# 04 - 297 Diagnostic Procedures in Respiratory Disease

### 297 Diagnostic Procedures in Respiratory Disease

In the second approach, FRC is determined by measuring the 
compressibility of gas within the chest, which is proportional to the 
volume of gas being compressed. The patient sits in a body plethys­
mograph (a chamber usually made of transparent plastic to minimize 
claustrophobia) and, at the end of a normal tidal breath (i.e., when 
lung volume is at FRC), is instructed to pant against a closed shutter, 
thus periodically compressing air within the lung slightly. Pressure 
fluctuations at the mouth and volume fluctuations within the body box 
(equal but opposite to those in the chest) are determined, and from 
these measurements, the thoracic gas volume is calculated by means 
of Boyle’s law (P1V1 = P2V2). Once FRC is obtained, TLC and RV are 
calculated by adding the value for inspiratory capacity and subtracting 
the value for expiratory reserve volume, respectively (both values hav­
ing been obtained during spirometry) (Fig. 296-2). The most impor­
tant determinants of healthy individuals’ lung volumes are height, age, 
and sex, but there is considerable additional normal variation beyond 
that accounted for by these parameters. In practice, a mean “normal” 
value is predicted by multivariate regression equations using height, 
age, and sex, and the patient’s value is divided by the predicted value 
to determine “percent predicted.” For most measures of lung function, 
85–115% of the predicted value can be normal; however, in health, 
the various lung volumes tend to scale together. For example, if one is 
“normal big” with a TLC 110% of the predicted value, all other lung 
volumes and spirometry values will also approximate 110% of their 
respective predicted values. This pattern is particularly helpful in 
evaluating airflow, as discussed below.
AIR FLOW  As noted above, spirometry plays a key role in lung vol­
ume determination. Even more often, spirometry is used to measure 
airflow, which reflects the dynamic properties of the lung. During an 
FVC maneuver, the patient inhales to TLC and then exhales rapidly 
and forcefully to RV; this method ensures that flow limitation has been 
achieved, so that the precise effort made has little influence on actual 
flow. The total amount of air exhaled is the FVC, and the amount of air 
exhaled in the first second is the FEV1; the FEV1 is a flow rate, revealing 
volume change per time. Like lung volumes, an individual’s maximal 
expiratory flows should be compared with predicted values based on 
height, age, and sex. While the FEV1/FVC ratio is typically reduced in 
airflow obstruction, this condition can also reduce FVC by raising RV, 
sometimes rendering the FEV1/FVC ratio “artifactually normal” with 
the erroneous implication that airflow obstruction is absent.
The relationships among volume, flow, and time during spirometry 
are best displayed in two plots—the spirogram (volume vs time) and 
the flow-volume loop (flow vs volume) (Fig. 296-4). In conditions 
that cause airflow obstruction, the site of obstruction is sometimes 
correlated with the shape of the flow-volume loop. In diseases that 
cause lower airway obstruction, such as asthma and emphysema, flows 
decrease more rapidly with declining lung volumes, leading to a char­
acteristic scooping of the flow-volume loop. In contrast, fixed upperairway obstruction typically leads to inspiratory and/or expiratory flow 
plateaus (Fig. 296-4).
RESPIRATORY MUSCLE STRENGTH  To measure respiratory muscle 
strength, the patient is instructed to exhale or inhale with maximal 
effort against a closed shutter while pressure is monitored at the mouth. 
Pressures >±60 cmH2O at FRC are considered adequate and make it 
unlikely that respiratory muscle weakness accounts for any other resting 
ventilatory dysfunction that is identified. A more sensitive and better 
tolerated approach to identify inspiratory muscle weakness is performing 
spirometry in the supine position. This position increases diaphragmatic 
work by neutralizing the assistance of gravity. FVC in normal subjects 
decreases approximately 3–8% from upright to supine position, and 
patients with diaphragmatic weakness, hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, or 
neuromuscular disease suffer decrements from 10 to >25%.
Measurement of Gas Exchange 
• 
DIFFUSING CAPACITY 
(DLCO)  This test uses a small (and safe) amount of carbon monoxide 
(CO) to measure gas exchange across the alveolar membrane during 
a 10-s breath hold. CO in exhaled breath is analyzed to determine the 
quantity of CO crossing the alveolar membrane and combining with 

hemoglobin in red blood cells. This “single-breath diffusing capacity” 
(DlCO) value increases with the surface area available for diffusion and 
the amount of hemoglobin within the capillaries, and it varies inversely 
with alveolar membrane thickness. Thus, DlCO decreases in diseases 
that thicken or destroy alveolar membranes (e.g., pulmonary fibrosis, 
emphysema), curtail the pulmonary vasculature (e.g., pulmonary 
hypertension), or reduce alveolar capillary hemoglobin (e.g., anemia). 
Single-breath diffusing capacity may be elevated in asthma, polycythe­
mia, and pulmonary hemorrhage.

Arterial Blood Gases 
The effectiveness of gas exchange can be 
assessed by measuring the partial pressures of oxygen and CO2 in a 
sample of blood obtained by arterial puncture. The oxygen content 
of blood (CaO2) depends on arterial saturation (%O2Sat), which is set 
by Pao2, pH, and Paco2 according to the oxyhemoglobin dissociation 
curve. CaO2 can also be measured by oximetry (see below):
Diagnostic Procedures in Respiratory Disease 
CHAPTER 297
CaO2 (mL/dL) = 1.39 (mL/dL) × [hemoglobin] (g) × %O2Sat 
+ 0.003 (mL/dL/mmHg) × Pao2 (mmHg)
If hemoglobin saturation alone needs to be determined, this task can 
be accomplished noninvasively with pulse oximetry.
Acknowledgment
Edward T. Naureckas and Julian Solway contributed to this chapter in the 
21st edition and some material from that chapter has been retained here.
■
■FURTHER READING
Alotaibi NM et al: Mild airways obstruction: Spirometer diagnostic 
pitfalls. Curr Opin Pulm Med 30:121, 2024.
Bates JH: Systems physiology of the airways in health and obstructive 
pulmonary disease. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Sys Biol Med 8:423, 2016.
Haverkamp HC, Balmain BN: Ventilatory response to exercise by 
age, sex, and health status. Curr Sports Med Rep 23:79, 2024.
Hughes JM et al: Effect of lung volume on the distribution of pulmo­
nary blood flow in man. Respir Physiol 4:58, 1968.
Macklem PT, Murphy BR: The forces applied to the lung in health 
and disease. Am J Med 57:371, 1974.
Pederson OF, Ingram RH: Configuration of maximal expiratory 
flow-volume curve: Model experiments with physiologic implica­
tions. J Appl Physiol 58:1305, 1985.
Prange HD: Respiratory Physiology: Understanding Gas Exchange. 
New York, Chapman and Hill, 1996.
Weibel ER: Morphometric estimation of pulmonary diffusion capac­
ity, I. Model and method. Respir Physiol 11:54, 1970.
West JB: Respiratory Physiology, The Essentials, 9th ed. Philadelphia, 
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012.
Wiley Online Library: Comprehensive physiology: The respira­
tory system. Available from http://www.comprehensivephysiology.
com/WileyCDA/Section/id-420557.html.  Accessed August 12, 2016.
George R. Washko, Hilary J. Goldberg, 

Mājid Shafiq

Diagnostic Procedures 

in Respiratory Disease
Diagnostic procedures in respiratory disease encompass a wide array of 
invasive and noninvasive modalities. Methods for acquiring diagnostic 
specimens are described in this chapter, as are the various imaging 
modalities at hand. Pulmonary function tests and measurements of 
gas exchange are described in Chap. 295.

BEDSIDE PLEURAL PROCEDURES

■
■THORACENTESIS
Thoracentesis, also known as pleurocentesis, refers to percutaneous 
aspiration of fluid from the pleural space. The right and left pleural 
spaces do not normally communicate with each other, and either can 
be directly accessed between the thoracic ribs. The current standard 
of care entails using point-of-care ultrasonography to mark the site of 
needle puncture; this reduces the risks of “dry tap” as well as complica­
tions such as pneumothorax. Beside palliation of symptoms associated 
with pleural effusion (most commonly dyspnea), thoracentesis may 
be performed for diagnostic purposes. The range of hematologic, bio­
chemical, microbiologic, and cytologic pleural fluid studies has largely 
remained unchanged over the past few decades, as has the widespread 
adoption of Light’s criteria for distinguishing exudates from tran­
sudates that were described in 1972. However, newer assays such as 
mesothelin-1 testing for neoplastic diseases (chiefly mesothelioma) 
have also become available more recently. More details on pleural 
fluid testing are described in Chap. 305.
PART 7
Disorders of the Respiratory System
■
■CLOSED PLEURAL BIOPSY
Closed pleural biopsy involves percutaneous sampling of the parietal 
pleural lining. This procedure can be performed either “blindly” 
(typically with an Abrams needle) or by using imaging guidance such 
as computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound. Closed pleural biopsy 
without ultrasound guidance is highly sensitive for pleural tubercu­
losis, owing to the diffuse pleural involvement that is typically seen in 
those cases.
Image-guided closed pleural biopsy is most helpful in case of focal 
pleural abnormalities such as pleural nodules, which are virtually 
pathognomonic of malignant involvement. Limited studies have 
shown high diagnostic yields of around 80–90% with this modality, 
but patient selection is key as the diagnostic performance may be 
considerably lower in the absence of a specific pleural abnormal­
ity that could be visualized. Between CT and ultrasound imaging, 
only ultrasound is typically performed in real time during the act of 
obtaining the biopsy.
THORACIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES
■
■THORACOSCOPY AND THORACOTOMY
Thoracoscopy and thoracotomy encompass a spectrum of surgical 
procedures that involve accessing and operating within the pleural 
space, either via one or more small entry ports using thoracoscopic 
tools or via larger incisions as in thoracotomy (Fig. 297-1). Thoracos­
copy varies in its scope considerably. An interventional pulmonologist 
typically performs a pleuroscopy (also known as medical thoracoscopy) 
and accesses the pleural space through a single port for parietal pleu­
ral biopsy or for limited therapeutic purposes such as minor lysis of 
adhesions, thoracoscopic pleurodesis, or indwelling pleural catheter 
placement. This procedure can usually be performed safely under 
conscious sedation. On the other hand, video-assisted thoracoscopic 
FIGURE 297-1  Thoracoscopy demonstrating numerous parietal pleural nodules 
in a patient with sarcoidosis-related pleural disease. Pleural biopsy revealed 
nonnecrotizing granulomas. (Source: Ma¯jid Shafiq, MD, MPH.)

surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) 
represent more invasive procedures but with more controlled envi­
ronments entailing general anesthesia with single-lung ventilation, 
creation of multiple entry ports, and several additional diagnostic and 
therapeutic possibilities including, but not limited to, lung biopsy, 
lymph node sampling, lobectomy, decortication, and creation of a 
pericardial window. Open thoracotomy uses wider incisions and more 
conventional surgical techniques for performing all of the above as well 
as additional tasks such as creation of a Clagett window for chronic 
bronchopleural fistula with empyema.
■
■MEDIASTINOSCOPY AND MEDIASTINOTOMY
Surgical access to the mediastinum, either through a small port (medi­
astinoscopy) or a wider incision (mediastinotomy), enables diagnostic 
sampling of mediastinal structures such as mediastinal lymph nodes 
as part of lung cancer staging. With the advent of endoscopic needlebased techniques (see below), surgery is no longer considered the firstline option for diagnostic lymph node sampling but is recommended in 
cases of negative needle-based sampling where suspicion for malignant 
nodal involvement remains sufficiently high.
BRONCHOSCOPY
Bronchoscopy, which entails passing a tube with a lighted camera 
inside the lower respiratory tract, includes flexible and rigid bron­
choscopy (termed after the physical properties of each bronchoscope). 
Flexible bronchoscopy is by far the more commonly used form and 
enables access to more distal parts of the respiratory tract. The rigid 
bronchoscope, although limited to the central airways, has the added 
advantage of providing a secure airway for ventilation; artificial breaths 
can then be administered through the scope itself as part of a closed 
circuit or through open jet ventilation. The rigid bronchoscope also 
provides a conduit for diagnostic or therapeutic instruments to be 
passed freely, rather than through the relatively constrained working 
channel of a flexible bronchoscope. When bronchoscopy is limited to 
diagnostic indications, the rigid bronchoscope is seldom used except 
on occasion as a precautionary measure for anticipated severe bleeding 
where having a more secure airway might be particularly advantageous 
(e.g., in transbronchial cryobiopsy). Different types of diagnostic bron­
choscopic procedures are described below.
Bronchoalveolar Lavage 
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the 
gold standard method for obtaining respiratory secretions for hemato­
logic, biochemical, microbiological, and/or cytologic analyses. It avoids 
the risk of salivary contamination, which may be seen in a sputum 
specimen and is particularly useful when sputum cannot be obtained 
or when sampling of a specific pulmonary lobe or segment is desired. 
After wedging the bronchoscope in a distal airway in order to prevent 
fluid escape around the scope, sterile saline or distilled water is instilled 
through the scope’s working channel (typically in one to three aliquots 
of ~50 mL each). Immediately thereafter, suction is applied to aspirate 
as much of the fluid as possible. This allows sampling of distal airways 
and lung parenchyma—areas not directly viewable or accessible. If 
there is concern for alveolar hemorrhage, serial BALs from the same 
site may show rising red blood cell counts and even visibly bloodier 
returns with subsequent lavages.
Brushing and Endobronchial Biopsy 
Bronchoscopic brushing 
is a minimally invasive sampling technique that can be used to sample 
the mucosal biofilm for microbiologic analyses as well as the bronchial 
epithelial layer for cytologic analyses. Endobronchial biopsy allows 
sampling of abnormal bronchial mucosa and submucosa for histopath­
ologic analysis (as may be indicated in cases of endobronchial amyloi­
dosis or sarcoidosis, for example). Among cigarette smokers with one 
or more lung nodules and a nondiagnostic bronchoscopy, bronchial 
brushings can be used with a commercially available classifier that 
estimates lung cancer probability based on a gene expression signature. 
Patients with intermediate pretest probability who end up with low 
posttest probability can more confidently opt for imaging surveillance, 
thus avoiding further invasive testing and related complications.

Transbronchial Biopsy Including Cryobiopsy 
Transbronchial 
biopsy involves removing a piece of alveolated lung tissue by passing a 
sampling tool into the alveolar space. The most commonly employed 
biopsy tool is flexible forceps, typically 2.0 mm or 2.8 mm in caliber. 
When a specific pulmonary lesion such as a lung nodule is being biop­
sied, various imaging and navigation tools (described below) may be 
used to help guide the site of forceps biopsy. When random sampling 
of the lung parenchyma is desired, e.g., to assess for posttransplant lung 
rejection, either fluoroscopic guidance or tactile feedback is commonly 
used to position the forceps in the subpleural lung parenchyma. Lim­
ited data point to three biopsy samples being adequate for optimizing 
sensitivity in case of malignant lung nodules. On the other hand, at 
least five distinct pieces of alveolated lung tissue are needed for formal 
diagnosis of acute cellular rejection among lung transplant recipients 
per current recommendations. An increasingly popular biopsy tool is 
the cryoprobe, a flexible catheter with a blunt tip that delivers liquid 
nitrogen or carbon dioxide over a few seconds to freeze a portion of 
lung parenchyma and make it adhere to the probe itself. Before the tis­
sue can thaw and detach, the probe is pulled back (typically along with 
the bronchoscope itself), and a frozen piece of lung tissue is removed 
alongside. Cryobiopsy has a higher diagnostic yield than forceps biopsy 
for diffuse parenchymal illnesses such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 
but comes with a higher risk of major bleeding and pneumothorax.
Transbronchial Needle Aspiration 
Transbronchial needle aspi­
ration (TBNA) involves using a hollow-bore needle for obtaining 
aspirated specimens. This may be accompanied by suction or simply 
rely on capillary action, with data not pointing to suction impacting 
diagnostic sensitivity. TBNA has diagnostic sensitivity superior to 
that of transbronchial biopsy for malignant peripheral nodules. This 
makes intuitive sense given that the lesion may lie extraluminally and 
require traversing the airway wall, which only the needle may be able 
to accomplish. Furthermore, combining TBNA with conventional 
transbronchial biopsy appears to increase pooled diagnostic sensitivity.
A
B
FIGURE 297-2  A. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration of a mediastinal lymph node. B. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) using Diff-Quik stain 
indicative of noncaseating granuloma. (Source: Ma¯jid Shafiq, MD, MPH.)

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle 
Aspiration 
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and EBUS-guided 
transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) represent a major 
advance in diagnostic bronchoscopy over the turn of the twentieth 
century, largely replacing surgical methods for lymph node sampling. 
EBUS-TBNA involves using a specialized flexible bronchoscope that 
simultaneously operates a video camera and a convex ultrasound probe 
(which is installed at its distal end). Under real-time ultrasonographic 
visualization, the aspiration needle is inserted through the airway wall 
into the mediastinal target and the aspirate is sent for microbiologic 
or cytologic analyses as indicated (Fig. 297-2). Newer variants of this 
technique involve the use of core needles or mini-forceps, providing 
tissue specimens rather than aspirates that can be sent for histopatho­
logic analysis. EBUS-TBNA has a sensitivity of ~90% for epithelial 
malignancies and ~70% for lymphoma (higher for detecting cases of 
lymphoma recurrence than for de novo lymphoma). For sarcoidosis, 
estimates point to a sensitivity of at least 80% (higher if combined with 
endobronchial and transbronchial biopsies). EBUS-TBNA has been 
shown to provide adequate amounts of material to provide ancillary 
testing in cases of malignancy, such as immunostaining or genetic 
testing. A related needle-based technique, also using ultrasound guid­
ance, involves sampling mediastinal structures through the esophagus, 
which can be a useful adjunct to EBUS-TBNA as it may provide bet­
ter access to certain mediastinal lymph node stations. The combined 
sensitivity of these two techniques is slightly higher compared to either 
one alone. Esophageal sampling can be accomplished either with the 
standard endoscope used by gastroenterologists for endoscopic ultra­
sound (EUS) or by inserting the same EBUS bronchoscope through the 
esophagus (EUS-B).

Diagnostic Procedures in Respiratory Disease 
CHAPTER 297
At many centers, EBUS-TBNA is accompanied by rapid on-site 
cytologic evaluation (ROSE), wherein a portion of the aspirated speci­
men is immediately examined by a cytotechnologist or pathologist 
using rapid staining. This rapid assessment, while often inadequate for

a definitive final diagnosis, can be helpful in establishing adequacy of 
sampled material by providing the bronchoscopist with real-time feed­
back on whether additional sampling is advisable.

The optimal way to process samples obtained via EBUS-TBNA is 
unknown. Some centers practice the tissue coagulum clot method, in 
which multiple aspirates are emptied onto a single piece of filter paper 
to form a clot that can help with preparation of a cell block. Other 
centers simply use the residue from spun specimens for this purpose. 
There is no conclusive evidence that one technique is superior to the 
other, but this question has not been well studied to date.
Guided Peripheral Bronchoscopy Including Robotic 
Bronchoscopy 
Guided peripheral bronchoscopy involves the use 
of advanced tools to aid with successful bronchoscopic sampling of 
peripherally located lesions in the lung parenchyma, such as lung 
nodules. Prior to 2018, this entailed the use of navigation software 
and/or real-time imaging while utilizing conventional flexible bron­
choscopes that were already commercially available. Robotic bron­
choscopic platforms, first approved for commercial use by the U.S. 
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018, were the first to offer 
additionally improved bronchoscope stability and reach within the 
peripheral airways compared to conventional flexible bronchoscopes 
(Fig. 297-3). Early data on the diagnostic performance of robotic bron­
choscopy, including from small-sized multicenter prospective studies, 
are encouraging.
PART 7
Disorders of the Respiratory System
Guided peripheral bronchoscopy comprises three crucial steps:
1.	 Navigation: Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (which 
involves GPS-like feedback as the bronchoscope is advanced toward 
the target) and virtual bronchoscopy (which overlays live endo­
scopic images onto a CT-derived virtual bronchoscopic map) can 
help with successful navigation through the airways to the appropri­
ate lobar/segmental/subsegmental airway. Shape-sensing technol­
ogy, used as part of one robotic bronchoscopy platform, also aims to 
achieve the same purpose.
FIGURE 297-3  Use of a robotic navigational bronchoscopic platform for sampling 
of a 9-mm apicomedial right upper lobe nodule. The navigational software indicates 
that the lesion is accurately localized (bottom right), as does the concentric image 
on radial endobronchial ultrasound (bottom left). Biopsy showed non-small cell lung 
carcinoma. (Source: Ma¯jid Shafiq, MD, MPH.)

2.	 Localization: The aforementioned technologies can also help local­
ize a lesion, although they are limited by relying on previously 
acquired CT images that may or may not accurately represent pre­
cisely where the lesion is currently located in a three-dimensional 
space. Radial EBUS uses a thin ultrasound-tipped catheter that can 
be passed through a bronchoscope’s working channel all the way 
to the lung periphery. This provides real-time images of structures 
beyond airway walls. A concentric image of the target, indicating a 
lesion with the airway going through its center, is associated with a 
high diagnostic yield. Alternatively, radiographic including fluoro­
scopic imaging can be used to recalibrate the precise target location 
on navigational bronchoscopic platforms, potentially improving 
localization as well. Cone-beam CT, which is a distilled version of 
CT imaging that has been used intraprocedurally in multiple other 
fields such as interventional radiology, can be used for confirmation 
of optimal tool-in-lesion (with the patient undergoing a breath hold) 
prior to sampling.
3.	 Sampling: The tools available for peripheral sampling include biopsy 
forceps, brushes, and aspiration needles, as described above, with 
TBNA having the highest diagnostic sensitivity for malignant lung 
nodules. Evidence for use of cryobiopsy for sampling discrete lesions 
in the lung periphery is currently limited but promising. Recent 
innovations also include real-time ultrasound-guided peripheral 
sampling (similar to EBUS-TBNA of mediastinal structures) and 
steerable sampling tools, which hold promise for more optimal 
sampling of the target lesion.
MEDICAL IMAGING
Imaging has revolutionized the practice of medicine. Technologies 
such as x-ray, CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron 
emission tomography (PET) can provide noninvasive assessments 
of alveolar perfusion, the metabolic activity of a lung nodule, the 
bronchovascular source of hemoptysis, or the earliest disease-related 
changes in parenchymal structure. Given the breadth of advances in 
respiratory system imaging and increasingly specialized applications 
across diseases, the following section is organized by technology. The 
final part of this section is dedicated to deep learning and the role it is 
increasingly playing in medical image interpretation.
■
■CHEST X-RAY
The field of medical imaging can be traced back to work done by 
Wilhelm Roentgen in the 1890s. Roentgen noted that after connecting 
a cathode ray tube to a power supply, material in his lab would fluo­
resce even if the emission of visible light from the tube was blocked. 
He quickly deduced the presence of additional invisible “x-rays” and 
subsequently observed that their passage through solid material was 
attenuated in proportion to the material’s density. Within weeks of its 
discovery, x-ray technology was being widely leveraged to guide surgi­
cal exploration and the extraction of foreign objects such as shrapnel 
from the battlefield. Chest x-ray (CXR) has since become the founda­
tion of clinical practice for respiratory medicine and is a widely avail­
able technology even in resource-limited settings.
The most commonly used CXR images for respiratory medicine 
are the posteroanterior (PA) and lateral films in the outpatient setting 
and anteroposterior (AP) films for those studies obtained at the bed­
side. These are two-dimensional representations of three-dimensional 
structures, and the differing views can be used to examine super­
imposed structures (e.g., a parenchymal opacity in the retrocardiac 
space). The contours of the chest wall, the silhouette of the heart, 
great vessels, and mediastinum, as well as the appearance of the paren­
chyma and bronchovascular bundle are all used to detect and classify 
disease as well as monitor its progression or response to therapeutic 
intervention. An example of a normal PA and lateral CXR is provided 
in Fig. 297-4.
In this image of the normal lung, many of the smaller structures 
such as the lymphatics and distal airways are beyond the ability of 
conventional x-ray technology to resolve. Larger structures such as the 
pulmonary vasculature may also be indistinct because of body position

A
B
FIGURE 297-4  Posteroanterior (A) and lateral (B) chest x-ray of a normal healthy subject. (Source: George Washko.)
and the redistribution of blood flow to more gravitationally dependent 
regions. Diseases involving these structures may enhance or obscure 
their appearance. An example of these diseases is congestive heart fail­
ure where the lymphatics become engorged (Kerley B lines), the non­
dependent vasculature more prominent (cephalization), and the outer 
boundaries of the bronchial walls blurred (bronchial cuffing). Each of 
these findings must be clinically contextualized, and while a thickened 
interstitium may be due to hydrostatic pulmonary edema, it may also 
be indicative of interstitial lung disease or carcinomatosis. CXR can 
also be used to discriminate pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease, 
and because of that, it is an excellent initial diagnostic for nonspecific 
symptoms. An elevated hemidiaphragm, fibrosis of the mediastinum, 
or hyperlucency of the lung parenchyma all reflect processes that cause 
dyspnea, but their treatment and prognosis differ markedly.
■
■COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
CT was introduced to clinical care in the 1980s and quickly became one 
of the most heavily leveraged modalities for medical imaging. While 
CXR provides one or two views of the thorax from which an experi­
enced clinician must disambiguate overlying structures, CT provides 
spatially resolved reconstructions of all structures in the thorax. The 
acquisition of a CT scan involves the same basic process as an x-ray 
with a patient placed between a source of photons and a detector, but 
the image reconstruction and advanced analytics that can be applied to 
those images differ markedly. The passage of photons through the body 
is impeded in proportion to tissue density. This absorption or attenu­
ation of photon passage is measured in Hounsfield units (HU), and 
clinical CT scanners are regularly calibrated to a standard scale with 
water having an HU of 0 and air –1000 HU. The broad range of tissue 
densities (reflected as attenuation values) in the thorax and the limited 
human ability to visually discriminate between two structures of simi­
lar densities are addressed by modifying the image display. A window 
width and level (the range and center of the range of HU values to dis­
play) is selected to optimize viewing structures of interest. For example, 
lung windows are optimized for visual inspection of the low-density 
lung parenchyma and all of the surrounding higher-density structures 
appear white, whereas the mediastinal windows are optimized to view 
the higher-density structures and anything of lower tissue density such 
as the lung parenchyma appears black. This does not change the HU 
values of the voxels (three-dimensional pixels) in the image, just their 
presentation for visual inspection.

Diagnostic Procedures in Respiratory Disease 
CHAPTER 297
The visual interpretation of thoracic CT is based on the appearance 
of the secondary pulmonary lobule. This structure is a fundamental 
subunit of the lung consisting of a central airway and pulmonary 
artery, parenchyma, and then surrounding interstitium with the lym­
phatics and pulmonary veins (Fig. 297-5).
Processes affecting the small airways such as respiratory bron­
chiolitis may appear as centrilobular nodules. Parenchymal diseases 
such as emphysema may begin by effacing the centroid of the lobule 
(centrilobular emphysema [CLE]), the periphery of the lobule (para­
septal emphysema [PSE]), or diffusely across the lobule (panlobular 
emphysema [PLE]). Pathology of the lymphatics or interstitium (inter­
stitial lung disease [ILD]) results in beading and/or thickening of the 
interlobular septa. Examples of many of these processes are provided 
in Chaps. 303 and 304.
The diagnostic information provided by the appearance of the 
secondary pulmonary lobule is further augmented by the distribution 
of these patterns of injury across the lung. Whereas CLE tends to first 
appear in the upper lung zones, PLE has a predilection to be basilar 
predominant. Interstitial thickening in the apices is more likely to be 
nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis (NSIP), while a basal and depen­
dent predominant distribution of that same process is more consistent 
with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).
Finally, morphology of the central airways and vessels can be used 
to diagnose disease and estimate its severity. Bronchiectatic dilation of 
the airways may be cylindrical and predominantly in the lower lobes, as 
is seen in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or be cystic 
dilation in the upper lobes (cystic fibrosis), or there may be a focal non­
specific dilation of an airway due to prior infection. Pathologic dilation 
of the airways may also be due to disease of the surrounding paren­
chyma. Because of the mechanical interdependence of the bronchial 
tree and parenchyma, conditions that reduce lung compliance may 
result in traction bronchiectasis. This may be a local process or more 
diffuse depending on the distribution of the underlying parenchymal 
disease and likely provides further insight into disease severity.
The caliber of the central pulmonary arterial (PA) trunk proximal 
to its first bifurcation is directly related to pulmonary arterial pressure. 
A measure of >3 cm is suggestive of the presence of elevated pulmonary 
vascular pressures, and more recent studies have demonstrated that 
an increased ratio of the PA diameter to the diameter of the adjacent 
aorta (PA/A) provides a metric of disease severity and, in the case 
of chronic respiratory diseases such as COPD, is prognostic for both

Bronchiole wall thickness 0.05–0.1 mm
Acinar artery and bronchioles diamter 0.5 mm
Interlobar septa
thickness 0.1 mm
Visceral pleura
thickness 0.1 mm
Acinus
0.6–1 cm
Respiratory
bronchiole
PART 7
Disorders of the Respiratory System
Terminal
bronchiole
Lobular bronchiole
diameter 1 mm
wall thickness 1.05 mm
A
Pulmonary vein
Lobular artery
Lobular
bronchiole
B
FIGURE 297-5  A. Illustration of the anatomy of the secondary pulmonary lobule. B. Computed tomography image showing the visible anatomy of the secondary pulmonary 
lobule. (Panel A adapted from WR Webb: Thin-section CT of the secondary pulmonary lobule: Anatomy and the Image–The 2004 Fleischner Lecture. Radiology 2006;239:322; 
Panel B source from Samuel Yoffe Ash, MD.)
acute respiratory exacerbations and death. Assessment of the intrapa­
renchymal pulmonary vasculature is typically augmented through the 
intravenous infusion or bolus of iodinated contrast. This bolus and 
subsequent image acquisition may be timed to visualize passage of 
contrast through the pulmonary arteries to enable detection of throm­
boembolic disease, which appears as dark filling voids in otherwise 
bright white vessels.
It must be noted that the acquisition of CXRs and thoracic CT scans 
involves exposing the patient to ionizing radiation. Several studies have 
estimated the excess numbers of cancer due to CT scanning, and exten­
sive efforts have been made by both CT manufacturers and clinicians to 
reduce the radiation dose to the lowest possible amount that does not 
jeopardize image quality and interpretability.
■
■MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
MRI is based on the behavior of protons in a magnetic field. A strong 
magnetic field is applied to align the protons, and then a pulse of radio­
frequency current is applied to the subject. This perturbs the protons, 
and the speed at which they subsequently realign differs based on the 

Pulmonary vein
diameter 0.5 mm
Lobular artery
diameter 1 mm
properties of the tissues within the region of interest. While this tech­
nique provides exquisite imaging data for the chest wall or solid organs 
such as the brain or heart, the abundance of air in the lung creates an 
artifact that impairs direct assessment of the parenchyma. For this 
reason, MRI of the lung leverages intravenous contrast agents such as 
gadolinium and is increasingly exploring the use of inhaled agents such 
as hyperpolarized noble gas. These respective agents enable in vivo 
assessments of organ perfusion and detailed measures of the morphol­
ogy of the distal airspaces. An example of noble gas–enhanced MRI is 
shown in Fig. 297-6. The inhaled agent is 3He, and because it is proton 
rich, it can be used to examine lung ventilation visually and objectively. 
Regions of the lung that are poorly ventilated due to disease of the air­
ways or distal airspaces have low concentrations of 3He and appear as 
dark regions in an otherwise bright blue organ.
While an MRI may have a longer acquisition time than CT, and the 
geometry of the equipment often leads to a sense of claustrophobia, it 
does not involve the administration of ionizing radiation. This makes 
it a modality of choice in the pediatric population or clinical situations 
where repeated assessments are required.

Healthy
Asthma
FIGURE 297-6  Noble gas magnetic resonance. Healthy control on left and asthma on 
right. (Images courtesy of Grace Parraga, PhD, Department of Medical Biophysics, 
Department of Medicine, School of Biomedical Engineering, Robarts Research 
Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.)
■
■POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
PET generates an image based on the aggregation of radiolabeled 
tracers. The most common agent used for these purposes is [18F]-
fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG). This radiolabeled glucose analogue 
is administered intravenously and is taken up by cells in direct pro­
portion to their metabolic activity. In the clinical setting, it is most 
commonly used for the discrimination of benign and malignant lung 
nodules, as well as lung cancer staging. Given the relatively low resolu­
tion of PET, co-registration with CT is common and the aligned imag­
ing modalities allow the reader to determine the structural source of 
heightened metabolic activity.
There is increasing interest in the use of PET imaging in the bio­
medical community. These applications are largely still confined to 
research, but advances in areas such as in vivo assessments of vascular 
biology in acute and chronic disease have been impressive.
■
■ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE/DEEP LEARNING
The final aspect to thoracic imaging that must be discussed is the grow­
ing field of artificial intelligence and deep learning applied to image 
analysis. Classic machine learning approaches to medical image inter­
pretation involve the development of advanced algorithms to detect 
structures of interest, segment their boundaries, and then extract 
metrics related to size, shape, texture, and so on. The massive increase 
in processing capacity afforded by graphical processing units (GPUs), 
the increasing availability of large amounts of data, and the wide dis­
semination of open-source software libraries allowing developers to 
create powerful work environments have led to explosive growth in 
the utilization of deep learning for image analytics. Some of the first 
medical applications of deep learning were in the field of dermatology, 
and more recently, this advanced form of pattern recognition has been 
reported to excel at the discrimination of benign and malignant lung 
nodules in thoracic CT scan. The breadth of application of these tools 
continues to expand to include image navigation and feature detection, 
biomarker development, and direct prediction of clinical outcomes. An 
example of deep learning–enabled segmentation of the heart and pul­
monary vasculature from non–contrast-enhanced non–cardiac-gated 
CT scan is shown in Fig. 297-7.
■
■TRANSTHORACIC NEEDLE ASPIRATION
Radiologically guided needle biopsy has served as a long-standing 
mechanism for evaluation of parenchymal lung lesions, both malignant 
and infectious. In the setting of published guidelines recommend­
ing low-dose screening CT scan for lung malignancy in high-risk 
patients, and with evolving guidelines for monitoring and assess­
ment of incidental lung lesions arising in this setting, radiologically 
guided sampling of lung lesions has become an increasingly important 
mechanism to address parenchymal lung abnormalities concerning for 
cancer. Moreover, as novel immune modulators and biologic agents 
are increasingly utilized for the management of systemic disease and 
transplantation, effective interventions are becoming progressively 
more important in assessing for potential pulmonary infections aris­
ing as complications of immune suppression. Transthoracic needle 

Diagnostic Procedures in Respiratory Disease 
CHAPTER 297
FIGURE 297-7  Arterial/venous segmentation of the pulmonary vasculature (blue: 
arteries; red: veins) and epicardial surface of the right (blue) and left ventricles (red). 
(Image courtesy of Raul San Jose Estepar, PhD, Applied Chest Imaging Laboratory, 
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA.)
aspiration (TTNA) remains one important arm in the assessment of 
these pulmonary complications.
TTNA can be accomplished with a variety of complementary imag­
ing mechanisms, including under fluoroscopic, CT, ultrasound, or 
MRI guidance. Overall adequacy of sampling as well as adequacy for 
epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) analysis of >90% and for 
cytologic analysis of >80%. CT is currently the most common imag­
ing modality used to assess parenchymal lung lesions, with sensitivity 
and specificity reported to be >90%. Sensitivity of CT-guided TTNA 
is increased in more peripheral lesions. Transthoracic ultrasound has 
the advantages of a low complication rate in the setting of fine-needle 
aspiration (FNA) and portability, allowing for more logistical simplic­
ity in the setting of lung lesion assessment. In a prospective study 
of ultrasound-guided percutaneous FNA compared with CT-guided 
FNA, diagnostic rates were comparable between the two groups, with 
shorter procedure time associated with ultrasound guidance, numeri­
cal suggestion of decreased complication rate using ultrasound guid­
ance, and lower costs associated with ultrasound guidance. Use of 
elastography to better characterize lung lesions has also been proposed 
in the context of ultrasound, although additional diagnostic yield 
has not yet been proven. Color Doppler ultrasonographic imaging 
has been demonstrated to have a high sensitivity and specificity and 
a low complication rate in another study. Electromagnetic guidance, 
unlike CT imaging, can be used in combination with endobronchial 
ultrasound and/or navigational bronchoscopy in the operative setting, 
theoretically allowing for a multimodal approach that could increase 
diagnostic yield and allow for a combined staging procedure. Electro­
magnetic TTNA alone has demonstrated an 83% diagnostic yield in a 
pilot study, with an increase to 87% when combined with navigational 
bronchoscopy. Conflicting data are available regarding the diagnostic 
superiority of TTNA compared with alternative biopsy modalities such 
as endobronchial ultrasound for diagnosis of lung lesions, and results 
may depend on center experience.
Transthoracic sampling can be obtained using FNA or core needle 
biopsy. In one retrospective study, FNA was found to have an inferior 
diagnostic rate, compared with core needle sampling, as well as lower 
specificity. In this study, a method involving two FNA passes was com­
pared to core needle sampling with six cores obtained from a single 
pass. No significant differences in complication rates were noted. In 
another retrospective study, in which procedure was determined by 
operator preferences, core needle aspirate samples were more likely to

provide sufficient material for molecular testing than FNA. A system­
atic review of these techniques concluded that insufficient evidence was 
available to support a difference between FNA and core needle biopsy 
in diagnostic efficiency, though core needle biopsy may be more spe­
cific in diagnosing benign lung lesions. Given the negative predictive 
value estimate of 70%, negative results from TTNA are less reliable than 
positive results and should not be considered definitive to eliminate the 
concern for malignancy. Further assessment is needed to directly com­
pare imaging modalities for TTNA guidance and to compare TTNA 
with other diagnostic modalities to determine the optimal choice of 
procedure in particular settings. Choice of procedure should be consid­
ered in the context of the size and location of the lesion, the experience 
of the center and operator, and patient-specific factors.

PART 7
Disorders of the Respiratory System
In regard to the safety of TTNA, in a retrospective study from 
2015, the presence of mild to moderate pulmonary hypertension in 
patients did not increase complication rates in the setting of TTNA. 
The complication rates noted in this report were substantial, however, 
with hemorrhage occurring in one-third to one-quarter of patients, 
and pneumothorax in 17–28%. The majority of pneumothoraces 
did not require chest tube placement. Other complications included 
hemoptysis and hemothorax, though these were uncommon. These 
complication rates are consistent with those reported in other stud­
ies. In a meta-analysis of complication rates of CT-guided TTNA, 
complication rates were higher with core needle aspirates than FNA 
(38.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.3–43.5%] vs 24% [95% CI 
18.2–30.8%]). The majority of these complications were minor. Risk 
factors for complications with FNA included smaller nodule diameter, 
larger needle diameter, and increased traversed lung parenchyma. No 
clear risk factors were noted for complications after core needle biop­
sies in this publication. More generally, the risks of TTNA increase for 
more centrally located lesions and those residing in close proximity to 
intrathoracic vasculature. In a study of patient claims in the Medicare 
and a subset of the commercial population between 2016 and 2020, the 
use of TTNA decreased in both groups, with the use of endobronchial 
ultrasound guidance for sampling increasing in the Medicare popula­
tion. In this study, TTNA presented a higher risk for pneumothorax 
than the use of alternate modalities.
Despite the outstanding questions regarding the context and optimal 
approach for TTNA, this modality has been shown to be effective in 
cancer diagnosis in the thorax. Adenocarcinoma has become the most 
prevalent parenchymal lung malignancy in reported studies and also the 
most common malignant diagnosis found on TTNA of the lung. TTNA 
can also be effective in diagnosing less common tumors of the lung, both 
malignant and benign, including squamous and small cell carcinomas, 
lymphomas, and others, as well as in assessing tumors of the mediasti­
num. The diagnostic utility of TTNA is consistent across solid, subsolid, 
and partially calcified lung nodules. Immunocytochemistry markers 
can be utilized in TTNA samples to assist with diagnosis, prognosis, 
and prediction of response to therapy, and samples should be preserved 
whenever possible to allow for these studies, if needed. RNA extraction 
has also proven feasible in the setting of a single FNA sample, which 
could be instrumental in gene expression profiling, though this has thus 
far only been successfully accomplished in a research context.
The utility of TTNA in diagnosing pulmonary infections is variable 
in published literature. Some publications have reported that TTNA 
establishes a diagnosis of infection in 60–70% of cases, with a particu­
larly high yield in the setting of Aspergillus infections. TTNA has also 
been shown to be particularly effective in the diagnosis of pulmonary 
tuberculosis, though a wide variety of infections have been diagnosed 
using this method. The presence of necrosis in lung lesions makes 
establishing an infectious diagnosis more likely using TTNA. Numer­
ous staining techniques are available to assist with infectious diagnoses, 
and immunohistochemistry can also aid in the diagnosis of infection. 
Cytology should be correlated with histopathology and culture results, 
when available. Metagenomics using next-generation sequencing for 
detection of infection is evolving but requires further study. TTNA has 
also been useful in identifying granulomatous inflammation, which 
can provide supportive evidence of a granulomatous parenchymal lung 
disease in the appropriate clinical setting.

In summary, TTNA is an important element of diagnostic algo­
rithms in the setting of lung nodules and masses, particularly when 
concern for malignancy is not high enough to warrant immediate 
excision, when the patient is not a surgical candidate, or the lesion or 
disease is not amenable to surgical resection. Further study is needed, 
however, to better understand the role of TTNA and other diagnostic 
modalities in the evaluation of parenchymal lung lesions.
MISCELLANEOUS TESTING
■
■SPUTUM TESTING
Sputum microscopy and culture are commonly utilized to diagnose 
respiratory tract infections and identify the causative organisms. In 
patients with productive cough, the sampling is simple and noninva­
sive; however, it is subject to patient technique and the potential for 
oropharyngeal and/or upper respiratory tract contamination. In those 
who are not expectorating, sputum induction can be considered using 
provocative nebulization with saline. This technique has been demon­
strated to be generally safe and well tolerated even in patients with air­
flow limitation. Numerous studies have attempted to define criteria for 
reliability and reproducibility of sputum samples. The majority include 
quantification of number of epithelial cells and white blood cells per 
low-power field, and many assess the ratio of the two for adequacy of 
sampling. None has been confirmed as superior in establishing the reli­
ability of sampling to reflect lower respiratory tract growth. The quality 
of the sputum sample directly impacts the diagnostic reliability in the 
setting of bacterial pneumonia. Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, 
Legionella, or pneumocystis should raise concern for infection, even 
in the setting of a poor sample. In a prospective study of the use of a 
multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in conjunction with 
sputum sampling, good-quality samples had a higher proportion of 
bacterial detections than low-quality samples but equivalent frequency 
of samples with bacterial growth in patients who received treatment. In 
this study, 40% of bacterial detections would have been missed if only 
high-quality samples were analyzed. The authors conclude that all sam­
ples submitted for PCR-based testing should be analyzed, regardless of 
sputum sample quality. In systematic analyses and meta-analyses, mul­
tiplex PCR assays have been shown to decrease the time to diagnosis 
and length of stay in the setting of viral infections and in patients with 
COVID-19 and bacterial co-infection. Endotracheal aspirates have not 
been demonstrated to be clearly superior to expectorated sputum in 
terms of diagnostic reliability, but such sampling may be required if 
spontaneous coughing is nonproductive and induced sputum is not 
feasible or successful. The use of multiplex fluorescence PCR may allow 
for assessment of multiple pathogens with a reduced time to pathogen 
identification.
As in the context of infection, sputum cytologic analysis has been 
utilized to assist in the diagnosis of malignancy, mainly because it 
can be obtained noninvasively. While sputum cytology demonstrating 
malignant cells is highly specific for a diagnosis of lung malignancy, its 
sensitivity has been reported at <40%. A systematic review of screening 
methods demonstrated no added benefit from sputum cytology when 
combined with CXR to screen for lung cancer. Advanced molecular 
techniques such as PCR, DNA methylation markers, micro-RNA 
assessment, and tumor-related protein analysis have been proposed in 
sputum assessment for diagnostic purposes and risk stratification. At 
present, however, sputum cytology is recommended only when more 
invasive techniques cannot be pursued, such as in patients with pro­
hibitive comorbidities or in resource-limited settings.
■
■EXHALED BREATH CONDENSATE
Exhaled breath condensate includes gaseous, liquid, and water-soluble 
components, with numerous biomarker types and collection system 
varieties developed over time. Validation standards for many compo­
nents are still being determined. Exhaled nitric oxide is the most highly 
validated of the biomarkers identified in exhaled breath condensate. 
The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been demonstrated 
in higher concentrations in exhaled breath condensate of patients with 
asthma than in healthy individuals, has been shown in a systematic