# 11 - 441 Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders

### 441 Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders

Peter J. Goadsby

Migraine and Other 

Primary Headache 

Disorders
The general approach to headache as a cardinal symptom is covered else­
where (Chap. 17); here, disorders in which headache and associated 
features occur in the absence of any exogenous cause are discussed. The 
most common are migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), and the 
trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs), notably cluster headache; 
the complete list is summarized in Table 441-1.
■
■MIGRAINE
Migraine, the second most common cause of headache, and the most 
common headache-related, and indeed neurologic, cause of disability in 
the world, afflicts ~15% of women and 6% of men over a 1-year period. 
It is usually an episodic headache associated with certain features, such 
as sensitivity to light, sound, or movement; nausea and vomiting often 
accompany the headache. A useful description of migraine is a recur­
ring syndrome of headache associated with other symptoms of neu­
rologic dysfunction in varying admixtures (Table 441-2). A migraine 
attack has three phases: premonitory (prodrome), headache phase, and 
postdrome; each has distinct and sometimes disabling symptoms, which 
may overlap. About 20–25% of migraine patients have a fourth phase: 
aura. Migraine can often be recognized by its activators, referred to as 
triggers.
PART 13
Neurologic Disorders
Migraineurs are particularly sensitive to environmental and sen­
sory stimuli; migraine-prone patients do not habituate easily to 
sensory stimuli. This sensitivity is amplified in women during the 
menstrual cycle. Headache can be initiated or amplified by various 
triggers, including altered sleep patterns; hunger; let-down from 
stress; physical exertion; stormy weather or barometric pressure 
changes; hormonal fluctuations during menses; and alcohol or other 
chemical stimulation, such as with nitrates. Knowledge of a patient’s 
susceptibility to specific triggers can be useful in management strate­
gies involving lifestyle adjustments, although it is becoming recog­
nized that some apparent triggers, such as light sensitivity, may be 
part of the initial phase of the attack; i.e., the premonitory phase or 
prodrome.
Pathogenesis 
The sensory sensitivity that is characteristic of migraine 
is probably due to dysfunction of monoaminergic and other sensory 
control systems located in the brainstem and hypothalamus (Fig. 441-1).
Activation of cells in the trigeminal nucleus results in the release 
of vasoactive neuropeptides, notably calcitonin gene–related pep­
tide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide 
(PACAP), at vascular terminals of the trigeminal nerve and within 
the trigeminal nucleus. CGRP receptor antagonists, gepants, have 
now been shown to be effective in the acute and preventive treat­
ment of migraine, and four monoclonal antibodies to CGRP, or its 
receptor, have been shown to be effective in migraine prevention, as 
has one PACAP monoclonal antibody in a phase 2 study. Centrally, 
the second-order trigeminal neurons cross the midline and project to 
ventrobasal and posterior nuclei of the thalamus for further process­
ing. Additionally, there are projections to the periaqueductal gray 
and hypothalamus, from which reciprocal descending systems have 
established antinociceptive effects. Other brainstem regions likely to 
be involved in descending modulation of trigeminal pain include the 
locus coeruleus and parabrachial nucleus in the pons and the rostro­
ventromedial medulla.
Pharmacologic and other data point to the involvement of the neu­
rotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; also known as serotonin) in 
migraine. In the late 1950s, methysergide was suggested to antagonize 
certain peripheral actions of 5-HT and was introduced, based on its 

anti-inflammatory properties, as a migraine preventive. The triptans 
were designed to stimulate selectively subpopulations of 5-HT recep­
tors; at least 14 different 5-HT receptors exist in humans. The triptans 
are potent agonists of 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors, and some are 
active at the 5-HT1F receptor; the latter’s exclusive agonists are called 
ditans. Triptans arrest nerve signaling in the nociceptive pathways of 
the trigeminovascular system, at least in the trigeminal nucleus cauda­
lis and trigeminal sensory thalamus, in addition to promoting cranial 
vasoconstriction, whereas ditans, which are also effective in acute 
migraine, act only at neural targets. A range of other neural targets are 
currently under investigation for the acute and preventive management 
of migraine.
Data also support a role for dopamine in the pathophysiology of 
migraine. Many migraine premonitory symptoms can be induced 
by dopaminergic stimulation. Moreover, there is dopamine receptor 
hypersensitivity in migraineurs, as demonstrated by the induction 
of yawning, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and other symptoms 
of a migraine attack by dopaminergic agonists at doses that do not 
affect nonmigraineurs. Dopamine receptor antagonists are effective 
therapeutic agents in migraine, especially when given parenterally or 
concurrently with other antimigraine agents. Moreover, hypothalamic 
activation, anterior to that seen in cluster headache, has been shown 
in the premonitory (prodromal) phase of migraine using functional 
imaging, and this may hold a key to understanding some part of the 
role of dopamine in the disorder.
Migraine genes identified by studying families with familial hemi­
plegic migraine (FHM) reveal involvement of ion channels, suggesting 
that alterations in membrane excitability can predispose to migraine 
aura. Mutations involving the Cav2.1 (P/Q)–type voltage-gated calcium 
channel CACNA1A gene are now known to cause FHM 1; this muta­
tion is responsible for about 50% of FHM cases. Mutations in the Na+-
K+ ATPase ATP1A2 gene, designated FHM 2, are responsible for about 
20% of FHMs. Mutations in the neuronal voltage-gated sodium chan­
nel SCN1A cause FHM 3. Functional neuroimaging has suggested that 
brainstem regions in migraine (Fig. 441-2) and the posterior hypotha­
lamic gray matter region close to the human circadian pacemaker cells 
of the suprachiasmatic nucleus in cluster headache (Fig. 441-3) are 
good candidates for specific involvement in these primary headache 
disorders.
Diagnosis and Clinical Features 
Classic diagnostic criteria for 
migraine headache are listed in Table 441-3 and should be considered 
together with the extended features in Table 441-2. A high index of 
suspicion is required to diagnose migraine: the migraine aura, consist­
ing of visual disturbances with flashing lights or zigzag lines moving 
across the visual field or of other neurologic symptoms, is reported in 
only 20–25% of patients. It should be distinguished from the pan-field 
television static-like disturbance now recognized as visual snow. The 
first phase of a migraine attack for most patients is the premonitory 
(prodromal) phase consisting of some or all of the following: yawning, 
sleepiness, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, mood change, neck discom­
fort, polyuria, and food cravings; this can last from a few hours to 
days. Typically, the headache phase follows with its associated features, 
such as nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia as well as allodynia 
or vertigo. When questioned, these typical migraine symptoms also 
emerge in the premonitory phase, and typical premonitory symptoms 
also continue into the headache phase. As the headache lessens, many 
patients enter a postdrome, most commonly feeling tired/weary, hav­
ing problems concentrating, and experiencing mild neck discomfort 
that can last for hours and sometimes up to a day. A headache diary 
can often be helpful in making the diagnosis and in assessing dis­
ability and the frequency of acute attacks. Patients with episodes of 
migraine on 8 or more days per month and with at least 15 total days 
of headache per month are considered to have chronic migraine (see 
“Chronic Daily Headache” in Chap. 17). Migraine must be differen­
tiated from TTH (discussed below), which is reported to be the most 
common primary headache disorder. Migraine has several forms that 
have been defined (Table 441-1): migraine with and without aura 
and chronic migraine are the most important. Migraine at its most

TABLE 441-1  Primary Headache Disorders, Modified from International Classification of Headache Disorders-III (Headache Classification 
Committee of the International Headache Society, 2018)
1. Migraine
1.1  Migraine without aura
1.2  Migraine with aura
  1.2.1  Migraine with typical aura
    1.2.1.1  Typical aura with headache
    1.2.1.2  Typical aura without headache
  1.2.2  Migraine with brainstem aura
  1.2.3  Hemiplegic migraine
    1.2.3.1  Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM)
      1.2.3.1.1  Familial hemiplegic migraine type 1
      1.2.3.1.2  Familial hemiplegic migraine type 2
      1.2.3.1.3  Familial hemiplegic migraine type 3
      1.2.3.1.4  Familial hemiplegic migraine, other loci
    1.2.3.2  Sporadic hemiplegic migraine
  1.2.4  Retinal migraine
1.3  Chronic migraine
1.4  Complications of migraine
  1.4.1  Status migrainosus
  1.4.2  Persistent aura without infarction
  1.4.3  Migrainous infarction
  1.4.4  Migraine aura-triggered seizure
1.5  Probable migraine
  1.5.1  Probable migraine without aura
  1.5.2  Probable migraine with aura
1.6  Episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine
  1.6.1  Recurrent gastrointestinal disturbance
    1.6.1.1  Cyclical vomiting syndrome
    1.6.1.2  Abdominal migraine
  1.6.2  Benign paroxysmal vertigo
  1.6.3  Benign paroxysmal torticollis
  A 1.6.4  Infantile colic
  A 1.6.6  Vestibular migraine
2. Tension-type headache
2.1  Infrequent episodic tension-type headache
2.2  Frequent episodic tension-type headache
2.3  Chronic tension-type headache
2.4  Probable tension-type headache
3. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
3.1  Cluster headache
  3.1.1  Episodic cluster headache
  3.1.2  Chronic cluster headache
3.2  Paroxysmal hemicrania
  3.2.1  Episodic paroxysmal hemicrania
  3.2.2  Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania
3.3  Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks
  3.3.1  Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT)
    3.3.1.1  Episodic SUNCT
    3.3.1.2  Chronic SUNCT
  3.3.2  Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms (SUNA)
    3.3.2.1  Episodic SUNA
    3.3.2.2  Chronic SUNA
3.4  Hemicrania continua
3.5  Probable trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia
4. Other primary headache disorders
4.1  Primary cough headache
4.2  Primary exercise headache
4.3  Primary headache associated with sexual activity
4.4  Primary thunderclap headache
4.5  Cold-stimulus headache
  4.5.1  Headache attributed to external application of a cold stimulus
  4.5.2  Headache attributed to ingestion or inhalation of a cold stimulus
4.6  External-pressure headache
  4.6.1  External-compression headache
  4.6.2  External-traction headache
4.7  Primary stabbing headache
4.8  Nummular headache
4.9  Hypnic headache
4.10  New daily persistent headache (NDPH)
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) 38(1), pp. 1-211. Copyright © 2018 by (International Headache Society) Reprinted by 
Permission of SAGE Publications.

CHAPTER 441
Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders

TABLE 441-2  Migraine Symptoms by Attack Phase
Premonitory (prodromal)
- Neck discomfort
- Higher center
• Cognitive impairment (brain “fog”)
• Mood change
• Fatigue
- Homeostatic
• Yawning/sleepiness
• Polyuria/polydipsia
• Food cravings
Aura
- Neurologic disturbance, such as scintillating scotoma
Headache phase
- Pain
- Nausea/vomiting
- Sensory sensitivity
PART 13
Neurologic Disorders
• Photophobia
• Phonophobia
• Osmophobia
• Allodynia
• Vertigo
Postdrome
- Tiredness
- Weariness
- Concentration impairment
Source: Adapted from PJ Goadsby et al: Pathophysiology of migraine: A disorder of 
sensory processing. Physiol Rev 97:553, 2017.
Cortex
Cortex
Thalamus
Thalamus
Hypothalamus
Hypothalamus
Dura
FIGURE 441-1  Brainstem pathways that modulate sensory input. The key pathway for pain in migraine is the trigeminovascular input from the meningeal vessels, which 
passes through the trigeminal ganglion and synapses on second-order neurons in the trigeminocervical complex (TCC). These neurons in turn project in the quintothalamic 
tract and, after decussating in the brainstem, synapse on neurons in the thalamus. Important modulation of the trigeminovascular nociceptive input comes from the dorsal 
raphe nucleus, locus coeruleus, and nucleus raphe magnus.

basic level is headache with associated features, and TTH is headache 
that is featureless. Most patients with disabling headache probably have 
migraine.
Patients with acephalgic migraine (typical aura without headache, 
1.2.1.2 in Table 441-1) experience recurrent neurologic symptoms, 
often with nausea or vomiting, but with little or no headache. 
Vertigo can be prominent; it has been estimated that one-third of 
patients referred for vertigo or dizziness have a primary diagno­
sis of migraine; the term vestibular migraine is often used in this 
setting (Table 441-1 A1.6.6). Migraine aura can have prominent 
brainstem symptoms, and the terms basilar artery and basilar-type 
migraine have now been replaced by migraine with brainstem aura 
(Table 441-1).
TREATMENT
Migraine Headache
Once a diagnosis of migraine has been established, it is important to 
assess the extent of a patient’s disease and disability. The Migraine 
Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS) is a well-validated, easy-touse tool (Fig. 441-4).
Patient education is an important aspect of migraine manage­
ment. Information for patients is available at websites such as the 
American Migraine Foundation (www.americanmigrainefounda­
tion.org) and the Migraine Trust (www.migrainetrust.org). It is 
helpful for patients to understand that migraine is an inherited 
tendency to headache; that migraine can be modified and con­
trolled by lifestyle adjustments and medications, but it cannot be 
eradicated; and that, except on some occasions in women on oral 
estrogens or contraceptives, migraine is not associated with serious 
or life-threatening illnesses.
Quintothalamic
tract
Quintothalamic
tract
Dorsal raphe
nucleus
Dorsal raphe
nucleus
Locus
coeruleus
Locus
coeruleus
Superior
salivatory nucleus
Superior
salivatory nucleus
Magnus raphe
nucleus
Magnus raphe
nucleus
TCC
Trigeminal
ganglion
Sphenopalatine
ganglion

A
B
C
D
FIGURE 441-2  Positron emission tomography (PET) and arterial spin labelled activations in migraine. Hypothalamic, dorsal midbrain, and dorsolateral pontine activation 
are seen in triggered attacks in the premonitory phase before pain, whereas in migraine attacks, dorsolateral pontine activation persists, as it does in chronic migraine (not 
shown). The dorsolateral pontine area, which includes the noradrenergic locus coeruleus, is fundamental to the expression of migraine. Moreover, lateralization of changes 
in this region of the brainstem correlates with lateralization of the head pain in hemicranial migraine; the scans shown in panels C and D are of patients with acute migraine 
headache on the right and left side, respectively. (Panel A from FH Maniyar et al: Brain activations in the premonitory phase of nitroglycerin-triggered migraine attacks. 
Brain 137:232, 2014. Panel B from unpublished data, Karsan and Goadsby. Panels C and D from SK Afridi et al: A PET study exploring the laterality of brainstem activation in 
migraine using glyceryl trinitrate. Brain 128:932, 2005.)
A
B
FIGURE 441-3  A. Posterior hypothalamic gray matter region activation demonstrated by positron emission tomography in a patient with acute cluster headache. B. Highresolution T1-weighted magnetic resonance image obtained using voxel-based morphometry demonstrates increased gray matter activity, lateralized to the side of pain in 
a patient with cluster headache. (Panel A from A May et al: Hypothalamic activation in cluster headache attacks. Lancet 352:275, 1998. Panel B from A May et al: Correlation 
between structural and functional changes in brain in an idiopathic headache syndrome. Nat Med 5:836, 1999.)

CHAPTER 441
Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders

TABLE 441-3  Simplified Diagnostic Criteria for Migraine
REPEATED ATTACKS OF HEADACHE LASTING 4–72 H IN PATIENTS WITH A 
NORMAL PHYSICAL EXAMINATION, NO OTHER REASONABLE CAUSE FOR THE 
HEADACHE, AND:
AT LEAST 2 OF THE FOLLOWING 
FEATURES:
PLUS AT LEAST 1 OF THE FOLLOWING 
FEATURES:
Unilateral pain
Nausea/vomiting
Throbbing pain
Photophobia and phonophobia
Aggravation by movement
Moderate or severe intensity
Source: Adapted from the International Headache Society Classification (Headache 
Classification Committee of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia 38:1, 
2018).
NONPHARMACOLOGIC MANAGEMENT
Migraine can often be managed to some degree by a variety of 
nonpharmacologic approaches. When patients can identify reli­
able triggers, their avoidance can be useful. A regulated lifestyle 
is helpful, including a healthy diet, regular exercise, regular sleep 
patterns, avoidance of excess caffeine and alcohol, and avoidance 
of acute changes in stress levels, being particularly wary of the letdown effect.
PART 13
Neurologic Disorders
The measures that benefit a given individual should be used 
routinely because they provide a simple, cost-effective approach to 
migraine management. Patients with migraine do not encounter 
more stress than headache-free individuals; overresponsiveness 
to changes in stress appears to be the issue. Because the stresses 
of everyday living cannot be eliminated, lessening one’s response 
to stress by various techniques is helpful for many patients. These 
may include yoga, transcendental meditation, hypnosis, and con­
ditioning techniques such as biofeedback. For most patients seen 
in clinical practice, this approach is, at best, an adjunct to pharma­
cotherapy. Nonpharmacologic measures are unlikely to prevent all 
migraine attacks, and pharmacologic approaches are often needed.
*MIDAS Questionnaire
INSTRUCTIONS: Please answer the following questions about ALL headaches you have had 
over the last 3 months. Write zero if you did not do the activity in the last 3 months.
1.
On how many days in the last 3 months did you miss work or school because 
of your headaches?
...............................................................................................
2.
How many days in the last 3 months was your productivity at work or school 
reduced by half or more because of your headaches (do not include days 
you counted in question 1 where you missed work or school)?
On how many days in the last 3 months did you not do household work 
because of your headaches?
3.
................................................................................
4.
How many days in the last 3 months was your productivity in household work 
reduced by half or more because of your headaches (do not include days 
you counted in question 3 where you did not do household work)?
5.
On how many days in the last 3 months did you miss family, social, or leisure 
activities because of your headaches?
A.
On how many days in the last 3 months did you have a headache? (If a 
headache lasted more than one day, count each day.)
B.
On a scale of 0–10, on average how painful were these headaches? (Where 
0 = no pain at all, and 10 = pain as bad as it can be.)
*Migraine Disability Assessment Score
(Questions 1−5 are used to calculate the MIDAS score.)
Grade I—Minimal or Infrequent Disability: 0–5
Grade II—Mild or Infrequent Disability: 6–10
Grade III—Moderate Disability: 11–20
Grade IV—Severe Disability: > 20
© Innovative Medical Research 1997
FIGURE 441-4  The Migraine Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS) Questionnaire. (Courtesy of Dr. Richard Lipton.) 

ACUTE ATTACK THERAPIES FOR MIGRAINE
The mainstay of pharmacologic therapy is the judicious use of one 
or more of the many medicines that are effective in migraine 
(Table 441-4). The selection of the optimal regimen for a given 
patient depends on a number of factors, the most important of 
which is the severity of the attack. Mild migraine attacks can usually 
be managed by oral agents; the average efficacy (pain relief) rate is 
50–70%. Severe migraine attacks may require parenteral therapy. 
Most drugs effective in the treatment of migraine are members 
of one of five major pharmacologic classes: nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists—triptans; CGRP 
receptor antagonists—gepants; 5-HT1F receptor agonists—ditans; 
and dopamine receptor antagonists.
In general, an adequate dose of whichever agent is chosen should 
be used as soon as possible after the onset of an attack. If additional 
medication is required within 60 min because symptoms return or 
have not abated, the initial dose should be increased for subsequent 
attacks or a different class of drug tried as first-line treatment. 
Repeat dosing of the same medicine at 2 h, while safe, is ineffective 
for triptans, and in contrast effective for gepants. Migraine therapy 
must be individualized; a standard approach for all patients is not 
possible. A therapeutic regimen may need to be refined until one is 
identified that provides the patient with rapid, complete, and con­
sistent relief with minimal side effects (Table 441-5).
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)  Both the sever­
ity and duration of a migraine attack can be reduced significantly 
by NSAIDs (Table 441-4). Indeed, many undiagnosed migraineurs 
self-treat with nonprescription NSAIDs. A general consensus is 
that NSAIDs are most effective when taken early in the migraine 
attack. However, the effectiveness of these agents in migraine is usu­
ally less than optimal in moderate or severe migraine attacks. The 
combination of acetaminophen (paracetamol), aspirin, and caffeine 
has been approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administra­
tion (FDA) for the treatment of mild to moderate migraine. The 
combination of aspirin and metoclopramide has been shown to be 
days
days
............................
days
.....................
days
days
.................................................................
.........................................
days
..........................................

TABLE 441-4  TREATMENT of Acute Migraine
DRUG
TRADE NAME
DOSAGE
Simple Analgesics
Acetaminophen, aspirin, caffeine
Excedrin Migraine
Two tablets or caplets q6h (max 8 per day)
NSAIDs
Naproxen
Aleve, Anaprox, generic
220–550 mg PO bid
Ibuprofen
Advil, Motrin, Nuprin, generic
400 mg PO q3–4h
Tolfenamic acid
Clotam Rapid
200 mg PO; may repeat ×1 after 1–2 h
Diclofenac K
Cambia
50 mg PO with water
5-HT1B/1D Receptor Agonists—Triptans
Oral
Ergotamine 1 mg, caffeine 100 mg
Cafergot
One or two tablets at onset, then one tablet q½h (max 6 per day, 10 per week)
Naratriptan
Amerge
2.5-mg tablet at onset
Rizatriptan
Maxalt
5–10-mg tablet at onset
Maxalt-MLT
Sumatriptan
Imitrex
50–100-mg tablet at onset
Frovatriptan
Frova
2.5-mg tablet at onset
Almotriptan
Axert
12.5-mg tablet at onset
Eletriptan
Relpax
40 or 80 mg at onset
Zolmitriptan
Zomig
2.5-mg tablet at onset
Zomig Rapimelt
Nasal
Dihydroergotamine
Migranal Nasal Spray
Trudhesa Nasal Spray
Prior to nasal spray, the pump must be primed 4 times; 1 spray (0.5 mg) is 
administered, followed in 15 min by a second spray
One spray into each nostril
Sumatriptan
Imitrex Nasal Spray
5–20 mg intranasal spray as 4 sprays of 5 mg or a single 20 mg spray
Zolmitriptan
Zomig
5 mg intranasal spray as one spray
Parenteral
Dihydroergotamine
DHE-45
1 mg IV, IM, or SC at onset and q1h (max 3 mg/d, 6 mg per week)
Sumatriptan
Imitrex Injection
Alsuma
Sumavel DosePro
CGRP Receptor Antagonists—Gepants
Oral
Rimegepant
Ubrogepant
Nasal
Zavegepant
Nurtec
Ubrelvy
Zavzpret
10 mg intranasal, single spray to one nostril once in 24 h
5-HT1F Receptor Agonist—Ditans
Oral
Lasmiditan
Reyvow
50, 100, or 200 mg PO
Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Oral
Metoclopramide
Reglan,a generica
5–10 mg/d
Prochlorperazine
Compazine,a generica
1–25 mg/d
Parenteral
Chlorpromazine
Generica
0.1 mg/kg IV at 2 mg/min; max 35 mg/d
Metoclopramide
Reglan,a generic
10 mg IV
Prochlorperazine
Compazine,a generica
10 mg IV
Other
Parenteral
Opioids
Other
Neuromodulation
Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS)
Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS)
Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN)
Transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation
External concurrent occipital and trigeminal 
neurostimulation (eCOT-NS)
Generica
Savi Dual
gammaCore
Nerivio
Cefaly
Relivion
aNot all drugs are specifically indicated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for migraine. Local regulations and guidelines should be consulted.
Note: Antiemetics (e.g., domperidone 10 mg or ondansetron 4 or 8 mg) or prokinetics (e.g., metoclopramide 10 mg) are sometimes useful adjuncts.
Abbreviations: 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; ODT, orally disintegrating tablets.

CHAPTER 441
Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders  
3, 4, or 6 mg SC at onset (may repeat once after 1 h for max of 2 doses in 24 h)
75 mg ODT PO
50 or 100 mg PO; a second dose may be taken 2 h after the first, if needed
Multiple preparations and dosages; see Table 14-1
Two pulses at onset followed by two further pulses
Two doses each of 120 s
30- to 45-min stimulation to the upper arm
60-min stimulation
30- to 60-min stimulation

TABLE 441-5  Clinical Stratification of Acute Specific 

Migraine Treatments
CLINICAL SITUATION
TREATMENT OPTIONS
Failed NSAIDs/
analgesics
First tier
Sumatriptan 50 mg or 100 mg PO
Almotriptan 12.5 mg PO
Rizatriptan 10 mg PO
Eletriptan 40 mg PO
Zolmitriptan 2.5 mg PO
Rimegepant 75 mg
Ubrogepant 50 or 100 mg
Lasmiditan 50, 100, or 200 mg
Slower effect/better tolerability
Naratriptan 2.5 mg PO
Frovatriptan 2.5 mg PO
PART 13
Neurologic Disorders
Infrequent headache
Ergotamine/caffeine 1–2/100 mg PO
Dihydroergotamine nasal spray 2 mg
Early nausea or 
difficulties taking 
tablets
Zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray
Sumatriptan 20 mg nasal spray
Rizatriptan 10 mg MLT wafer
Zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray
Headache recurrence
Ergotamine 2 mg (most effective PR/usually with 
caffeine)
Naratriptan 2.5 mg PO
Almotriptan 12.5 mg PO
Eletriptan 40 mg
Rimegepant 75 mg
Ubrogepant 50 or 100 mg
Tolerating acute 
treatments poorly
Naratriptan 2.5 mg
Almotriptan 12.5 mg
Rimegepant 75 mg
Ubrogepant 50, 100 mg
Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation
Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation
Remote electrical neuromodulation
Early vomiting
Zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray
Zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray
Sumatriptan 25 mg PR
Sumatriptan 6 mg SC
Menses-related 
headache
Prevention
Ergotamine PO at night
Estrogen patches
Rimegepant 75 mg PO taken during the menses
Treatment
Triptans
Dihydroergotamine nasal spray
Very rapidly developing 
symptoms
Zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray
Zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray
Sumatriptan 6 mg SC
Dihydroergotamine 1 mg IM
Abbreviation: NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
comparable to a single dose of oral sumatriptan. Important 
side effects of NSAIDs include dyspepsia and gastrointestinal 
irritation.
5-HT1B/1D RECEPTOR AGONISTS—TRIPTANS AND ERGOTS
Oral  Stimulation of 5-HT1B/1D receptors can stop an acute migraine 
attack. Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine are nonselective recep­
tor agonists, whereas the triptans are selective 5-HT1B/1D recep­
tor agonists. A variety of triptans—sumatriptan, almotriptan, 

eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan—
are available for the treatment of migraine.
Each drug in the triptan class has similar pharmacologic proper­
ties, varying slightly in terms of clinical efficacy. Rizatriptan and 
eletriptan are, on a population basis, the most efficacious of the 
triptans. Sumatriptan and zolmitriptan have similar rates of effi­
cacy as well as time to onset, with an advantage of having multiple 
formulations, whereas almotriptan has a similar rate of efficacy 
to sumatriptan and is better tolerated, and frovatriptan and nara­
triptan are somewhat slower in onset and are also well tolerated. 
Clinical efficacy appears to be related more to the tmax (time to peak 
plasma level) than to the potency, half-life, or bioavailability. This 
observation is consistent with a large body of data indicating that 
faster-acting analgesics are more effective than slower-acting ones.
Unfortunately, monotherapy with a selective oral 5-HT1B/1D 
receptor agonist does not result in rapid, consistent, and complete 
relief of migraine in all patients. Triptans are generally not effec­
tive in migraine with aura unless given after the aura is completed 
and the headache initiated. Side effects are common, although 
often mild and transient. Moreover, 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists are 
contraindicated in individuals with a history, symptoms, or signs 
of ischemic cardiac, cerebrovascular, or peripheral vascular syn­
dromes. Recurrence of headache, within the usual time course of 
an attack, is another important limitation of triptan use and occurs 
at least occasionally in most patients. Evidence from randomized 
controlled trials shows that coadministration of a longer-acting 
NSAID, naproxen 500 mg, with sumatriptan will augment the ini­
tial effect of sumatriptan and, importantly, reduce rates of headache 
recurrence.
Ergotamine preparations offer a nonselective means of stimulat­
ing 5-HT1 receptors. A nonnauseating dose of ergotamine should 
be sought because a dose that provokes nausea is too high and may 
intensify head pain. Oral (excluding sublingual) formulations of 
ergotamine also contain 100 mg caffeine (theoretically to enhance 
ergotamine absorption and possibly to add additional analgesic 
activity). The average oral ergotamine dose for a migraine attack 
is 2 mg. Because the clinical studies demonstrating the efficacy 
of ergotamine in migraine predated the clinical trial methodolo­
gies used with the triptans, it is difficult to assess the comparative 
efficacy of ergotamine versus the triptans. In general, with use of 
ergotamine there appears to be a much higher incidence of nausea 
than with triptans but less headache recurrence.
Nasal  Nasal formulations of dihydroergotamine, zolmitriptan, or 
sumatriptan can be useful in patients requiring a nonoral route of 
administration. The nasal sprays result in substantial blood levels 
within 30–60 min. Although in theory nasal sprays might provide 
faster and more effective relief of a migraine attack than oral formu­
lations, their reported pain relief rate is only ~50–60%. Studies with 
a new inhalational formulation of dihydroergotamine indicate that 
its absorption problems can be overcome to produce rapid onset of 
action with good tolerability.
Parenteral  Administration of drugs by injection, such as dihydro­
ergotamine and sumatriptan, is approved by the FDA for the rapid 
relief of a migraine attack. Peak plasma levels of dihydroergotamine 
are achieved 3 min after IV dosing, 30 min after intramuscular 
(IM) dosing, and 45 min after subcutaneous (SC) dosing. If an 
attack has not already peaked, SC or IM administration of 1 mg 
of dihydroergotamine is adequate for about 80–90% of patients. 
Sumatriptan, 3, 4, or 6 mg SC, depending on local availability, is 
effective in ~50–80% of patients and can now be administered by a 
needle-free device.
CALCITONIN GENE-RELATED PEPTIDE (CGRP) RECEPTOR 
ANTAGONISTS—GEPANTS
Gepants are small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists that are 
effective in the acute treatment of migraine. Three are currently 
approved by the FDA: rimegepant, and ubrogepant are oral, and 
zavegepant is a nasal spray (Table 441-4). They are more likely to

render patients pain-free at 2 h and most bothersome symptom–
free when compared with placebo in large phase 3 clinical trials. The 
most bothersome symptom is derived by asking patients to identify 
which symptom—of nausea, photophobia, or phonophobia—was 
most bothersome during the treated attack; success required that 
this symptom was eliminated at 2 h. Gepants are extremely well 
tolerated with only a small percentage of patients reporting trouble­
some side effects, such as mild nausea.
5-HT1F RECEPTOR AGONISTS—DITANS
Lasmiditan, a highly selective, orally available, 5-HT1F receptor 
agonist, has been approved by the FDA for the acute treatment of 
migraine based on large phase 3 studies where it was superior to 
placebo (Table 441-4). Ditans have no vascular effects because the 
5-HT1F receptor is located in the central and peripheral nervous 
system but not vasculature; the class thus unequivocally fills a gap 
in therapy for patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular 
disease. The major side effect is dizziness, occurring in ~15% 
of patients in clinical trials, and somnolence in 6%. Patients are 
advised not to drive for 8 h after treatment.
DOPAMINE RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS
Oral  Oral dopamine receptor antagonists can be considered as 
adjunctive therapy in migraine. Drug absorption is impaired dur­
ing migraine because of reduced gastrointestinal motility. Delayed 
absorption occurs even in the absence of nausea and is related to 
the severity of the attack and not its duration. Therefore, when 
oral NSAIDs and/or triptan agents fail, the addition of a dopamine 
receptor antagonist, such as metoclopramide 10 mg, prochlorpera­
zine 10 mg, or domperidone 10 mg (not available in the United States), 
should be considered to enhance gastric absorption. In addition, 
dopamine receptor antagonists decrease nausea/vomiting and 
restore normal gastric motility.
Parenteral  Dopamine receptor antagonists (e.g., chlorpromazine, 
prochlorperazine, metoclopramide) by injection can also provide 
significant acute relief of migraine; they can be used in combination 
with parenteral 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists. A common IV protocol 
used for the treatment of severe migraine is the administration 
over 2 min of a mixture of 5 mg of prochlorperazine and 0.5 mg of 
dihydroergotamine.
OTHER OPTIONS FOR ACUTE MIGRAINE
Oral  For milder attacks of migraine, the combination of acet­
aminophen, aspirin, and caffeine is FDA approved (Table 441-4).
Parenteral  Opioids are modestly effective in the acute treatment 
of migraine. For example, IV meperidine (50–100 mg) is given fre­
quently in the emergency department (ED). This regimen “works” 
in the sense that the pain of migraine is eliminated. Importantly, it 
is clear from a randomized controlled trial that prochlorperazine 
is superior to hydromorphone in the ED setting. However, opioids 
are clearly suboptimal for patients with recurrent headache. Opi­
oids do not treat the underlying headache mechanism; rather, they 
act to alter the pain sensation, and there is evidence their use may 
decrease the likelihood of a response to triptans in the future. More­
over, in patients taking oral opioids, such as oxycodone or hydro­
codone, habituation or addiction can greatly confuse the treatment 
of migraine. Opioid craving and/or withdrawal can aggravate and 
accentuate migraine. Therefore, it is recommended that opioid use 
in migraine be limited to patients with severe, but infrequent, head­
aches that are unresponsive to other pharmacologic approaches or 
who have contraindications to other therapies.
Neuromodulation  Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimula­
tion (sTMS) is FDA cleared for the acute treatment of migraine. 
Two pulses can be applied at the onset of an attack, and this can be 
repeated. The use of sTMS is safe where there is no cranial metal 
implant and offers an option to patients seeking nonpharmaceuti­
cal approaches to treatment. Similarly, a noninvasive vagus nerve 
stimulator (nVNS) is FDA cleared for the treatment of migraine 

attacks in adults. One to two 120-s doses may be applied for attack 
treatment. Remote electrical neuromodulation using a smartphone 
app that stimulates the upper arm for 30–45 min is also effective 
for treatment of acute migraine. Transcutaneous supraorbital nerve 
stimulation for 60 min and external concurrent occipital and tri­
geminal neurostimulation (eCOT-NS) for 30–60 min are both FDA 
cleared.

MEDICATION-OVERUSE HEADACHE
Acute attack medications, particularly opioid or barbituratecontaining compound analgesics, have a propensity to aggravate 
headache frequency and induce a state of refractory daily or neardaily headache called medication-overuse headache. This condition 
is likely not a separate headache entity but a reaction of the patient’s 
underlying migraine biology to a particular medicine. Migraine 
patients who have two or more headache days a week should be 
cautioned about frequent analgesic use (see “Chronic Daily 
Headache” in Chap. 17).
CHAPTER 441
PREVENTIVE TREATMENTS FOR MIGRAINE
Patients with an increasing frequency of migraine attacks or with 
attacks that are either unresponsive or poorly responsive to abortive 
treatments are good candidates for preventive agents. In general, a 
preventive medication should be considered in patients with four or 
more migraine days a month. Significant side effects are associated 
with the use of many agents; furthermore, determination of dose 
can be difficult because the recommended doses have been derived 
for conditions other than migraine. The mechanism of action of 
older medicines is unclear; it seems likely that the brain sensitivity 
that underlies migraine is modified. Patients are usually started 
on a low dose of a chosen treatment; the dose is then gradually 
increased, up to a reasonable maximum, to achieve clinical benefit.
Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders  
Treatments that have the capacity to stabilize migraine are listed 
in Table 441-6. Most treatments must be taken daily, and there 
is usually a lag of 2–12 weeks before an effect is seen. The drugs 
that have been approved by the FDA for the preventive treatment 
of migraine include propranolol, timolol, sodium valproate, topi­
ramate, eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, 
rimegepant, and atogepant. In addition, a number of other drugs 
appear to display preventive efficacy. This group includes amitripty­
line, candesartan, nortriptyline, flunarizine, phenelzine, and cypro­
heptadine. Placebo-controlled trials of onabotulinum toxin type 
A in episodic migraine were negative, whereas, overall, placebocontrolled trials in chronic migraine were positive. The FDA has 
approved a range of neuromodulation approaches for the preventive 
treatment of migraine (Table 441-6). They offer a well-tolerated, 
effective option for patients. Phenelzine is a monoamine oxidase 
inhibitor (MAOI); therefore, tyramine-containing foods, decon­
gestants, and meperidine are contraindicated, and it is reserved 
for only very recalcitrant cases. Methysergide is now of historical 
interest only because it is no longer manufactured. Melatonin has 
been reported to be useful, with controlled trial evidence, but is not 
approved for this indication in the United States.
The probability of success with any one of the antimigraine 
drugs is ~40–50%. Many patients are managed adequately with 
well-tolerated doses of candesartan, propranolol, amitriptyline, 
topiramate, or valproate. As data on fetal developmental issues 
have arisen, both topiramate and valproate are now considered 
less attractive for use in females during reproductive years. If these 
agents fail or produce unacceptable side effects, neuromodulation 
approaches can be used (Table 441-6). Once effective stabilization is 
achieved, the drug is continued for ~6–12 months and then slowly 
tapered, assuming the patient agrees, to assess the continued need. 
Many patients are able to discontinue medication and experience 
fewer and milder attacks for long periods. The advent of CGRP 
monoclonal antibodies and CGRP receptor antagonists has sig­
nificantly changed the landscape of preventive treatment; with the 
combination of efficacy that is often within the first month and 
excellent tolerability, expectations of outcomes have changed.

TABLE 441-6  Preventive Treatments in Migrainea
DRUG
DOSE
SELECTED SIDE EFFECTS
Beta blocker
  Propranolol
  Metoprolol
40–120 mg bid
25–100 mg bid
Antidepressants
  Amitriptyline
10–75 mg at night
Drowsiness
  Dosulepin
25–75 mg at night
  Nortriptyline
25–75 mg at night
Note: Some patients may only need a total dose of 

10 mg, although generally 1–1.5 mg/kg body weight is 
required.
  Venlafaxine
75–150 mg/d
Anticonvulsants
  Topiramate
25–200 mg/d
Paresthesias
PART 13
Neurologic Disorders
  Valproate
400–600 mg bid
Drowsiness
Serotonergic drugs
  Pizotifenb
0.5–2 mg qd
Weight gain
CGRP pathway blockers
  Eptinezumab
  Erenumab
  Fremanezumab
  Galcanezumab
100 or 300 mg IV every 12 weeks
70 or 140 mg SC monthly
225 mg monthly or 675 mg q3 months, SC
240 mg loading then 120 mg monthly, SC
  Rimegepant
  Atogepant
75 mg every other day
10, 30, or 60 mg once daily
Other classes
  Flunarizineb
5–15 mg qd
Drowsiness
  Candesartan
4–24 mg daily
Dizziness
  Memantine
5–20 mg daily
Dizziness, tiredness
  Melatonin
3–12 mg nightly
Drowsiness
Neuromodulation
  Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS)
  Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS)
  Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN)
  Transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation
4–24 pulses per day
120-s treatments 2–3 times daily
45 min every other day
20 min daily
Chronic migraine
  Onabotulinum toxin type A
155 U
Loss of brow furrow
No convincing evidence from controlled trials
  Verapamil
Controlled trials demonstrate no effect
  Nimodipine
  Clonidine
  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: fluoxetine
aCommonly used preventives are listed with typical doses and common side effects. Not all listed medicines are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; local 
regulations and guidelines should be consulted. bNot available in the United States.

Reduced energy
Tiredness
Postural symptoms
Contraindicated in asthma
Cognitive symptoms
Weight loss
Glaucoma
Caution with nephrolithiasis
Weight gain
Tremor
Hair loss
Fetal abnormalities
Hematologic or liver abnormalities
Nasopharyngitis
Nasopharyngitis, constipation
Injection site reactions
Nasopharyngitis
Nausea abdominal pain/dyspepsia
Constipation, nausea
Weight gain
Depression
Parkinsonism
Lightheadedness
Tingling
Tinnitus
Site discomfort, irritation or pain
Muscle twitching
Well-tolerated; some local sensory symptoms
Local paresthesia

■
■TENSION-TYPE HEADACHE
Clinical Features 
The term tension-type headache is commonly 
used to describe a chronic head-pain syndrome characterized by 
bilateral tight, bandlike discomfort. The pain typically builds slowly, 
fluctuates in severity, and may persist more or less continuously for 
many days. The headache may be episodic or chronic (present >15 
days per month).
A useful clinical approach is to diagnose TTH in patients whose 
headaches are completely without accompanying features such as 
nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia, osmophobia, throbbing, 
and aggravation with movement. Such an approach neatly separates 
migraine, which has one or more of these features and is the main dif­
ferential diagnosis, from TTH. The International Headache Society’s 
main definition of TTH allows an admixture of nausea, photophobia, 
or phonophobia in various combinations, although the appendix defi­
nition does not; this illustrates the difficulty in distinguishing these two 
clinical entities. In clinical practice, using the appendix definition to 
dichotomize patients on the basis of the presence of associated features 
(migraine) and the absence of associated features (TTH) is highly rec­
ommended. Indeed, patients whose headaches fit the TTH phenotype 
and who have migraine at other times, along with a family history 
of migraine, migrainous illnesses of childhood, or typical migraine 
triggers to their migraine attacks, may be biologically different from 
those who have TTH headache with none of the features. TTH may be 
infrequent (episodic) or occur on 15 days or more a month (chronic).
Pathophysiology 
The pathophysiology of TTH is incompletely 
understood. It seems likely that TTH is due to a primary disorder of 
central nervous system pain modulation alone, unlike migraine, which 
involves a more generalized disturbance of sensory modulation. Data 
suggest a genetic contribution to TTH, but this may not be a valid 
finding: given the current diagnostic criteria, the studies undoubtedly 
included many migraine patients. The name tension-type headache 
implies that pain is a product of nervous tension, but there is no clear 
evidence for tension as an etiology. Muscle contraction has been 
TABLE 441-7  Clinical Features of the Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias
CLUSTER HEADACHE
PAROXYSMAL HEMICRANIA
SUNCT/SUNA
Gender
M > F
F = M
F ~ M
Pain
  Type
Stabbing, boring
Throbbing, boring, stabbing
Burning, stabbing, sharp
  Severity
Excruciating
Excruciating
Severe to excruciating
  Site
Orbit, temple
Orbit, temple
Periorbital
Attack frequency
1/alternate day–8/d
1–20/d (>5/d for more than half the time)
3–200/d
Duration of attack
15–180 min
2–30 min
5–240 s
Autonomic features
Yes
Yes
Yes (prominent conjunctival injection 
and lacrimation)a
Migrainous featuresb
Yes
Yes
Yes
Alcohol trigger
Yes
No
No
Cutaneous triggers
No
No
Yes
Indomethacin effect
—
Yesc
—
Abortive treatment
Sumatriptan injection or nasal spray
Zolmitriptan nasal spray
Oxygen
nVNSc
Preventive treatment
Verapamil
Galcanezumab
Topiramate
Melatonin
Lithium
Gabapentin
aIf conjunctival injection and tearing are not present, consider SUNA. bNausea, photophobia, or phonophobia; photophobia and phonophobia are typically unilateral on 
the side of the pain. cNoninvasive vagus nerve stimulation is U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved in episodic cluster headache dIndicates complete response to 
indomethacin.
Abbreviations: nVNS, non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation; SUNA, short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic features; SUNCT, 

short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing.

considered to be a feature that distinguishes TTH from migraine, but 
there appear to be no differences in contraction between the two head­
ache types. In primary care, <10% of patients presenting with headache 
over 3 months or more without any neurologic symptoms or signs have 
tension-type headache; >90% have migraine.

TREATMENT
Tension-Type Headache
The pain of TTH can generally be managed with simple analgesics 
such as acetaminophen, aspirin, or NSAIDs. Behavioral approaches 
including relaxation can also be effective. Clinical studies have 
demonstrated that triptans in pure TTH are not helpful, although 
triptans are effective in apparent TTH when the patient also has 
migraine. For chronic TTH, amitriptyline is the only proven treat­
ment (Table 441-6); other tricyclics, selective serotonin reuptake 
inhibitors, and the benzodiazepines have not been shown to be 
effective. There is no evidence for the efficacy of acupuncture. 
Placebo-controlled trials of onabotulinum toxin type A in chronic 
TTH were negative.
CHAPTER 441
■
■TRIGEMINAL AUTONOMIC CEPHALALGIAS, 
INCLUDING CLUSTER HEADACHE
The TACs describe a grouping of primary headache disorders including 
cluster headache, paroxysmal hemicrania (PH), SUNCT (short-lasting 
unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection 
and tearing)/SUNA (short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache 
attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms), and hemicrania continua 
(Table 441-1). TACs are characterized by relatively short-lasting attacks 
of head pain associated with lateralized cranial autonomic symptoms, 
such as lacrimation, conjunctival injection, aural fullness, or nasal con­
gestion (Table 441-7). Pain is usually severe and may occur more than 
once a day. Because of the associated nasal congestion or rhinorrhea, 
patients are often misdiagnosed with “sinus headache” and treated with 
decongestants, which are ineffective.
Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders  
No effective treatment
Lidocaine (IV)
Indomethacind
Lamotrigine
nVNS
Topiramate

TACs must be differentiated from short-lasting headaches that do 
not have prominent cranial autonomic syndromes, notably trigeminal 
neuralgia (TN), primary stabbing headache, and hypnic headache. The 
cycling pattern and length, frequency, and timing of attacks are useful 
in classifying patients. Patients with TACs should be considered, if 
clinically indicated, to undergo pituitary imaging and pituitary func­
tion tests because there is an excess of TAC presentations in clinical 
practice in patients with pituitary tumor–related headache, particularly 
prolactin and growth hormone secreting tumors.

Cluster Headache 
Cluster headache is a relatively rare form of 
primary headache, although nonetheless a common condition, with a 
population frequency of ~0.1%. The pain is deep, usually retroorbital, 
often excruciating in intensity, nonfluctuating, and explosive in qual­
ity. A core feature of cluster headache is periodicity. Usually one of the 
daily attacks of pain recurs at about the same hour each day for the 
duration of a cluster bout. The typical cluster headache patient has 
daily bouts of one to two attacks of relatively short-duration unilateral 
pain for 8–10 weeks a year; this is usually followed by a pain-free inter­
val that averages a little less than 1 year. Cluster headache is character­
ized as chronic when there is <3 months of sustained remission without 
treatment. Patients are generally perfectly well between episodes. Onset 
of attacks is nocturnal in about 50% of patients, and men are affected 
three times more often than women. Patients with cluster headache 
tend to move about during attacks, pacing, rocking, or rubbing their 
head for relief; some may even become aggressive during attacks. This 
is in sharp contrast to patients with migraine, who prefer to remain 
motionless during attacks.
PART 13
Neurologic Disorders
Cluster headache is associated with ipsilateral symptoms of cra­
nial parasympathetic autonomic activation: conjunctival injection or 
lacrimation, aural fullness, rhinorrhea or nasal congestion, or cranial 
sympathetic dysfunction such as ptosis. The sympathetic deficit is 
peripheral and likely to be due to parasympathetic activation with 
injury to ascending sympathetic fibers surrounding a dilated carotid 
artery as it passes into the cranial cavity. When present, photophobia 
and phonophobia are more likely to be unilateral and on the same side 
of the pain, rather than bilateral, in contrast to migraine. This phenom­
enon of unilateral photophobia/phonophobia is characteristic of TACs. 
Cluster headache is likely to be a disorder involving central pacemaker 
neurons and neurons in the posterior hypothalamic region (Fig. 441-3).
TREATMENT
Cluster Headache
The most satisfactory treatment is the administration of drugs to 
prevent cluster attacks until the bout is over. However, treatment 
of acute attacks is required for all cluster headache patients at some 
time.
ACUTE ATTACK TREATMENT
Cluster headache attacks peak rapidly, and thus a treatment with 
rapid onset is required. Many patients with acute cluster headache 
respond very well to oxygen inhalation. This should be given as 
100% oxygen at 10–12 L/min for 15–20 min. It appears that high 
flow and high oxygen content are important, thus ultra-high flow 
with a demand valve may be a better option for some patients. 
Sumatriptan 6 mg SC is rapid in onset and will usually shorten an 
attack to 10–15 min; where available, 3 or 4 mg SC can also be effec­
tive; there is no evidence of tachyphylaxis. Sumatriptan (20 mg) and 
zolmitriptan (5 mg) nasal sprays are both effective in acute cluster 
headache, offering a useful option for patients who may not wish 
to self-inject daily. nVNS is FDA cleared for the acute treatment of 
attacks in episodic cluster headache using three 2-min stimulation 
cycles applied consecutively at the onset of headache on the side 
of pain; this may be repeated after 9 min. Oral sumatriptan is not 
effective for prevention or for acute treatment of cluster headache.
PREVENTIVE TREATMENTS (TABLE 441-8)
The choice of a preventive treatment in cluster headache depends 
in part on the length of the bout. Patients with long bouts or those 

TABLE 441-8  Preventive Management of Cluster Headache
SHORT-TERM PREVENTION
LONG-TERM PREVENTION
EPISODIC CLUSTER HEADACHE AND 
PROLONGED CHRONIC CLUSTER 
HEADACHE
EPISODIC CLUSTER HEADACHE
Prednisone 1 mg/kg up to 60 mg qd, 
tapering over 21 days
Verapamil 160–960 mg/d
Galcanezumab 300 mg SC
Greater occipital nerve injection (local 
anesthetic and corticosteroids)
Verapamil 160–960 mg/d
nVNS 6–24 stimulations/d
Melatonina 9–12 mg/d
Topiramatea 100–400 mg/d
Lithium 400–800 mg/d
Abbreviations: nVNS, noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation.
with chronic cluster headache require medicines that are safe 
when taken for long periods. For patients with relatively short 
bouts, limited courses of oral glucocorticoids can be very use­
ful. A 10-day course of prednisone, beginning at 60 mg daily 
for 7 days and followed by a rapid taper, may interrupt the pain 
bout for many patients. Greater occipital nerve injection with 
lidocaine and corticosteroids has been shown to be effective in 
randomized controlled trials, with a benefit that lasts up to 6–8 
weeks. The CGRP monoclonal antibody galcanezumab has been 
approved by the FDA for treatment of episodic cluster headache; 
it reduces attack frequency, is well tolerated, and is often an effec­
tive option.
Most experts favor verapamil as the first-line preventive treat­
ment for patients with chronic cluster headache or with prolonged 
bouts. While verapamil compares favorably with lithium in practice, 
some patients require verapamil doses far in excess of those admin­
istered for cardiac disorders. The initial dose range is 40–80 mg 
twice daily; effective doses may be as high as 960 mg/d. Side effects 
such as constipation, leg swelling, or gingival hyperplasia can be 
problematic. Of paramount concern, however, is the cardiovascular 
safety of verapamil, particularly at high doses. Verapamil can cause 
heart block by slowing conduction in the atrioventricular node, a 
condition that can be monitored by following the PR interval on a 
standard electrocardiogram (ECG). Approximately 20% of patients 
treated with verapamil develop ECG abnormalities, which can be 
observed with doses as low as 240 mg/d; these abnormalities can 
worsen over time in patients on stable doses. A baseline ECG is 
recommended for all patients. The ECG is repeated 10 days after a 
dose change in patients whose dose is being increased above 240 mg 
daily. Dose increases are usually made in 80-mg increments. For 
patients on long-term verapamil, ECG monitoring every 6 months 
is advised.
NEUROMODULATION THERAPY
When medical therapies fail in chronic cluster headache, neuro­
modulation strategies can be used. Sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) 
stimulation with an implanted battery-free stimulator has been 
shown in randomized controlled trials to be effective in aborting 
attacks and reducing their frequency over time. nVNS compares 
favorably with standard-of-care in open-label experience. Similarly, 
occipital nerve stimulation has been used open label and appears to 
be beneficial. Deep-brain stimulation of the region of the posterior 
hypothalamic gray matter is successful in about 50% of patients 
treated, although its risk-versus-benefit ratio makes it inappropriate 
before all other less invasive options have been explored.
■
■PAROXYSMAL HEMICRANIA
Paroxysmal hemicrania (PH) is characterized by frequent unilateral, 
severe, short-lasting episodes of headache. Like cluster headache, the 
pain tends to be retroorbital but may be experienced all over the head 
and is associated with cranial autonomic phenomena such as lacrima­
tion and nasal congestion. Patients with remissions are said to have 
episodic PH, whereas those with the nonremitting form are said to 
have chronic PH. The essential features of PH are unilateral very severe

pain; short-lasting attacks (2–45 min); very frequent attacks (usually >5 
a day); marked autonomic features ipsilateral to the pain; rapid course 
(<72 h); and excellent response to indomethacin. In contrast to cluster 
headache, which predominantly affects males, the male-to-female ratio 
in PH is close to 1:1.
Indomethacin (25–75 mg tid), which can completely suppress 
attacks of PH, is the treatment of choice. Although therapy may be 
complicated by indomethacin-induced gastrointestinal side effects, 
currently there are no consistently effective alternatives. Topiramate 
is helpful in some cases. nVNS can be very effective in PH. Melatonin 
may be indomethacin-sparing in some patients. Verapamil, an effective 
treatment for cluster headache, does not appear to be useful for PH. 
In occasional patients, PH can coexist with TN (PH-tic syndrome); 
similar to cluster-tic syndrome, each component may require separate 
treatment.
Secondary PH has been reported with lesions in the region of the 
sella turcica, including arteriovenous malformation, cavernous sinus 
meningioma, pituitary pathology, and epidermoid tumors. Secondary 
PH is more likely if the patient requires high doses (>200 mg/d) of 
indomethacin. In patients with apparent bilateral PH, raised cerebro­
spinal fluid (CSF) pressure should be suspected. It is important to note 
that indomethacin reduces CSF pressure. When a diagnosis of PH is 
considered, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is indicated to exclude 
a pituitary lesion.
■
■SUNCT/SUNA
SUNCT is a rare primary headache syndrome characterized by severe, 
unilateral orbital or temporal pain that is stabbing or throbbing in 
quality. Diagnosis requires at least 20 attacks, lasting for 5–240 s; 
ipsilateral conjunctival injection and lacrimation should be present. In 
some patients, conjunctival injection or lacrimation is missing, and the 
diagnosis of SUNA can be made.
Diagnosis 
The pain of SUNCT/SUNA is unilateral and may be 
located anywhere in the head. Three basic patterns can be seen: single 
stabs, which are usually short-lived; groups of stabs; or a longer attack 
comprising many stabs between which the pain does not completely 
resolve, thus giving a “saw-tooth” phenomenon with attacks lasting 
many minutes. Each pattern may be seen in the context of an under­
lying continuous head pain. Characteristics that lead to a suspected 
diagnosis of SUNCT are the cutaneous (or other) triggers of attacks, a 
lack of refractory period to triggering between attacks, and the lack of a 
response to indomethacin. Apart from trigeminal sensory disturbance, 
the neurologic examination is normal in primary SUNCT/SUNA.
The diagnosis of SUNCT/SUNA is often confused with TN, par­
ticularly in first-division TN (Chap. 452). Minimal or no cranial auto­
nomic symptoms and a clear refractory period to triggering indicate a 
diagnosis of TN.
Secondary (Symptomatic) SUNCT 
SUNCT can be seen with 
posterior fossa or pituitary lesions. All patients with SUNCT/SUNA 
should be evaluated with pituitary function tests and a brain MRI with 
pituitary views.
TREATMENT
SUNCT/SUNA
ABORTIVE THERAPY
Therapy of acute attacks is not a useful concept in SUNCT/SUNA 
because the attacks are of such short duration. However, IV lido­
caine, which arrests the symptoms, can be used in hospitalized 
patients.
PREVENTIVE THERAPY
Long-term prevention to minimize disability and hospitalization is 
the goal of treatment. The most effective treatment for prevention 
is lamotrigine, 200–400 mg/d. Topiramate and gabapentin may also 
be effective. Carbamazepine, 400–500 mg/d, has been reported by 
patients to offer modest benefit.

Surgical approaches such as microvascular decompression or 
destructive trigeminal procedures are seldom useful and often 
produce long-term complications. Greater occipital nerve injection 
has produced limited benefit in some patients. nVNS may be use­
ful. Occipital nerve stimulation is probably helpful in a subgroup of 
these patients. For intractable cases, short-term prevention with IV 
lidocaine can be effective.

■
■HEMICRANIA CONTINUA
The essential features of hemicrania continua are moderate and con­
tinuous unilateral pain associated with fluctuations of severe pain; 
complete resolution of pain with indomethacin; and exacerbations that 
may be associated with cranial autonomic features, including conjunc­
tival injection, lacrimation, and photophobia on the affected side. The 
age of onset ranges from 10 to 70 years; women are affected twice as 
often as men. The cause is unknown.
CHAPTER 441
TREATMENT
Hemicrania Continua
Treatment consists of indomethacin; other NSAIDs appear to be 
of little or no benefit. The IM injection of 100 mg of indomethacin 
has been proposed as a diagnostic tool, and administration with a 
placebo injection in a blinded fashion can be very useful diagnosti­
cally. Alternatively, a trial of oral indomethacin, starting with 25 mg 
tid, then 50 mg tid, and then 75 mg tid, can be given. Up to 2 weeks 
at the maximal dose may be necessary to assess whether a dose has 
a useful effect. Topiramate can be helpful in some patients. nVNS 
can be very useful in these patients. Melatonin can be useful as an 
indomethacin-sparing agent. Occipital nerve stimulation probably 
has a role in patients with hemicrania continua who are unable to 
tolerate indomethacin.
Migraine and Other Primary Headache Disorders  
■
■OTHER PRIMARY HEADACHE DISORDERS
Primary Cough Headache 
Primary cough (Valsalva maneuver) 
headache is a generalized headache that begins suddenly, lasts for 
seconds or several minutes, sometimes up to a few hours, and is pre­
cipitated by coughing; it is preventable by avoiding coughing or other 
precipitating events, which can include sneezing, straining, laughing, 
or stooping. In all patients with this syndrome, serious etiologies must 
be excluded before a diagnosis of “benign” primary cough headache 
can be established. A Chiari malformation or any lesion causing 
obstruction of CSF pathways or displacing cerebral structures can be 
the cause of the head pain. Other conditions that can present with 
cough or exertional headache as the initial symptom include cerebral 
aneurysm, carotid stenosis, and vertebrobasilar disease. Benign cough 
headache can resemble benign exertional headache (below); patients 
with the former condition are typically older.
TREATMENT
Primary Cough Headache
Indomethacin 25–50 mg two to three times daily is the treatment 
of choice. Some patients with cough headache obtain complete 
cessation of their attacks with lumbar puncture; this is a simple 
option when compared to prolonged use of indomethacin, and it 
is effective in about one-third of patients. The mechanism of this 
response is unclear.
Primary Exercise Headache 
Primary exercise headache has 
features resembling both cough headache and migraine. It may be 
precipitated by any form of exercise; it often has the pulsatile quality 
of migraine. The pain lasts <48 h, is bilateral, and is often throbbing 
at onset; migrainous features may develop in patients susceptible to 
migraine. The duration tends to be shorter in adolescents than in older 
adults. Primary exercise headache can be prevented by avoiding exces­
sive exertion, particularly in hot weather or at high altitude.

The mechanism of primary exercise headache is unclear. Acute 
venous distension likely explains one syndrome—the acute onset 
of headache with straining and breath holding, as in weightlifter’s 
headache. Because exercise can trigger headache in a number of seri­
ous underlying conditions (Chap. 17), these must be considered in 
patients with exercise headache. Pain from angina may be referred to 
the head, probably by central connections of vagal afferents, and may 
present as exercise headache (cardiac cephalgia). The link to exercise is 
the main clinical clue that headache is of cardiac origin. Pheochromo­
cytoma may occasionally cause exercise headache. Intracranial lesions 
and stenosis of the carotid arteries are other possible etiologies.

TREATMENT
Primary Exercise Headache
Exercise regimens should begin modestly and progress gradu­
ally to higher levels of intensity. Indomethacin at daily doses from 
25–150 mg is generally effective in benign exertional headache. 
Indomethacin (50 mg), a gepant-rimegepant (75 mg orally) or 
ubrogepant (100 mg orally), ergotamine (1 mg orally), and dihy­
droergotamine (2 mg by nasal spray) are useful short-term pre­
ventive measures.
PART 13
Neurologic Disorders
Primary Headache Associated with Sexual Activity 
Three 
types of sex headache are reported: a dull bilateral ache in the head and 
neck that intensifies as sexual excitement increases; a sudden, severe, 
explosive headache occurring at orgasm; and a postural headache 
developing after coitus. The latter arises from vigorous sexual activity 
and is a form of low CSF pressure headache and thus not a primary 
headache disorder (Chap. 17). Headaches developing at the time of 
orgasm are not always benign; 5–12% of cases of subarachnoid hemor­
rhage are precipitated by sexual intercourse. Sex headache is reported 
by men more often than women and may occur at any time during the 
years of sexual activity. It may appear on several occasions in succes­
sion and then not trouble the patient again, even without an obvious 
change in sexual activity. In patients who stop sexual activity when 
headache is first noticed, the pain may subside within a period of 
5 min to 2 h. In about half of patients, sex headache will subside within 
6 months. Most patients with sex headache do not have exercise or 
cough headache; this clinical paradox is generally a marker of primary 
sex headache. Migraine is probably more common in patients with sex 
headache.
TREATMENT
Primary Sex Headache
Benign sex headaches recur irregularly and infrequently. Manage­
ment can often be limited to reassurance and advice about ceasing 
sexual activity if a mild, warning headache develops. Propranolol 
can be used to prevent headache that recurs regularly or frequently, 
but the dosage required varies from 40–200 mg/d. An alterna­
tive is the calcium channel–blocking agent diltiazem, 60 mg tid. 
Indomethacin (25–50 mg), a gepant-rimegepant (75 mg orally) or 
ubrogepant (100 mg orally), or frovatriptan (2.5 mg), taken 30–45 min 
prior to sexual activity can also be helpful.
Primary Thunderclap Headache 
Sudden onset of severe head­
ache may occur in the absence of any known provocation. The 
differential diagnosis includes the sentinel bleed of an intracranial 
aneurysm, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS), 
cervicocephalic arterial dissection, and cerebral venous thrombosis. 
Headaches of explosive onset may also be caused by the ingestion of 
sympathomimetic drugs or of tyramine-containing foods in a patient 
who is taking MAOIs, or they may be a symptom of pheochromo­
cytoma. Whether thunderclap headache can be the presentation of 
an unruptured cerebral aneurysm is uncertain; some experts believe 

that RCVS is the cause of most or all cases of otherwise undiagnosed 
thunderclap headache. When neuroimaging studies and lumbar 
puncture exclude subarachnoid hemorrhage, patients with thunder­
clap headache usually do very well over the long term. In one study of 
patients whose computed tomography (CT) scans and CSF findings 
were negative, ~15% had recurrent episodes of thunderclap headache, 
and nearly half subsequently developed migraine or TTH.
The first presentation of any sudden-onset severe headache should 
be diligently investigated with neuroimaging (CT or, when pos­
sible, MRI with MR angiography) and CSF examination. In the 
presence of posterior leukoencephalopathy, the differential diagnosis 
includes cerebral angiitis, posterior reversible encephalopathy syn­
drome (PRES), drug toxicity (cyclosporine, intrathecal methotrexate/
cytarabine, pseudoephedrine, or cocaine), posttransfusion effects, and 
postpartum angiopathy. Treatment with nimodipine may be helpful, 
although the vasoconstriction often resolves spontaneously.
Cold-Stimulus Headache 
This refers to head pain triggered by 
application or ingestion/inhalation of something cold. It is brought on 
quickly and typically resolves within 10–30 min of the stimulus being 
removed. It is best recognized as “brain-freeze” headache or ice-cream 
headache when due to ingestion. Although cold may be uncomfortable 
at some level for many people, it is the reliable, severe, and somewhat 
prolonged nature of these pains that set them apart. The transient 
receptor potential cation subfamily M member 8 (TRPM8) channel, a 
known cold-temperature sensor, may be a mediator of this syndrome. 
Naproxen 500 mg taken 30 min prior to exposure can be helpful for 
this problem.
External Pressure Headache 
External pressure from compres­
sion or traction on the head can produce a pain that may have some 
generalized component, although the pain is largely focused around 
the site of the pressure. It typically resolves within an hour of the stimu­
lus being removed. Examples of stimuli include helmets, swimming 
goggles, or very long ponytails. Treatment is to recognize the problem 
and remove the stimulus.
Primary Stabbing Headache 
The essential features of primary 
stabbing headache are stabbing pain confined to the head or, rarely, 
the face, lasting from 1 to many seconds and occurring as a single stab 
or a series of stabs; absence of associated cranial autonomic features; 
absence of cutaneous triggering of attacks; and a pattern of recurrence 
at irregular intervals (hours to days). When present in adolescents, 
primary stabbing headache may be a presenting and very troublesome 
problem for the patient. The pains have been variously described as 
“ice-pick pains” or “jabs and jolts.” They are more common in patients 
with other primary headaches, such as migraine, the TACs, and hemi­
crania continua. A key clinical feature is an irregular cadence compared 
to the regular cadence of the throbbing or pounding that characterizes 
migraine.
TREATMENT
Primary Stabbing Headache
The response of primary stabbing headache to indomethacin 
(25–50 mg two to three times daily) is usually excellent. As a general 
rule, the symptoms wax and wane, and after a period of control on 
indomethacin, it is appropriate to withdraw treatment and observe 
the outcome.
Nummular Headache 
Nummular headache is felt as a round 
or elliptical discomfort that is fixed in place, ranges in size from 
1–6 cm, and may be continuous or intermittent. Uncommonly, it may 
be multifocal. It may be episodic but is more often continuous during 
exacerbations. Accompanying the pain there may be a local sensory 
disturbance, such as allodynia or hypesthesia. Local dermatologic or 
bony lesions need to be excluded by examination and investigation. 
This condition can be difficult to treat when present in isolation;