a variety of situations may develop the same
reactions to those situations. Indeed, studies find that
phobias clearly run in families (Kendler et al., 2001). It is
unclear whether this is due largely to children learning
phobias from their parents or also partially due to genetic
transmission of phobias. The first-degree relatives of
people with phobias are three to four times more likely
than others to also have a phobia, and twin studies suggest that this is due, at least in part, to genetics (Hettema
et al., 2001). What is likely to be inherited is vulnerability
to fear conditioning rather than the phobia per se
(Hettema, Annas, Neale, Kendler, & Fredrikson, 2003).
Behavioral theories have led to highly successful treatments for phobias, lending further support to these
theories. In contrast, treatments based on psychodynamic
theories of phobias tend to be unsuccessful, and current
drug treatments tend to relieve phobic symptoms only in
the short term.
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
Obsessive-compulsive disorder
A man gets out of bed several times each night and checks
all the doors to make sure they are locked. Upon returning
to bed, he is tormented by the thought that he may have
missed one. Another man takes three or four showers in
succession, scrubbing his body thoroughly with a special
disinfectant each time, fearful that he may be contaminated by germs. A woman has recurrent thoughts
about stabbing her infant and feels panic-stricken whenever she has to handle scissors or knives. A teenage girl is
always late to school because she feels compelled to repeat
many of her actions (replacing her brush on the dresser,
arranging the school supplies in her book bag, crossing the
threshold to her bedroom) a set number of times, usually
some multiple of the number 4.
All of these people have symptoms of obsessivecompulsive disorder: Their lives are dominated by repetitive acts or thoughts. Obsessions are persistent intrusions
of unwelcome thoughts, images, or impulses that elicit
anxiety. Compulsions are irresistible urges to carry out
certain acts or rituals that reduce anxiety. Obsessive
thoughts are often linked with compulsive acts (for
example, thoughts of lurking germs, which lead to the
compulsion to wash eating utensils many times before
using them). Regardless of whether the repetitive element
is a thought (obsession) or an act (compulsion), the central
feature of the disorder is the subjective experience of loss of
control. The victims struggle mightily to rid themselves of
the troublesome thoughts or resist performing the repetitive acts but are unable to do so.
At times, all of us have persistently recurring thoughts
(‘Did I leave the gas on?’) and urges to perform ritualistic
behavior (arranging items on a desk in a precise order
before starting an assignment). But for people with
obsessive-compulsive disorders, such thoughts and acts
occupy so much time that they seriously interfere with
ª MURIEL LASURE j DREAMSTIME.COM
Obsessions with germs may lead to compulsive hand washing.

daily life. These individuals recognize their thoughts as
irrational and repugnant but are unable to ignore or
suppress them. They realize the senselessness of their
compulsive behavior but become anxious when they try
to resist their compulsions, and feel a release of tension
once the acts are carried out.
Obsessive thoughts cover a variety of topics, but most
often they are concerned with causing harm to oneself or
others, fear of contamination, and doubt that a completed
task has been accomplished satisfactorily (Hewlett, 2000;
Rachman & Hodgson, 1980). Interestingly, the content
of obsessions changes with the times. In earlier days,
obsessive thoughts about religion and sex were common –
for example, blasphemous thoughts or impulses to shout
obscenities in church or expose one’s genitals in public.
These types of obsessions are less frequent today. And
whereas obsessions about contamination used to focus on
syphilis, AIDS has now become the object of many contamination fears.
Some people with an obsessive-compulsive disorder
have intrusive thoughts without engaging in repetitious
actions. However, the majority of patients with obsessive
thoughts also exhibit compulsive behavior. Compulsions
take a variety of forms, of which the two most common
are washing and checking (Foa & Steketee, 1989).
‘Washers’ feel contaminated when exposed to certain
objects or thoughts and spend hours performing washing
and cleaning rituals. ‘Checkers’ check doors, lights,
ovens, or the accuracy of a completed task 10, 20, or
100 times or repeat ritualistic acts over and over again.
They believe that their actions will prevent future ‘disasters’ or punishments. Compulsive acts that are meant
to ward off the harm an individual is obsessing about
are another example of safety behaviors. Sometimes
these rituals are related to the anxiety-evoking obsessions in a direct way (for example, repeatedly checking
to see if the stove has been turned off to avoid a possible
fire); other rituals are not rationally related to the
obsessions (for example, dressing and undressing in
order to prevent one’s spouse from having an accident).
The common theme behind all of these repetitive
behaviors is doubt. Obsessive-compulsive individuals
cannot trust their senses or their judgment; they can’t
trust their eyes, even though they see no dirt, or really
believe that the door is locked. Obsessive-compulsive
disorders are related to phobic disorders in that both
involve severe anxiety and both may appear in the same
patient. However, there are important differences.
Phobic patients seldom ruminate about their fears, nor
do they show ritualistic compulsive behavior. And the
two disorders are evoked by different stimuli. Dirt,
germs, and harm to others – common obsessive-compulsive preoccupations – seldom cause major problems
for phobic individuals.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder often begins at a young
age (Foa & Franklin, 2001). It tends to be chronic if left
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
ANXIETY DISORDERS
untreated. Obsessional thoughts are very distressing, and
engaging in compulsive behaviors can take a great deal of
time and be highly maladaptive (for example, washing
one’s hands so often that they bleed). People with this
disorder thus are quite psychologically impaired. Between
1 percent and 3 percent of people develop obsessivecompulsive disorder at some time in their lives (Hewlett,
2000). The prevalence of OCD does not seem to differ
greatly across countries that have been studied, including
the United States, Canada, Mexico, England, Norway,
Hong Kong, India, Egypt, Japan, and Korea (Escobar,
1993; Insel, 1984; Kim, 1993).
Understanding obsessive-compulsive disorder
Cognitive and behavioral theorists suggest that people
with obsessive-compulsive disorder have more trouble
‘turning off’ intrusive thoughts because they have a tendency toward rigid, moralistic thinking (Rachman, 1998;
Salkovskis, 1999). They tend to feel responsible for preventing harmful things from happening. They are more
likely to judge their negative, intrusive thoughts as
unacceptable, and they become more anxious and guilty
about these thoughts. This anxiety then makes it even
harder to dismiss the thought. People with obsessivecompulsive disorder may also believe that they should be
able to control all thoughts and have trouble accepting
the fact that everyone has negative thoughts occasionally.
They tend to believe that having these thoughts means
they are going crazy, or they equate having the thought
with actually engaging in the behavior (‘If I’m thinking
about hurting my child, I’m as guilty as if I actually did
hurt my child’). Of course, this just makes them even
more anxious when they have thoughts, because it’s
harder to dismiss them.
Compulsions may develop when the obsessional
person discovers that some behavior temporarily quells
the obsession and the anxiety it arouses. This reduction
in anxiety reinforces the behavior, and a compulsion is
born: Every time the person has the obsession, he or she
will feel compelled to engage in the behavior to reduce
anxiety. This cognitive-behavioral account of OCD has
received a considerable amount of empirical support
(Julien, O’Connor, & Aardema, 2007). Some of the
best evidence in favor of cognitive and behavioral perspectives on obsessive-compulsive disorder can be seen in
the fact that therapies based on these perspectives are
helpful to people with the disorder, as we will discuss in
Chapter 16.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder may also have biological causes. Some family research suggests that disordered
genes may play a role in determining who is vulnerable to
OCD (Mundo, Zanoni, & Altamura, 2006). Most of the
biological research on OCD, however, has focused on a
critical circuit in the brain. People with this disorder may
have deficiencies in the neurotransmitter serotonin in the

areas of the brain that regulate primitive impulses about
sex, violence, and cleanliness – impulses that are often the
focus of obsessions (Rauch, 2003). An elaborate circuit in
the brain seems to be involved, beginning with the frontal
cortex (see Figure 15.4). Impulses arise here and are
carried to a part of the basal ganglia called the caudate
nucleus. The strongest impulses then travel to the thalamus, where they may be acted upon. As a result, primitive
impulses may break through into consciousness and
motivate the execution of stereotyped behaviors much
more often in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder
than in normal individuals.
Neuroimaging
studies
of
people
with
obsessivecompulsive disorder show aberrant activity in the areas of
the brain involved in this primitive circuit compared to
people without the disorder (Rauch et al., 2007). In
addition, people with the disorder often get some relief
from their symptoms when they take drugs that regulate
serotonin levels (Dell’Osso, Nestadt, Allen, & Hollander,
2006). Finally, patients who respond well to these drugs
tend to show greater reductions in the rate of activity in
these brain areas than patients who do not respond well
to these drugs (Baxter et al., 1992; Swedo et al., 1992).
Interestingly, OCD patients who respond to behavior
therapies also tend to show decreases in activity in the
caudate nucleus and thalamus (see Figure 15.5; Schwartz,
Stoessel, Baxter, Martin & Phelps, 1996).
In sum, biological and psychological factors probably
combine in creating many of the anxiety disorders. Many
people who develop these disorders probably have a
genetic, neurological, or biochemical vulnerability to
anxiety. But it may be necessary for them also to have a
tendency toward catastrophizing and engaging in maladaptive avoidant behaviors that reduce anxiety for a full
anxiety disorder to develop.
Putamen and
globus pallidus
Caudate
nucleus
Cerebral cortex
Basal ganglia
Cingulate gyrus
Cerebellum
Thalamus
Orbital frontal cortex
Corpus callosum
Frontal cortex
Figure 15.4 The Human Brain and OCD. This three-dimensional view of the human brain shows the locations of the orbital frontal
cortex and the basal ganglia – areas implicated in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Among the basal ganglia’s structures are the caudate
nuclei, which filter powerful impulses that arise in the orbital frontal cortex so that only the most powerful ones reach the thalamus.
Figure 15.5 OCD Pretreatment Versus Posttreatment. PET
studies show decreases in metabolic activity in the caudate
nucleus in OCD patients after they have received behavior
therapy. (From Schwartz, Stoessel, Baxter, Martin, & Phelps, 1996).
Image courtesy of UCLA School of Medicine.
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

INTERIM SUMMARY
l Anxiety disorders include generalized anxiety (constant
worry and tension), panic disorders (sudden attacks
of overwhelming apprehension), phobias (irrational fears
of specific objects or situations), and obsessivecompulsive disorders (persistent unwanted thoughts, or
obsessions, combined with urges, or compulsions, to
perform certain acts).
l Biological theories of anxiety disorders attribute them to
genetic predispositions or to biochemical or neurological
abnormalities. Most anxiety disorders run in families,
and twin studies strongly suggest that panic disorder
and obsessive-compulsive disorder have an inherited
component.
l People who suffer panic attacks have an overreactive
fight-or-flight response, perhaps because of serotonin
deficiencies in the limbic system.
l People with obsessive-compulsive disorder may have
serotonin deficiencies in areas of the brain that regulate
primitive impulses.
l Cognitive and behavioral theorists suggest that people
with anxiety disorders are prone to catastrophizing
cognitions and to rigid, moralistic thinking. Maladaptive
behaviors such as avoidant behaviors and compulsions
arise through operant conditioning when the individual
discovers that the behaviors reduce anxiety. Phobias
may emerge through classical conditioning.
l Psychodynamic theories attribute anxiety disorders to
unconscious conflicts that are disguised as phobias,
obsessions, or compulsions.
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
1 Women are more likely than men to suffer from the
anxiety disorders (except for obsessive-compulsive
disorder). Can you generate some hypotheses for this
gender difference?
2 Humans are much more likely to develop phobias of
snakes and spiders than of guns or other modern
weapons that are a greater danger to them. Can you
generate an evolutionary explanation for this?
MOOD DISORDERS
Individuals
with
mood
disorders
may
be
severely
depressed or manic (wildly elated), or may experience
periods of depression as well as periods of mania. Mood
disorders are divided into depressive disorders, in which
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
MOOD DISORDERS
the individual has one or more periods of depression
without a history of manic episodes, and bipolar disorders,
in which the individual alternates between periods of
depression and periods of mania, usually with a return to
normal mood between the two extremes. Manic episodes
without some history of depression are uncommon.
Depression
From the time I woke up on the morning until the time I
went to bed at night, I was unbearably miserable and
seemingly incapable of any kind of joy or enthusiasm.
Everything – every thought, word, movement – was
an effort. Everything that once was sparkling now was
flat. I seemed to myself to be dull, boring, inadequate,
thick brained, unlit, unresponsive, chill skinned,
bloodless and sparrow drab. I doubted, completely, my
ability to do anything well. It seemed as though my mind
had slowed down and burned out to the point of being
virtually useless. The wretched, convoluted, and pathetically confused mass of gray worked only well enough
to torment me with a dreary litany of my inadequacies
and shortcomings in character and to taunt me with the
total, the desperate hopelessness of it all.
(Jamison, 1995, p. 110)
Most of us have periods when we feel sad, lethargic, and
uninterested in any activities – even pleasurable ones.
Mild depressive symptoms are a normal response to many
of life’s stresses, especially important losses. Depression
becomes a disorder when the symptoms become so severe
that they interfere with normal functioning, and when
they continue for weeks at a time. Depressive disorders
are relatively common, with about 13 percent of people
having an episode of severe depression such as Jamison
describes at some time in their lives (Alonso et al., 2004).
Women are twice as likely as men to develop depression.
Although depression is characterized as a mood disorder,
it is truly a disorder of the whole person, affecting bodily
functions, behaviors, and thoughts as well as emotions
(see Figure 15.6). A person need not have all the symptoms of depression to be diagnosed with a disorder, but
the more symptoms he or she has and the more intense
they are, the more certain we can be that the individual is
suffering from depression.
The emotional symptoms of depression are not the
everyday blues that we all experience from time to time,
but an unrelenting pain and despair. People also report
that they have lost the ability to experience joy, even in
response to the most joyous occasions, a symptom
referred to as anhedonia. They say that they don’t find
interacting with family or friends, their work, or their
hobbies enjoyable anymore.
The cognitive symptoms consist primarily of negative
thoughts, with themes of worthlessness, guilt, hopelessness,
and even suicide. Motivation is at a low ebb: The
depressed person tends to be passive and has difficulty

552
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
Emotional symptoms
• Sadness
• Loss of pleasure
Cognitive symptoms
• Negative views of self
• Hopelessness
• Poor concentration and 
 memory; confusion
DEPRESSION
Physical symptoms
• Changes in appetite 
 and sleep
• Fatigue
• Increase in aches and pains
Motivational symptoms
• Passivity
• Will not initiate or persist 
 at activities
Figure 15.6 The Symptoms of Depression. Depression
includes emotional, cognitive, motivational, and physical symptoms.
initiating activities. The following conversation between a
patient and his therapist illustrates this passivity. The man,
who had been hospitalized after a suicide attempt, spent
his days sitting motionless in the lounge. His therapist
decided to try to engage him in some activities:
Therapist:
I understand that you spend most of your
day in the lounge. Is that true?
Patient:
Yes, being quiet gives me the peace of
mind I need.
Therapist:
When you sit here, how’s your mood?
Patient:
I feel awful all the time. I just wish I could
fall in a hole somewhere and die.
Therapist:
Do you feel better after sitting for 2 or
3 hours?
Patient:
No, the same.
Therapist:
So you’re sitting in the hope that you’ll
find peace of mind, but it doesn’t sound
like your depression improves.
Patient:
I get so bored.
Therapist:
Would you consider being more active?
There are a number of reasons why I think
increasing your activity level might help.
Patient:
There’s nothing to do around here.
Therapist:
Would you consider trying some activities
if I could come up with a list?
Patient:
If you think it will help, but I think you’re
wasting your time. I don’t have any
interests.
(Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery, 1979, p. 200)
Depressed people experience many physical symptoms.
Their appetite may wane, they may sleep a great deal or
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
ª RAJA RC j DREAMSTIME.COM
Some people suffer depression for years.
very little, they tend to be very fatigued, and their energy is
drained. Because a depressed person’s thoughts are focused
inward rather than toward external events, he or she may
magnify minor aches and pains and worry about health.
As we see from this description of its symptoms,
depression can be a debilitating disorder. Unfortunately,
severe depression can also be long-lasting. One study of
people with severe depression found that in a given year
they were symptom-free only about 30 percent of the time
(Kessler et al., 2003). Even if they recover from one bout
of depression, people remain at high risk for relapses
into new episodes. There is some good news, however.
Episodes of depression can be greatly shortened – and
new episodes prevented – with either drug therapy or
psychotherapy, as we discuss in Chapter 16.
Bipolar disorder
The majority of depressions occur without episodes of
mania. But some people with a mood disorder will
experience both depression and mania and hence can be
diagnosed with bipolar disorder, also known as manicdepression. The individual alternates between depression
and extreme elation. In some cases the cycle between
depressive episodes and manic episodes is swift, with only
a brief return to normality in between.

People experiencing manic episodes behave in a way
that appears on the surface to be the opposite of depression. During mild manic episodes, they are energetic,
enthusiastic, and full of self-confidence. They talk continually, rush from one activity to another with little need for
sleep, and make grandiose plans, paying little attention to
their practicality, as Jamison (1995, pp. 36–37) describes:
I was a senior in high school when I had my first
attack. At first, everything seemed so easy. I raced
about like a crazed weasel, bubbling with plans and
enthusiasms, immersed in sports, and staying up all
night, night after night, out with friends, reading
everything that wasn’t nailed down, filling manuscript
books with poems and fragments of plays, and making
expansive, completely unrealistic plans for my future.
The world was filled with pleasure and promise; I felt
great. Not just great, I felt really great. I felt I could do
anything, that no task was too difficult. My mind
seemed clear, fabulously focused, and able to make
intuitive mathematical leaps that had up to that point
entirely eluded me. Indeed, they elude me still. At the
time, however, not only did everything make perfect
sense, but it all began to fit into a marvelous kind of
cosmic relatedness. My sense of enchantment with the
laws of the natural world caused me to fizz over, and I
found myself buttonholing my friends to tell them how
beautiful it all was. They were less than transfixed by
my insights into the webbings and beauties of the
universe although considerably impressed at how
exhausting it was to be around my enthusiastic ramblings: You’re talking too fast, Kay. Slow down, Kay.
You’re wearing me out, Kay. Slow down, Kay. And
those times when they didn’t actually come out and say
it, I still could see it in their eyes: For God’s sake, Kay,
slow down.
This kind of energy, self-confidence, and enthusiasm may
actually seem quite attractive to you, and indeed, many
people in the midst of a manic episode do not want to get
rid of their symptoms. At some point, however, manic
symptoms often cross a line from joyful exuberance into
hostile agitation. People may become angered by attempts
to interfere with their activities and become abusive.
Impulses
(including
sexual
ones)
are
immediately
expressed in actions or words. People may become confused and disoriented and may experience delusions of
great wealth, accomplishment, or power. Eventually,
most manic episodes revert into episodes of depression,
sometimes extremely severe.
Bipolar disorders are relatively uncommon. Whereas
about 17 percent of adult females and 9 percent of adult
males in Europe will experience depression at some time
in their lives, less than 2 percent of the adult population
has had a bipolar disorder (Alonso et al., 2004). Bipolar
disorder, which appears to be equally common in men
and women, differs from other mood disorders in that it
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
MOOD DISORDERS
is more likely to run in families, responds to different
medications, and almost always recurs if not treated.
Understanding mood disorders
As with the anxiety disorders, a combined biological and
psychological model may best explain the mood disorders.
Most people who develop depression – and particularly
bipolar disorder – may have a biological vulnerability to
these disorders. But the experience of certain types of life
events, along with a tendency to think in negative ways,
also clearly increases the likelihood of developing these
disorders.
The biological perspective
A tendency to develop mood disorders, particularly
bipolar disorders, appears to be inherited. Family history
studies of people with bipolar disorder find that their
first-degree relatives (parents, children, and siblings) have
five to ten times higher rates of both bipolar disorder and
depressive disorders than relatives of people without
bipolar disorder (Farmer, Elkin & McGuffin, 2007).
Twin studies of bipolar disorder have also consistently
suggested that the disorder has a genetic component.
Indeed, the identical twins of individuals with bipolar
disorder are 45 to 75 times more likely to develop the
disorder than people in the general population (Farmer,
Elkin, & McGuffin, 2007).
There is increasing evidence that depression, particularly recurrent depression, also is heritable. Family history
studies find that first-degree relatives of people with
depression have two to four times higher rates of depression than others (Sullivan, Neale, & Kendler, 2000).
Interestingly, relatives of depressed people do not have any
greater risk of developing bipolar disorder than relatives of
people with no mood disorder. This suggests that bipolar
disorder has a different genetic basis from that of depression. Twin studies also suggest that depression is heritable
but to a lesser degree than bipolar disorder (Sullivan et al.,
2000).
The specific role that genetic factors play in mood
disorders is unclear. However, it seems likely that a
biochemical abnormality is involved. A group of neurotransmitters called monoamines – norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine – are believed to play an important
role in the mood disorders. Recall from Chapter 2 that
neurotransmitters are synthesized by one neuron and
released into the synapse, or gap between neurons. Then
the neurotransmitter fits into receptors on the membrane
of other neurons like a key in a lock (see Figure 15.7).
When a neurotransmitter binds to a receptor, this sets off
a cascade of biochemical processes within that neuron
that transmits signals down the neuron. This process of
neurotransmission can go awry at any stage – there may
be an inappropriate amount of neurotransmitter released
into the synapse, the number or sensitivity of receptors for

the neurotransmitter can be wrong, or the cascade of
signals initiated by the binding of the neurotransmitter to
the receptor can malfunctions. Several studies suggest that
people with depression or bipolar disorder may have
abnormalities at all the stages of neurotransmission for
the monoamines, particularly in areas of the brain that
are involved in the regulation of emotion, such as the
hypothalamus (Belmaker & Agam, 2008).
The structure and functioning of the brain also appear
to be altered in people with mood disorders. Neuroimaging studies using computed tomography (CT) scans
and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have found
deterioration in the prefrontal cortex of people with
severe unipolar depression or bipolar disorder (Dougherty & Rauch, 2007). This is associated with abnormalities in metabolism in this area of the brain, according to
positron emission tomography (PET) studies. Figure 15.8
shows reduced activity in one area of the prefrontal cortex,
the cingulate gyrus, in patients with bipolar disorder, as
well as reductions in activity in the thalamus, an area of the
brain associated with cognitive functioning and the regulation of emotion. Similarly, people who are depressed
show variations in the functioning of the prefrontal cortex,
as well as thalamus, hypothalamus, amygdala, and hippocampus, which are involved in the regulation of
responses to stress and in sleep, appetite, sexual drive,
motivation, and memory (see Figure 15.9; Southwick et
al., 2005). These structural and functional brain abnormalities could be precursors and causes of mood disorders,
or they could be the result of biochemical processes in the
mood disorders that have a toxic effect on the brain. We do
not yet know the precise meaning of these abnormalities,
but the rapid advances in neuroimaging technologies are
sure to bring exciting new clues in the future.
Serotonin
Norepinephrine
Norepinephrine
receptor
Serotonin
receptor
Figure 15.7 Neurotransmission in Depression. The neuronal
receptors for norepinephrine and serotonin may not work efficiently in depressed people, so that norepinephrine and serotonin released from one neuron cannot bind to receptor sites on
other neurons.
Cingulate
gyrus
Thalamus
Figure 15.8 PET Scans of Bipolar Disorder. PET scans in six control subjects and six patients with bipolar disorder. Note decreases
in relative metabolic rate in the cingulate gyrus and thalamus in bipolar subjects. (Courtesy of Monte S. Buschbaum, M.D., Mt. Sinai School of
Medicine, New York).
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

The cognitive perspective
Cognitive theories focus primarily on depression. According to these theories, people become depressed because they
tend to interpret events in their lives in pessimistic, hopeless
ways (Abramson et al., 2002). One of the most influential
cognitive theorists, Aaron Beck, grouped the negative
thoughts of depressed individuals into three categories,
which he called the cognitive triad: negative thoughts about
the self, about present experiences, and about the future
(Beck, 1976). Negative thoughts about the self include the
depressed person’s belief that he or she is worthless and
inadequate. The depressed person’s negative view of the
future is one of hopelessness. Depressed people believe that
their inadequacies and defects will prevent them from ever
improving their situation.
Beck proposes that the depressed person’s negative
beliefs about self (‘I am worthless’, ‘I can’t do anything
right’) are formed during childhood or adolescence
through such experiences as loss of a parent, social
rejection by peers, criticism by parents or teachers, or a
series of tragedies. These negative beliefs are activated
whenever a new situation resembles in some way –
perhaps only remotely – the conditions in which the
beliefs were learned, and depression may result. Moreover, according to Beck, depressed individuals make some
systematic errors in thinking that lead them to misperceive reality in a way that contributes to their negative
beliefs about themselves. These cognitive distortions are
listed in Table 15.4.
Another cognitive approach to depression, which
focuses on the kinds of attributions, or causal explanations, that people make when bad things happen, was
discussed in Chapter 14. This theory proposes that people
who tend to attribute negative events to causes that are
internal (‘it’s my fault’), are stable over time (‘it’s going to
last forever’), and affect many areas of their lives are more
prone to depression than individuals who have a less
pessimistic attributional style (Abramson, Metalsky, &
Alloy, 1989; Peterson & Seligman, 1984).
Evidence that cognitive factors play a role in depression comes from a study that followed students through
their college careers. Researchers measured the students’
tendencies toward negative thinking patterns early in
Figure 15.9 Brain Functioning in Depression. This brain
image shows increased metabolism in the medial thalamus of
people with depression compared with those without depression.
(Source: Drevets, W.C. (2000). Neuroimaging studies of mood disorders.
Biological Psychiatry, 48, 813–829).
Table 15.4
Cognitive distortions in depression According to Beck’s theory, these are the principal errors in thinking that characterize
depressed individuals.
Overgeneralization
Drawing a sweeping conclusion on the basis of a single event. For example, a student concludes from his
poor performance in one class on a particular day that he is inept and stupid.
Selective abstraction
Focusing on an insignificant detail while ignoring the more important features of a situation. For example,
from a conversation in which her boss praises her overall job performance, a secretary remembers the only
comment that could be construed as mildly critical.
Magnification and
minimization
Magnifying small bad events and minimizing major good events in evaluating performance. For example, a
woman gets a small dent in her car fender and views it as a catastrophe (magnification), while the fact that
she gave an excellent presentation in class does nothing to raise her self-esteem (minimization).
Personalization
Incorrectly assuming responsibility for bad events in the world. For example, when rain dampens spirits at
an outdoor buffet, the host blames himself rather than the weather.
Arbitrary inference
Drawing a conclusion when there is little evidence to support it. For example, a man concludes from his
wife’s sad expression that she is disappointed in him; if he had checked out the situation, he would have
discovered that she was distressed by a friend’s illness.
MOOD DISORDERS
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

556
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
their first year of college and followed them for the next
few years. Students who evidenced a negative cognitive
triad or a pessimistic attributional style were almost seven
times more likely to experience episodes of depression
during their college years than those who did not, even if
they had never been depressed before going to college
(Alloy, Abramson, Whitehouse, Hogan, Panzarella, &
Rose, 2006).
Depressed people tend to show biases not only in the
content of their thinking but also in their processes of
thinking. They tend to ruminate – to focus on their
problems and feelings in a repetitive, circular manner
without moving into problem-solving (Nolen-Hoeksema,
Wisco, & Lyubormisky, 2008; Watkins, 2004). This tendency to ruminate is not just a symptom of depression – it
predisposes people who are not already depressed to
develop serious depression (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000).
Depressed people also show biases toward negative
thinking in basic attention and memory processes (Harvey
et al., 2004). They are more likely than nondepressed people
to dwell on negative stimuli, such as sad faces, and to have
trouble disengaging their attention from negative stimuli.
When given a list of words to learn, they will selectively recall
the negative words more than the positive words. These
biases in attention to, and memory for, negative information
could contribute to the development of the negative beliefs
depressed people have about themselves, the world and the
future, and their tendencies to ruminate (Harvey et al., 2004).
Interpersonal perspectives
Interpersonal theories of depression suggest that depressed
people are often too dependent on the opinions and support of other people (Joiner, 2002). Their insecurity about
their relationships and their self-image lead them to engage
in excessive reassurance seeking – constantly looking for
assurances from others that they are accepted and loved.
They never quite believe the affirmations other people give,
however, and anxiously keep going back for more. After a
while, their family members and friends can become weary
of this behavior and become frustrated or hostile. The
insecure person picks up on these cues of annoyance and
becomes even more worried about the relationship, and in
turn engages in even more excessive reassurance seeking.
Eventually, the person’s social support may withdraw
altogether, leading him or her to develop even more
depression. In support of this theory, studies show that
depressed people are more sensitive to rejection and more
likely to engage in excessive reassurance seeking than
people with other mental disorders, and in turn, community participants with these interpersonal liabilities are
more likely to develop depression over time (Joiner, 2002).
Depressed people also show a number of other interpersonal difficulties. Their social skills are sometimes
lacking and they have more conflictual interpersonal relationships (Beach & O’Leary, 1993; Lewinsohn et al.,
1980). Perhaps surprisingly, depressed people actively seek
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
negative feedback from others, apparently in an attempt to
confirm their negative self-views (Swann, 1990).
Psychosocial factors in bipolar disorder
Although bipolar disorder has strong genetic roots, psychosocial factors play a role in the course of the disorder.
Stressful life events can trigger new episodes of bipolar
disorder (Miklowitz & Johnson, 2006). In particular,
having an unsupportive family where members are critical, hostile and exaggerated in emotional responses to
each other increases the chances that a person with
bipolar disorder will have a relapse of his or her symptoms (Hooley, 2007). In turn, psychotherapy designed to
improve a toxic family atmosphere and teach the person
with bipolar disorder how to reduce and cope with stress
results in a lower risk of relapse of the disorder (Lam &
Wong, 2005; Miklowitz & Craighead, 2007).
INTERIM SUMMARY
l The mood disorders are divided into depressive
disorders, in which individuals experience only
depressed mood, and bipolar disorder (or manicdepression), in which individuals experience both
depression and mania.
l Biological theories attribute mood disorders to genetic
factors and to problems in regulation of the
neurotransmitters serotonin and norepinephrine.
l Cognitive theories attribute depression to pessimistic
views of the self, the world, and the future and to
maladaptive attributional styles.
l Psychodynamic theories view depression as a reactivation
of loss of parental affection in a person who is dependent
on external approval and tends to turn anger inward.
l Interpersonal theories view depression as the result of
insecurities about relationships and maladaptive
patterns of social interaction.
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
1 There is evidence that depression is much more common
among people born in recent generations (since the
1950s) than in people born in earlier generations (around
the turn of the twentieth century). Can you generate
some hypotheses for this historical trend?
2 Many famous artists and writers have suffered from
depression or bipolar disorder, including composer
Robert Schumann, writers Sylvia Plath and William
Styron, and U.S. comedian Drew Carey. Could there be
a link between mood disorders and creativity, and if so,
what might be the nature of that link?

CUTTING EDGE RESEARCH
Understanding Suicide
The most disastrous consequence of depression is suicide.
Not everyone who attempts or commits suicide is depressed,
however, and suicidal thoughts and actions are alarmingly
common. Internationally, an estimated 1 million people die by
suicide each year, or one person every 40 seconds (WHO,
2005).
Women attempt to commit suicide about three times more
often than men do, but men succeed more often than women
in killing themselves (see Figure A). The greater number of
suicide attempts by women is probably related to the greater
incidence of depression among women. The fact that men are
more successful in their attempts is related to the choice of
method. Women have tended to use less lethal means, such
as cutting their wrists or overdosing on sleeping pills; men are
more likely to use firearms or carbon monoxide fumes or to
hang themselves (WHO, 2005).
There are cross-national differences in suicide rates, with
higher rates in Europe, the former Soviet Union, and Australia,
and low rates in Latin American and South America (see
Figure B; WHO, 2005). The suicide rates in the United States,
Canada, and England fall between these two extremes. These
differences may have to do with cultural and religious norms
against suicide.
Over 90 percent of people who commit suicide have
probably been suffering from a diagnosable mental disorder,
most commonly a mood disorder (Fortune & Hawton, 2005;
Jacobson & Gould, 2008). In addition, drug abuse plays an
important role in suicide. The lifetime risk for suicide among
people who are dependent on alcohol is seven times greater
than the lifetime risk among people not alcohol dependent
(Joiner et al., 2005; see also Nock et al., 2008). When
5–14
15–24
25–34
35–44
45–54
55–64
65–74
75+
Age group
Male
Female
10
30
50
Rate per 100,000
Figure A Gender, Age, and Suicide. In many nations of the
world, men are more likely to commit suicide than women, and
the rates of suicide are highest among the elderly.
Source: World Health Organization (2004). Distribution of suicide rates
per (1,000,000) by gender and age, 2000. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/charts/en/
>13
6.5–13
<6.5
no data
Figure B Map of Suicide Rates. There are significant differences across countries in suicide rates. This map shows the rate per
100,000 people in different regions of the world. Source: World Health Organization (2004). Distribution of suicide rates per (1,000,000) by
gender and age, 2000. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/charts/en/
MOOD DISORDERS
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

558
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
alcoholism co-occurs with depression, the risk of suicide is
especially high (Waller, Lyons, & Constantini-Ferrando, 1999).
Alcohol lowers people’s inhibitions to engage in impulsive
acts, even self-destructive acts like suicide attempts.
Recent research suggests that suicide can be contagious,
particularly among people who are already having psychological problems (Jacobson & Gould, 2008). For example,
researchers in Taiwan interviewed 438 individuals suffering
from depression shortly after massive media coverage of the
suicide of a popular television star named M. J. Nee. They
found that 38.8 percent of the depressed individuals reported
that the media coverage had increased their own thoughts
about suicide, and 5.5 percent said it had led them to make a
suicide attempt (Cheng, Hawton, Chen et al., 2007). Individuals who had themselves made a suicide attempt in the
month prior to the media coverage of the celebrity suicide
were nearly 12 times more likely to report having made
another suicide attempt in response to the media coverage
than individuals who had not made a recent suicide attempt.
When a well-known member of the society commits suicide, people who closely identify with that person may see
suicide as more acceptable. Among the depressed individuals in the Taiwanese study just described, several said that
SCHIZOPHRENIA
Things that relate, the town of Antelope, Oregon,
Jonestown, Charlie Manson, the Hillside Strangler,
the Zodiac Killer, Watergate, King’s trial in L.A., and
many more. In the last 7 years alone, over 23 Starwars
scientists committed suicide for no apparent reason.
The AIDS coverup, the conference in South American
in 87 had over 1,000 doctors claim that insects can
transmit it. To be able to read one’s thoughts and place
thoughts in one’s own mind without the person
knowing it’s being done. Realization is a reality of
bioelectromagnetic control, which is thought transfer
and emotional control, recording individual brainwave frequencies of thought, sensation and emotions.
(quoted in Nolen-Hoeksema, 2007, pp. 385–386)
This ‘announcement’ posted by an individual with
schizophrenia suggests what many of the unusual symptoms people with this disorder experience, including
beliefs that others are conspiring against them, that their
thoughts are being controlled, and thoughts are being
transmitted into their minds. People with schizophrenia
have such difficulty in sorting out the real from the unreal
and in responding to the everyday events of life that they
often become immobilized. Schizophrenia occurs in all
cultures, even those that are remote from the stresses of
industrialized civilization, and appears to have plagued
humanity for at least 200 years. The disorder affects
about 1 percent of the population and occurs equally in
men and women. Schizophrenia exacts heavy costs both
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
‘His case showed that suicide is not shameful’ and ‘He was a
courageous martyr for me to follow elegantly.’ (Cheng et al.,
2007, p. 72–73). When two or more suicides or attempted
suicides are nonrandomly bunched in space or time, such as
a series of suicide attempts in the same school or a series of
completed suicides in response to the suicide of a celebrity,
scientists refer to this as a suicide cluster (Joiner, 1999).
Suicide clusters seem to occur primarily among adolescents
(Jacobson & Gould, 2008).
If you suspect that a friend or family member might be
contemplating suicide, what should you do? For many of us,
this is such a frightening situation that we may not want to
deal with it. Or we may think that by asking people about their
suicidal feelings, we may suggest something they haven’t
already thought of. Research shows, however, that it is
important to talk directly with people who might be suicidal
about their feelings and intentions. Often, they find it a relief
that someone notices and is concerned. Then, it is important
to get help – to encourage suicidal individuals to seek treatment, and even to help them get emergency care if they are
thinking of hurting themselves imminently, by taking them to
the emergency room of a hospital or calling a suicide crisis
hotline.
on the individual and on his or her family and community. People with schizophrenia must seek psychiatric and
medical help frequently, and international studies show
that up to 3 percent of a nation’s health care budget can
be attributed to the costs of treating schizophrenia
(Knapp, Mangalore, & Simon, 2004). The disorder usually begins in late adolescence or early adulthood, just
when an individual is beginning a career and starting a
family. Unfortunately, schizophrenia is one of the most
stigmatized disorders, so individuals with this disorder
and their families often carry tremendous shame.
Characteristics of schizophrenia
Sometimes schizophrenia develops slowly as a gradual
process of increasing seclusiveness and inappropriate
behavior. Sometimes the onset is sudden, marked by
intense confusion and emotional turmoil. Such acute
cases are usually precipitated by a period of stress in
individuals whose lives have tended toward isolation,
preoccupation with self,
and feelings
of insecurity.
Whether schizophrenia develops slowly or suddenly, the
symptoms are many and varied. The primary characteristics of schizophrenia can be summarized under the following headings, although not every person diagnosed as
having the disorder will exhibit all of these symptoms.
Disturbances of thought and attention
In schizophrenia, both the process of thinking and the
content of thought may be disordered. The following
excerpt from the writings of a person with schizophrenia

illustrates how difficult it is to understand
schizophrenic thinking.
If things turn by rotation of agriculture or
levels in regards and timed to everything;
I am referring to a previous document when
I made some remarks that were facts also
tested and there is another that concerns
my daughter she has a lobed bottom right
ear, her name being Mary Lou. Much of
abstraction has been left unsaid and undone
in these products milk syrup, and others,
due to economics, differentials, subsidies,
bankruptcy, tools, buildings, bonds,
national stocks, foundation craps, weather,
trades, government in levels of breakages
and fuses in electronics too all formerly
states not necessarily factuated.
(Maher, 1966, p. 395)
By themselves, the words and phrases make
sense, but they are meaningless in relation to
each other. The juxtaposition of unrelated
words and phrases and the idiosyncratic word
associations (sometimes called word salad) are
characteristic of the writing and speech of people with
schizophrenia. They reflect a loosening of associations in
which the individual’s ideas shift from one topic to
another in ways that appear unrelated. Moreover, the
train of thought often seems to be influenced by the sound
of words rather than by their meaning. The following
account by a woman with schizophrenia of her thoughts
in response to her doctor’s questions illustrates this tendency to form associations by rhyming words, referred to
as clang associations:
Doctor:
How about the medication? Are you
still taking the Haldol? [an antipsychotic drug]
Patient Thinks:
Foul Wall. (She nods but does not
reply.)
Doctor:
What about the vitamins?
Patient Thinks:
Seven sins. Has-beens. (She nods.)
Doctor:
I don’t think you’re taking all your
meds.
Patient Thinks:
Pencil leads.
(North, 1987, p. 261)
The confused thought processes that are the hallmark
of schizophrenia seem to stem from a general difficulty in
focusing attention and filtering out irrelevant stimuli.
Most of us are able to focus our attention selectively.
From a mass of incoming sensory information, we are
able to select the stimuli that are relevant to the task at
hand and ignore the rest. A person who suffers from
schizophrenia is receptive to many stimuli at the same
time and has trouble making sense of the profusion of
SCHIZOPHRENIA
COLLECTION, RUPRECHT-KARLSPUNIVERSITAT HEIDELBERG KLINIKUM
PRINZHORN
Prinzhorn 
The German psychiatrist Hans
has assembled an extensive collection of artwork by mental patients. This painting, by August Neter, illustrates the hallucinations and paranoid fantasies experienced by many
schizophrenic patients.
inputs, as the following statement by a schizophrenic
patient illustrates:
I can’t concentrate. It’s diversions of attention that
trouble me. I am picking up different conversations.
It’s like being a transmitter. The sounds are coming
through to me, but I feel my mind cannot cope with
everything. It’s difficult to concentrate on any one
sound.
(McGhie & Chapman, 1961, p. 104)
A sense of being unable to control one’s attention and
focus one’s thoughts is central to the experience of
schizophrenia.
In addition to disorganized thought processes, people
with schizophrenia experience disturbances in the content
of thought. Most individuals suffering from schizophrenia
show a lack of insight. When asked what is wrong or why
they are hospitalized, they seem to have no appreciation of
their condition and little realization that their behavior is
unusual. They are also subject to delusions, beliefs that
most people would view as misinterpretations of reality.
The most common delusions are beliefs that external
forces are trying to control one’s thoughts and actions.
These delusions of influence include the belief that one’s
thoughts are being broadcast to the world so that others
can hear them, that strange thoughts (not one’s own) are
being inserted into one’s mind, or that feelings and actions
are being imposed on one by some external force. Also
frequent are beliefs that certain people or certain groups
are threatening or plotting against one (delusions of persecution). Less common are beliefs that one is powerful
and important (delusions of grandeur).

560
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
The term paranoid is used to refer to beliefs that focus
on persecution. Such a person may become suspicious of
friends and relatives, fear being poisoned, or complain of
being watched, followed, and talked about. In rare cases,
a person who has a paranoid form of schizophrenia may
lash out at those he or she thinks are trying to inflict
harm. Most people with schizophrenia are not a danger
to others, although their confusion may make them a
danger to themselves.
The specific content of delusions in schizophrenia may
vary across cultures (Tateyama, Asai, Hashimoto, Bartels,
& Kasper, 1998). For example, delusions of persecution
often focus on persons of authority in the culture. Thus,
Americans with persecutory delusions may fear that the
Central Intelligence Agency is out to get them, whereas
Afro Caribbeans may believe that people are trying to kill
them with curses (Westermeyer, 1993). Among the
Japanese, people with schizophrenia might have delusions
of being slandered, whereas Western Europeans with
schizophrenia are more likely to have religious delusions
of having committed a sin. These differences in the content of delusions probably reflect differences in a culture’s
belief systems as well as structures of authority.
Disturbances of perception
People experiencing acute schizophrenic episodes often
report that the world appears different (noises seem louder,
colors more intense). Their own bodies may no longer
appear the same (their hands may seem too large or too
small, their legs overly extended, their eyes dislocated in
the face). Some people fail to recognize themselves in a
mirror, or see their reflection as a triple image. The most
dramatic disturbances of perception are hallucinations,
sensory experiences in the absence of relevant or adequate
external stimulation. Auditory hallucinations (usually voices telling one what to do or commenting on one’s actions)
are the most common. Visual hallucinations (such as seeing
strange creatures or heavenly beings) are somewhat less
frequent. Other sensory hallucinations (a bad odor emanating from one’s body, the taste of poison in food, the
feeling of being pricked by needles) occur infrequently.
Hallucinations are often frightening, even terrifying, as the
following example illustrates:
At one point, I would look at my co-workers and their
faces would become distorted. Their teeth looked like
fangs ready to devour me. Most of the time I couldn’t
trust myself to look at anyone for fear of being swallowed. I had no respite from the illness. Even when I
tried to sleep, the demons would keep me awake, and at
times I would roam the house searching for them. I was
being consumed on all sides whether I was awake or
asleep. I felt I was being consumed by demons.
(Long, 1996)
Auditory hallucinations may have their origin in ordinary thought. We often carry on internal dialogues – for
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
example, commenting on our actions or having an imaginary conversation with another person. We may even
occasionally talk aloud to ourselves. The voices that people
with schizophrenia hear, calling them names or telling
them what to do, are similar to internal dialogues. But a
person experiencing an auditory hallucination does not
believe that the voices originate within the self or that they
can be controlled. The inability to distinguish between
external and internal, real and imagined, is central to the
experience of schizophrenia.
Disturbances of emotional expression
People suffering from schizophrenia often exhibit unusual
emotional responses. They may be withdrawn and unresponsive in situations that should make them sad or happy.
For example, a man may show no emotional response
when informed that his daughter has cancer. However, this
blunting of emotional expression can conceal inner turmoil, and the person may erupt with angry outbursts.
Sometimes individuals with schizophrenia express
emotions that are inappropriately linked to the situation
or to the thought being expressed, such as smiling while
speaking of tragic events. Because our emotions are
influenced by cognitive processes, it is not surprising that
disorganized thoughts and perceptions are accompanied
by changes in emotional responses. This point is illustrated in the following comments:
Half the time I am talking about one thing and
thinking about half a dozen other things at the same
time. It must look queer to people when I laugh about
something that has got nothing to do with what I am
talking about, but they don’t know what’s going on
inside and how much of it is running around in my
head. You see I might be talking about something quite
serious to you and other things come into my head
at the same time that are funny and this makes me
laugh. If I could only concentrate on one thing at the
one time I wouldn’t look half so silly.
(McGhie & Chapman, 1961, p. 104)
Motor symptoms and withdrawal from reality
People with schizophrenia sometimes exhibit bizarre motor
activity. They may grimace, adopt strange facial expressions, or gesture repeatedly using peculiar sequences of
finger, hand, and arm movements. Some may become very
agitated and move about in continual activity, as in a manic
state. Some, at the other extreme, may become totally
unresponsive and immobile, adopting an unusual posture
and maintaining it for long periods of time. For example, a
person may stand like a statue with one foot extended and
one arm raised toward the ceiling, maintaining this state of
catatonic immobility for hours. Such an individual, who
appears to have completely withdrawn from reality, may be
responding to inner thoughts and fantasies.

Decreased ability to function
Besides the specific symptoms we have described, people
with schizophrenia are impaired in their ability to carry
out the daily routines of living. If the disorder occurs in
adolescence, the individual shows a decreasing ability to
cope with school and has limited social skills and few
friends. Adults suffering from schizophrenia are often
unsuccessful in obtaining or holding a job. Personal
hygiene and grooming deteriorate, and the individual
avoids the company of other people. Author Greg
Bottoms describes his brother Michael’s descent into
schizophrenia:
Michael’s decline, both mentally and physically, was
astonishingly fast. He had gone from being a decent
student and an amazing athlete to failing everything
in the space of four years; he had gone from being a
black belt in karate – lithe, aggressive, handsome – to
being a disheveled, Bible-toting one-man show in less
than one year. The rapidity of his decline once he hit
twenty – particularly the physical decline – caught us
all off guard. His poor marks in school had nothing
to do with aptitude, but rather with his shifting of
focus. He had a mission in life and little time to pursue
other things, even if people insisted these things –
school, a job, friends – were important.
His body softened dramatically, his hygiene could
produce a gag reflex. Where he had once been
inordinately handsome, he now had smears of
blackheads across his nose, a double chin, greasy
hair. . . . He started smoking three packs of Camels a
day, sometimes rocked back and forth uncontrollably in the school smoking section during lunch,
looking up through his long bangs at the other
dopers to tell them that Jesus loved them. . . . He
never slept – or if he did, it was maybe an hour or
two at a time. . . . Sometimes he’d scream in the
middle of the night.
(Bottoms, 2000, pp. 63–64)
The signs of schizophrenia are many and varied. Trying
to make sense of the variety of symptoms is complicated
by the fact that some may result directly from the disorder, whereas others may be a reaction to life in a mental
hospital or to the effects of medication.
Culture and the progression of schizophrenia
Generally, schizophrenia is more chronic and debilitating than other psychological disorders. Between 50 and
80 percent of people who are hospitalized with one
episode of schizophrenia are eventually rehospitalized
for another episode at some time in their lives (Eaton
et al., 1992). Not everyone with schizophrenia shows
progressive
deterioration
in
functioning,
however.
Between 20 and 30 percent of people treated for
schizophrenia recover substantially from the illness
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
SCHIZOPHRENIA
Developing countries
Developed countries
60
Percent
30
10
In remission
Continuous
or episodic
symptoms
Impaired
social
functioning
Figure 15.10 Cultural Differences in the Course of
Scizophrenia. People with schizophrenia in developing countries
show a more positive course of the disorder than people in
developed countries Source: A. Jablensky (2000): Epidemiology of
schizophrenia: the global burden of disease and disability, European
Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Volume 250,
Number 6 / December, 2000
within 10 to 20 years of its onset (Wiersma, Nienhuis,
Sloof, & Giel, 1998).
Culture seems to play a strong role in the course of
schizophrenia. People who have schizophrenia in developing countries, such as India, Nigeria, and Colombia,
are less likely to remain incapacitated by the disorder for
the long term than people who have schizophrenia in
developed countries such as the Great Britain, Denmark,
or the United States (see Figure 15.10; Jablensky, 2000).
Why might this be? Differences in how cultures treat their
individuals with schizophrenia probably play a strong
role. In developing countries, people with schizophrenia
are more likely cared for at home by a broad network of
family members who share responsibility for the individual (Anders, 2003). In contrast, in developed countries, it is less likely that the person with schizophrenia
lives with family or that his or her immediate family has
other family members nearby who share in the care.
Caring for a family member with schizophrenia can be a
huge burden. When this burden is shouldered by only a
few people, there can be tremendous conflict in the family, which may exacerbate the symptoms of the person
with schizophrenia.
Understanding schizophrenia
Schizophrenia probably has strong biological roots, but
environmental stress may push people who are vulnerable
to schizophrenia into more severe forms of the disorder or
new episodes of psychosis.

562
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
The biological perspective
Family studies show that there is a hereditary predisposition for schizophrenia. Relatives of people with schizophrenia are more likely to develop the disorder than
people from families that are free of schizophrenia
(Gottesman & Reilly, 2003). Figure 15.11 shows the
lifetime risk of developing schizophrenia as a function of
how closely an individual is genetically related to a person
diagnosed with schizophrenia. Note that an identical twin
of a schizophrenic is three times more likely than a fraternal twin to develop schizophrenia and 46 times more
likely than an unrelated person to develop the disorder.
However, fewer than half of identical twins of people
with schizophrenia develop schizophrenia themselves,
even though they share the same genes.
How do the genetic abnormalities that predispose an
individual to schizophrenia affect the brain? Current
research focuses on two areas: brain structure and biochemistry. Two types of structural deficits are consistently
found in the brains of people with schizophrenia. First, the
prefrontal cortex is smaller and shows less activity in some
people with schizophrenia than in people without the disorder (Andreasen, 2001; Barch, 2005; see Figure 15.12).
The prefrontal cortex is the largest region of the brain in
Genetic
relatedness
Relationship
100%
Identical twin
--
Born of
schizophrenic parents 
50%
Fraternal twin
50%
Having one
schizophrenic parent 
50%
Sibling
25%
Nephew or niece 
0%
Spouse
0%
Unrelated person 
10
30
50
Percent risk
Figure 15.11 Genetic Relationships and Schizophrenia. The lifetime risk
of developing schizophrenia is largely a function of how closely an individual is
genetically related to a schizophrenic person and not a function of how much
their environment is shared. In the case of an individual with two schizophrenic
parents, genetic relatedness cannot be expressed in terms of percentages,
but the regression of the individual’s ‘genetic value’ on that of the parents is
100%, the same as it is for identical twins. (Schizophrenia: The Epigenetic Puzzle,
by I. I. Gottesman & J. Shields. Copyright © 1992 Cambridge University Press.
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
LABORATORY OF PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY,
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH
The odds of all four of a set of identical quadruplets being
diagnosed with schizophrenia are 1 in 2 billion – yet these
quadruplets, the Genain sisters, all suffer from schizophrenia and
have been hospitalized at various times since high school.
human beings, nearly 30 percent of the total cortex, and it
has connections to all the other cortical regions, as well as
to the limbic system, which is involved in emotion and
cognition, and the basal ganglia, which is involved in
motor movement. The prefrontal cortex
plays important roles in language, emotional
expression, planning and producing new
ideas, and mediating social interactions.
Thus, it seems logical that people whose
prefrontal cortex is unusually small or
inactive would show a wide range of deficits
in cognition, emotion, and social interaction,
as people with schizophrenia do.
Second, people with schizophrenia have
enlarged ventricles and fluid-filled spaces
in
the
brain
(see
Figure
15.13;
Eyler
Zorrilla et al., 1997; Galderisi et al., 2000).
The presence of enlarged ventricles suggests
atrophy or deterioration in other brain tissue. The specific areas of the brain that
have deteriorated, resulting in ventricular
enlargement, could lead to different manifestations of schizophrenia.
Although
neurochemical
theories
of
mood disorders center on norepinephrine
and serotonin, the culprit in schizophrenia
is believed to be dopamine. Early dopamine
theories of schizophrenia held that the disorder was the result of the presence of too
much dopamine in key areas of the brain.
This view is now considered too simple.
The most recent theories suggest that there
is a complicated imbalance in levels of
dopamine in different areas of the brain
(Conklin & Iacono, 2002). First, there
may be excess dopamine activity in the

mesolimbic system, a subcortical part of the brain
involved in cognition and emotion, which leads to hallucinations, delusions, disordered thought. On the other
hand, there may be unusually low dopamine activity in
the prefrontal area of the brain, which is involved in
attention, motivation, and organization of behavior (see
Figure 15.14; Taber, Lewis, & Hurley, 2001). Low
dopamine activity in the prefrontal area may lead to lack
of motivation, inability to care for oneself, inappropriate
emotional expression.
As we mentioned, these abnormalities in brain structure and neurochemical functioning could be due to
genetics, but they also could be the result of insults to the
brain of a fetus or young child. Studies have found that
people who have schizophrenia are more likely to have a
history of birth complications, perinatal brain damage,
infections in the central nervous system (such as meningitis) in infancy, and maternal pregnancy complications
or influenza in pregnancy (Cannon & Keller, 2006). Each
of these might cause permanent damage to the central
nervous system of the fetus or young child, perhaps
contributing to risk for schizophrenia.
The social and psychological perspective
Psychosocial factors appear to play an important role in
determining the eventual severity of the disorder in people
with a biological predisposition toward schizophrenia, as
well as in triggering new episodes of psychosis. The type
of stress that has received the most attention in recent
studies is family-related stress. Members of families that
are high in expressed emotion are overinvolved with one
another, overprotective of the disturbed family member,
and, at the same time, critical, hostile, and resentful
toward the disturbed member. People with schizophrenia
whose families are high in expressed emotion are three to
four times more likely to suffer a new psychotic episode
than those whose families are low in expressed emotion
(Hooley, 2007). Being in a family with high levels of
expressed emotion may create stresses that trigger new
Ventricles
Ventricles
Figure 15.13 Brain Functioning in Schizophrenia. The MRI on the left shows evidence of ventricular enlargement in the brain of
a person with schizophrenia compared with that of a person without schizophrenia in the image on the right. (Courtesy of Silvana Galderisi,
from Galderisi, Vita, Rossi, Stratta, Leonardi and Invernizzi, (2000) ‘Qualitative MRI findings in patients with schizophrenia’, Psychiatry Research:
Neuroimaging Section 98:117–126, reprinted by pemission.)
Figure 15.12 A Normal Brain Versus a Schizophrenic Brain.
This PET scan shows the metabolic differences between the
prefrontal cortex of an individual with schizophrenia and the
same areas in the brain of a normal individual.
© PHOTO RESEARCHERS
SCHIZOPHRENIA
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

episodes of psychosis by overwhelming the schizophrenic
person’s ability to cope.
The link between expressed emotion and relapse in
schizophrenia may help to explain the cross-cultural differences in the prognosis of this disorder. One study found
that families of people with schizophrenia in Mexico and
India scored lower on measures of expressed emotions
than did families of people with schizophrenia in Europe
and the United States (see Figure 15.15; Karno & Jenkins,
1993).
Critics of the research on expressed emotion argue that
the hostility and intrusiveness observed in some families
of people with schizophrenia might be the result of the
symptoms exhibited by the disturbed member, rather than
a factor contributing to the disorder (Parker, Johnston, &
Hayward, 1988). Although families are often forgiving of
positive symptoms like hallucinations, viewing them as
uncontrollable, they can be unforgiving of the negative
symptoms like lack of motivation (Hooley, 2007). People
with these symptoms may elicit more negative expressed
emotion and may be especially prone to relapse.
Another alternative explanation for the link between
expressed emotion and relapse comes from evidence that
family members who are especially high in expressed
emotion are themselves more likely to exhibit some form
of psychopathology (Goldstein, Talovic, Nuechterlein, &
Fogelson, 1992). In such families, people with schizophrenia may have high rates of relapse because they have
a greater genetic predisposition toward psychopathology,
as evidenced by the presence of psychopathology in their
families, rather than because their families are high in
expressed
emotion.
Perhaps
the
best
evidence
that
expressed emotion actually influences relapse is that
treatments that reduce expressed emotion tend to reduce
the relapse rate in family members with schizophrenia.
80
40
0
 Percent of families with 
high expressed emotion
India
23%
Mexican
41%
British
48%
European
American
67%
Figure 15.15 Cultural Differences in the Prevalence of
Expressed Emotion in Families of People with Schizophrenia.
Families of people with schizophrenia from developing countries
tend to show lower levels of expressed emotion than do families of
schizophrenics from developed countries. This may be one reason
that people with schizophrenia from developing countries have
fewer relapses than do those from developed countries. (M. Karno &
J. H. Jenkins (1993). ‘Cross-Cultural Issues in the Course and Treatment of
Schizophrenia’. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16, 339–350.
Reprinted by permission of W. B. Saunders Co.)
Figure 15.14 Dopamine Axons in Prefrontal Cortex and Schizophrenia. The photomicrograph on the left is from a nonschizophrenic
person and shows a much denser network of dopamine axons in the prefrontal cortex than the photomicrograph on the right, which is
from a person with schizophrenia (bar ¼ 200 microns). Courtesy of David A. Lewis, MD, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

INTERIM SUMMARY
l Schizophrenia is characterized by disturbances in
thought, including disorganized thought processes,
delusions, and lack of insight.
l Other symptoms include perceptual disturbances (such
as hallucinations), inappropriate emotional expression,
bizarre motor activity, withdrawal, and impaired
functioning.
l Schizophrenia clearly is transmitted genetically.
l People with schizophrenia also have problems in
dopamine regulation.
l Two types of brain abnormalities are consistently seen in
schizophrenia: The prefrontal cortex is smaller and less
active, and the ventricles are enlarged.
l Difficult environments may worsen the disorder and
contribute to relapses.
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
1 What might be the mechanisms by which living in a
family with high expressed emotion contributes to
relapse in people with schizophrenia?
2 There is evidence that people with schizophrenia
are more likely to have been born in the winter or
spring of the year than in the summer or fall. Can
you generate some hypotheses about why this might
be so?
PERSONALITY DISORDERS
Personality disorders are long-standing patterns of maladaptive behavior. In Chapter 13, we described personality traits as enduring ways of perceiving or relating to
the environment and thinking about oneself. When personality traits become so inflexible and maladaptive that
they significantly impair the individual’s ability to function, they are referred to as personality disorders. People
with personality disorders experience themselves and the
world in ways that are highly distressing to them and/or
impair their ability to function in daily life. These experiences begin in childhood or adolescence and persist over
time and across situations, affecting most areas of the
person’s life. The particular emotions, thoughts, and
behaviors that an individual experiences vary according
to the specific disorder.
ICD-10 lists several personality disorders. The characteristics of these disorders tend to overlap, making it
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
PERSONALITY DISORDERS
difficult to agree on how to classify some individuals.
Moreover, it is difficult to say when a person’s behavior is
simply different from other people’s behaviors and when
the behavior is so severe that it warrants a diagnosis. The
personality disorder that has been studied the most and is
the most reliably diagnosed is the antisocial personality
disorder (technically labeled dissocial personality disorder
in the ICD-10, but most commonly referred to as antisocial personality disorder, and sometimes referred to as
psychopathy or sociopathy). We discuss it in this section,
along with borderline personality disorder, a controversial personality disorder that has received much attention
in recent years.
Antisocial personality disorder
People who have antisocial personality disorder have little
sense of responsibility, morality, or concern for others.
Their behavior is determined almost entirely by their own
needs. In other words, they lack a conscience. Whereas
the average person realizes at an early age that some
restrictions are placed on behavior and that pleasures
must sometimes be postponed in consideration of the
needs of others, individuals who have antisocial personalities seldom consider any desires except their own. They
ª PICTORIAL PRESS LTD / ALAMY
Anthony Hopkins played a criminal with extreme antisocial
behavior in Silence of the Lambs.

566
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
behave impulsively, seek immediate gratification of their
needs, and cannot tolerate frustration. Extreme versions
of this disorder were depicted by Woody Harrelson in the
movie Natural Born Killers and by Anthony Hopkins in
The Silence of the Lambs.
Antisocial behavior results from a number of causes,
including membership in a delinquent gang or a criminal
subculture, the need for attention and status, loss of
contact with reality, and inability to control impulses.
However, most juvenile delinquents and adult criminals
show some concern for others (for example, family or
gang members) and adhere to some code of moral conduct (never betray a friend). In contrast, people with
antisocial personalities have little feeling for anyone
except themselves and seem to experience little guilt or
remorse, regardless of how much suffering their behavior
may cause. Other characteristics of the antisocial personality include a great facility for lying, a need for thrills
and excitement with little concern for possible injury, and
inability to alter behavior as a consequence of punishment. Such individuals are sometimes attractive, intelligent, charming people who are adept at manipulating
others – in other words, good con artists. Their façade of
competence and sincerity wins them promising jobs, but
they have little staying power. Their restlessness and
impulsiveness soon lead them into an escapade that
reveals their true nature; they accumulate debts, desert
their families, squander company money, or commit
crimes. When they are caught, their declarations of
repentance are so convincing that they often escape
punishment and are given another chance. But antisocial
personalities seldom live up to these declarations; what
they say has little relation to what they feel or do.
Deceitfulness is one of the defining characteristics of
antisocial personality (Kraus & Reynolds, 2001).
Fortunately, the full syndrome of antisocial personality
disorder is relatively rare. It is much more common in
men than in women, with about 3 percent of men and
1 percent of women having this disorder at some time in
their lives (Kraus & Reynolds, 2001).
Understanding antisocial personality disorder
What factors contribute to the development of an antisocial personality? Current research focuses on biological
determinants, the quality of the parent–child relationship,
and ways of thinking that promote antisocial behaviors.
Biological factors
Genetic factors appear to play a role in the development
of antisocial personality. Both twin and adoption studies
show that antisocial personality is heritable, perhaps
particularly antisocial tendencies that begin early in
childhood (Kendler, Jacobson, Myer, & Eaves, 2008).
One of the cardinal features of antisocial personality is
impulsivity (Rutter, 1997). Many animal studies and
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
some human studies suggest that impulsive and aggressive
behaviors are linked to low levels of the neurotransmitter
serotonin (Krakowski, 2003; Mann et al., 2001). Low
serotonin levels may contribute to impulsivity in antisocial personality disorder.
People with antisocial personalities also show deficits in
the ability to sustain concentration, in abstract reasoning
and concept formation, in formulating and implementing
goals, in self-monitoring and self-awareness, and in shifting from maladaptive patterns of behavior to more adaptive ones (Henry & Moffitt, 1997). Collectively, these are
known as executive functions, and their control resides
largely in the temporal and frontal lobes of the brain. In
turn, some studies have found differences between antisocial adults (usually prison inmates) and the general
population in the structure or functioning of these areas of
the brain (Morgan & Lilienfeld, 2000). These brain
anomalies could be the result of medical illnesses and
exposure to toxins during infancy and childhood, which
are both more common in antisocial people than in controls, or to genetic abnormalities. Whatever their causes,
deficits in executive functions could contribute to poor
impulse control and difficulty in anticipating the consequences of one’s actions.
Many studies have argued that people with antisocial
personality disorder have low levels of arousability,
measured by relatively low resting heart rates and low
skin conductance activity (Herpertz et al., 2001; Raine,
1997). Low levels of arousal may indicate low levels of
fear in response to threatening situations. Fearlesness can
be put to good use – for instance, British paratroopers
and bomb disposal experts show low levels of arousal
(McMillan & Rachman, 1987; O’Connor, Hallam, &
Rachman, 1985). However, fearlessness may also allow
some people to engage in antisocial and violent behaviors,
such as fighting or robbery. In addition, children with low
arousal levels may not fear punishment, and thus may not
be deterred from antisocial behavior by the threat of
punishment.
Chronically low arousal may also be an uncomfortable
state that people with antisocial personality disorder relieve
by seeking stimulation (Eysenck, 1994). Again, if an individual seeks stimulation through prosocial or neutral acts,
such as skydiving, stimulation seeking may not lead to
antisocial behavior. But some individuals may engage in
dangerous or impulsive acts to seek stimulation, and they
may be more prone to develop antisocial personalities.
Social factors
Even children who have a biological predisposition for
antisocial behavior appear unlikely to develop antisocial
personality disorder unless they are also exposed to
environments that promote antisocial behavior (Dishion
& Patterson, 1997; Dodge & Pettit, 2003). The parents
of children with antisocial personalities often appear to
be simultaneously neglectful and hostile toward their

ªISTOCKPHOTO.COM/JENNIFER STEELE
When parents use physical punishment, children are more likely
to develop violent tendencies.
children. The children are frequently unsupervised for
long periods. The parents often are not involved in the
children’s everyday lives, not knowing where they are or
who their friends are. But when these parents do interact
with their children, the interactions are often characterized
by
hostility,
physical
violence,
and
ridicule
(Dishion & Patterson, 1997). This description does not fit
all parents of such children, but parental noninvolvement
and hostility are good predictors of children’s vulnerability to antisocial personality disorder.
The biological and family factors that contribute to
antisocial
personality
often
coincide.
Children
who
behave in antisocial ways often suffer from neuropsychological problems that are the result of maternal
drug use, poor prenatal nutrition, prenatal and postnatal
exposure to toxic agents, child abuse, birth complications,
and low birth weight (Moffitt, 1993). Children with these
neuropsychological problems are more irritable, impulsive, awkward, overreactive, and inattentive, and they
learn more slowly than their peers. This makes them
difficult to care for, and they are therefore at increased
risk for maltreatment and neglect. In turn, the parents of
these children are more likely to be teenagers or to have
psychological problems of their own that contribute to
ineffective, harsh, or inconsistent parenting. Thus, for
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
PERSONALITY DISORDERS
these children a biological predisposition to disruptive,
antisocial behaviors may be combined with a style of
parenting that contributes to these behaviors. In a study
of 536 boys, Moffitt (1990) found that those who had
both neuropsychological deficits and adverse home environments scored four times higher on an aggression scale
than those with neither neuropsychological deficits nor
adverse home environments.
Personality factors
Children with antisocial personalities tend to process
information about social interactions in ways that promote
aggressive reactions to these interactions (Crick & Dodge,
1994). They assume that other children will be aggressive
toward them, and they interpret other children’s actions in
line with these assumptions rather than using cues from the
specific situations they actually face. In addition, they tend
to believe that any negative action by a peer – such as
taking their favorite pencil – is intentional rather than
accidental. When deciding what action to take in response
to a perceived provocation by a peer, children with antisocial personalities tend to think of a narrow range of
responses, usually including aggression. When pressed to
consider responses other than aggression, they make ineffective or vague responses and often consider responses
other than aggression to be useless or unattractive.
Children who think about their social interactions in
this way are likely to engage in aggressive behaviors
toward others and may therefore suffer retaliation. Other
children will hit them, parents and teachers will punish
them, and they will be perceived more negatively by
others. These actions may feed their assumptions that the
world is against them, causing them to misinterpret future
actions by others. In this way, a cycle of interactions can
be established that maintains and encourages aggressive,
antisocial behaviors.
Borderline personality disorder
Borderline personality disorder is a lifelong disorder characterized by extreme variability in mood, relationships,
and self-perceptions. It has been the focus of considerable
attention in the popular press and in clinical and research
writings in psychology in the past couple of decades.
Instability is a key feature of borderline personality
disorder. The mood of individuals with this disorder is
unstable, with bouts of severe depression, anxiety, or
anger seeming to arise frequently, often without good
reason. The self-concept is unstable, with periods of
extreme self-doubt and grandiose self-importance. Interpersonal relationships are extremely unstable, and the
person can switch from idealizing other people to
despising them without provocation. People with borderline personality disorder often feel desperately empty
and will initially cling to a new acquaintance or therapist
in the hope that he or she will fill the tremendous void

568
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
they feel in themselves. At the same time, they may misinterpret other people’s innocent actions as signs of
abandonment or rejection. For example, if a therapist has
to cancel an appointment because she is ill, a person with
borderline personality disorder might interpret this as a
rejection and become extremely depressed or angry.
Along with instability of mood, self-concept, and interpersonal relationships comes a tendency toward impulsive self-damaging behaviors, including self-mutilation
and suicidal behavior. Self-mutilation often takes the
form of burning or cutting. Finally, people with borderline personality disorder are prone to transient episodes in
which they feel unreal, lose track of time, and may even
forget who they are.
In the following passage, a clinician describes a woman
who was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder
(Linehan, Cochran, & Kehrer, 2001, pp. 502–504).
At the initial meeting, Cindy was a 30-year-old, white,
married woman with no children who was living in
a middle-class suburban area with her husband. She had
a college education and had successfully completed
almost 2 years of medical school. Cindy was referred by
her psychiatrist of 11
2 years, who was no longer willing
to provide more than pharmacotherapy following a
recent hospitalization for a near-lethal suicide attempt.
In the 2 years prior to referral, Cindy had been hospitalized at least 10 times (one lasting 6 months) for
psychiatric treatment of suicidal ideation; had engaged
in numerous instances of parasuicidal behavior,
including at least 10 instances of drinking Clorox
bleach, multiple deep cuts, and burns; and had had
three medically severe or nearly lethal suicide attempts,
including cutting an artery in her neck.
Until age 27 Cindy was able to function well in
work and school settings, and her marriage was reasonably satisfactory to both partners, although the
husband complained of Cindy’s excessive anger. When
Cindy was in the second year of medical school, a
classmate she knew only slightly committed suicide.
Cindy stated that when she heard about the suicide,
she immediately decided to kill herself also, but had
very little insight into what about the situation actually
elicited the inclination to kill herself. Within weeks she
left medical school and became severely depressed and
actively suicidal. Although Cindy presented herself as a
person with few psychological problems before the
classmate’s suicide, further questioning revealed a
history of severe anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa,
and alcohol and prescription medication abuse, originating at the age of 14 years.
Over the course of therapy, a consistent pattern
associated with self-harm became apparent. The chain
of events would often begin with an interpersonal
encounter (almost always with her husband), which
culminated in her feeling threatened, criticized, or
unloved. These feelings would often be followed by
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
urges either to self-mutilate or to kill herself, depending
somewhat on her levels of hopelessness, anger, and
sadness. Decisions to self-mutilate and/or to attempt
suicide were often accompanied by the thought ‘I’ll
show you.’ At other times, hopelessness and a desire
to end the pain permanently seemed predominant.
Following the conscious decision to self-mutilate or
attempt suicide, Cindy would then immediately dissociate and at some later point cut or burn herself, usually while in a state of ‘automatic pilot’. Consequently,
Cindy often had difficulty remembering specifics of the
actual acts. At one point, Cindy burned her leg so
badly (and then injected it with dirt to convince the
doctor that he should give her more attention) that
reconstructive surgery was required.
People with borderline personality disorder also tend to
receive diagnoses of one of the acute disorders, including
substance abuse, depression, generalized anxiety disorder,
simple phobias, agoraphobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, and panic disorder (Kraus & Reynolds, 2001).
Longitudinal studies of people with this disorder indicate
that about 10 percent die by suicide, and perhaps
75 percent have attempted suicide (Linehan et al., 2001).
The greatest risk of suicide appears to be in the first year
or two after receiving a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. This may be due to the fact that a person is
often not diagnosed with this disorder until a crisis brings
him or her into therapy.
About 1 to 2 percent of the population will develop
borderline personality disorder at some time in their lives
(Weissman, 1993). The disorder is diagnosed much more
often in women than in men. People with this disorder tend
to have stormy marital relationships, more job difficulties,
and a higher rate of physical disability than average.
Understanding borderline personality disorder
Psychoanalytic theorists suggest that individuals with
borderline personalities have very poorly developed views
of self and others, stemming from poor early relationships
with caregivers (Kernberg, 1979). The caregivers of people
with borderline personality disorder may have encouraged
excessive dependence from them as children, punishing the
children’s attempts at developing an autonomous selfconcept. As a result, people with borderline personality
disorder never learn to fully differentiate between their views
of self and others. This makes them extremely sensitive to
others’ opinions of them and to the possibility of being
abandoned. When others are perceived as rejecting them,
they reject themselves and may engage in self-punishment or
self-mutilation.
Psychoanalytic theories also argue that individuals
with borderline personalities have never been able to
integrate the positive and negative qualities of either their
self-concept or their concept of others, because their early
caregivers were comforting and rewarding when they

remained dependent and compliant toward them but
hostile and rejecting when they tried to separate from
them. People with borderline personalities therefore tend
to see themselves and others as either ‘all good’ or ‘all
bad’ and vacillate between these two views. This process
is referred to as splitting. The changeability of borderline
individuals’ emotions and interpersonal relationships is
caused by splitting – their emotions and their perspectives
on their relationships reflect their vacillation between the
‘all good’ and the ‘all bad’ self or other.
Empirical studies have found that people with borderline personality disorder are more likely than people
without the disorder to report childhoods marked by
instability, abuse, neglect, and parental psychopathology
(Helgeland & Torgersen, 2004). Of course, this is true of
the childhoods of people with many different types of
psychopathology and does not directly address the psychoanalytic theory of the development of this disorder.
One influential theorist, Marcia Linehan (Linehan et
al., 2001), argues that people with borderline personality
disorder have fundamental deficits in the ability to regulate emotions. Extreme emotional reactions to situations
lead to impulsive actions. In addition, Linehan argues that
people with borderline personality disorder have histories
of significant others discounting and criticizing their
emotional experiences. Such a history makes it even
harder for them to learn appropriate emotion-regulation
skills and to understand and accept their emotional
reactions to events. People with this disorder come to rely
on others to help them cope with difficult situations but
do not have enough self-confidence to ask for help from
others in mature ways. They become manipulative and
indirect in trying to gain support from others.
INTERIM SUMMARY
l Personality disorders are lifelong patterns of
maladaptive behavior involving difficulties in coping with
stress or solving problems.
l Individuals with antisocial personality disorder are
impulsive, show little guilt, are concerned only with their
own needs, and are frequently in trouble with the law.
l Antisocial personality disorder may have genetic and
biological roots. Neglectful and hostile parenting also
appear to contribute to the disorder.
l People with borderline personality disorder show instability
in mood, self-concept, and interpersonal relationships.
l Psychodynamic theories suggest that the caregivers of
people with this disorder required their children to be
highly dependent and alternated between extreme
expressions of love and hostility. Other theorists argue
that people with borderline personality disorder have
extreme difficulties in regulating their emotions
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
PERVASIVE DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
1 Do personality disorders seem to be just the extremes
of normal personality traits or distinct entities that
are qualitatively different from normal personality
traits?
2 What similarities do you see between antisocial
personality disorder and borderline personality
disorder?
PERVASIVE DEVELOPMENTAL
DISORDERS
The pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) are a set of
disorders first beginning in childhood and characterized by
severe and lasting impairment in several areas of development, including social interactions, communication
with others, everyday behaviors, interests, and activities.
The pervasive developmental disorder that is probably
most familiar to you is autism – a disorder in which children show deficits in social interaction, communication,
activities, and interests. Many children with pervasive
developmental disorders also show at least mild levels of
intellectual disability, although some have normal or
superior intelligence or special skills. We first detail the
characteristics of autism, then describe how the other
pervasive developmental disorders relate to autism.
Diagnosis of autism
Autism involves three types of deficits. The first is deficits
in social interaction. Even as infants, children with autism
seem not to connect with other people, including their
parents. They may not smile and coo in response to their
caregivers or initiate play with their caregivers, the way
most young infants do. They may not want to cuddle with
their parents, even when they are frightened. Whereas
most infants love to gaze upon their caregivers as the
caregivers gaze adoringly at them, autistic infants may
hardly ever make eye-to-eye contact. When they are a bit
older, children with autism may not be interested in
playing with other children, preferring to remain in solitary play. They also do not seem to react to other people’s
emotions. Richard is a child with autism (adapted from
Spitzer et al., 1994, pp. 336–337):
Richard, age 31
2, appeared to be self-sufficient and
aloof from others. He did not greet his mother in the
mornings or his father when he returned from work,
though, if left with a baby-sitter, he tended to scream
much of the time. He had no interest in other children

570
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
and ignored his younger brother. His babbling had
no conversational intonation. At age 3 he could
understand simple practical instructions. His speech
consisted of echoing some words and phrases he had
heard in the past, with the original speaker’s accent
and intonation; he could use one or two such phrases
to indicate his simple needs. For example, if he said,
‘Do you want a drink?’ he meant he was thirsty. He
did not communicate by facial expression or use
gesture or mime, except for pulling someone along
with him and placing his or her hand on an object
he wanted. He was fascinated by bright lights and
spinning objects and would stare at them while
laughing, flapping his hands, and dancing on tiptoe.
He also displayed the same movements while listening
to music, which he liked from infancy. He was
intensely attached to a miniature car, which he held in
his hand, day and night, but he never played imaginatively with this or any other toy. He could assemble
jigsaw puzzles rapidly (with one hand because of the
car held in the other), whether the picture side was
exposed or hidden. From age 2 he had collected
kitchen utensils and arranged them in repetitive patterns all over the floors of the house. These pursuits,
together with occasional periods of aimless running
around, constituted his whole repertoire of spontaneous activities.
The major management problem was Richard’s
intense resistance to any attempt to change or extend
his interests. Removing his toy car, disturbing his
puzzles or patterns, even retrieving, for example, an
egg whisk or a spoon for its legitimate use in cooking,
or trying to make him look at a picture book precipitated temper tantrums that could last an hour or
more, with screaming, kicking, and the biting of himself or others. These tantrums could be cut short by
restoring the status quo. Otherwise, playing his
favorite music or going for a long car ride were
sometimes effective.
His parents had wondered if Richard might be deaf,
but his love of music, his accurate echoing, and his
sensitivity to some very soft sounds, such as those
made by unwrapping chocolate in the next room,
convinced them that this was not the cause of his
abnormal behavior. Psychological testing gave Richard
a mental age of 3 years in non–language-dependent
skills (such as assembling objects) but only 18 months
in language comprehension.
It was formerly thought that children with autism are
preoccupied with internal thoughts and fantasies, much
as people with schizophrenia might be preoccupied with
hallucinations and delusions. Indeed, autism in children
formerly was considered a precursor to adult schizophrenia. Studies over the past few decades have shown,
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
ª PHOTOTAKE INC. / ALAMY
Children with autism may show no interest in playing with others.
however, that these children do not develop the classic
symptoms of schizophrenia as adults (for example, they
show no evidence of hallucinations and delusions) and
that adults with schizophrenia do not have histories of
full autistic disorder as young children. In addition,
autism and schizophrenia do not co-occur in families at a
high rate, suggesting that they have different genetic
causes.
The second group of deficits in autism has to do with
communication. Children with autism show a number of
difficulties in communication and speech, as did Richard.
Rather than generating his own words, he simply echoed
what he had just heard, in a phenomenon called echolalia.
He reversed pronouns, using you when he meant I. When
he did try to generate his own words or sentences, he did
not modulate his voice for expressiveness, sounding
almost like a voice-generating machine.
The third group of deficits concerns the type of activities and interests of children with autism. Rather than
engaging in symbolic play with toys, they are preoccupied
with one part of a toy or an object, as Richard was preoccupied with his miniature car. They may engage in
bizarre, repetitive behaviors with toys. For example,
rather than using two dolls to play ‘dollies have tea’, child
with autism might take the arm off one doll and simply
pass it back and forth between her two hands. Routines

ª PHOTOS 12 / ALAMY
Dustin Hoffman (right) played a man with autism in Rain Man.
and rituals are often extremely important to children with
autism: When any aspect of the daily routine is changed –
for example, if a child’s mother stops at the bank on the
way to school – they may fly into a rage. Some children
perform stereotyped and repetitive behaviors using some
parts of their own bodies, such as incessantly flapping
their hands or banging their heads against walls. These
behaviors are sometimes referred to as self-stimulatory
behaviors, under the assumption that these children
engage in these behaviors for self-stimulation. It is not
clear, however, that this is their true purpose.
Children with autism often do poorly on measures of
intellectual ability, such as IQ tests and 50 to 70 percent
have moderate to severe intellectual impairments (Sigman, Spence, & Wang, 2006). The deficits of some children with autism, however, are confined to skills that
require language and perspective-taking skills, and they
may score in the average range on subtests that do not
require language skills. Much has been made in the
popular press about the special talents that some children
with autism have, such as the ability to play music
without having been taught or to draw extremely well, or
exceptional
memory
and
mathematical
calculation
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
PERVASIVE DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS
abilities, as was depicted in the movie Rain Man. These
persons are sometimes referred to as savants. These cases
are quite rare, however (Bolte & Poustka, 2004).
By definition, the symptoms of autism have their onset
before the age of 3. However, children with autism are
not simply delayed in their development of important
skills. When they do develop language or social interaction patterns, these patterns are highly unusual. It is
important to note, though, that there is a wide variation
in the severity and outcome of this disorder. Howlin,
Goode, Hutton, and Rutter (2004) followed 68 individuals who had been diagnosed with autism as children and
who had a performance IQ of at least 50. As adults, onefifth of them had been able to obtain some sort of academic degree, five had gone on to college, and two had
obtained post-graduate degrees. Almost a third were
employed and about a quarter had close friendships. The
majority, however, remained very dependent on their
parents or required some form of residential care. Fiftyeight percent had overall outcomes that were rated as
‘poor’ or ‘very poor’. They were unable to live alone or
hold a job, and had persistent problems in communication and social interactions.
By far, the best predictor of the outcome of autism is a
child’s IQ and amount of language development before
the age of 6 (Howlin et al., 2004; Nordin & Gillberg,
1998). Children who have IQs above 50 and communicative speech before age 6 have a much better prognosis
than do those with IQs below 50 and no communicative
speech before age 6. In the study by Howlin and colleagues (2004), people with an IQ of 70 or above were
especially likely to achieve a ‘good’ or ‘very good’
outcome.
A review of epidemiological studies estimated that the
prevalence of autism is about 5 per 10,000 children, and
the prevalence of all forms of pervasive developmental
disorder is 14 per 10,000 children (Fombonne, 1999).
Boys outnumber girls about three to one.
Asperger’s syndrome and other pervasive
developmental disorders
Other
pervasive
developmental
disorders
include
Asperger’s syndrome. Rett’s disorder and childhood disintegrative disorder. In both Rett’s disorder and childhood
disintegrative disorder, children appear to develop normally for a while and then show apparently permanent
loss of basic skills in social interactions, language, and/or
movement.
Asperger’s syndrome is characterized by deficits in
social interactions and in activities and interests that are
similar to those in autism, but differs from autism in that
there are no significant delays or deviance in language,
and in the first three years of life, children show normal

SEEING BOTH SIDES
IS ATTENTION DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY
DISORDER (ADHD) OVERDIAGNOSED?
ADHD is overdiagnosed
Caryn L. Carlson, The University of Texas at Austin
The growing public attention to attention-deficit hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD) in recent years has increased the detection of
legitimate cases and led to much-needed research. We must be
cautious, however, that we do not allow the diagnostic pendulum
to swing too far, since finding answers about ADHD depends on
the rigor and integrity of our classification system.
There is reason to believe that ADHD is currently being
overdiagnosed in some areas of the United States. Prescriptions
of stimulant medications, which are almost exclusively for ADHD,
provide a ‘proxy’ for diagnostic rates and afford an examination
of trends over time and place. Use of methylphenidate in the
United States, already high by worldwide standards (International
Narcotics Control Board, 1998), skyrocketed in the early 1990s,
more than doubling from 1990 through 1995 (Safer, Zito, & Fine,
1996) and has continued to increase since then. While rates are
up for all age groups, the largest increase is for teenagers and
adults; among school-age children in one region, the proportion
of high school students using stimulant medication tripled from
1991 through 1995 (Safer, Zito, & Fine, 1996). Certainly the true
prevalence of ADHD has not increased at this rate, although part
of the increase no doubt reflects the detection of previously
unrecognized ADHD. While some reports suggest that even now
many ADHD children may not be recognized or treated (Wolraich, Hannah, Baumgaertel, & Feurer, 1998), the average rates
are now quite high (Safer, Zito, & Fine, 1996).
Part of the dramatic increase probably reflects overdiagnosis,
particularly when considered in light of the vast disparities across
geographical locales in the United States. The rate of methylphenidate consumption per capita in 1995 was 2.4 times higher
in Virginia than in neighboring West Virginia, and nearly 4 times
higher than in California (Spanos, 1996). Even more troubling are
the high discrepancies across counties within states. For
example, although the per capita rate for males of ages 6–12 in
1991 in New York was 4.1 percent statewide, rates varied by a
factor of 10 among counties, ranging up to 14 percent (Kaufman,
1995).
What factors might lead to overdiagnosis of ADHD? We know
from epidemiological research that unreasonable prevalence
rates (e.g., up to nearly 23% of school-age boys [Wolraich,
Hannah, Baumgaertel, & Feurer, 1998]) are obtained when
ADHD is identified based merely on simple ratings from one
source, but become much lower when full diagnostic criteria –
including age of onset by 7, presence across settings, and
confirmation of impairment – are imposed. The wide variability in
diagnostic rates across locations suggests that clinicians are
applying diagnostic criteria inconsistently. Some clinicians diagnose without assessing all criteria, and often they rely only on
parent reports. While underdiagnosis may be occurring in some
places, overdiagnosis is occurring in others.
When is overdiagnosis most likely? It seems that the diagnosis
of ADHD has become fashionable for those who experience some
negative life event – such as school failure or job loss – and desire to
attribute such problems to a disorder rather than accept personal
responsibility. This tendency is apparent even in more mundane
arenas, such as feeling bored or unmotivated – ‘What a relief: the
fact that I find it difficult to pay attention in my “history of Swedish
cartographers” class isn’t my fault. I have ADHD.’
One safeguard against misdiagnosis is the current criteria that
symptoms must appear by age 7. But how early and by what
means can we detect ADHD if we agree that it is present from an
early age? Since objective measures that can reliably identify
ADHD are currently unavailable, we must rely on symptom
reports from others. Setting the age of onset at 7 years recognizes that normal behavior patterns may be similar to symptoms
of ADHD up to about age 5, when normally activity decreases
and attention increases (but not in children with ADHD). Also,
impairment may not occur outside the demands of a classroom
environment. But if individuals do not have symptoms early but
develop them later for a variety of reasons, including life situations or stress, then diagnosis does not seem warranted.
Should such problems be recognized? By all means. Should
they be treated? Of course, by teaching people organizational
and behavior management strategies, and possibly even with
medication. But significant problems in living are not the equivalent of disorders, and to call them that will deter us in the search
for etiologies of ADHD.
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

SEEING BOTH SIDES
IS ATTENTION DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY
DISORDER (ADHD) OVERDIAGNOSED?
ADHD is neither overdiagnosed nor
overtreated
William Pelham, SUNY Buffalo
Because ADHD is the most widely diagnosed mental health
disorder of childhood and because its frequency of treatment
with medication has been increasing exponentially through the
1990s, it has become fashionable in many quarters – particularly
among educators – to argue that it is overdiagnosed and consequently overtreated. Histrionic diatribes aside, there is no solid
empirical evidence that ADHD is overdiagnosed or overtreated.
First, consider the accusation that ADHD is only a relatively
recent phenomenon. To the contrary, the diagnosis was often
widely used in the past but played second fiddle to other diagnoses. For example, one of the more important early studies in
treatment of conduct disordered children (Patterson, 1974)
noted, almost as an aside that more than two-thirds of the boys
had hyperkinesis, an early label for ADHD. Thus while ADHD may
well be diagnosed more often than in the past 30 years, it is
simply being diagnosed more appropriately and given the
prominence it deserves.
It is important to note that the major reason for the increasing
rate of ADHD identification in the US since the early1990s is the
1991 change in the status of ADHD in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the federal law that governs special
education throughout the United States. This change included
ADHD as a handicapping condition. Further, the U.S. Office of
Education sent a memorandum to all state officers of education
directing them to consider ADHD as a condition eligible for
special education. As a result of this directive, school districts
throughout the country for the first time were required to
establish screening and diagnostic procedures for ADHD. The
increase in diagnosis for ADHD is thus not a conspiracy or a fatal
flaw in education or an indictment of current parenting practices,
but is instead a natural by-product of a change in federal regulations governing education in the United States.
What about the criticism that ADHD is a disorder with diagnostic rates that vary widely both within North America and
across the world? The explanation is that local school districts
and states vary dramatically in the degree to which they have
implemented the mandated changes in the IDEA. Furthermore,
ADHD when similar diagnostic criteria are applied, comparable
rates to those in North America exist in a diverse collection of
countries that include Italy, Spain, South Africa, Israel, Argentina,
and Vietnam.
The most important factor in deciding whether a mental health
disorder is overdiagnosed is whether the diagnosed individuals
have impairments in daily life functioning sufficient to justify the
label. ADHD is a particularly compelling example of this issue
because the children suffer from dramatic impairment in relationships with peers, parents, teachers, and siblings, as well as in
classroom behavior and academic performance. To take a single
example, in one classic study of consecutive referrals to a clinic,
96 percent of ADHD children were rejected by their peers on
sociometric nominations at a rate higher than their class averages (Pelham & Bender, 1982). In the field of child psychopathology, the number of negative nominations received on a
classroom peer nomination inventory in elementary school is
widely thought to be the best indicator of severe impairment in
childhood and poor outcome in adulthood, so this elevated rate
of negative nominations highlights the impairment that ADHD
children suffer in the peer domain.
A corollary of the argument that many children are inappropriately diagnosed with ADHD is the complaint that these children are
being inappropriately treated – usually with medication. In fact, the
literature shows that only a small minority of diagnosed ADHD
children (or all children with mental health disorders for that matter)
receive treatment – medication or otherwise. We should be happy
that treatment rates for the disorder are increasing. The dramatic
rise in the treatment of ADHD – pharmacological or otherwise –
clearly results from the increase in the rates of diagnosis, which are
secondary to the change in the IDEA noted above. Notably, one of
the studies that supports these arguments regarding impairment
and treatment was conducted with children identified using only
teacher ratings, which have been the main target for complaints of
overdiagnosis (Wolraich et al., 1998).
In summary, ADHD is the most common mental health disorder
of childhood, and it is one of the most impairing and refractory, and
one with poor long-term prognosis. Current diagnostic rates are in
line with scientific views of the nature of the disorder. If anything, we
need to accurately identify more children with ADHD and provide
the evidence-based treatments – both behavioral and pharmacological – that they need.
PERVASIVE DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk

574
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
levels of curiosity about the environment and acquire
most normal cognitive skills. Children with Asperger’s
syndrome tend to have IQ scores within the average
range.
Children with Asperger’s syndrome tend to have difficulty in relationships with others and to engage in
unusual behaviors (such as memorizing ZIP codes) to the
point of being obsessed with arcane facts and issues.
They can be rather formal in their speech, and the disorder has sometimes been referred to as the ‘little professor syndrome’.
A study of over 4,400 children in Finland compared
the rate of Asperger’s syndrome according to the ICD-10
and DSM-IV criteria, which differ slightly (Matilla et al.,
2007). The ICD-10 criteria diagnosed 2.9 children per
1000 with Asperger’s syndrome, and the DSM-IV criteria
diagnosed 2.5 children per 1000 with the disorder.
The different pervasive developmental disorders are
often viewed as falling along a continuum, with autism
being the most severe (and even within autism there is a
range of severity) and the other pervasive developmental
disorders being somewhat less severe. Thus, pervasive
developmental disorders are often referred to as autism
spectrum disorders. Estimates across the world suggest
that 1 child in 166 is affected with some autism spectrum
disorder (DiCicco-Bloom et al., 2006).
Understanding pervasive developmental
disorders
Over the years, several theories of pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) have been proposed. The
psychiatrist who first described autism, Leo Kanner
(1943), thought that autism is caused partly by biological
factors and partly by poor parenting. He and later psychoanalytic theorists (Bettelheim, 1967) described the
parents of children with autism as cold, distant, and
uncaring (hence the description ‘refrigerator mothers’).
The child’s symptoms were seen as a retreat inward to a
secret world of fantasies in response to unavailable
parents. Research over the decades has clearly shown,
though, that parenting practices play little or no role in
the development of autism.
Biological factors
Several biological factors have been implicated in the
development of PDDs. Family and twin studies strongly
suggest that genetics play a role in the development of
these disorders. The siblings of children with a PDD are
50 times more likely to have one of these disorders than
are the siblings of children without a PDD (Sigman et al.,
2006). Twin studies show concordance rates for autism to
be about 60 to 80 percent for monozygotic twins and 0 to
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
10 percent for dizygotic twins (Bailey et al., 1995). In
addition, about 90 percent of the MZ twins of children
with autism have a significant cognitive impairment,
compared with 10 percent of DZ twins. Finally, children
with autism have a higher than average rate of other
genetic disorders associated with cognitive impairment,
including Fragile X syndrome and PKU (Szatmari et al.,
1998). These data suggest that a general vulnerability to
several types of cognitive impairment, only one of which
is manifested as autism, runs in families.
It seems likely that neurological factors are involved in
PDDs. The broad array of deficits seen in PDDs suggests
disruption in the normal development and organization
of the brain (DiCicco-Bloom et al., 2006). In addition,
approximately 25 percent of children with PDDs develop
seizure disorders by adolescence, suggesting a severe
neurological dysfunction (Fombonne, 1999).
There are both macroscopic and microscopic abnormalities in neurological development in individuals with
PDDs. Children with PDDs tend to have a greater brain
volume, especially in the preschool years (Lotspeich et al.,
2004). These children also show growth abnormalities in
a number of areas of the brain, including the cerebellum,
cerebrum, amygdala, and possibly the hippocampus (see
DiCicco-Bloom et al., 2006). At the level of specific types
of cells and neurons, these children also show abnormal
growth patterns.
Neuroimaging studies have been used to assess brain
functioning when children with PDDs are doing tasks that
require perception of facial expressions, joint attention
with another person, empathy, and thinking about social
situations. These studies suggest that children with PDDs
show abnormal functioning in areas of the brain that are
recruited for tasks such as these. For example, when
shown photos of faces, children with PDDs show less
activation than healthy children in an area of the brain
called the fusiform gyrus, which is involved in facial
perception (see Figure 15.16; Schultz, 2005). Difficulties
in
perceiving
and
understanding
facial
expressions
could contribute to these children’s deficits in social
interactions.
One type of task that children with PDDs perform
more poorly on compared to healthy children taps into
theory of mind, which is the ability to understand that
people – including oneself – have mental states and to use
this understanding to interact and communicate with
others (Baron-Cohen & Swettenham, 1997). Having a
theory of mind is essential to comprehending, explaining,
predicting, and manipulating the behavior of others.
Children with PDDs often fail tasks assessing theory of
mind, even when they perform appropriately on other
cognitive tasks for their age group (Yirmiya et al., 1998).
The absence of a theory of mind may make it impossible
for these children to understand and operate in the social

Figure 15.16 Functional MRI abnormalities observed in
autism. Abnormal activation of the fusiform gyrus is seen in
autism. Source: Schultz RT (2005) Developmental deficits in social
perception in autism: the role of the amygdala and fusiform face area.
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 23:125–141.
world and to communicate appropriately with others.
Their strange play behavior – specifically the absence of
symbolic play – may also represent an inability to
understand anything but the concrete realities before
them. Positron emission tomography studies show that
children with PDDs show deficits in the medial prefrontal
and amygdaloid areas of the brain when doing theory of
mind tasks, that require them to take someone else’s
perspective (Castelli et al., 2002).
CHAPTER SUMMARY
The diagnosis of abnormal behavior is based on
social norms, statistical frequency, maladaptiveness of behavior, and personal distress. Characteristics of good mental health include efficient
perception of reality, control of behavior, selfesteem, ability to form affectionate relationships,
and productivity.
The ICD-10 and DSM-IV classify mental disorders
according to specific behavioral symptoms. Such
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
CHAPTER SUMMARY
INTERIM SUMMARY
l The pervasive developmental disorders are characterized
by severe and lasting impairment in several areas
of development, including social interaction,
communication, everyday behaviors, interests, and
activities. They include Asperger’s disorder, Rett’s
disorder, childhood disintegrative disorder, and autism.
l Autism is characterized by significant interpersonal,
communication, and behavioral deficits. Two-thirds of
children with autism score in the mentally retarded range
on IQ tests.
l There is wide variation in the outcome of autism,
although the majority of autistic children must have
continual care as adults. The best predictors of a good
outcome in autism are an IQ above 50 and language
development before the age of 6.
l Biological causes of PDDs may include a genetic
predisposition and a variety of neurodevelopmental
abnormalities.
CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS
1 Parents are often very nervous that their child is not
developing ‘normally’. Do you think that regular
screenings for developmental disorders would be a
good idea? Why or why not?
2 Intensive behavioral interventions from an early age
can help some children with pervasive developmental
disorders to develop normal skills. Should this
intervention be a right given to all children with these
disorders, even though only some will benefit from it?
classification systems help communicate information and provide a basis for research.
Theories about the causes of mental disorders and
proposals for treating them can be grouped
according to those that focus on the brain and
other biological factors, those that focus on the
mind, including psychoanalytic, behavioral, and
cognitive perspectives, and those that focus on
sociocultural
and
environmental
factors.
The

576
CHAPTER 15 PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS
vulnerability-stress model emphasizes the interaction between a predisposition (biological and/or
psychological) that makes a person vulnerable to a
particular disorder, and stressful environmental
conditions encountered by the individual.
Anxiety
disorders
include
generalized
anxiety
(constant worry and tension), panic disorders
(sudden attacks of overwhelming apprehension),
phobias (irrational fears of specific objects or situations), and obsessive-compulsive disorders (persistent
unwanted
thoughts,
or
obsessions,
combined with urges, or compulsions, to perform
certain acts).
Biological theories of anxiety disorders attribute
them to genetic predispositions or to biochemical
or neurological abnormalities. Most anxiety disorders run in families, and twin studies strongly
suggest
that
panic
disorder
and
obsessivecompulsive disorder have an inherited component. People who suffer panic attacks may have an
overreactive fight-or-flight response. People with
obsessive-compulsive disorder may have neurotransmitter deficiencies in areas of the brain that
regulate primitive impulses.
Cognitive and behavioral theorists suggest that
people with anxiety disorders are prone to catastrophizing cognitions and to rigid, moralistic
thinking. Maladaptive behaviors such as avoidant
behaviors and compulsions arise through operant
conditioning when the individual discovers that
the behaviors reduce anxiety. Phobias may emerge
through classical conditioning.
Mood disorders are divided into depressive disorders (in which the individual has one or more
periods of depression) and bipolar disorders (in
which the individual alternates between periods of
depression and periods of elation, or mania).
Sadness, loss of gratification in life, negative
thoughts, and lack of motivation are the main
symptoms of depression.
Biological theories attribute mood disorders to
genetic factors and to problems in regulation of the
neurotransmitters serotonin and norepinephrine.
Cognitive theories attribute depression to pessimistic views, to rumination, and to negatively
biased cognitive processes. Interpersonal theories
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk
view depression as the result of deficits in social
skills and relationships. Stress, particularly family
stress, plays a role in relapse in people with bipolar
disorder
Schizophrenia is characterized by disturbances in
thought, including disorganized thought processes, delusions, and lack of insight. Other
symptoms include perceptual disturbances (such
as
hallucinations),
inappropriate
emotional
expression, bizarre motor activity, withdrawal,
and impaired functioning.
Genetic factors appear to be strongly involved in the
predisposition to schizophrenia. People with schizophrenia also have problems in dopamine regulation,
as well as two types of brain abnormalities: The
prefrontal cortex is smaller and less active, and the
ventricles
are
enlarged.
Difficult
environments
probably cannot cause schizophrenia, but they may
worsen the disorder and contribute to relapses.
Personality disorders are lifelong patterns of
maladaptive behavior involving coping with stress
or solving problems. Individuals with antisocial
personalities are impulsive, show little guilt, are
concerned only with their own needs, and are
frequently in trouble with the law. Antisocial
personality disorder may have genetic and biological roots. Neglectful and hostile parenting
may also contribute to the disorder.
People with borderline personality disorder show
instability in mood, self-concept, and interpersonal relationships. Psychodynamic theories suggest that the caregivers of people with this
disorder required their children to be highly
dependent
and
alternated
between
extreme
expressions of love and hostility. Other theories
attribute the disorder to extreme difficulties in
emotion regulation.
The pervasive developmental disorders are characterized by severe and lasting impairment in
several areas of development, including social
interaction, communication, everyday behaviors,
interests, and activities. They include Asperger’s
disorder, Rett’s disorder, childhood disintegrative
disorder,
and
autism.
Genetic
and
neurodevelopmental factors are involved in the pervasive developmental disorders.

CD-ROM LINKS
Psyk.Trek 3.0
Check out CD Unit 11, Abnormal Behavior and Therapy
11a
Anxiety disorders
11b
Mood disorders
11c
Schizophrenic disorders
WEB RESOURCES
http://www.atkinsonhilgard.com/
Take a quiz, try the activities and exercises, and explore web links.
http://www.mentalhealth.com/
This site contains general information on the most common mental disorders and assorted resources, links and news.
http://www.chovil.com/
This personal site by schizophrenic patient Ian Chovil includes his own life story that helps give a ‘face’ to
schizophrenia. Chovil also discusses the biology of schizophrenia and therapy for people with the disease.
http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/mentalhealthinfo.aspx
This site run by the UK’s Royal College of Psychiatrists includes a wealth of information about mental health and
information for parents and teachers on various psychological disorders.
CORE CONCEPTS
cultural relativist perspective
abnormal
maladaptive
distress
normality
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, 4th edition
International Classification of Diseases
neurosis
psychosis
biological perspective
psychological perspective
psychoanalytic perspective
behavioral perspective
cognitive perspective
cultural perspective
vulnerability-stress model
anxiety disorders
generalized anxiety disorder
panic attack
panic disorder
ataque de nervios
agoraphobia
phobia
simple phobia
social phobia
obsessive-compulsive disorder
obsessions
compulsions
mood disorders
depressive disorders
bipolar disorders
anhedonia
manic episodes
schizophrenia
word salad
loosening of associations
delusions
paranoid
hallucinations
personality disorders
antisocial personality disorder
borderline personality disorder
pervasive developmental disorders
autism
Rett’s disorder
childhood disintegrative disorder
Asperger’s syndrome
CD-ROM LINKS
For more Cengage Learning textbooks, visit www.cengagebrain.co.uk