# 07 - 129 Immunization Principles and Vaccine Use

### 129 Immunization Principles and Vaccine Use

versus nonvaccinees; (3) Are there rare causally related adverse events? 
If so, what is the incidence rate, and are there risk factors for developing 
the adverse event that could lead to vaccine contraindications? and (4) 
What is the impact of vaccination in protecting the community (i.e., herd 
immunity) by preventing or reducing transmission? Answering these 
questions requires a comprehensive surveillance system to detect and 
determine characteristics of disease in the postvaccine era and whether 
such disease is the result of failure to vaccinate or vaccine failure. If 
the former, what measures can be taken to enhance vaccine uptake, or 
should recommendations for vaccination be broadened if substantial 
numbers of cases are occurring in groups for whom vaccine is not rec­
ommended? If there is evidence of vaccine failure, is it the result of vac­
cine mishandling (e.g., improper storage) or is the rate of failure within 
expected levels (e.g., the measured vaccine effectiveness is within levels 
expected based on the prelicensure trials)? If effectiveness is low, are 
there groups at higher risk for vaccine failure, and if so, would additional 
doses of vaccines or alternative schedules reduce that risk?
Assessing Vaccine Safety 
Adequately assessing vaccine safety 
is critical to the success of immunization programs and requires an 
existing comprehensive system to monitor safety. In the United States, 
there are several systems in place to assess safety in the postlicensure 
setting. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) allows 
providers, parents, and patients to report adverse events. The VAERS 
program functions more to raise hypotheses about whether receipt of 
a vaccine or vaccines causes an adverse event than it does to evaluate 
causation. The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) is a collaborative project 
between CDC’s Immunization Safety Office (ISO) and eight health care 
organizations. The VSD was initiated in 1990 and continues to moni­
tor safety of vaccines over large populations and to conduct studies to 
assess rare and serious adverse events following immunization. The 
Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Project is a national 
network of vaccine safety experts from the CDC’s ISO, seven medical 
research centers, and other partners, which provides a comprehensive 
vaccine safety public health service to the nation.
Vaccine Injury Compensation 
Most vaccine-preventable dis­
eases are transmitted person-to-person. Thus, when individuals are 
vaccinated, they are protected from disease and indirectly are protect­
ing others in society who either cannot be vaccinated (e.g., have medi­
cal contraindications to vaccine) or fail to make an adequate immune 
response. Therefore, if someone is injured by vaccine, society should 
provide that person compensation. This is the basis of the National 
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). This program offers 
compensation for the injured vaccine recipient and reduces the risk of 
liability for the vaccine provider and the manufacturer, as persons who 
receive vaccines covered by the NVICP must first go through this com­
pensation process before suing the provider or manufacturer.
Vaccine Hesitancy 
Over the past decade there has been an increase 
in vaccine hesitancy. Reasons for vaccine hesitancy are multifactorial 
and include concerns over vaccine safety, questioning whether specific 
vaccines are needed to prevent disease, and mistrust of the public 
health sector and medical professionals recommending the vaccines. 
This hesitancy has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic coinci­
dent with the proliferation of antivaccine tropes and with concern over 
loss of autonomy of individuals to make decision for themselves. These 
concerns can often be alleviated or lessened by addressing the spe­
cific questions raised by the hesitant individual and by a presumptive 
approach where vaccines are presented as the standard of care. A strong 
recommendation for a vaccine by a trusted health care provider is one 
proven mechanism to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Websites maintained 
by the CDC, NIH, and various specialty and subspeciality organiza­
tions have extensive information about vaccines, and providers should 
refer their patients to these credible sources.
■
■SUMMARY
Few programs have had the impact of vaccines in reducing health 
burdens. This is the result of a rigorous system to ensure that recom­
mended vaccines are safe and effective, and of an equally rigorous 

system to ensure that persons for whom vaccines are recommended 
receive them. With the development and introduction of new vaccines, 
public health gains are expected to increase in coming years as long as 
high vaccine coverage levels can be maintained.

■
■FURTHER READING
Cunningham AL et al: Vaccine development: From concept to early 
clinical testing. Vaccine 34:6655, 2016.
Li X et al: Estimating the health impact of vaccination against ten 
pathogens in 98 low-income and middle-income countries from 2000 
to 2030: A modelling study. Lancet 397:398, 2021.
McCarthy NL et al: Monitoring vaccine safety using the Vaccine 
Safety Datalink: Utilizing immunization registries for pandemic 
influenza. Vaccine 29:4891, 2011.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine: 
The critical public health value of vaccines: Tackling issues of access 
and hesitancy: Proceedings of a workshop. Washington DC, National 
Academies Press, 2021.
National Vaccine Advisory Committee: Protecting the public’s 
health: Critical functions of the Section 317 Immunization Pro­
gram—a report of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Public 
Health Rep 128:78, 2013.
O’leary ST et al: Strategies for improving vaccine communication and 
uptake. Pediatrics 153:e2023065483, 2024.
Pickering LK et al: Principles of vaccine licensure, approval and rec­
ommendations for use. Mayo Clin Proc 95:600, 2020.
Plotkin SA: Correlates of protection induced by vaccination. Clin 
Vaccine Immunol 17:1055, 2010.
Shattock AJ et al: Contribution of vaccination to improved survival 
CHAPTER 129
and health: Modelling 50 years of the Expanded Programme on 
Immunization. Lancet 403:2307, 2024.
Walton LR et al: The history of the United States Advisory Committee 
on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Vaccine 33:405, 2015.
Immunization Principles and Vaccine Use 
Sarah Meyer, Amanda Cohn, 

Georgina Peacock

Immunization Principles 

and Vaccine Use
Few medical interventions of the past century can rival the effect that 
immunization has had on longevity, economic savings, and quality 
of life. Twenty-one diseases are now preventable through vaccines 
routinely administered to children and adults in the United States 
(Table 129-1), and most vaccine-preventable diseases of childhood are 
at historically low levels (Table 129-2). In the past few years, the adult 
immunization landscape has changed substantially with an increased 
number of recommended routine vaccines.
The COVID-19 pandemic identified a need for improved infra­
structure to ensure adult vaccination, especially for those who are 
uninsured and who have limited access to health systems. Health care 
providers in a variety of settings deliver the vast majority of vaccines 
in the United States and therefore play an integral role in the nation’s 
public health system.
■
■VACCINE IMPACT
Direct and Indirect Effects 
Many immunizations against specific 
infectious diseases protect individuals against infection and thereby 
prevent symptomatic illnesses. In addition, specific vaccines may 
blunt the severity of clinical illness (e.g., rotavirus vaccines and severe 
gastroenteritis) or reduce complications (e.g., zoster vaccines and

TABLE 129-1  Diseases Preventable with Vaccines Routinely 
Administered in the United States to Children and/or Adults
CONDITION
TARGET POPULATION(S) FOR ROUTINE USE
Pertussis
Children, adolescents, adults
Diphtheria
Children, adolescents, adults
Tetanus
Children, adolescents, adults
Poliomyelitis
Children
Measles
Children
Mumps
Children
Rubella, congenital rubella 
syndrome
Children
Hepatitis B
Children and high-risk adults
Haemophilus influenzae type b 
infection
Children and high-risk adults
Hepatitis A
Children and high-risk adults
Influenza
Children, adolescents, adults
Varicella
Children
Pneumococcal disease
Children, older adults, and high-risk adultsa
Serogroups A, C, W, Y 
meningococcal disease
Adolescents and high-risk children 

and adults
Serogroup B meningococcal 
disease
High-risk children and adultsa
Rotavirus infection
Infants
Human papillomavirus infection, 
cervical and anogenital cancers
Adolescents and young adultsa
Zoster
Older adults and high-risk adults
Respiratory syncytial virus
Infants, high-risk children, pregnant 
personsa
PART 5
Infectious Diseases
COVID-19
Children, adolescents, adults
Dengue
High-risk children (i.e., those living in 
endemic areas and with laboratory 
confirmation of prior infection)
Mpox
High-risk adults
aOthers in certain age groups may be vaccinated based on shared clinical 
decision-making.
postherpetic neuralgia). Some immunizations also reduce transmis­
sion of infectious disease agents from immunized persons to others, 
thereby reducing the impact of infection spread. This indirect impact 
is known as herd immunity. The level of immunization in a population 
that is required to achieve indirect protection of unimmunized persons 
varies substantially with the specific vaccine and disease. For example, 
because of how transmissible measles is, an estimated 95% of the popu­
lation needs to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity, whereas with 
polio, an estimated 80% coverage is needed.
Over the past 30 years, due to the implementation of the Vaccines 
for Children Program, children have had broad access to routine 
childhood vaccines, regardless of insurance status. For routinely rec­
ommended vaccines in the United States, major declines in rates of 
vaccine-preventable diseases among both children and adults have 
become evident (Table 129-2). For example, vaccination of children 
<5 years of age against Streptococcus pneumoniae has led to not only a 
96% reduction in invasive pneumococcal disease, but also substantial 
reductions in incidence among adults through herd immunity. Among 
children born during 1994–2023, the childhood vaccination series will 
prevent 508 million illnesses and 1,129,000 deaths over the course of 
their lifetime and save nearly $2.7 trillion in societal costs (U.S.).
Control, Elimination, and Eradication of Vaccine-Preventable 
Diseases 
Immunization programs are associated with the goals of 
controlling, eliminating, or eradicating a disease. Control of a vaccinepreventable disease reduces poor illness outcomes and often limits 
the disruptive impacts associated with outbreaks of disease in com­
munities, schools, and institutions. Control programs can also reduce 
absences from work for ill persons and for parents caring for sick 

TABLE 129-2  Decline in Vaccine-Preventable Diseases in the 

United States following Widespread Implementation of National 

Vaccine Recommendations
REDUCTION 
(%) IN CASES 
AFTER 
WIDESPREAD 
VACCINATION
ANNUAL NO. 
OF PREVACCINE 
CASES (AVERAGE)
NO. OF CASES 
REPORTED IN 
2023a
CONDITION
Smallpox
29,005

Diphtheria
21,053

>99
Measles
530,217

>99
Mumps
162,344

>99
Pertussis
200,752

Polio (paralytic)
16,316

Rubella
47,745

>99
Congenital rubella 
syndrome

Tetanus

Haemophilus 
influenzae type b 
infection age <5 years
20,000
27b
>99
Hepatitis A
117,333
11,500c

Hepatitis B (acute)
66,232
13,300c

Invasive pneumococcal 
infection: all ages
63,067
17,700d

Rotavirus 
hospitalizations 

(<3 years old)
62,500
16,250e

Varicella
4,085,120
26,919f

a2023 reported cases unless otherwise specified (provisional as of February 2024). 
bAn additional 12 type b infections are estimated to have occurred among 257 
reports of H. influenzae infection caused by unknown types among children <5 years 
of age. cData from the CDC’s Viral Hepatitis Surveillance, 2021. dUnpublished data 
from the CDC’s Active Bacterial Core Surveillance, 2020. eData from the CDC’s New 
Vaccine Surveillance Network, 2021; U.S. rotavirus disease now has a biennial 
pattern. fData from CDC’s varicella program, 2021.
Source: Adapted from SW Roush et al: JAMA 298:2155, 2007 and Morb Mortal Wkly 
Rep 65:924, 2017.
children, decrease absences from school, and limit health care utiliza­
tion associated with treatment visits.
Elimination of a disease is a more demanding goal than control, 
usually requiring the reduction to zero of cases in a defined geographic 
area but sometimes defined as reduction in the indigenous sustained 
transmission of an infection in a geographic area. As of 2024, the 
United States had eliminated indigenous transmission of measles, 
rubella, poliomyelitis, and diphtheria. Importation of pathogens from 
other parts of the world continues to be important, and public health 
efforts are intended to respond promptly to such cases in order to limit 
forward spread of the infectious agent.
Eradication of a disease is achieved when its elimination can be sus­
tained without the need to continue interventions. The only vaccinepreventable disease of humans that has been globally eradicated thus 
far is smallpox. Although smallpox vaccine is no longer given routinely, 
the disease has not reemerged naturally because all chains of human 
transmission were interrupted through earlier vaccination efforts and 
humans were the only natural reservoir of the virus. Currently, a major 
health initiative is targeting the global eradication of polio. Two of 
the three wild poliovirus types (types 2 and 3) have been eradicated 
globally. However, endemic transmission of wild poliovirus type 1 con­
tinues in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and circulating vaccine-derived 
polioviruses have been detected in areas of the world where poliovirus 
had been eliminated, including a case of vaccine-derived poliovirus 
type 2 in New York in 2022. Detection of a case of disease that has 
been targeted for eradication or elimination is considered a sentinel 
event that could permit the infectious agent to become reestablished in 
the community or region. Therefore, such episodes must be promptly 
reported to public health authorities.

Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Response 
Clusters 
of cases of a vaccine-preventable disease detected in an institution, a 
medical practice, or a community may signal important changes in 
the pathogen, vaccine, or environment. Several factors can give rise 
to increases in vaccine-preventable disease, including (1) low rates of 
immunization that result in an accumulation of susceptible persons 
(e.g., measles resurgence among vaccination abstainers); (2) changes in 
the infectious agent that permit it to escape vaccine-induced protection 
(e.g., non-vaccine-type pneumococci); (3) waning of vaccine-induced 
immunity (e.g., pertussis among adolescents and adults vaccinated in 
early childhood); and (4) point-source introductions of large inocula 
(e.g., food-borne exposure to hepatitis A virus). Reporting episodes 
of outbreak-prone diseases to public health authorities can facilitate 
recognition of clusters that require further interventions.
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of a strong 
immunization program: robust surveillance systems to detect emerging 
infectious disease threats; public–private partnerships to accelerate the 
development of novel vaccines; and systems in place to rapidly imple­
ment a vaccination program and monitor vaccine safety and effective­
ness. On a global scale, the “100 Days Mission” is being explored by the 
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and partners 
as a response to the next “Disease X” to make safe, effective vaccines, 
therapeutics, and diagnostics within 100 days of identification.
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTING  Recognition of suspected cases of dis­
eases targeted for elimination or eradication—along with other dis­
eases that require urgent public health interventions, such as contact 
tracing, administration of chemo- or immunoprophylaxis, or epi­
demiologic investigation for common-source exposure—is typically 
associated with special reporting requirements. Many diseases against 
which vaccines are routinely used, including measles, pertussis, and 
Haemophilus influenzae type b invasive disease, are nationally notifi­
able. Clinicians and laboratory staff have a responsibility to report 
some vaccine-preventable disease occurrences to local or state public 
health authorities according to specific case-definition criteria. All 
providers should be aware of state or city disease-reporting require­
ments and the best ways to contact public health authorities. A prompt 
response to vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks can greatly enhance 
the effectiveness of control measures.
GLOBAL CONSIDERATIONS  Vaccinations are estimated to prevent 
3.5–5 million deaths every year on a global scale. The COVID-19 
pandemic led to disruptions of routine vaccination programs, resulting 
in declines in vaccine coverage in more than 100 countries. Although 
there have been promising signs of recovery, with diphtheria-pertussistetanus (DPT) coverage in 2022 nearly recovered to 2019 levels, gaps 
remain for other vaccines. For example, 22 million children missed 
their first dose of measles vaccine in 2022 compared with 19 million in 
2019. As a result, the World Health Organization, the United Nations 
Children’s Fund, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and the Bill & Melinda 
Gates Foundation launched “The Big Catch-Up” to support recovery of 
childhood vaccination rates to at least prepandemic levels.
Enhancing Immunization in Adults 
Although immunization 
has become a centerpiece of routine pediatric medical visits, it has 
not been as well integrated into routine health care for adults. This 
chapter focuses on immunization principles and vaccine use in adults. 
Accumulating evidence suggests that immunization coverage can be 
increased through efforts directed at consumer-, provider-, institu­
tion-, and system-level factors. The literature suggests that the applica­
tion of multiple strategies is more effective at raising coverage rates 
than is the use of any single strategy.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ADULT IMMUNIZATIONS  The CDC’s Advi­
sory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) makes recom­
mendations for administration of vaccines approved or authorized by 
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in children and 
adults in the U.S. civilian population. The ACIP is a federal advisory 
committee that consists of up to 20 voting members (experts in fields 
associated with immunization) appointed by the Secretary of the 
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, as well as ex officio 

members representing federal agencies and nonvoting representatives 
of various liaison organizations, including major medical societies and 
managed-care organizations. ACIP recommendations are available at 
www.cdc.gov/acip-recs/hcp/vaccine-specific/.

ACIP makes several types of recommendations. Routine, catch-up, 
and risk-based recommendations are those in which everyone in a 
particular age or risk group is recommended to receive vaccination. 
Examples include recombinant zoster vaccination for adults age 
≥50 years and hepatitis B vaccination for adults age 19–59 years. Shared 
clinical decision-making recommendations are individually based and 
informed by a decision process between the health care provider and 
patient. With shared clinical decision-making recommendations, the 
decision to vaccinate is informed by the best available evidence on who 
may benefit from vaccination; the individual’s characteristics, values, 
and preferences; the health care provider’s clinical discretion; and the 
characteristics of the vaccine being considered. Examples of shared 
clinical decision-making recommendations include human papilloma­
virus vaccination of adults age 27-45 years and serogroup B meningococ­
cal vaccination of adolescents and young adults age 16-23 years.
ADULT IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULES  Immunization schedules for 
adults in the United States are updated regularly, through an adden­
dum after ACIP votes on a new recommendation as well as an annual 
update, and can be found online (www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imzschedules/adult-age.html). The adult immunization schedule is also 
approved by seven provider organizations and published annually in 
Annals of Internal Medicine and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 
(www.cdc.gov/mmwr). The adult immunization schedules for 2024 are 
summarized in Fig. 129-1. Additional information and specifications 
are contained in the footnotes to these schedules.
CHAPTER 129
■
■IMMUNIZATION PRACTICE STANDARDS
Administering immunizations to adults involves a number of pro­
cesses, such as deciding whom to vaccinate, assessing vaccine contra­
indications and precautions, providing vaccine information statements 
(VISs), ensuring appropriate storage and handling of vaccines, admin­
istering vaccines, and maintaining vaccine records. In addition, pro­
vider reporting of adverse events that follow vaccination is an essential 
component of the vaccine safety monitoring system. In 2014, the Stan­
dards for Adult Immunization Practice were revised to help providers 
take steps to ensure that their patients are fully immunized, including 
assessing the immunization status of patients at every clinical encoun­
ter, strongly recommending vaccines that patients need, administering 
vaccines or referring the patient to a vaccination provider, and docu­
menting vaccines received by the patient.
Immunization Principles and Vaccine Use 
Deciding Whom to Vaccinate 
Every effort should be made to 
ensure that adults receive all indicated vaccines as expeditiously as pos­
sible. When adults present for care, their immunization history should 
be assessed and recorded, and this information should be used to 
identify needed vaccinations according to the most current version of 
the adult immunization schedule. Decision-support tools incorporated 
into electronic health records can provide prompts for needed vaccina­
tions. Standing orders, which are often used for routinely indicated 
vaccines (e.g., influenza and zoster vaccines), permit a nurse or another 
approved licensed practitioner to administer vaccines without a spe­
cific physician order, thus lowering barriers to adult immunization.
Assessing Contraindications and Precautions 
Before vac­
cination, all patients should be screened for contraindications and 
precautions. A contraindication is a condition that increases the risk 
of a serious adverse reaction to vaccination. A vaccine should not be 
administered when a contraindication is documented. For example, 
a history of an anaphylactic reaction to a dose of vaccine or to a vac­
cine component is a contraindication for further doses. A precaution 
is a condition that may increase the risk of an adverse event or that 
may compromise the ability of the vaccine to evoke immunity (e.g., 
administering measles vaccine to a person who has recently received 
immune globulins or other blood products and may consequently have 
transient passive immunity to measles virus). Normally, a vaccine is

Vaccine
19–26 years
27–49 years
50–64 years
≥65 years
COVID-19
1 or more doses of updated (2023–2024 Formula) vaccine (see notes)
Influenza inactivated (IIV4) or
Influenza recombinant (RIV4)
1 dose annually
or
or
Influenza live, attenuated
(LAIV4)
1 dose annually
Respiratory syncytial virus
(RSV)
  
Seasonal administration during pregnancy. See notes.
≥60 years
Tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis
(Tdap or Td)
1 dose Tdap each pregnancy; 1 dose Td/Tdap for wound management (see notes)
1 dose Tdap, then Td or Tdap booster every 10 years
Measles, mumps, rubella
(MMR)
 
1 or 2 doses depending on indication
(if born in 1957 or later)
For healthcare personnel,
see notes
Varicella
(VAR)
 
2 doses
(if born in 1980 or later)
2 doses
Zoster recombinant
(RZV)
 
2 doses for immunocompromising conditions (see notes)
2 doses
Human papillomavirus
(HPV)
 
 
2 or 3 doses depending on age at
initial vaccination or condition
27 through 45 years
Pneumococcal
(PCV15, PCV20, PPSV23)
See notes
Hepatitis A
(HepA)
 
2, 3, or 4 doses depending on vaccine
Hepatitis B
(HepB)
 
Meningococcal A, C, W, Y
(MenACWY)
1 or 2 doses depending on indication, see notes for booster recommendations
Meningococcal B
(MenB)
 
2 or 3 doses depending on vaccine and indication, see notes for booster recommendations
19 through 23 years
Haemophilus influenzae type b 
(Hib)
1 or 3 doses depending on indication
Mpox
PART 5
Infectious Diseases
Recommended vaccination for adults who meet age requirement,
lack documentation of vaccination, or lack evidence of immunity
Recommended vaccination for adults with an
additional risk factor or another indication
HIV infection CD4
percentage and count
Immunocompromised
(excluding HIV
infection)
Men who have sex
with men
VACCINE
Pregnancy
COVID-19
See notes
IIV4 or RIV4
1 dose annually
LAIV4
1 dose annually
if age 19–49 years
RSV
Seasonal
administration.
See notes
See notes
See notes
Tdap or Td
Tdap: 1 dose
each pregnancy
1 dose Tdap, then Td or Tdap booster every 10 years
MMR
*
VAR
*
See notes
RZV
See notes
HPV
*
3 dose series if indicated
Pneumococcal
HepA
HepB
See notes
Age ≥60 years
MenACWY
MenB
Hib
Asplenia:
1 dose
Mpox
See notes
See notes
See notes
Not recommended for all adults,
but recommended for some
adults based on either age OR
increased risk for or severe
outcomes from disease
Recommended based
on shared clinical
decision-making
Recommended for all adults
who lack documentation of
vaccination, OR lack
evidence of immunity
a. Precaution for LAIV4 does not apply to alcoholism.
b. See notes for influenza; hepatitis B; measles, mumps, and rubella; and varicella vaccinations.
c. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
FIGURE 129-1  Recommended adult immunization schedules, United States, 2024. Additional information, including footnotes for each vaccine, contraindications, and 
precautions, can be found at www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/adult-age.html. The recommendations in this schedule were approved by the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), the American College of 
Physicians (ACP), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and the American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM). For complete statements by the 
ACIP, visit www.cdc.gov/acip-recs/hcp/vaccine-specific/.

See notes
2, 3, or 4 doses depending on vaccine or condition
Recommended vaccination based on shared
clinical decision-making
No recommendation/
Not applicable
Kidney failure,
End-stage
renal disease
or on dialysis
Asplenia,
complement
deficiency
Heart or lung
disease
Chronic liver
disease;
alcoholisma
Diabetes
1 dose annually if age 19–49 years
Precaution: Might be
indicated if benefit of
protection outweighs
risk of adverse reaction
Contraindicated or not
recommended
*Vaccinate after pregnancy,
if indicated
Recommended for all adults,
and additional doses may be
necessary based on medical
condition or other indications.
See notes.
No Guidance/
Not Applicable

not administered when a precaution is noted. However, situations may 
arise when the benefits of vaccination outweigh the estimated risk of 
an adverse event, and the provider may decide to vaccinate the patient 
despite the precaution.
In some cases, contraindications and precautions are temporary 
and may lead to mere deferral of vaccination until a later time. For 
example, moderate or severe acute illness with or without fever is 
generally considered a transient precaution to vaccination and results 
in postponement of vaccine administration until the acute phase has 
resolved; thus, the superimposition of adverse effects of vaccination on 
the underlying illness and the mistaken attribution of a manifestation 
of the underlying illness to the vaccine are avoided. Contraindications 
and precautions to vaccines licensed in the United States for use in 
adults are summarized in Table 129-3. It is important to recognize con­
ditions that are not contraindications in order not to miss opportunities 
for vaccination. For example, in most cases, mild acute illness (with or 
without fever) or a history of a mild to moderate local reaction to a 
previous dose of the vaccine are not contraindications to vaccination.
History of Immediate Hypersensitivity to a Vaccine Compo­
nent 
A severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to a previous dose 
of a vaccine or to one of its components is a contraindication to vac­
cination. While most vaccines have many components, substances to 
which individuals are most likely to have had a severe allergic reaction 
include egg protein, gelatin, and yeast. In addition, although natural 
rubber (latex) is not a vaccine component, some vaccines are supplied 
in vials or syringes that contain natural rubber latex. These vaccines 
can be identified by the product insert and should not be administered 
to persons who report a severe (anaphylactic) allergy to latex unless the 
benefit of vaccination clearly outweighs the risk for a potential allergic 
reaction. The much more common local or contact hypersensitivity to 
latex, such as to medical gloves (which contain synthetic latex that is 
not linked to allergic reactions), is not a contraindication to adminis­
tration of a vaccine supplied in a vial or syringe that contains natural 
rubber latex.
■
■SPECIFIC ADULT POPULATIONS
Pregnant Persons 
Several vaccines are recommended for preg­
nant persons in the United States: tetanus and diphtheria toxoids 
and acellular pertussis (Tdap), inactivated influenza, COVID-19, and 
respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, as well as hepatitis B vaccine 
(if not already vaccinated). Tdap and RSV vaccine are administered 
to pregnant persons specifically to prevent severe pertussis and RSV 
disease, respectively, in their infants, while influenza, COVID-19, and 
hepatitis B (HepB) vaccines are given to protect both the pregnant 
person and infant.
Tdap vaccine is recommended during each pregnancy at the 27th 
through 36th week of gestation (preferably during the earlier part of 
this time period), regardless of prior vaccination status, in order to 
prevent pertussis in young infants. Annual influenza vaccination is rec­
ommended for everyone age ≥6 months, including pregnant persons in 
any trimester, ideally during September or October. Vaccination during 
July or August can be considered for pregnant persons in their third 
trimester if vaccine is available. Staying up to date with COVID-19 
vaccination is recommended for everyone age ≥6 months, including 
pregnant persons in any trimester. It is recommended that every infant 
receive protection against severe RSV disease, either through maternal 
RSV vaccination during the 32nd through 36th week of gestation (dur­
ing September to January) or through infant administration of nirse­
vimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody.
Pregnant persons may need additional vaccines as well, such as 
HepB vaccine if not already vaccinated, since all adults age 19 through 
59 years are recommended to receive HepB vaccination. Pregnancy 
is not a contraindication to administration of most other inactivated 
vaccines when otherwise indicated or when the benefits of vaccination 
are judged to outweigh potential risks (e.g., serogroup B meningo­
coccal vaccination); it is recommended that human papillomavirus 
(HPV) and recombinant zoster vaccination are delayed until after 
pregnancy. Live-virus vaccines (e.g., measles, mumps, and rubella 

[MMR], varicella) are contraindicated during pregnancy because of 
the hypothetical risk that vaccine virus replication will cause congenital 
infection or have other adverse effects on the fetus. Patients who are 
breast-feeding or trying to get pregnant should stay up to date on all 
recommended vaccines, especially as certain congenital infections 
(e.g., rubella) are preventable through vaccination.

Immunocompromised Persons 
Immunocompromised persons 
are at increased risk for severe outcomes from infectious diseases. 
Therefore, staying up to date on recommended vaccines is impor­
tant for this population. Immunocompromised patients may need to 
receive vaccines at an earlier age than the general population (e.g., 
pneumococcal and zoster at age ≥19 years instead of age ≥50 years), 
receive additional doses of a recommended vaccine (e.g., three-dose 
primary series and additional doses of COVID-19), receive vaccines 
based on a particular type of immunocompromising condition (e.g., 
meningococcal vaccination for those with complement deficiency), or 
have different vaccine recommendations based on degree of immune 
suppression, particularly for live-virus vaccines. Live-virus vaccines 
elicit an immune response due to replication of the attenuated (weak­
ened) vaccine virus that is contained by the recipient’s immune system. 
In persons with compromised immune function, enhanced replication 
of vaccine viruses is possible and could lead to disseminated infection 
with the vaccine virus. For this reason, live-virus vaccines are con­
traindicated for persons with severe immunosuppression, the defini­
tion of which may vary with the vaccine. Severe immunosuppression 
may be caused by many disease conditions, including hematologic or 
other malignancy. In some of these conditions, all affected persons 
are severely immunocompromised. In others (e.g., HIV infection), 
the degree to which the immune system is compromised depends on 
the severity of the condition, which in turn depends on the stage of 
disease or treatment. For example, MMR vaccine may be given to HIVinfected persons with CD4 percentage of ≥15 and count of ≥200/µL.
CHAPTER 129
Older Adults 
As age increases, the ability to mount adaptive and 
innate immune responses declines, resulting in increased susceptibility 
to infectious diseases and reduced responses after vaccination. This 
immunosenescence, along with increased rates of underlying condi­
tions, increases the risk of severe outcomes of infectious diseases in 
older adults. Long-term care facility residents among this age group 
are potentially at even greater risk due to increased frailty as well as 
risk of transmission associated with congregate settings. In addition 
to staying up to date on all recommended vaccines (e.g., COVID-19, 
Td/Tdap), there are specific vaccine recommendations for older adults: 
zoster vaccine in adults age ≥50 years, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 
for adults age ≥50 years, and RSV vaccine in all adults aged ≥75 years 
and in those age 60–74 years at increased risk for severe RSV. Further­
more, adults age ≥65 years are recommended to receive a higher-dose 
influenza vaccine (i.e., high-dose, adjuvanted, or recombinant vaccine) 
rather than the standard-dose vaccine.
Immunization Principles and Vaccine Use 
Health Care Workers 
Health care workers are recommended 
to stay up to date with all vaccines recommended for them based on 
age or underlying condition (including influenza and COVID-19 vac­
cines), and they may be recommended to receive additional vaccines 
due to their occupational exposure (e.g., meningococcal vaccine for 
laboratory personnel who handle Neisseria meningitidis isolates). As 
part of their participation in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid 
Services’ Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting program, acute-care 
hospitals and select other facilities are required to report the propor­
tion of their health care personnel who have received seasonal influ­
enza and COVID-19 vaccination. Some institutions and jurisdictions 
have added mandates on influenza vaccination of health care workers 
and have expanded on earlier requirements related to vaccination 
or proof of immunity for hepatitis B, measles, mumps, rubella, and 
varicella.
■
■VACCINE INFORMATION STATEMENTS
A Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) is a one-page (twosided) information sheet produced by the CDC that informs vaccine

PART 5
Infectious Diseases
TABLE 129-3  Contraindications and Precautions for Commonly Used Vaccines in Adults
VACCINE 
FORMULATION
CONTRAINDICATIONS AND PRECAUTIONS
All vaccines
Contraindication
Severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) after a previous vaccine dose or to a vaccine component
Precaution
Moderate or severe acute illness with or without fever. Defer vaccination until illness resolves.
Td
Precautions
GBS within 6 weeks after a previous dose of TT-containing vaccine
History of Arthus-type hypersensitivity reactions after a previous dose of TD- or DT-containing vaccines (including MenACWY). 
Defer vaccination until at least 10 years have elapsed since the last dose.
Tdap
Contraindication
History of encephalopathy (e.g., coma or prolonged seizures) not attributable to another identifiable cause within 7 days of administration of a 
vaccine with pertussis components, such as DTaP or Tdap
Precautions
GBS within 6 weeks after a previous dose of TT-containing vaccine
Progressive or unstable neurologic disorder, uncontrolled seizures, or progressive encephalopathy. Defer vaccination until a treatment 
regimen has been established and the condition has stabilized.
History of Arthus-type hypersensitivity reactions after a previous dose of TT- or DT-containing vaccines (including MenACWY). 
Defer vaccination until at least 10 years have elapsed since the last dose.
HPV
Contraindications
History of immediate hypersensitivity to yeast
Pregnancy (vaccinate after pregnancy if indicated)
MMR
Contraindications
History of immediate hypersensitivity reaction to gelatina or neomycin
Pregnancy (vaccinate after pregnancy if indicated)
Known severe immunodeficiency (e.g., hematologic and solid tumors; chemotherapy; congenital immunodeficiency; long-term 
immunosuppressive therapy; severe immunocompromise due to HIV infection)
Family history of altered immunocompetence (i.e., congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency in a first-degree relative), unless the immune 
competence of the potential vaccine recipient has been substantiated clinically or verified by a laboratory
Precautions
Recent receipt (within 11 months) of antibody-containing blood product
History of thrombocytopenia or thrombocytopenic purpura
Need for tuberculin skin testing or interferon γ release assay (IGRA) testing
Varicella
Contraindications
Pregnancy (vaccinate after pregnancy if indicated)
Known severe immunodeficiency
History of immediate hypersensitivity reaction to gelatina or neomycin
Family history of altered immunocompetence (i.e., congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency in a first-degree relative), unless the immune 
competence of the potential vaccine recipient has been substantiated clinically or verified by a laboratory
Precaution
Recent receipt (within 11 months) of antibody-containing blood product
Receipt of specific antiviral drugs (acyclovir, famciclovir, or valacyclovir) 24 h before vaccination
Use of aspirin or aspirin-containing products
Influenza, inactivated, 
injectable
Precautionb
History of GBS within 6 weeks after a previous influenza vaccine dose
Influenza, live 
attenuated nasal spray
Contraindicationsb
Pregnancy
Immunosuppression, including that caused by medications or by HIV infection; known severe immunodeficiency (e.g., hematologic and 
solid tumors; chemotherapy; congenital immunodeficiency; long-term immunosuppressive therapy; severe immunocompromise due to HIV 
infection)
Close contact with severely immunosuppressed persons who require a protected environment, such as isolation in a bone marrow 
transplantation unit
Receipt of oseltamivir or zanamivir within 48 h before vaccination, peramivir within the previous 5 days, or baloxavir within the previous 
17 days.
Active cerebrospinal fluid/oropharyngeal communications/leaks
Cochlear implants
Anatomic or functional asplenia (e.g., sickle cell disease)
Precautions
History of GBS within 6 weeks of a previous influenza vaccine dose
Medical conditions that might predispose to higher risks of complications from influenza, such as diabetes mellitus; chronic pulmonary 
disease (including asthma); chronic cardiovascular disease (except hypertension); renal, hepatic, neurologic/neuromuscular, hematologic, 
or metabolic disorders
(Continued)

TABLE 129-3  Contraindications and Precautions for Commonly Used Vaccines in Adults
VACCINE 
FORMULATION
CONTRAINDICATIONS AND PRECAUTIONS
Pneumococcal 
polysaccharide
None, other than those listed for all vaccines
Pneumococcal 
conjugate
None, other than those listed for all vaccines
Hepatitis A
Contraindication
History of immediate hypersensitivity to neomycin
Hepatitis B
Contraindications
History of immediate hypersensitivity to yeast (for Engerix-B and Recombivax-HB)
Pregnancy: Heplisav-B and PreHevbrio are not recommended; use other hepatitis B vaccines if indicated
Meningococcal 
conjugate
None, other than those listed for all vaccines
Serogroup B 
meningococcal
Precaution
Pregnancy (vaccination may be indicated if benefits of protection outweigh risks of adverse reaction)
Zoster
Precaution
Current herpes zoster infection
COVID-19
Precaution
Diagnosed nonsevere allergy (e.g., urticaria beyond the injection site) or nonsevere, immediate (onset <4 h) allergic reaction after 
administration of a previous dose
Myocarditis or pericarditis within 3 weeks after a dose
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A)
Respiratory syncytial 
virus
None, other than those listed for all vaccines
Mpox
None, other than those listed for all vaccines
aExtreme caution must be exercised in administering MMR, varicella, or live zoster vaccine to persons with a history of anaphylactic reaction to gelatin or gelatin-containing 
products. Before administration, skin testing for sensitivity to gelatin can be considered. However, no specific protocols for this purpose have been published. bHistory of 
severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to egg is a labeled contraindication to the use of inactivated influenza vaccine and live attenuated influenza vaccine. However, 
CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends that any licensed, recommended, and appropriate inactivated influenza vaccine or recombinant 
influenza vaccine may be administered to persons with egg allergy of any severity (www.cdc.gov/acip-recs/hcp/vaccine-specific/flu.html).
Abbreviations: DT, diphtheria toxoid; DTaP, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis; GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome; HPV, human papillomavirus; MenACWY, quadrivalent 
meningococcal conjugate vaccine; MMR, measles, mumps, and rubella; Td, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids; Tdap, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis; 

TT, tetanus toxoid.
recipients (or their parents or legal representatives) about the benefits 
and risks of a vaccine. VISs are mandated by the National Childhood 
Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 and—whether the vaccine recipi­
ent is a child or an adult—must be provided for any vaccine covered 
by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). As of February 
2024, vaccines that are covered by the NCVIA and that are licensed for 
use in adults include tetanus, diphtheria, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, HPV, 
influenza, MMR, pneumococcal conjugate, meningococcal, polio, and 
varicella vaccines. When combination vaccines for which no separate 
VIS exists are administered (e.g., hepatitis A and B combination vac­
cine), all relevant VISs should be provided. In addition, although provi­
sion of a VIS is not specifically mandated under the Public Readiness 
and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which authorizes the Coun­
termeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP), CDC has pub­
lished VISs for the approved or authorized vaccines currently covered 
under the CICP, including COVID-19 and mpox vaccines. The CICP 
provides compensation for injuries that occur after the administration 
of certain countermeasures.
VISs also exist for some vaccines not covered by the VICP or CICP, 
such as pneumococcal polysaccharide, Japanese encephalitis, rabies, 
herpes zoster, typhoid, and yellow fever vaccines. The use of these VISs 
is encouraged but is not mandated.
All current VISs are available at two websites: the CDC’s Vaccine 
Information Statements site (www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/) and the 
Immunization Action Coalition’s site (www.immunize.org/vaccines/vis/
about-vis/). (The latter site also includes translations of the VISs.) VISs 
from these sites can be downloaded and printed.
■
■STORAGE AND HANDLING
Injectable vaccines are packaged in multidose vials, single-dose vials, or 
manufacturer-filled single-dose syringes. The live attenuated nasal-spray 
influenza vaccine is packaged in single-dose sprayers. Oral typhoid 

(Continued)
CHAPTER 129
Immunization Principles and Vaccine Use 
vaccine is packaged in capsules. Some vaccines, such as MMR and 
varicella, come as lyophilized (freeze-dried) powders that must be recon­
stituted (i.e., mixed with a liquid diluent) before use. The lyophilized 
powder and the diluent come in separate vials. Diluents are not inter­
changeable but rather are specifically formulated for each type of vaccine; 
only the specific diluent provided by the manufacturer for each type of 
vaccine should be used. Once lyophilized vaccines have been reconsti­
tuted, their shelf-life is limited and they must be stored under appropri­
ate temperature and light conditions. For example, varicella must be 
protected from light and administered within 30 min of reconstitution; 
recombinant zoster and MMR vaccines likewise must be protected from 
light but can be used up to 6 and 8 h after reconstitution, respectively.
Vaccines are stored either at refrigerator temperature (2–8°C) or at 
freezer temperature (–15°C or colder). In general, inactivated vaccines 
(e.g., inactivated influenza, pneumococcal polysaccharide, and menin­
gococcal conjugate vaccines) are stored at refrigerator temperature, 
while vials of lyophilized-powder live-virus vaccines (e.g., varicella, 
MMR vaccines) are stored at freezer temperature. Diluents for lyophi­
lized vaccines may be stored at refrigerator or room temperature. Live 
attenuated influenza vaccine—a live-virus liquid formulation adminis­
tered by nasal spray—is stored at refrigerator temperature.
Vaccine storage and handling errors can result in the loss of vaccines 
worth millions of dollars, and administration of improperly stored 
vaccines may elicit inadequate immune responses or adverse events 
in patients. To improve the standard of vaccine storage and handling 
practices, the CDC has published detailed guidance (available at www.
cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/admin/storage/toolkit/storage-handling-toolkit.
pdf). For vaccine storage, the CDC recommends stand-alone units—
i.e., self-contained units that either refrigerate or freeze but do not do 
both—as these units maintain the required temperatures better than 
combination refrigerator/freezer units. Dormitory-style combined 
refrigerator/freezer units should never be used for vaccine storage.

The temperature of refrigerators and freezers used for vaccine stor­
age must be monitored and recorded at least twice each workday. Ide­
ally, continuous thermometers that measure and record temperature all 
day and all night are used, and minimal and maximal temperatures are 
read and documented each workday. The CDC recommends the use 
of calibrated digital thermometers with a probe in thermal-buffered 
material; more detailed information on specifications of storage units 
and temperature-monitoring devices is provided at the link given 
above.

■
■ADMINISTRATION OF VACCINES
Most parenteral vaccines recommended for routine administration to 
adults in the United States are given by either the intramuscular (IM) 
or the subcutaneous (SC) route; one influenza vaccine formulation 
approved for use in persons 2–49 years of age is given intranasally. 
Some vaccines can be given by multiple routes; for example, MMRV 
vaccine, one of the MMR vaccines (M-M-R II), and 23-valent pneumo­
coccal polysaccharide vaccine can be given by either IM or SC route, 
and the mpox vaccine can be given intradermally or subcutaneously.
Vaccines given to adults by the SC route are administered with a 
5/8-inch needle into the upper outer-triceps area. Vaccines adminis­
tered to adults by the IM route are injected into the deltoid muscle 
(Fig. 129-2) with a needle whose length should be selected on the 
basis of the recipient’s sex and weight to ensure adequate penetra­
tion into the muscle. Current guidelines indicate that, for men and 
women weighing <152 lb (<70 kg), a 1-inch needle is sufficient; for 
women weighing 152–200 lb (70–90 kg) and men weighing 152–260 lb 
(70–118 kg), a 1- to 1.5-inch needle is needed; and for women weigh­
ing >200 lb (>90 kg) and men weighing >260 lb (>118 kg), a 1.5-inch 
needle is required. Additional illustrations of vaccine injection loca­
tions and techniques may be found at www.immunize.org/wp-content/
uploads/catg.d/p2020.pdf.
PART 5
Infectious Diseases
Aspiration, the process of pulling back on the plunger of the syringe 
after skin penetration but prior to injection, is not necessary because 
no large blood vessels are present at the recommended vaccine injec­
tion sites.
Multiple vaccines can be administered at the same visit; indeed, 
administration of all needed vaccines at one visit is encouraged. Studies 
have shown that in general, vaccines are as effective when administered 
simultaneously as they are individually, and simultaneous administra­
tion of multiple vaccines is not associated with an increased risk of 
Site of intramuscular
injection: deltoid
Dermis
Fatty tissue
(subcutaneous)
Muscle
tissue
FIGURE 129-2  Technique for IM administration of vaccine.

adverse effects and may increase uptake due to not needing to return 
for subsequent vaccinations. If more than one vaccine must be admin­
istered in the same limb, the injection sites should be separated by 1–2 
inches so that any local reactions can be differentiated. If a vaccine and 
an immune globulin preparation are administered simultaneously (e.g., 
Td vaccine and tetanus immune globulin), a separate anatomic site 
should be used for each injection.
For certain vaccines (e.g., hepatitis B vaccine), multiple doses are 
required for an adequate and persistent antibody response. The rec­
ommended vaccination schedule specifies the interval between doses. 
Many adults who receive the first dose in a multiple-dose vaccine series 
do not complete the series or do not receive subsequent doses within 
the recommended interval; this lack of adherence to protocol com­
promises vaccine efficacy and/or the duration of protection. Providers 
should implement recall systems that will prompt patients to return for 
subsequent doses in a vaccination series at the appropriate intervals. 
With some exceptions (e.g., oral typhoid vaccine), an interruption in 
the schedule does not require restarting of the entire series or the addi­
tion of extra doses.
Syncope may follow vaccination, especially in adolescents and 
young adults. Serious injuries, including skull fracture and cerebral 
hemorrhage, have occurred. Adolescents and adults should be seated 
or lying down during vaccination. The majority of reported syncope 
episodes after vaccination occur within 15 min. The CDC recommends 
that vaccine providers consider observing vaccine recipients, particu­
larly adolescents, with patients seated or lying down for 15 min after 
vaccination to decrease the risk of injury should they develop syncope. 
If syncope develops, patients should be observed until the symptoms 
resolve.
Anaphylaxis is a rare complication of vaccination. All facilities 
providing immunizations should have an emergency kit containing 
aqueous epinephrine for administration in the event of a systemic 
anaphylactic reaction.
■
■MAINTENANCE OF VACCINE RECORDS
All vaccines administered should be fully documented in the patient’s 
permanent medical record. Documentation should include the date 
of administration, the name or common abbreviation of the vaccine, 
the vaccine lot number and manufacturer, the administration site, the 
VIS edition, the date the VIS was provided, and the name, address, 
and title of the person who administered the vaccine. Increasing use 
Intramuscular
needle insertion
90°

of two-dimensional bar codes on vaccine vials and syringes that can be 
scanned for data entry into compatible electronic medical records and 
immunization information systems may facilitate more complete and 
accurate recording of required information.
■
■VACCINE SAFETY MONITORING AND ADVERSE 
EVENT REPORTING
Prelicensure Evaluations of Vaccine Safety 
Before vaccines 
are licensed by the FDA, they are evaluated in clinical trials with vol­
unteers. These trials are conducted in three progressive phases. Phase 
1 trials are small, usually involving <100 volunteers. Their purposes are 
to provide a basic evaluation of safety and to identify common adverse 
events. Phase 2 trials, which are larger and may involve several hundred 
participants, collect additional information on safety and are usually 
designed to evaluate immunogenicity as well. Data gained from phase 
2 trials can be used to determine the composition of the vaccine, the 
number of doses required, and a profile of common adverse events. 
Vaccines that appear promising are evaluated in phase 3 trials, which 
typically involve several hundred to several thousand volunteers and 
are generally designed to demonstrate vaccine efficacy and provide 
additional information on vaccine safety.
Postlicensure Monitoring of Vaccine Safety 
After licensure, 
a vaccine’s safety is assessed by several mechanisms. The NCVIA of 
1986 requires health care providers to report certain adverse events 
that follow vaccination. As a mechanism for that reporting, the Vaccine 
Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was established in 1990 and 
is jointly managed by the CDC and the FDA. This safety surveillance 
system collects reports of adverse events associated with vaccines cur­
rently approved or authorized in the United States. Adverse events are 
defined as untoward events that occur after immunization and that 
might be caused by the vaccine product or vaccination process. While 
the VAERS was established in response to the NCVIA, reporting of 
any adverse event following vaccination—whether in a child or an 
adult, and whether or not it is believed to have actually been caused 
by vaccination—is encouraged through the VAERS. The adverse 
events that health care providers are required to report are listed in the 
reportable-events table at vaers.hhs.gov/docs/VAERS_Table_of_Report­
able_Events_Following_Vaccination.pdf. The number of VAERS reports 
submitted varies each year. In 2019, VAERS received more than 48,000 
reports. Approximately 85–90% of the reports described mild side 
effects such as fever, arm soreness, or mild irritability; the remaining 
reports are classified as serious. However, a report to VAERS does not 
mean that a vaccine caused an adverse event.
Anyone can file a VAERS report, including health care providers, 
manufacturers, and vaccine recipients or their parents or guardians. 
VAERS reports may be submitted online or in paper form (vaers.hhs.
gov/reportevent.html); additional information can be obtained by email 
(info@vaers.org) or phone (800-822-7967). The VAERS form asks for 
the following information: the type of vaccine received; the timing of 
vaccination; the time of onset of the adverse event; and the recipient’s 
current illnesses or medications, history of adverse events following 
vaccination, and demographic characteristics (e.g., age and sex). This 
information is entered into a database. The individual who reported 
the adverse event then receives a confirmation letter by mail with a 
VAERS identification number that can be used if additional informa­
tion is submitted later. In selected cases of serious adverse reaction, the 
patient’s recovery status may be followed up at 60 days and 1 year after 
vaccination. The FDA and the CDC have access to VAERS data and 
use this information to monitor vaccine safety and conduct research 
studies. VAERS data (minus personal information) are also available 
to the public.
While the VAERS provides useful information on vaccine safety, 
this passive reporting system has important limitations. One is that 
events following vaccination are merely reported; the system cannot 
assess whether a given type of event occurs more often than expected 
after vaccination. A second is that event reporting is incomplete and 
is biased toward events that are believed to be more likely to be due to 
vaccination and that occur relatively soon after vaccination. To obtain 

more systematic information on adverse events occurring in both vac­
cinated and unvaccinated persons, the Vaccine Safety Datalink project 
was initiated in 1991. Directed by the CDC, this project includes 11 
managed-care organizations in the United States; member databases 
include information on immunizations, medical conditions, demo­
graphics, laboratory results, and medication prescriptions. In addition 
to these systems, CDC, FDA, and other federal partners use multiple 
other systems and data sources to conduct comprehensive vaccine 
safety monitoring, including CDC’s V-safe system, FDA’s Biologics 
Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) system, CMS’s Medicare claims data­
base, and the Department of Defense’s Vaccine Adverse Event Clinical 
System. In addition, postlicensure evaluations of vaccine safety may be 
conducted by the vaccine manufacturer. In fact, such evaluations are 
often required by the FDA as a condition of vaccine licensure.

■
■CONSUMER ACCESS TO AND DEMAND FOR 
IMMUNIZATION
By removing barriers to the consumer or patient, providers and health 
care institutions can improve vaccine use. Financial barriers have tra­
ditionally been important constraints. Fortunately, some progress has 
been made to mitigate out-of-pocket costs for vaccination of adults. 
The Affordable Care Act enacted in 2010 requires that most private 
insurance plans provide coverage for immunizations that appear on 
the approved immunization schedules without deductibles or copays 
when administered by an in-network provider. In addition, as of 2023, 
the Inflation Reduction Act eliminated out-of-pocket costs for ACIPrecommended vaccines for patients with Medicare prescription drug 
coverage and requires state Medicaid programs to cover and pay for 
ACIP-recommended adult vaccines without cost-sharing. However, 
barriers to vaccination remain for uninsured adults. A comprehensive 
Vaccines for Adults program to provide vaccines to uninsured adults 
has been proposed but has not yet been authorized for funding. To help 
ensure access to COVID-19 vaccines for uninsured and underinsured 
adults, CDC launched the Bridge Access Program for COVID-19 vaccines 
in 2023; this program ended in 2024.
CHAPTER 129
Immunization Principles and Vaccine Use 
In addition to removing financial barriers, other strategies that 
enhance patients’ access to vaccination include extended office hours 
(e.g., evening and weekend hours) and scheduled vaccination-only 
clinics where waiting times are reduced. In recent years, pharmacies 
have become an increasingly important venue for adult vaccination 
and have helped improve equitable access to vaccines, given that the 
majority of the adult population lives within 5 miles of a pharmacy. 
Other locations outside the “medical home” (e.g., through occupa­
tional clinics, universities, and retail settings) also can expand access 
for adults who do not make medical visits frequently.
Health promotion efforts aimed at increasing the demand for 
immunization are common. Direct-to-consumer advertising by phar­
maceutical companies has been used for some newer adolescent and 
adult vaccines. Efforts to raise consumer demand for vaccines have 
not increased immunization rates unless implemented in conjunction 
with other strategies that target strengthening of provider practices or 
reduction of consumer barriers. Attitudes and beliefs related to vacci­
nation can be considerable impediments to consumer demand. Many 
adults view vaccines as important for children but are less familiar 
with vaccinations targeting disease prevention in adults. Several vac­
cines are recommended for adults with certain medical risk factors, 
but self-identification as a high-risk individual is relatively rare. Com­
munication research suggests that adults are motivated to get vaccines 
to protect their own health and many would get vaccinated to protect 
loved ones. Adults with chronic conditions are more likely to be aware 
that they need to protect their own health.
■
■STRATEGIES FOR PROVIDERS AND HEALTH CARE 
FACILITIES
Recommendation from the Provider 
Health care providers can 
have great influence on patients with regard to immunization. Studies 
repeatedly show that a health care provider is the most trusted source 
of vaccine information, and patients who receive a strong vaccine rec­
ommendation from a provider are more likely to get vaccinated than