# 09 - 317 Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death

### 317 Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death

For pulmonary edema resulting from upper airway obstruction, 
recognition of the obstructing cause is key because treatment then 
is to relieve or bypass the obstruction.

■
■FURTHER READING
Alviar CL et al: For the ACC Critical Care Cardiology Working 
Group. Positive pressure ventilation in the cardiac intensive care unit. 
J Am Coll Cardiol 72:1532, 2018.
Amin AP et al: The evolving landscape of Impella use in the United States 
among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with 
mechanical circulatory support. Circulation 141:273, 2020.
Baran DA et al: SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 94:29, 2019.
Damluji AA et al: Mechanical complications of acute myocardial 
infarction. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 144:e16, 2021.
Dhruva SS et al: Association of use of intravascular microaxial left 
PART 8
Critical Care Medicine
ventricular assist device vs intra-aortic balloon pump on in-hospital 
mortality and major bleeding among patients with acute myocardial 
infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA 323:734, 2020.
Heidenreich PA et al: 2022 AHA/ACC/HFS guideline for the 
management of heart failure. Circulation 145:895, 2022.
Ingbar DH: Cardiogenic pulmonary edema: Mechanisms and 
treatment—An intensivists view. Curr Opin Crit Care 25:371, 2019.
Møller JE et al: Microaxial flow pump or standard care in infarctrelated cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 390:1382, 2024.
Naidu SS et al: SCAI SHOCK stage classification expert consensus 
update: A review and incorporation of validation studies. J Am Coll 
Cardiol 79:933, 2022.
Thiele H et al: Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction 
with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 367:1287, 2012.
Thiele H et al: PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 377:2419, 2017.
Thiele H et al: Percutaneous short-term active mechanical support 
devices in cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and collaborative 
meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 38:3523, 2017.
Thiele H et al: One-year outcomes after PCI strategies in cardiogenic 
shock. N Engl J Med 379:1699, 2018.
Thiele H et al: Management of cardiogenic shock complicating 
myocardial infarction: An update 2019. Eur Heart J 40:2671, 2019.
Thiele H et al: Extracorporeal life support in infarct-related cardiogenic 
shock. N Engl J Med 389:1286, 2023.
van Diepen S et al: Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: 
A scientific statement. Circulation 136:e232, 2017.
Zeymer U et al: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in 
patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock: An individual patient 
data meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 402:1338, 2023.
Christine M. Albert, William H. Sauer

Cardiovascular Collapse,  
Cardiac Arrest, and  
Sudden Cardiac Death
OVERVIEW AND DEFINITIONS 
(SEE TABLE 317-1)
Cardiovascular collapse is severe hypotension from acute cardiac dysfunction or loss of peripheral vasculature resistance resulting in cerebral 
hypoperfusion and loss of consciousness. This condition can be the 
result of a cardiac arrhythmia, severe myocardial or valvular dysfunction, loss of vascular tone, and/or acute disruption of venous return. 

When effective circulation is restored spontaneously, patients present 
with syncope (see Chap. 23). In the absence of spontaneous resolution, cardiac arrest occurs, ultimately resulting in death if resuscitation 
attempts are unsuccessful or not initiated. Underlying etiologies for 
cardiovascular collapse include benign conditions, such as neurocardiogenic syncope, but also life-threatening conditions including ventricular 
tachyarrhythmias, severe bradycardia, severely depressed myocardial 
contractility, as with massive acute myocardial infarction (MI) or pulmonary embolus, and other catastrophic events interfering with cardiac 
function such as myocardial rupture with cardiac tamponade or papillary muscle rupture with torrential mitral regurgitation.
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) refers to an abrupt loss of cardiac function resulting in complete cardiovascular collapse due either to an acute 
life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia or abrupt loss of myocardial pump 
function that requires emergency medical intervention for restoration of 
effective circulation. Most SCAs occur outside the hospital, and fewer than 
10% of these victims survive to be discharged from the hospital despite 
undergoing attempted resuscitation by emergency medical services (EMS). 
For those who die prior to hospital admission, a cardiovascular cause for 
the arrest is often presumed based upon the absence of evidence for a traumatic or other noncardiac cause at the time of the arrest. If the patient does 
not survive a SCA, the death is classified as a sudden cardiac death (SCD). 
Deaths that occur during hospitalization or within 30 days after resuscitated cardiac arrest are usually counted as SCDs in epidemiologic studies.
SCD also includes a broader category of unexplained rapid deaths 
thought to be due to cardiac causes where resuscitation was not 
attempted. In epidemiologic studies, SCD is usually defined as an unexpected death without obvious extracardiac cause that occurs in association with a witnessed rapid collapse or within 1 hour of symptom onset. 
This definition is based on the presumption that rapid deaths are often 
due to an arrhythmia, an assumption that cannot always be validated. 
Approximately half of all SCDs are not witnessed. In the United States, 
few deaths undergo autopsies, and noncardiac conditions that evolve 
rapidly such as acute cerebral hemorrhage, aortic rupture, and pulmonary embolism cannot be excluded without an autopsy. Therefore, 
definitive information necessary to establish the cause of death is usually not available. In unwitnessed cases, the definition is often further 
expanded to include unexpected deaths where the subject was documented to be well when last observed within the preceding 24 hours. 
This expanded definition further decreases the certainty that the death 
was due to an arrhythmia or other cardiac causes, and recent data suggest that noncardiac causes may comprise a larger than expected percentage of these unwitnessed sudden deaths. Most countries, including 
the United States, do not have national surveillance systems or reporting 
requirements for SCD; thus, the true incidence and frequency of SCD 
and its different mechanisms can only be estimated.
EPIDEMIOLOGY
■
■DEMOGRAPHICS
SCA and SCD are major public health problems that account for 15% of 
all deaths and comprise 50% of all cardiac deaths. In the United States 
alone, there are an estimated 350,000 EMS-attended out-of-hospital 
cardiac arrests and 210,000 SCDs in the adult population annually. The 
estimated societal burden of premature death due to SCD is 2 million 
years of potential life lost for men and 1.3 million years of potential 
life lost for women, which is greater than most other leading causes of 
death. Although cardiac pathology, particularly coronary heart disease 
(CHD), underlies the majority of SCDs, up to two-thirds of all SCDs 
occur as the first clinical expression of previously undiagnosed heart 
disease. SCD rates have declined but not as steeply as rates for CHD in 
general. Age, gender, race, and geographic region all influence the incidence of SCD. Rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are lower in Asia 
(52.5 per 100,000 person-years) than Europe (86.4 per 100,000 personyears), North America (98.1 per 100,000 person-years), and Australia 
(111.9 per 100,000 person-years), and also vary within geographic 
regions of the United States. SCD is rare in individuals younger than 35 
years of age (1–3 per 100,000 per year) and increases markedly with age 
as the incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF),

TABLE 317-1  Distinction Between Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Death
TERM
DEFINITION
QUALIFIERS
MECHANISMS
Cardiovascular collapse
Sudden loss of effective circulation due to cardiac 
and/or peripheral vascular factors that may reverse 
spontaneously (e.g., neurocardiogenic syncope 
transient hypotension) or require interventions (e.g., 
hypovolemia, tamponade, ventricular fibrillation).
Cardiac arrest
Abrupt cessation of cardiac function resulting in 
loss of effective circulation that may be reversible 
by prompt emergency medical intervention.
Sudden cardiac death
Sudden unexpected death attributed to cardiac 
arrest, which occurs within 1 hour of symptom 
onset.
and other predisposing conditions also increases. Although absolute 
SCD rates increase with age, the proportion of deaths that are due to 
SCD decreases as other causes of death increase.
Women have a lower incidence of SCD and SCA than men, and 
women are more likely to present with pulseless electrical activity 
(PEA) and to have their SCD occur at home as compared with men. 
Possibly related to these factors, the SCD rate has not declined as much 
for younger women compared to men in recent years. Black as opposed 
to white Americans have higher rates of SCD, are more likely to have 
unwitnessed arrests and to be found with PEA, and have lower rates of 
survival. Socioeconomic disparities, with resuscitation being less likely 
in low-income neighborhoods, are contributing factors but do not 
appear to account for the entirety of the elevated SCD rate in blacks. 
Alternatively, individuals of Hispanic ethnicity appear to have lower 
rates of SCD, despite having a higher prevalence of cardiac risk factors. 
It appears that the incidence of SCD may be relatively low among Asian 
populations as well, both within the United States and globally. These 
gender and racial differences in SCD/SCA incidence and survival are 
poorly understood and warrant further research.
■
■RISK FACTORS (SEE FIG. 317-1)
The presence of overt structural heart disease and/or certain types 
of inherited arrhythmia syndromes markedly elevates SCD risk 
(see Chaps. 261 and 262). Preexisting CHD and HF are the most 
prevalent predisposing cardiac conditions and are associated with a 
four- to tenfold increase in SCD risk. Correspondingly, SCD shares 
many of the same risk factors with CHD and heart failure (HF), 
including hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, and 
smoking. Diabetes is a particularly strong risk factor for SCD even 
in patients with established CHD. Hypertension and resultant left 
ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) appear to be particularly important 
markers of SCD risk in blacks, in whom the prevalence of these condi­
tions is greater. Smoking markedly elevates risk, and smoking cessation 
lowers risk particularly among individuals who have not yet developed 
overt CHD. Serum cholesterol appears to be more strongly related to 
SCD at younger ages, and the benefits of cholesterol lowering on SCD 
incidence have not been firmly established. There also appears to be 
a genetic component to SCD risk that is distinct from that associated 
with other manifestations of atherosclerosis. A history of SCD in a 
first-degree relative is associated with an increased risk for SCD, and 
with the occurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) during acute MI, 
but is not associated with an increased risk for acute MI. These data 
suggest that genetic factors may predispose to fatal ventricular arrhyth­
mia in the setting of ischemia, rather than to CHD in general.
Obstructive sleep apnea and seizure disorders are also associated 
with increased SCD risk; the underlying mechanism is not clear but 
may be due to hypoxia-induced cardiac arrest. Atrial fibrillation also 
appears to be associated with an increased risk of SCD, which is partly, 
but not entirely, accounted for by its association with underlying heart 
disease. Patients with chronic kidney disease are also at higher SCD 

Broad term that includes cardiac 
arrest as well as transient events that 
characteristically revert spontaneously 
presenting as syncope.
Same as cardiac arrest, plus 
neurocardiogenic syncope or other causes 
of transient loss of blood flow.
Rare spontaneous reversions; likelihood 
of successful intervention relates to 
mechanism of arrest, clinical setting, 
availability of emergency medical 
services, and prompt return of 
circulation.
Ventricular fibrillation, ventricular 
tachycardia, asystole, bradycardia, 
pulseless electrical activity, noncardiac 
mechanical factors (e.g., pulmonary 
embolism).
In unwitnessed cases, the definition is 
often expanded to include unexpected 
deaths where the subject was 
documented to be well within the 
preceding 24 hours.
Same as cardiac arrest.
CHAPTER 317
risk with annualized SCD rates approaching 5.5% in patients under­
going dialysis. Electrolyte shifts and LVH, which are common in this 
population, have been suggested to play a role. There are also potential 
dietary influences on SCD risk. Individuals with higher intakes of 
polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly n-3 fatty acids, and other 
components of a Mediterranean-style diet have lower SCD risks in 
observational studies, possibly due to antiarrhythmic effects of dietary 
components. Low levels of alcohol intake may be beneficial, but heavy 
intake (>3 drinks/day) appears to elevate risk.
Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death  
■
■PRECIPITATING FACTORS
SCD/SCA occurs with higher frequency at certain times, locations, 
and in association with certain activities and exposures. Although not 
consistently observed across all studies, there do appear to be circa­
dian variations in the incidence of SCD and cardiac arrest, with peaks 
in incidence in the morning hours and again in the later afternoon. 
There is also seasonal variability in SCD rates, which may be related to 
temperature and light exposure. Rates are highest during winter in the 
northern hemisphere and summer in the southern hemisphere. SCD 
rates also acutely peak during disasters such as earthquakes and terror­
ist attacks. SCA arrests are more likely to occur in certain locations as 
well, with notable clustering around train stations, airports, and other 
public places where there is significant population transit. SCD rates 
tend to be higher in urban areas, and individuals who live near major 
roadways are at elevated SCD risk. There is also a well-recognized 
acute elevation in SCD risk that occurs during or shortly after bouts 
of vigorous exertion, and men appear to be more susceptible. Habitual 
exercise and training lower this acute risk but do not eliminate it 
entirely. Exertion-associated SCDs are particularly tragic and highly 
publicized when they occur in highly trained athletes; however, the 
majority of such deaths actually occur in the general population. The 
common thread among these precipitating factors is likely heightened 
autonomic tone, which can promote ischemia and has direct proar­
rhythmia and electrophysiologic actions that lower the threshold for 
sustained VF.
CAUSES OF SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH
■
■UNDERLYING HEART DISEASE (FIG. 317-1)
Our understanding regarding the diseases that contribute to SCD 
is derived primarily from autopsy series and cardiac evaluations in 
cardiac arrest survivors, which are highly variable in level of detail. 
Despite the limitations of these data, it is generally accepted that 
sudden death due to cardiac causes is most commonly due to CAD, 
although the proportion with CAD varies markedly by age, race, and 
sex. It is estimated that ~70% of SCDs in white men are due to CAD, 
as compared with only 40–50% in women and blacks. The proportion 
of SCDs with underlying CAD may be even lower in Asian ethnicities. 
Recent data suggest that the proportion of SCDs with CAD on autopsy 
may be declining in some parts of Europe and the United States, and,

Idiopathic
VF/Others
Valvular heart disease
1–5%
Inherited arrhythmia
syndrome
(LQTS, BrS, CPVT, ERS, etc.)
1–2% in Western countries
10% in Asia
Myocardial Substrates:
Myocardial scar
Hypertrophy
Fibrosis
Myocardial stretch
Electrical heterogeneity
Ion channel functional modification
Abnormal calcium handling
Sudden Cardiac Death
Causes
Cardiomyopathies
(NIDCM, HCM, ARVC, etc.)
10–15% in Western countries
30–35% in Asia
PART 8
Critical Care Medicine
Population‐Based Risk Factors
Male sex
Black race
Diabetes
Current smoking
Hypertension
Chronic kidney disease
ECG features (QT, QRS prolongation, early repolarization, LVH)
Family history of SCD (genetics)
Diet low in N-3 PUFA
Atrial fibrillation
Obstructive sleep apnea
Heavy alcohol intake
Low magnesium levels
A
CPVT, LQTS

HCM, ARVC
Age of SCD onset
NIDCM
BrS, ERS
B
FIGURE 317-1  A. Proportionate causes, substrates, risk factors, and triggers of sudden cardiac death (SCD). B. Variation of causes by age of onset. ARVC, arrhythmogenic 
right ventricular cardiomyopathy; BrS, Brugada syndrome; CPVT, catecholaminergic ventricular tachycardia; ECG, electrocardiogram; ERS, early repolarization syndrome; 
HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LQTS, long QT syndrome; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; NICDM, nonischemic cardiomyopathy; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; 
SCD, sudden cardiac death; VF, ventricular fibrillation. (Reproduced with permission from M Hayashi et al: The spectrum of epidemiology underlying sudden cardiac death. 
Circ Res 116:1887, 2015.)
at the same time, increasing in parts of Japan and other parts of Asia. 
Beyond CAD, nonischemic cardiomyopathies (hypertrophic, dilated, 
and infiltrative) are the second most frequent cause of SCD in the 
United States and European countries. Other less common causes 
include valvular heart disease, myocarditis, myocardial hypertrophy 
(often from hypertension), and rare primary electrical heart diseases 
such as long QT and Brugada syndromes. On average, 5–10% of SCA 
victims do not have a significant cardiac abnormality at the time of 
autopsy or after extensive premortem cardiac evaluation, and this also 
varies by gender and race. Before 35 years of age, atherosclerotic CAD 
accounts for a much smaller proportion of deaths, with hypertrophic 
cardiomyopathy (HCM), coronary artery anomalies, myocarditis, 
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and primary ion 
channelopathies accounting for a significant number of these deaths.
■
■CARDIAC RHYTHMS AND SUDDEN DEATH
The initial rhythm found when EMS arrive at the scene of an out-ofhospital cardiac arrest is an important indication of the potential cause 
of the arrest and of the prognosis. In the early days of EMS systems, 
over half of victims were found in VF, giving rise to the hypothesis that 
ischemic VF or ventricular tachycardia (VT) degenerating to VF was 
the most common event. The proportion of cardiac arrests found in VF 
has decreased markedly since the 1970s, to only 20–25% in more recent 
studies, and PEA and asystole are now the most common scenarios. 
However, the vast majority of cardiac arrests are not monitored at the 
time of collapse, and since arrhythmias are inherently unstable once 
hemodynamic collapse occurs, the rhythm at the time of EMS arrival 

Coronary heart disease ~ 40–70%
White Men: 70%
Women and Black Men 40–50%
Asians < 40%
Triggers
Heart failure/Stretch
Ischemia
Myocardial inflammation
Vigorous exertion
Electrolyte abnormality
Environmental stress
Psychological stress/Depression
Coronary Heart Disease
Valvular Heart Disease
may not reflect the rhythm that initially precipitated the SCA because 
VF and primary bradycardias can degenerate into asystole. Nonethe­
less, VF as an initial rhythm still predominates in public locations or 
in other situations when there is a short time frame between witnessed 
arrest and arrival of EMS, suggesting that VF remains a common 
initial precipitating rhythm. However, there are also data to support 
an absolute decrease in VF incidence. Proposed explanations include 
decreases in underlying CHD incidence, increased use of beta blockers 
in CHD, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) in high-risk 
patients. There also appears to be an increase in PEA incidence over the 
past several years, suggesting that the proportion of SCD due to abrupt 
hemodynamic collapse in the absence of preceding fatal arrhythmia 
may be increasing. Proposed explanations for these proportional 
changes in PEA versus VF include the aging of the population and the 
increased prevalence of end-stage cardiovascular disease and other 
severe comorbidities. These older, sicker patients may be more likely to 
have arrests in the home and to have acute precipitants leading to PEA 
(i.e., respiratory, metabolic, vascular) and/or be less likely to sustain VF 
up to the point of EMS arrival.
■
■DISEASE-SPECIFIC MECHANISMS
CAD can cause SCD through several mechanisms (Table 317-2). The 
most common cause is acute MI or transient myocardial ischemia that 
leads to polymorphic VT and VF (see Chap. 262). Other primary 
mechanisms include severe bradyarrhythmias such as heart block with 
a slow escape rhythm, or PEA due to a massive MI or associated myo­
cardial rupture. Areas of ventricular scar from prior infarcts increase

TABLE 317-2  Causes of Cardiovascular Collapse and Sudden Cardiac Arrest
CAUSE
PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC SUBSTRATE
RHYTHM PRESENTATION
Cardiac Causes
 
 
Coronary artery disease
  Atherosclerotic, coronary spasm, congenital anomalies
Acute myocardial ischemia/infarction, ventricular rupture, 
tamponade
Ventricular scar from healed infarction
Cardiomyopathies
  Dilated, hypertrophic, ARVC, infiltrative disease, valvular 
Ventricular scar
Ventricular hypertrophy
Pump failure
disease with LV failure
Congenital heart disease
  (Tetralogy of Fallot, VSD, others)
Ventricular scar from surgical repair
Hypertrophy
Aortic stenosis
Obstruction to aortic outflow
Ventricular hypertrophy
Mitral valve prolapse/mitral regurgitation
Pump failure
Ventricular scar
Arrhythmia syndromes without structural heart disease:
  Genetic:
    Long QT
    Brugada
    CPVT
  Idiopathic VF, early repolarization
  Drug toxicities (acquired long QT, others)
  Electrolyte abnormalities (severe hypokalemia)
Abnormal cellular electrophysiology
Polymorphic VT/VF
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
Accessory atrioventricular connection
Pre-excited AF/VF
Commotio cordis
Blunt precordial impact
Polymorphic VT/VF
Noncardiac Causes of Cardiovascular Collapse
  Pulmonary embolism
 
PEA
  Stroke
 
PEA, bradyarrhythmia
  Aortic dissection
 
PEA, VF
  Exsanguination/hypovolemia
 
PEA
  Tension pneumothorax
 
PEA
  Sepsis
 
PEA
  Neurogenic
 
PEA, bradyarrhythmia
  Drug overdose
 
PEA, bradyarrhythmia
Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; ARVC, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; CPVT, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia; LV, left ventricle; 
PEA, pulseless electrical activity; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VSD, ventricular septal defect; VT, ventricular tachycardia.
the predisposition to reentrant VT, which often degenerates to VF. 
Once patients have suffered an MI, their risk of SCD elevates up to 
10-fold, with the highest absolute rates in the first 30 days after MI. The 
mechanisms underlying SCD vary at different time points after MI, 
with nonarrhythmic causes such as myocardial rupture and/or exten­
sive reinfarction predominating early, within the first 1–2 months, and 
ischemic polymorphic VT and/or scar-related ventricular arrhythmias 
prevailing later. VT and sudden death can, and often do, occur years 
after an initial MI.
Cardiomyopathies and Other Forms of Structural Heart 
Disease 
Scar-mediated reentrant VT can also occur in a host of 
nonischemic cardiomyopathies in which replacement fibrosis and/or 
inflammatory ventricular infiltrates occur (Chap. 261). In congenital 
heart disease, surgical scars created during corrective surgery, such as 
those performed to correct ventricular septal defects in tetralogy of 
Fallot, can also serve as the substrate for ventricular reentry. Other 
common predisposing processes such as LVH, ventricular stretch due 
to fluid overload, and cardiomyocyte dysfunction can result in electri­
cal heterogeneity and other electrophysiologic changes that predispose 

Polymorphic VT/VF
Bradyarrhythmia
Pulseless electrical activity
VT
VF
VT
Polymorphic VT/VF
Pulseless electrical activity
Bradyarrhythmia
VT
Bradyarrhythmias
Polymorphic VT/VF
CHAPTER 317
Bradyarrhythmia
Pulseless electrical activity
Bradyarrhythmia
Polymorphic VT/VF
Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death  
Polymorphic VT/VF
to ventricular arrhythmias, including ion channel alterations that 
prolong action potential duration, impair cellular calcium handling, 
and diminish cellular coupling. These processes occur in a wide vari­
ety of diseases associated with depressed ventricular function and/or 
hypertrophy, including CAD, valvular heart disease, myocarditis, and 
nonischemic cardiomyopathies.
Absence of Structural Heart Disease 
In the absence of structural 
heart disease, VF can be due to an inherited ion channel abnormality, 
as in long QT and Brugada syndromes (Chap. 262), rapid atrial fibrilla­
tion associated with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (Chap. 256), or 
drug toxicities, such as polymorphic VT due to drugs that prolong the 
QT interval (Chap. 263). Blunt, nonpenetrating precordial impact over 
the (left) chest wall can lead to commotio cordis and is a rare cause of 
SCD in otherwise healthy individuals. PEA can result from pulmonary 
emboli, exsanguination, or the terminal phase of respiratory arrest.
MANAGEMENT OF CARDIAC ARREST
As the ability to predict SCA in the population is very limited, com­
munity approaches to reduce death focus on the rapid identification 
of victims and implementation of resuscitation measures by those

who first encounter the victim, most likely the lay public, who ide­
ally summon EMS and initiate basic life-support measures with chest 
compressions. The approach is codified in the “out-of-hospital chain 
of survival,” which includes: (1) initial evaluation and recognition of 
the SCA and activation of the emergency response system; (2) rapid 
initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with an emphasis 
on chest compressions; (3) defibrillation as quickly as possible usually 
with an automatic external defibrillation applied by the lay rescuer or 
emergency medical technician (EMT); (4) advanced life support; (5) 
postcardiac arrest care; and (6) recovery from cardiac arrest. There 
have been major advances in each of these areas, and survival rates 
to hospital discharge for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have increased, 
particularly for patients found in VT or VF, where survival rates can 
approach 30% in some regions. Overall survival rates for out-of-hospital 
cardiac arrest are also higher for patients receiving CPR, with recent 
studies in Europe reporting survival rates of 16%. Multiple studies have 
pointed to socioeconomic disparities in the administration of CPR and 
application of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) contributing to 
reduced survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in black and 
Hispanic populations in the United States.

PART 8
Critical Care Medicine
The initial goal of resuscitation is to achieve the return of spon­
taneous circulation (ROSC). Success is strongly related to the time 
between collapse and initiation of resuscitation, decreasing markedly 
after 5 min, and the rhythm at the time of EMT arrival, being best for 
VT, worse for VF, and poor for PEA and asystole. Outcomes are also 
determined by the age, clinical state, and comorbidities of the victim 
prior to the arrest.
■
■INITIAL EVALUATION AND INITIATION OF CPR
The rescuer should check for a response from the victim, shout for help, 
and call or ask someone else to call their local emergency number (e.g., 
911), ideally on a cell phone that can be placed on speaker mode at the 
patient’s side such that the responding dispatcher can provide instruc­
tions and queries to the rescuer. Consideration of aspiration or airway 
obstruction is important, and if suspected, a Heimlich maneuver may 
dislodge the obstructing body. A trained health care provider would 
also check for a pulse (taking no longer than 10 seconds so as not to 
delay initiation of chest compressions) and assess breathing. Gasping 
respirations and brief seizure activity are common during SCA and 
may be misinterpreted as breathing and responsiveness. Chest com­
pressions should be initiated without delay and administered at a rate 
of 100–120/min depressing the sternum by 5 cm (2 in.) and allowing 
full chest recoil between compressions. Chest compressions generate 
forward cardiac output with sequential filling and emptying of the car­
diac chambers, with competent valves maintaining forward direction 
of flow. Interruption of chest compressions should be minimized to 
reduce end-organ ischemia. Ventilation may be administered with two 
breaths for every 30 compressions if a trained rescuer is present, but for 
lay rescuers without training, chest compressions alone (“hands-only 
CPR”) are more likely to be effectively applied and of similar benefit. 
If a second rescuer is present, they should be sent to seek out an AED, 
which are now widely available in many public areas.
■
■RHYTHM-BASED MANAGEMENT (SEE FIG. 317-2)
The rapidity with which defibrillation/cardioversion is achieved is an 
important predictor of outcome. A defibrillator, most often an AED, 
should be applied as soon as available. AEDs are easily used by lay res­
cuers and trained first responders, such as police officers and trained 
security guards. When the arrest is witnessed, the use of AEDs by lay 
responders can improve cardiac arrest survival rates. Once patches are 
applied to the chest, a brief pause in chest compressions is required 
to allow the AED to record the rhythm. An AED will advise delivery 
of a shock if the recorded rhythm meets criteria for VF or VT. Chest 
compressions are continued while the defibrillator is being charged. 
As soon as a diagnosis of VF or VT is established, a 200-J biphasic 
waveform shock should be delivered. Chest compressions are resumed 
immediately and continue for 2 min until the next rhythm check. If 
VT/VF is still present, a second maximal energy shock is delivered. 
This sequence is continued until personnel to administer advanced life 

support are available or ROSC is achieved. Electrocardiogram (ECG) 
rhythm strips produced by the AED should be retrieved, as the initial 
rhythm can be an important consideration in determining the cause of 
the arrest and to guide further therapy and evaluation if resuscitation 
is successful.
When advanced cardiac life support is available, an intravenous line 
is established for administration of medication and consideration given 
to placement of an advanced airway (endotracheal tube or supraglottic 
airway device). Intraosseous access may be considered if attempts at 
intravenous access are not successful or are not feasible. Epinephrine 
1 mg every 3–5 min may be administered intravenously or intraos­
seously. If circulation is not restored or the patient is less than fully 
conscious despite return of circulation, confirmation that acidosis 
and hypoxia are adequately addressed should be assessed with arte­
rial blood gas analysis. If metabolic acidosis persists after successful 
defibrillation and with adequate ventilation, 1 mEq/kg NaHCO3 may 
be administered.
The cardiac rhythm guides resuscitation when monitoring is avail­
able. VT is treated with external shocks synchronized to the QRS when 
VT is monomorphic, and asynchronous shocks for polymorphic VT or 
VF. If VT/VF recurs after one or more shocks, amiodarone 300 mg can 
be administered as a bolus via intravenous or intraosseous route in the 
hope that arrhythmia recurrence will be prevented after the next shock, 
followed by a 150-mg bolus if the arrhythmia recurs. If amiodarone 
fails, lidocaine can be administered.
Consideration of etiology should also guide therapy (Chaps. 261 
and 262). Commonly encountered causes of recurrent VT/VF may be 
due to ongoing myocardial ischemia or infarction that would benefit 
from emergent coronary angiography and revascularization, or QT 
prolongation causing the polymorphic VT torsades des pointes that 
may respond to administration of magnesium. Hyperkalemia should 
respond to administration of calcium, while other measures are imple­
mented to reduce serum potassium.
PEA/asystole should be managed with CPR, ventilation, and admin­
istration of epinephrine. Causes of PEA/asystole that require specific 
therapy should be considered including airway obstruction, hypoxia, 
hypovolemia, acidosis, hyperkalemia, hypothermia, toxins, cardiac 
tamponade, tension pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism, and MI. 
Naloxone should be administered if opiate overdose is suspected.
■
■POSTCARDIAC ARREST ACUTE MANAGEMENT
Following restoration of effective circulation, the possibility of acute 
MI should be immediately assessed. The majority of patients who have 
ST elevation consistent with acute MI will be found to have a culprit 
coronary stenosis/occlusion and emergent coronary angiography with 
percutaneous angioplasty, and stenting is recommended. Emergent 
angiography may also be considered if cardiogenic shock, electrical 
instability, signs of significant myocardial damage, or ongoing isch­
emia is present. Emergent or early angiography has not been found to 
result in better outcomes compared to delayed angiography in patients 
presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to a VT/VF with 
no ECG evidence of ST-segment elevation. Thus, decisions regard­
ing which patients without ST-segment elevation should undergo 
urgent angiography are complex, and factors such as hemodynamic or 
electrical instability and evidence of ongoing ischemia are taken into 
consideration.
Hemodynamic instability is often present following resuscitation, 
and further ischemic end-organ damage is a major consideration. 
Optimizing ventilation with consideration of acidosis, hypoxemia, 
and electrolyte abnormalities is important. Maintaining systolic blood 
pressure at >90 mmHg and mean blood pressure >65 mmHg is desir­
able and may require administration of vasopressors and adjustment 
of volume status. Potentially treatable reversible causes, including 
hyperkalemia, severe hypokalemia, and drug toxicity with QT prolon­
gation causing torsades des pointes, should be identified and treated 
(Chap. 262).
After stable spontaneous circulation is achieved, brain injury due 
to ischemia and reperfusion is a major determinant of survival and 
accounts for over two-thirds of deaths. The probability of successful

Ventricular Fibrillation or Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia
Chest compressions at 100–120/min
Immediate defibrillation
and resume CPR for 2 min
2 min of chest compressions/ventilation and repeat shock
Continue chest compressions, I.V. or I.O. access, advanced airway
Epinephrine 1 mg q 3–5 min
Repeat shock
I.V. amiodarone 300 mg (may repeat 150 mg), continue CPR
Repeat shock
Monomorphic
VT
Polymorphic VT/VF
Acute coronary syndrome:
lidocaine, PCI
Acquired long QT: Mg,
transvenous pacing,
isoproterenol.
Brugada syndrome, idiopathic
VF: isoporterenol, quinidine.
lidocaine
procainamide
A
Bradyarrhythmia/Asystole
Pulseless Electrical Activity
CPR, intubate, I.V. access
[Assess pulse]
[Confirm asystole]
Identify and treat reversible causes
* Hypoxia
* Hyper-/hypokalemia
* Severe acidosis
* Drug overdose
* Hypothermia
Epinephrine  — 1 mg I.V. {repeat 3–5 min}
For Bradycardia:
Atropine 1 mg I.V.
Pacing — external or pacing wire
B
FIGURE 317-2  Algorithm for approach to cardiac arrest due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF; shockable rhythm). A. Chest compressions with 
ventilation and defibrillation or cardioversion should be initiated as soon as possible. Defibrillation should be repeated with minimal interruption of chest compressions. 
Once an intravenous or intraosseous access is established, administration of epinephrine defibrillation and amiodarone and defibrillation are performed. Further therapy 
can be guided by possible causes as suggested by the initial or recurrent cardiac rhythm as shown. CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; I.O., intraosseous; I.V., intravenous; 
PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation. B. Algorithm for approach to cardiac arrest due to bradyarrhythmias/asystole and 
pulseless electrical activity. Chest compressions with ventilation (and intubation) should be initiated as soon as possible, and intravenous access should be obtained. Once 
an intravenous or intraosseous access is established, administration of epinephrine is performed. At the same time, an investigation for potential reversible causes should 
be made and any such causes should be treated if present. For bradycardic rhythms, atropine 1 mg administered intravenously and external subcutaneous or transvenous 
pacing are also performed. Defibrillation should be repeated with minimal interruption of chest compressions. Further therapy can be guided by possible causes. CPR, 
cardiopulmonary resuscitation; I.O., intraosseous; I.V., intravenous; M.I., myocardial infarction.

No ROSC
No ROSC
No ROSC
CHAPTER 317
Specific therapies
Sinusoidal VT
Pulseless electrical
activity
Asystole
Hyperkalemia:
Ca, NaHCO3.
Acute coronary
syndrome
Drug toxicity
Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death  
* Pulmonary embolus
* Drug overdose
* Hyperkalemia
* Severeacidosis
* Massive acute M.I.
* Hypovolemia
* Hypoxia
* Tamponade
* Pneumothorax
* Hypothermia

neurologic recovery decreases rapidly with time from collapse to ROSC 
and is <30% at 5 min in the absence of bystander CPR. The time 
between collapse and restoration of circulation is generally imprecise, 
and some patients have a period of hypotensive VT prior to complete 
collapse, such that a reported long period before the arrival of rescu­
ers does not always preclude good neurologic recovery. Therapeutic 
hypothermia (targeted temperature management) has been shown to 
improve the likelihood of survival and neurologic recovery in patients 
who present with shockable (VT or VF) rhythms and is recom­
mended for all cardiac arrest patients who remain comatose, regard­
less of presenting rhythm, who have lack of purposeful response to 
verbal commands following ROSC. A constant target temperature of 
32–37.5°C for at least 24 h is recommended, although a recent trial 
failed to demonstrate benefit compared with a strategy of targeted 
normothermia with early and aggressive treatment of fever. Shivering 
suppression with analgesics and sedatives may be needed. Induction of 
hypothermia should be started in the hospital, as no benefit was shown 
for implementation before hospital arrival, and administration of large 
volumes of cold saline for this purpose increased the risk of pulmonary 
edema. Brain injury is often accompanied by seizures and status epi­
lepticus that may have further deleterious effects, warranting periodic 
or continuous electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. Treatment 
of clinically apparent seizures is indicated and may also be reasonable 
in those with EEG patterns on the ictal-interictal continuum on moni­
toring. Several other therapies hoped to improve postarrest outcomes 
have been assessed but have not been shown to be beneficial, including 
administration of corticosteroids, hemofiltration, and efforts to tightly 
control blood glucose.

PART 8
Critical Care Medicine
Hypothermia and sedation preclude reliable prognostication for 
neurologic recovery. Functional neurologic assessment for neurologic 
recovery is generally deferred for at least 72 hours after return to nor­
mothermia, typically 4–5 days after the cardiac arrest. Features that 
predict poor outcome include the absence of pupillary reflex to light, 
status myoclonus, absence of EEG reactivity to external stimuli, and 
persistent burst suppression on EEG.
■
■LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT AFTER SURVIVAL OF 
OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST
For patients who survive cardiac arrest and have neurologic recovery, 
the likely underlying cause of the arrest guides further treatment. For 
arrests not due to an obvious noncardiac cause, a full evaluation for the 
forms of structural heart disease outlined in Fig. 317-1 and Table 317-2 
should be performed including an assessment for underlying CAD and 
ischemia as well as echocardiography and/or cardiac magnetic reso­
nance imaging (MRI) to look for evidence of prior MI, valvular disease, 
and nonischemic cardiomyopathies, and to provide an assessment of 
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). If the initial evaluation is not 
definitive or is suggestive of an inflammatory cardiomyopathy (i.e., 
sarcoidosis, myocarditis), a cardiac positron emission tomography 
(PET) scan and/or endomyocardial biopsy may also be performed. 
Patients without obvious structural abnormalities should undergo 
an evaluation for primary electrical disease (long QT syndrome 
[LQTS], Brugada syndrome, early repolarization syndrome, or WolffParkinson-White syndrome). In cases where a heritable syndrome is 
suspected, further genetic evaluation should be considered. Diagnostic 
electrophysiology studies are warranted in selected patients to assess 
inducible arrhythmias, or provocative testing, such as with epinephrine 
challenge for LQTS, or sodium channel blocker (e.g., procainamide) 
challenge for Brugada syndrome.
Patients with shockable rhythms at arrest (VF and VT) that are 
not deemed to have been due to a transient reversible cause and have 
reasonable life expectancy should undergo insertion of an ICD for sec­
ondary prevention of SCA/SCD. Most of these patients will be found 
to have CAD. Patients with a VF arrest that occurs within the first 48 h 
of a documented acute MI generally do not require an ICD because 
they have a similar risk of sudden death over the next 5 years as infarct 
survivors who did not have a cardiac arrest. However, patients who 
have a large infarction with acutely depressed LVEF (e.g., <35%) have 
an increased risk for future development of life-threatening ventricular 

arrhythmias related to reentry in the infarct scar (Chap. 259). The 
percentage of patients with such large infarcts has been declining due 
to improved revascularization strategies for acute MI. Implantation 
of an ICD early after MI in these patients does not, however, improve 
overall survival, in part because a significant number of sudden deaths 
in the first 3 months are due to recurrent myocardial ischemia or 
myocardial rupture, rather than cardiac arrhythmias. For patients 
with large infarcts, a wearable defibrillator that will treat VT/VF if it 
occurs may be used while left ventricular remodeling is taking place, 
followed by reevaluation of arrhythmia risk after the infarct is healed 
to determine if an ICD is warranted. Patients who experience VF in 
the hospital >48 h after MI or in the setting of myocardial ischemia 
without infarction may be at risk for recurrent VT/VF. These patients 
should be evaluated and optimally treated for ischemia. If there is evi­
dence that clearly implicates ischemia immediately preceding the onset 
of VF without evidence of a prior MI, coronary revascularization may 
be adequate therapy. Others may warrant ICD implantation. When 
the cardiac arrest is due to sustained monomorphic VT, a prior infarct 
scar is often present, and the recurrence rate is significant regardless of 
whether the arrest occurred in association with elevated serum tropo­
nin. In this circumstance, even when revascularization is performed for 
ischemia, an ICD is usually warranted owing to the risk of recurrence 
of scar-related VT.
Patients who have cardiac arrest due to a treatable reversible cause, 
such as hyperkalemia or drug toxicity with QT prolongation causing 
torsades des pointes (Chap. 262), which can be adequately addressed 
and prevented by other means, do not usually need an ICD. An ICD 
is usually recommended for cardiac arrest due to VT or VF without 
a clearly reversible cause, particularly when structural heart disease, 
such as hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic 
cardiomyopathy, cardiac sarcoidosis, or a cardiac syndrome associated 
with sudden death, including Brugada syndrome, or LQTS is present 
(Chaps. 261 and 262). In patients with structural heart disease, it is 
important to recognize that life-threatening arrhythmias can be an 
indication of terminal, end-stage heart disease with minimal prospect 
for meaningful survival despite successful resuscitation, and ICDs will 
not alter the course of these patients and should not be implanted in 
this situation unless there is a prospect for cardiac replacement therapy 
with future cardiac transplantation or a ventricular assist device.
Finally, the psychological needs of both the SCA survivor and family 
members need to be assessed and addressed. Comprehensive rehabili­
tation and treatment plans for physical, neurologic, cardiopulmonary, 
and cognitive impairments of the SCA survivor should be formulated 
before hospital discharge.
PREVENTION OF SCD
Although advances in CPR and postresuscitation care have improved 
survival rates after cardiac arrest, 90% of patients will not survive to be 
discharged from the hospital. Of those who do survive, a proportion 
(~20%) are left with severe neurologic and/or physical disability. The 
majority of cardiac arrests do not occur in public places where AEDs 
and rapid defibrillation have the greatest impact. Patients who suffer 
an arrest at home also have longer EMS response times and are much 
less likely to be found in VF. Finally, 50% of cardiac arrests are not 
witnessed, precluding effective resuscitation efforts. Thus, preventive 
efforts are critical to reducing mortality from cardiac arrest.
■
■SCD RISK STRATIFICATION
The presence of overt structural heart disease and/or primary electri­
cal heart disease is associated with an increased risk of SCD that var­
ies with the severity and type of disease. For patients with structural 
heart disease, depressed left ventricular function is the best validated 
marker for risk, and clinical HF elevates risk further. After MI, SCD 
risk increases gradually as the LVEF decreases to 40% and then 
exponentially thereafter. In addition to LVEF and congestive heart 
failure, other potential markers of increased SCD risk in the setting 
of structural heart disease include unexplained syncope, sustained VT 
induced at electrophysiologic study (EP study), left ventricular scar size 
and heterogeneity on cardiac magnetic resonance, markers of altered

autonomic function and altered repolarization, and QRS prolonga­
tion. The majority of these tests, with the exception of the EP study 
in post-MI patients, broadly predict death from cardiovascular causes 
and are not able to discriminate between patients who will die suddenly 
from an arrhythmia and those who will die of other cardiac causes. 
For example, patients with the greatest degree of systolic HF and/or 
lowest LVEF, although at elevated risk for SCD, are more likely to die 
from pump failure. Although sustained VT at EP study does identify 
individuals at a higher risk of SCA versus non-SCA in certain subsets 
of patients, the sensitivity of the test is generally inadequate when LV 
function is significantly reduced.
■
■PREVENTIVE THERAPIES FOR SCD IN 

HIGH-RISK POPULATIONS
Therapy with beta-adrenergic blockers has been demonstrated to 
reduce SCD risk in a multitude of settings, including after MI, among 
patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and in 
TABLE 317-3  Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Indications
 
ESC GUIDELINES
Secondary Prevention
All Disease States with VT or VF
 
 
 
Cardiac arrest due to VF or hemodynamically unstable sustained VT after evaluation to define the cause of the 
event and to exclude any completely reversible causes
Structural heart disease and spontaneous hemodynamically stable sustained VT
Class IIa
Class I
B
Structural heart disease and spontaneous hemodynamically not-tolerated sustained VT
Class I
Class I
B
Sustained VT and normal or near-normal ventricular function
–
Class IIa
C
Syncope
 
 
 
Patients with syncope and inducible VT or VF at EP study
–
Class I
B
Patients with syncope and structural heart disease in whom invasive and noninvasive studies have failed to 
determine a cause
Primary Prevention
Coronary Artery Disease
LVEF ≤35% + NYHA functional class II–III
Class I
Class I
A
LVEF ≤35% (ESC) + NYHA functional class I
Class IIa
–
B
LVEF ≤30% (AHA) + NYHA functional class I
–
Class I
A
LVEF ≤40% + NSVT + inducible monomorphic VT
Class IIa
Class I
B
LVEF ≤40% + unexplained syncope + inducible monomorphic VT
Class IIa
Class I
B
Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy
LVEF ≤35% + NYHA functional class II–II
Class IIa
Class I
A
LVEF ≤35% + NYHA functional class I
–
Class IIb
B
Pathogenic mutation in LMNA gene + 2 or more risk factors (NSVT, LVEF <45%, nonmissense mutation, male sex)
–
Class IIa
C
LMNA mutation with estimated 5-year risk of VA ≥10% + NSVT or LVEF <50% or AV conduction delay
Class IIa
–
C
LVEF >35% and ≥ 2 risk factors (syncope, LGE on CMR, inducible VT at PES, pathogenic mutations in PLN, FLNC, 
and RBM20 genes)
NYHA Functional Class IV Candidates for Advanced Heart Failure Therapy
 
 
 
Awaiting cardiac transplant
Class IIa
Class IIa
C
With destination LVAD and sustained VT
Class IIa
–
B
With destination LVAD
–
Class IIa
B
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
Arrhythmic syncope
Class IIa
Class IIa
B
Moderate right (<40%) or left (<45%) ventricular dysfunction and NSVT or inducible monomorphic VT
Class IIa
–
C
Significant right ventricular dysfunction with LVEF ≤35%
–
Class I
B
Significant right ventricular dysfunction with RVEF ≤35%
Class IIa
Class I
C
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
 
Maximum left ventricular wall thickness >30 mm
–
Class IIa
B
SCD in first-degree relative presumably due to HCM
–
Class IIa
B
Unexplained syncope
–
Class IIa
B
NSVT or abnormal blood pressure response during exercise + additional SCD risk modifiers or high-risk 
features

LQTS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, aldosterone antago­
nists, and more recently angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors 
and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been 
associated with reductions in SCD in subsets of patients with structural 
heart disease, primarily ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy 
accompanied by HF. Coronary artery bypass grafting has also been 
associated with reductions in SCD risk, and revascularization may 
lower SCD risk through reduction in ischemic events and resultant 
improvements in left ventricular systolic function by reducing areas of 
hibernating myocardium.

For patients whose disease continues to confer a substantial risk 
of sustained VT or VF on optimal medical therapy, an ICD is rec­
ommended (Table 317-3). The ICD indication in these patients is 
referred to as “primary prevention of sudden death.” The indications 
for primary prevention ICDs vary depending on the type of underlying 
structural heart disease and its severity, and the strength of evidence 
varies by indication. In some cases, there are slight differences in the 
CHAPTER 317
AHA/ACC/HRS 
GUIDELINES
LEVEL OF 
EVIDENCE
Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death  
Class I
Class I
A
–
Class IIb
C
Class IIa
–
C
–
Class IIa
C
(Continued)

TABLE 317-3  Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Indications
 
ESC GUIDELINES
NSVT or abnormal blood pressure response during exercise without additional SCD risk modifiers or high-risk 
features
Estimated 5-year risk of sudden death based on the HCM Risk–SCD Calculator ≥6%
Class IIa
–
B
Estimated 5-year risk of sudden death based on HCM Risk–SCD Calculator (≥4 to <6%) AND
Class IIa
–
B
  Significant LGE on CMR or
 
 
 
  LVEF <50% or
 
 
 
  Abnormal blood pressure during exercise test or
 
 
 
  Left ventricular apical aneurysm or
 
 
 
  Presence of sarcomeric pathogenic mutation
 
 
 
Estimated 5-year risk of sudden death based on the HCM Risk–SCD Calculator ≥4 to <6%
Class IIb
–
B
Estimated 5-year risk of sudden death based on the HCM Risk–SCD Calculator <4% AND
Class IIb
–
B
  Significant LGE on CMR or
 
 
 
PART 8
Critical Care Medicine
  LVEF <50% or
 
 
 
  Left ventricular apical aneurysm
 
 
 
Congenital Long QT Syndrome
 
Symptomatic high-risk patients + ineffectiveness or intolerance of β-blocker therapy (high risk: QTc >500 ms, 
genotypes LQTS 2 and LQTS 3, LQTS 2 females, age <40 years, onset of symptoms <10 years, recurrent 
syncope)
Unexplained syncope during β-blocker and genotype-specific therapy
Class I
–
B
Symptomatic patients + intolerance or contraindication of β-blocker and genotype-specific therapy
Class IIa
–
B
Asymptomatic patients with QTc >500 ms during β-blocker treatment
–
Class IIb
B
Asymptomatic patients with high-risk profile according to 1-2-3- LQTS-Risk calculator
Class IIb
–
 
Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT)
Syncope during β-blocker treatment
–
Class I
C
Syncope during combined β-blocker and flecainide treatment
Class IIa
–
C
Brugada Syndrome
Spontaneous type 1 Brugada ECG + recent history of syncope presumed due to ventricular arrhythmia
Class IIa
Class I
C
Asymptomatic patients with type 1 Brugada ECG and inducible ventricular fibrillation
Class IIb
–
C
Cardiac Sarcoidosis
Cardiac sarcoidosis with 1 or more risk factors for SCD
–
Class IIa
C
Indication for permanent pacemaker implantation regardless of LVEF
Class IIa
–
C
LVEF >35% and significant LGE on CMR after resolution of acute inflammation
Class IIa
–
C
LVEF 35–50% and inducible VT at PES
Class IIa
–
C
Familial Cardiomyopathy
Patients with familial cardiomyopathy associated with SCD
–
Class IIb
C
Left Ventricular Noncompaction
Patients with left ventricular noncompaction
–
Class IIb
C
Abbreviations: ACC, American College of Cardiology; AHA, American Heart Association; AV, atrioventricular; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG, electrocardiogram; EP, 
electrophysiologic; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HRS, Heart Rhythm Society; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; LQTS, long QT 
syndrome; LVAD, left ventricular assist device; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NSVT, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PES, 
programmed electrical stimulation; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction; SCD, sudden cardiac death; VA, ventricular arrhythmia; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, ventricular 
tachycardia.
strength of recommendation among professional societies in Europe 
and America for implantation of an ICD, but overall, there is agree­
ment on ICD implantation for the highest-risk patients. In patients 
with a history of MI >40 days ago, primary prevention ICDs are indi­
cated for those with class II–III New York Heart Association (NYHA) 
HF and LVEF <35% and those who are NYHA functional class I with 
LVEF <30%. Although ICDs have not been found to be beneficial when 
implanted within 40 days of an MI, those with recent or old MI, non­
sustained VT, LVEF <40%, and inducible sustained VT at EP study also 
warrant an ICD. In general, these criteria are not applied to patients 
who are within 90 days of myocardial revascularization, since some will 
experience improvement in ventricular function and older trial data 
suggested there was no benefit with ICDs in these patients. High-risk 
patients with low LVEFs may be considered for a wearable defibrillator 
with later reassessment of ventricular function and ICD placement.
ICDs for primary prevention of sudden death are also recom­
mended for patients with diseases other than CAD that put them 

(Continued)
AHA/ACC/HRS 
GUIDELINES
LEVEL OF 
EVIDENCE
–
Class IIb
C
–
Class I
B
at risk for SCD. Primary prevention ICDs are currently indicated in 
select high-risk patients with HCM, arrhythmogenic right ventricular 
dysplasia, cardiac sarcoidosis, Brugada syndrome, and congenital 
LQTS. ICDs are currently also recommended for those with nonisch­
emic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) who have an LVEF ≤35% and 
who have NYHA functional class II or III symptoms on guidelinedirected medical therapy. In addition to invasive electrophysiologic 
testing, new risk stratification methods for certain conditions have 
emerged, including genetic findings and the presence of late gado­
linium enhancement (LGE) on MRI. For example, the European 
guidelines account for pathogenic mutations associated with a high 
risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardio­
myopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and long QT syndrome. The 
presence of LGE has been shown to be a risk factor for sudden death 
in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopa­
thy, and thus, this imaging finding has been incorporated into ICD 
implantation guidelines.

TABLE 317-4  Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Not 
Indicated
Patients who do not have a reasonable expectation of survival with an 
acceptable functional status for at least 1 year, even if they meet ICD 
implantation criteria.
Patients with incessant VT or VF.
Patients with significant psychiatric illnesses that may be aggravated by device 
implantation or that may preclude systematic follow-up.
Patients with drug-refractory New York Heart Association class IV congestive 
heart failure who are not candidates for cardiac transplantation or cardiac 
resynchronization therapy.
Syncope of undetermined cause in a patient without inducible ventricular 
tachyarrhythmias and without structural heart disease.
VF or VT is amenable to surgical or catheter ablation in patients 

without other disease predisposing to sudden cardiac arrest (e.g., atrial 
arrhythmias associated with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, RV or LV 

outflow tract VT, idiopathic VT, or fascicular VT in the absence of structural heart 
disease).
Patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias due to a completely reversible 
disorder in the absence of structural heart disease (e.g., electrolyte imbalance, 
drugs, or trauma).
Abbreviations: LV, left ventricular; RV, right ventricular; VF, ventricular fibrillation; VT, 
ventricular tachycardia.
Source: Adapted from H Könemann et al: Management of ventricular arrhythmias 
worldwide: comparison of the latest ESC, AHA/ACC/HRS, and CCS/CHRS guidelines. 
JACC Clin Electrophysiol 9:715, 2023.
Proportion of Sudden Cardiac Death by Clinical Subgroups
Sustained VT/VF 5%
Patients
treated
with ICDs
LVEF <30–35%
15%
A
Absolute Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death by Clinical Subgroups
7.2%
SCD Rate Per Year (%)
3%Year:
6.0%
3.0%
Threshold for
ICD
Demonstrate
benefit
1.5%
1.5%
Sustained
VT/VF
Arrest
Ischemic CM,
LVEF<30%
(MADIT)
B
FIGURE 317-3  A. Proportion of sudden cardiac deaths that occur in clinical subgroups of the population treated and not treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators 
(ICDs). B. Absolute risk of sudden cardiac death within clinical subgroups in comparison to the threshold of risk where ICDs demonstrated benefit.

Although the ICD is very effective for treatment of arrhythmic 
sudden death, competing causes of mortality must be considered in 
patients with severe cardiomyopathy. Data from a recent random­
ized trial, the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients 
with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH), 
performed in patients with nonischemic DCM and LVEF ≤35%, who 
also had elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels and 
NYHA class II–IV HF, have resulted in some debate regarding the 
utility of ICDs in this population. This trial did not demonstrate an 
overall mortality benefit of the ICD despite a reduction in the inci­
dence of SCD. In subgroup analyses, mortality benefits were observed 
in younger patients in whom the competing risk of dying from other 
causes of death was lower. These data underscore the importance of 
considering competing risks for other causes of mortality when decid­
ing to implant a primary prevention ICD. Patients who are likely to die 
from other causes are unlikely to benefit from an ICD. Patients who 
do not have a reasonable expectation of survival with an acceptable 
functional status for at least 1 year should not undergo ICD placement. 
There are also other circumstances where an ICD is not indicated even 
if there is a significant sudden death risk (Table 317-4).

CHAPTER 317
■
■THE CHALLENGE OF SCD PREVENTION 
(FIG. 317-3)
Cardiovascular Collapse, Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Cardiac Death  
The Greatest Number of Sudden Deaths Occur in “LowRisk” Patients 
While patients with reduced left ventricular 
Post-MI, CHD,
CM, or HF with
LVEF>35%
Other
80%
No known heart
disease
50%
1.0%
0.8%
0.08%
General
Population
POST-MI,
LVEF>35%
Multiple 
Cardiac
Risk Factors
Heart Failure 
with 
Preserved
Ejection 
Fraction
(HFPEF)
Ischemic +
Non-Ischemic
CM, LVEF
≤35%, NYHA
HF Class II-III
(SCD-HEFT)
Non-Ischemic
CM, LVEF 
≤35% NYHA
HF Class IIIV, NTproBNP>200
(DANISH Trial)