# 115 - 222 Candidiasis

### 222 Candidiasis

The goal of maintenance is to prevent recurrent disease, and its 
duration depends on the immune status of the patient. Individu­
als who remain deeply immunocompromised, such as those with 
HIV whose CD4+ T lymphocyte counts remain <200/μL or have 
not attained control of HIV with ART may need to remain on flu­
conazole indefinitely. Newer triazoles like voriconazole, posaconazole, 
and isavuconazole are highly active against cryptococcal strains 
and appear to be clinically effective, but clinical experience with 
these agents is limited. An oral formulation (cochleated) of AmB 
is in development. The echinocandins are not effective against 
Cryptococcus species. Addition of a short course of interferon γ to 
antifungal therapy in patients with HIV infection increases clear­
ance of cryptococci from the CSF. Antifungal drug resistance has 
not been a major problem with cryptococcal strains, but there 
are increasing reports of drug-resistant strains, including some 
emerging during the prolonged therapy needed for cryptococco­
sis. Hence, cryptococcosis that is refractory to antifungal therapy 
should prompt an investigation into the susceptibility of the clinical 
isolates in question.

Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis may be associated with 
increased ICP, which can damage the brain and cranial nerves. CSF 
pressure should be measured and increased ICP diligently man­
aged in such patients. The mechanism leading to increased ICP is 
often excess CSF fluid. Neurologic symptoms, including headache, 
blurred vision, cranial nerve abnormalities, and altered mental sta­
tus, are typical clues to increased ICP. Management requires reduc­
tion of pressure by repeated therapeutic lumbar punctures and the 
placement of shunts. Neither mannitol nor acetazolamide is effec­
tive. Glucocorticoids are not helpful unless the elevated ICP is from 
a brain lesion with associated mass effect and edema.
PART 5
Infectious Diseases
Several clinical syndromes in cryptococcosis are driven by an 
overactive immune response. In people with HIV disease who 
are treated with ART, an immune reconstitution inflammatory 
syndrome (IRIS) occurs when immunity rebounds in the setting 
of treated cryptococcosis (or an undiagnosed asymptomatic infec­
tion). Similar syndromes can occur in transplant recipients whose 
immunosuppressive regimens have been reduced to help control 
the infection and even in non-immunocompromised people with 
infection that had appeared to be resolving. The immune response 
triggers an inflammatory reaction that can be difficult to distin­
guish from a relapsing infection. Symptoms can include fevers, 
headache, lymphadenopathy, and pulmonary, CNS, and cutaneous 
manifestations. Administration of prophylactic dexamethasone in 
HIV-associated cryptococcosis is not recommended because it has 
been associated with reduced fungal clearance and increased mor­
tality. The approach to patients that have already developed IRIS 
and the related immune-driven syndromes must attempt to balance 
resurgent immunity against immune-mediated damage. Manage­
ment is individualized and can involve the use of glucocorticoids to 
reduce inflammation. Apart from the difficulties in distinguishing 
these inflammatory syndromes from cryptococcal relapse, their 
management is complex because the cause is often triggered by the 
desirable outcome of improving immunity, which is important in 
controlling cryptococcal infection and preventing relapses.
A major consideration for clinicians treating symptomatic AIDSrelated cryptococcosis is when to begin ART, which can trigger 
rebounding immunity. Current recommendations are to start ART 
4−6 weeks after initiating antifungal therapy. Screening with serum 
CRAg is recommended for asymptomatic people with HIV and 
CD4+ T lymphocyte counts of <100–200/μL. Positive tests should 
be followed up with careful evaluation for active disease including 
CSF analysis. For those with antigenemia but no evidence of active 
disease, a preemptive fluconazole regimen is recommended with 
14 days of induction dosing at 800 mg daily and up to 1200 mg 
daily when fungal burden is high (e.g., CRAg titers exceed 1:80) 
followed by consolidation and maintenance dosing. Initiation of 
ART should start 2 weeks after initiation of antifungal therapy in 
such circumstances.

■
■PROGNOSIS AND COMPLICATIONS
Even with antifungal therapy, cryptococcosis is associated with high 
rates of morbidity and death. For most patients with cryptococcosis, 
the most important prognostic factors are the extent and the dura­
tion of the underlying immunologic deficits that predisposed them to 
develop the disease. Cryptococcosis is often curable with antifungal 
therapy in individuals with no apparent immunologic dysfunction, but 
in patients with irreversible immunosuppression, the best that can be 
hoped for is that antifungal therapy will induce remission, which can 
then be maintained with lifelong suppressive therapy. Before the advent 
of ART, the median overall survival period for AIDS patients with 
cryptococcosis was <1 year. Cryptococcosis in patients with underlying 
neoplastic disease has a particularly poor prognosis. For CNS crypto­
coccosis, poor prognostic markers are a CSF assay positive for yeast 
cells on initial India ink examination (evidence of a heavy fungal bur­
den), high CSF pressure, low CSF glucose levels, low CSF pleocytosis 
(<2/μL), recovery of yeast cells from extraneural sites, absence of anti­
body to capsular polysaccharide, a CSF or serum cryptococcal antigen 
level of ≥1:32, and concomitant glucocorticoid therapy or hematologic 
malignancy. A response to treatment does not guarantee cure since 
relapse of cryptococcosis is common even among patients with rela­
tively intact immune systems and immune reconstitution syndromes 
can occur in patients who had been improving with antifungal therapy. 
Complications of CNS cryptococcosis include cranial nerve deficits, 
vision and hearing loss, and cognitive impairment.
■
■PREVENTION
No vaccine is available for cryptococcosis. Primary prophylaxis with 
fluconazole 100–200 mg daily is an approach in high-risk HIV patients 
(e.g., CD4+ T lymphocyte count <100/μL) and can be used in places 
where cryptococcal antigen testing is not readily available. Since ART 
raises the CD4+ T lymphocyte count, it constitutes an immunologic 
form of prophylaxis.
■
■FURTHER READING
Alanio A: Dormancy in Cryptococcus neoformans: 60 years of accu­
mulating evidence. J Clin Invest 130:3353, 2020.
Boyer-Chammard T et al: Recent advances in managing HIV-associated 
cryptococcal meningitis. F1000Res 8:F1000 Faculty Rev-743, 2019.
Kwon-Chung KJ et al: The case for adopting the “species complex” 
nomenclature for the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. mSphere 
2:e00357, 2017.
Robertson EJ et al: Cryptococcus neoformans ex vivo capsule size is 
associated with intracranial pressure and host immune response in 
HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. J Infect Dis 209:74, 2014.
Ssebambulidde K et al: Treatment recommendations for non-HIV 
associated cryptococcal meningoencephalitis including management 
of post-infectious inflammatory response syndrome. Front Neurol 
13:994396, 2022.
Tugume L et al: Cryptococcal meningitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 9:62, 
2023.
Michail S. Lionakis, Shakti Singh, 

Ashraf S. Ibrahim, John E. Edwards, Jr.

Candidiasis
The genus Candida encompasses >150 species, only a few of which 
cause disease in humans. With rare exceptions (although the excep­
tions are increasing in number), the human pathogens are C. albicans, 
C. guilliermondii (recently revised to Meyerozyma guilliermondii), 
C. krusei (recently revised to Pichia kudriavzevii), C. parapsilosis,

C. tropicalis, C. lusitaniae (recently revised to Clavispora lusitaniae), 

C. dubliniensis, C. glabrata (recently revised to Nakaseomyces glabratus), 
and the emerging, multidrug-resistant C. auris, which has been respon­
sible for several outbreaks in health care facilities in recent years. Ubiq­
uitous in nature, they inhabit the gastrointestinal tract (including the 
mouth and oropharynx), the female genital tract, and the skin in the 
majority of healthy persons. Although cases of candidiasis have been 
described since antiquity in debilitated patients, the advent of Candida 
species as common human pathogens dates to the introduction of 
modern therapeutic approaches that suppress normal host defense 
mechanisms. Of those advances, the most important are the use of 
antibacterial agents that alter the normal human microbiota and allow 
nonbacterial species to become more prevalent in the commensal flora, 
the use of indwelling intravenous catheters, and the use of cytotoxic, 
immunosuppressive treatments for malignant and autoimmune disor­
ders. With the introduction of antifungal agents, the causes of Candida 
infections shifted from an almost complete dominance of C. albicans 
to the common involvement of C. glabrata and the other species listed 
above. The non-albicans species now account for approximately half of 
all cases of candidemia and hematogenously disseminated candidiasis. 
Recognition of this change is clinically important since the various spe­
cies differ in susceptibility and are increasingly resistant to the newer 
antifungal agents.
Candida is a small, thin-walled, ovoid yeast that measures 4–6 μm 
in diameter and reproduces by budding. Organisms of this genus 
occur in three forms in tissue: blastospores, pseudohyphae, and 
hyphae. Candida grows readily on simple media; lysis centrifugation 
enhances its recovery from blood. Species are identified by biochemi­
cal testing (currently with automated devices) or on special agar (e.g., 
CHROMagar).
■
■EPIDEMIOLOGY
Candida are present in humans as commensals, in animals, in foods, 
and on inanimate objects. In developed countries, where contemporary 
medical therapeutics are commonly used, Candida species are now 
among the most common nosocomial pathogens. In the United States, 
these species are among the four most common pathogens isolated 
from the blood of hospitalized patients. In fact, in a recent pointprevalence study in the United States, Candida species were the most 
common organisms infecting the bloodstream of hospitalized patients. 
In regions where advanced medical care is not readily available, muco­
cutaneous Candida infections, such as thrush, are more common than 
deep-organ infections, which rarely occur. However, the incidence of 
deep-organ candidiasis has been increasing steadily as advances in 
health care—such as therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics, more 
aggressive treatment of cancer, and the use of immunosuppression for 
sustaining organ transplants—have been implemented. In aggregate, 
the global incidence of infections due to Candida species has risen over 
the past few decades.
C. auris is an emerging species of Candida that has spread rapidly in 
recent years to >50 countries and is a major public health concern. It 
was designated an urgent threat in the 2019 Centers for Disease Con­
trol and Prevention (CDC) Antimicrobial Resistance Threat Report, 
and it was included within the critical priority group in the 2022 
World Health Organization (WHO) fungal priority pathogens list. This 
concern stems from its occurrence in health care facilities, its ability 
to adhere to and persist long term on inanimate objects (in hospitals) 
and the human skin despite decolonization efforts, its association 
with substantial mortality, its propensity for misidentification as other 
Candida species, the incomplete understanding of its environmental 
reservoirs, and its multidrug resistance to the current antifungal thera­
peutic armamentarium, with some C. auris strains being resistant to all 
antifungal drug classes currently available for treatment. C. auris (auris 
meaning ear in Latin) was first identified in 2009 from the ear drain­
age of a patient with an ear infection in Japan. However, subsequent 
retrospective analysis of Candida strain collections identified the earli­
est known C. auris strain to date back to 1996 in South Korea. Notably, 
whole genome sequencing analysis of C. auris strains from South Asia, 
East Asia, South America, South Africa, and Iran found that although 

strains within each geographic region are closely related to each other, 
they are distinct compared to strains from other geographic regions. 
These findings indicate that C. auris emerged independently in mul­
tiple geographic locations around the same time; the epidemiologic 
reasons for this emergence remain poorly understood but may relate to 
the increasing use of antifungal drugs and climate change.

The presence of a central venous catheter and/or other invasive 
medical devices and recent residence in nursing homes are major risk 
factors for C. auris colonization and infection. Screening of selected 
patients who are in a hospital or nursing home where C. auris has 
been cultured and are at risk for dissemination from a colonization site 
may help in implementing effective infection control measures. Hand 
hygiene with an alcohol-based hand sanitizer is recommended when 
hands are not visibly soiled, in which case washing with soap and water 
is preferred. Identifying the source of contamination, if possible, and 
using an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered hospitalgrade disinfectant effective against Clostridioides difficile spores are 
desirable. If a patient develops an invasive or bloodstream infection, 
it is recommended that the health care facility informs the CDC, or a 
similar agency in other countries, and adheres to recommendations for 
infection control, including isolation of patients (contact or enhanced 
barrier precautions), use of proper personal protective coverings, 
enforcement of hospital environment hygiene, and communicating 
with other health care facilities if the patient is being transferred.
■
■PATHOGENESIS
In the most severe form of Candida infection, the organisms dis­
seminate hematogenously and form microabscesses and small mac­
roabscesses in major organs. Although the exact mechanism is not 
known, Candida probably enters the bloodstream from mucosal 
surfaces after growing to large numbers as a consequence of bacterial 
suppression by antibacterial drugs and breaches in the integrity of the 
mucosal barrier; alternatively, in some instances, the organism may 
enter the bloodstream from the skin via central venous catheters. A 
change from the blastospore stage to the pseudohyphal and hyphal 
stages is generally considered integral to Candida’s penetration into 
tissue. However, C. glabrata and C. auris can cause life-threatening 
infection, even though they do not transform into pseudohyphae or 
hyphae. Adherence to both epithelial and endothelial cells is thought 
to be the first step in invasion and infection; several adhesins have 
been identified as well as a mucosal toxin, candidalysin. Biofilm 
formation also is considered important in pathogenesis. Numerous 
reviews of cases of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis have 
identified the predisposing factors or conditions associated with 
disease (Table 222-1).
CHAPTER 222
Candidiasis
Several genes that are involved in the pathogenesis of other Candida 
species—such as those responsible for biofilm formation, proteinases, 
lipases, phospholipases, hydrolases, adhesins, secreted aspartyl prote­
ases, and transporters involved in azole resistance—are also present in 
C. auris. Unlike other Candida species, several C. auris strains exhibit 
aggregate-forming properties in vivo, which may enable immune eva­
sion. In addition, C. auris shows a unique tolerance to high temperature 
and saline concentrations and can grow optimally at up to 42°C and in 
a 10% saline concentration, making it possible to exist and persist in 
harsh environments. Furthermore, C. auris has significant affinity for 
TABLE 222-1  Well-Recognized Factors and Conditions Predisposing to 
Hematogenously Disseminated Candidiasis
Antibacterial agents
Indwelling intravenous catheters
Hyperalimentation fluids
Indwelling urinary catheters
Parenteral glucocorticoids
Severe burns
CARD9 deficiency (central nervous 
system)
Abdominal and thoracic surgery
Cytotoxic chemotherapy
Immunosuppressive agents for organ 
transplantation
Respirators
Myeloperoxidase deficiency
Neutropenia
Low birth weight (neonates)
Diabetes

abiotic surfaces such as plastic materials and medical devices, as well 
as human skin and nasal and ear cavities, which may account for its 
persistent colonization capabilities. The C. auris–specific adhesin sur­
face colonization factor 1 (SCF1) was recently identified as a key fungal 
factor governing biofilm formation, colonization of skin and medical 
devices, and virulence during invasive infection.

Innate immunity is the most important defense mechanism against 
hematogenously disseminated candidiasis, and the neutrophil is the 
most potent component of this defense. Macrophages also play an 
important host defense role. On the other hand, interleukin (IL) 17–
producing innate and adaptive lymphoid cells contribute significantly 
to defense against mucocutaneous candidiasis as evidenced by several 
monogenic disorders of IL-17 receptor signaling that manifest with 
chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) (see “Clinical Manifestations,” 
below). Although many immunocompetent individuals have antibodies 
to Candida, the role of these antibodies in defense against the organism is 
not clear. Multiple genetic polymorphisms in host immune-related genes 
that predispose to both disseminated and focal candidiasis have been 
identified and may contribute to patient susceptibility.
■
■CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
Mucocutaneous Candidiasis 
Thrush is characterized by white, 
adherent, painless, discrete or confluent patches in the mouth, on the 
tongue, or in the esophagus, occasionally with fissuring at the corners 
of the mouth. This form of disease caused by Candida can also occur 
at points of contact with dentures (called “denture sore mouth”). 
Organisms are identifiable in gram-stained scrapings from lesions. 
The occurrence of thrush in a young, otherwise healthy-appearing 
person should prompt an investigation for underlying HIV infec­
tion. More commonly, thrush is seen as a nonspecific manifestation 
of severe debilitating illness. Vulvovaginal candidiasis is accompanied 
by pruritus, pain, and vaginal discharge, which is usually thin but may 
contain whitish “curds” in severe cases. In contrast to oral thrush, 
HIV is not considered a major risk factor for vulvovaginal candidiasis. 
Instead, many women who receive antibiotics, particularly β-lactams, 
may develop vulvovaginal candidiasis. A subset of patients with recur­
rent vulvovaginitis may have a deficiency in the surface expression of 
Dectin-1, encoded by CLEC7A, a major recognition factor for β-glucan 
on the surface of Candida and/or in the downstream adaptor molecule 
CARD9, which ultimately increases the propensity for recurrent muco­
cutaneous (including vaginal) infections.
PART 5
Infectious Diseases
Other Candida skin infections include paronychia, a painful swelling 
at the nail–skin interface; onychomycosis, a fungal nail infection rarely 
caused by this genus; intertrigo, an erythematous irritation with red­
ness and pustules in the skin folds; balanitis, an erythematous-pustular 
infection of the glans penis; erosio interdigitalis blastomycetica, an infec­
tion between the digits of the hands or toes; folliculitis, with pustules 
developing most frequently in the area of the beard; perianal candidia­
sis, a pruritic, erythematous, pustular infection surrounding the anus; 
mastitis; and diaper rash, a common erythematous, pustular perineal 
infection in infants. Generalized disseminated cutaneous candidiasis, 
another form of infection that occurs primarily in infants, is character­
ized by widespread eruptions over the trunk, thorax, and extremities. 
The diagnostic macronodular lesions of hematogenously disseminated 
candidiasis (Fig. 222-1) indicate a high probability of dissemination to 
multiple organs as well as the skin. While the lesions are seen predomi­
nantly in immunocompromised patients treated with cytotoxic drugs, 
they may also develop in patients without neutropenia.
CMC is a heterogeneous infection of the hair, nails, skin, and mucous 
membranes that persists despite intermittent antifungal therapy. The 
onset of disease usually comes in infancy or within the first two 
decades of life, but in rare cases, it occurs in later life. The condition 
may be mild and limited to a specific area of the skin or nails, or it may 
take a severely disfiguring form (Candida granuloma) characterized 
by exophytic outgrowths on the skin. CMC is usually associated with 
specific immunologic dysfunction; most frequently reported is a failure 
of lymphocytes to secrete or respond to type-17 cytokines following 
stimulation by Candida antigens in vitro. A subset of the affected 

FIGURE 222-1  Macronodular skin lesions associated with hematogenously 
disseminated candidiasis. Candida organisms are usually but not always visible 
on histopathologic examination. The fungi grow when a portion of the biopsied 
specimen is cultured. Therefore, for optimal identification, both histopathology 
and culture should be performed. (Image courtesy of Dr. Noah Craft and the Victor 
Newcomer collection at UCLA, archived by Logical Images, Inc.; with permission.)
patients has mutations in the IL-17 receptors IL-17RA or IL-17RC, its 
adaptor molecule ACT1 (TRAF3IP2), or, more often, in STAT1.
Approximately half of patients with CMC have associated endocrine 
abnormalities either in the setting of gain-of-function mutations in STAT1 
or in the context of autoimmune polyendocrinopathy–candidiasis–
ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) syndrome. This syndrome is due 
to mutations in the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene and is most 
prevalent among Finns, Iranian Jews, and Sardinians. Conditions that 
usually follow the onset of the disease include hypoparathyroidism, 
adrenal insufficiency, autoimmune thyroiditis, autoimmune hepatitis, 
autoimmune pneumonitis, alopecia, pernicious anemia, intestinal mal­
absorption, and primary hypogonadism. In addition, dental enamel 
dysplasia, vitiligo, nail dystrophy, asplenia, and calcification of the 
brain and tympanic membranes may occur. Patients with CMC rarely 
develop hematogenously disseminated candidiasis, reflecting their 
intact neutrophil function.
Deeply Invasive Candidiasis 
Deeply invasive Candida infections 
may or may not be due to hematogenous seeding. Deep esophageal 
infection may result from penetration by organisms from superficial 
esophageal erosions; joint or deep-wound infection from contiguous 
spread of organisms from the skin; kidney infection from catheterinitiated ascending spread of organisms through the urinary tract; 
infection of intraabdominal organs and the peritoneum from perfora­
tion of the gastrointestinal tract; and gallbladder infection from retro­
grade migration of organisms from the gastrointestinal tract into the 
biliary drainage system.
However, more commonly, deeply invasive candidiasis results from 
hematogenous seeding of various organs as a complication of candi­
demia. Once the organism gains access to the intravascular compart­
ment (either from the gastrointestinal tract or, less often, from the skin 
through the site of an indwelling intravascular catheter), it may spread 
hematogenously to a variety of deep organs. The brain, chorioretina 
(Fig. 222-2), heart, and kidneys are most commonly infected and the 
liver and spleen are less commonly affected in nonneutropenic hosts 
(but most often involved in neutropenic patients). In fact, nearly any 
organ can become involved, including the endocrine glands, pancreas, 
heart valves (native or prosthetic), skeletal muscle, joints (native or 
prosthetic), bones, and meninges. Candida organisms can also spread 
hematogenously to the skin and cause classic macronodular lesions 
(Fig. 222-1). Frequently, painful muscular involvement is evident 
beneath the area of affected skin. Chorioretinal involvement and skin 
involvement are highly significant since both findings are associ­
ated with a very high probability of abscess formation in multiple

FIGURE 222-2  Hematogenous Candida endophthalmitis. A classic off-white lesion 
projecting from the chorioretina into the vitreous causes the surrounding haze. The 
lesion is composed primarily of inflammatory cells rather than organisms. Lesions 
of this type may progress to cause extensive vitreal inflammation and eventual loss 
of the eye. Partial vitrectomy, combined with IV and possibly intravitreal antifungal 
therapy, may be helpful in controlling the lesions. (Image courtesy of Dr. Gary 
Holland; with permission.)
deep organs as a result of generalized hematogenous seeding. Ocular 
involvement (Fig. 222-2) may require specific treatment (e.g., partial 
vitrectomy or intraocular injection of antifungal agents) to prevent per­
manent blindness. An ocular examination is indicated for patients with 
candidemia, whether or not they have ocular manifestations. C. auris 
invasive infections are similar to those of other Candida species and 
are most frequently associated with recent surgical procedures, immu­
nosuppression, invasive devices such as catheters or various support or 
drainage tubes, and extended hospital stays. In the majority of invasive 
infections, C. auris has been isolated from the blood, but invasion of 
the kidney or spleen, and its recovery from cerebrospinal, bile, perito­
neal, and pleural fluids demonstrate its invasiveness and dissemination 
potential. C. auris–associated candidemia can be life-threatening, with 
a crude mortality rate of 30–60%.
■
■DIAGNOSIS
The diagnosis of Candida infection is established by visualization of 
pseudohyphae or hyphae on wet mount (saline and 10% KOH), tis­
sue Gram stain, periodic acid–Schiff stain, or methenamine silver 
stain in the presence of inflammation. Absence of organisms on 
hematoxylin-eosin staining does not reliably exclude Candida infec­
tion. The most challenging aspect of diagnosis is determining which 
patients with Candida isolates have hematogenously disseminated 
A
B
C
FIGURE 222-3  C. auris colony morphology and color on CHROMagar plates. A. Candida mixed culture: culture of C. glabrata (purple), C. tropicalis (navy blue), and C. auris 
(white, circled in red). B. C. auris showing multiple colony morphologies. C. C. auris after Salt SAB Dulcitol Broth enrichment. (From CDC: Identification of Candida auris. 
Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/identification.html.)

candidiasis. For instance, recovery of Candida from sputum, urine, or 
peritoneal catheters may indicate mere colonization rather than deepseated infection, and Candida isolation from the blood of patients with 
indwelling intravascular catheters may reflect inconsequential seeding 
of the blood from or growth of the organisms on the catheter. Despite 
extensive research into both antigen and antibody detection systems, 
there is currently no widely available and validated diagnostic test to 
distinguish patients with inconsequential seeding of the blood from 
those whose positive blood cultures represent hematogenous dissemi­
nation to multiple organs. Many studies have examined the utility of 
the β-glucan test; at present, its greatest utility is its negative predictive 
value (~90%). Meanwhile, the presence of ocular or macronodular skin 
lesions is highly suggestive of widespread infection of multiple deep 
organs. Despite extensive diagnostic tests for hematogenous dissemi­
nation, such as polymerase chain reaction and T2 technology, no test 
is fully validated or widely available at present. Matrix-assisted laser 
desorption–ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDITOF MS) is now being used extensively for detection and speciation 
and is useful for the correct diagnosis of C. auris.

C. auris can be misdiagnosed in the microbiology laboratory, often 
leading to inappropriate treatment and delay in the implementation of 
appropriate infection control measures. Preliminary testing by culturing 
the fungus and examination of colony morphology may help in the initial 
identification, but this must be confirmed with more advanced diagnos­
tic methods. For example, features such as budding yeast morphology, 
absence of hyphal growth or germ tubes, and growth at 40–42°C (unlike 
other Candida species) on CHROMagar that may appear white, pink, 
red, or purple should raise suspicion for C. auris (Fig. 222-3).
CHAPTER 222
Several advanced molecular techniques accurately identify C. auris 
strains and therefore are being used for the follow-up testing and 
confirmation of the specimens that failed to be identified by tradi­
tional methods. MALDI-TOF equipment with upgraded libraries, 
such as Bruker Biotyper MALDI-TOF (CA System library version 
claim 4 or research use only [RUO] libraries versions 2014 [5627] and 
more recent), and using the bioMérieux VITEK MALDI-TOF MS 
(IVD v3.2 or RUO libraries with Saramis Ver 4.14 database and Sac­
charomycetaceae update), are the most common methods of C. auris 
identification. Other supplemental MALDI-TOF databases, such as 
MicrobeNet, which include additional C. auris strains from the four 
phylogenetic clades (i.e., South Asian, East Asian, South American, 
and South African) also can be used for the identification of C. auris 
strains. Sequencing of the D1–D2 region of the 28s rDNA or the 
internal transcribed region (ITS) of rDNA can also correctly identify 
C. auris. Recently, an automated, qualitative nucleic acid multiplex in 
vitro diagnostic test by GenMark called ePlex Blood Culture Identifica­
tion Fungal Pathogen (BCID-FP) Panel was approved by the U.S. Food 
and Drug Administration for C. auris testing. Also, several polymerase 
chain reaction–based detection methods have been reported to identify 

Candidiasis

TABLE 222-2  Typical Decision-Making Steps in the Diagnosis of C. auris
NO.
METHOD
DATABASE/SOFTWARE
INITIAL FINDING
CONFIRMATION
1.
Bruker Biotyper 
MALDI-TOF
RUO libraries
C. auris
C. auris
CA System library
C. auris
C. auris
2.
bioMérieux VITEK 
MS MALDI-TOF
RUO library
C. auris
C. auris
IVD library (v3.2)
C. auris
C. auris
Older IVD libraries
C. haemulonii
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
C. lusitaniae
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
No identification
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
3.
VITEK 2 YST
Software version 8.01
C. auris
C. auris confirmed
C. haemulonii
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
C. duobushaemulonii
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
Candida spp. not identified
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
Older versions
C. haemulonii
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
C. duobushaemulonii
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
Candida spp. not identified
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
4.
API 20C
 
Rhodotorula glutinis, if characteristic red color absent
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
C. sake
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
Candida spp. not identified
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
5.
API ID 32C
 
C. intermedia
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
C. sake
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
Saccharomyces kluyveri
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
6.
BD Phoenix
 
C. catenulata
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
C. haemulonii
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
Candida spp. not identified
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
PART 5
Infectious Diseases
7.
MicroScan
 
C. lusitaniae
No hyphal growth present
Can rule out C. lusitaniae, C.
guilliermondii, and C. parapsilosis.
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
C. guilliermondii
C. parapsilosis
C. lusitaniae
Hyphal growth present
Possibly C. lusitaniae,
C. guilliermondii, C. parapsilosis, or
C. auris: Needs further workup
C. guilliermondii
C. parapsilosis
C. famata
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
Candida spp. not identified
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
8.
RapID Yeast Plus
 
C. parapsilosis → Test on 
corneal agar
Candida spp. not identified
C. auris possible: Needs further workup
9.
GenMark ePlex 
BCID-FP Panel
 
C. auris
C. auris confirmed
Abbreviations: IVD, in vitro diagnostic; RUO, research use only.
Source: Adapted from CDC: Identification of Candida auris. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/pdf/Testing-algorithm_by-Method_508.pdf.
C. auris in various specimens. Table 222-2 outlines the typical 
decision-making steps in the diagnosis of C. auris by using different 
methods. A suspicious C. auris specimen is usually sent to a regional 
reference laboratory for further testing and confirmation of C. auris.
TREATMENT
Candida Infections
MUCOCUTANEOUS CANDIDA INFECTION
The treatment of mucocutaneous candidiasis is summarized in 
Table 222-3.
CANDIDEMIA AND SUSPECTED HEMATOGENOUSLY 
DISSEMINATED CANDIDIASIS
All patients with candidemia are treated with a systemic anti­
fungal agent. A certain percentage of patients, including many of 
those who have candidemia associated with an indwelling intra­
vascular catheter, probably have “benign” candidemia rather than 

No hyphal growth present
Can rule out C. parapsilosis. C. auris possible: Needs 
further workup
Hyphal growth present
Possibly C. parapsilosis or
C. auris: Needs further workup
deep-organ seeding. However, because there is no reliable way to 
distinguish benign candidemia from deep-organ infection, and 
because antifungal drugs less toxic than amphotericin B are avail­
able, antifungal treatment for candidemia—with or without clinical 
evidence of deep-organ involvement—has become the standard 
of practice. In addition, if an indwelling intravascular catheter is 
TABLE 222-3  Treatment of Mucocutaneous Candidal Infections
DISEASE
PREFERRED TREATMENT
ALTERNATIVES
Cutaneous
Topical azole
Topical nystatin
Vulvovaginal
Oral fluconazole (150 mg) or 
ibrexafungerp (300 mg twice daily for 1 
day) or azole cream or suppository
Nystatin suppository
Oral (thrush)
Fluconazole tablets (100–200 mg/d)
Clotrimazole trashes, 
nystatin
Esophageal
Fluconazole tablets (100–200 mg/d) or 
itraconazole solution (200 mg/d)
Caspofungin, 
micafungin, or 
amphotericin B

TABLE 222-4  Agents for the Treatment of Disseminated Candidiasis
ROUTE OF 
ADMINISTRATION
DOSEa
COMMENT
AGENT
Amphotericin B deoxycholate
IV only
0.5–1.0 mg/kg daily
Mostly replaced by lipid formulations
Amphotericin B lipid formulations
 
 
Not approved as primary therapy by the U.S. Food and Drug 
Administration, but used commonly because they are less toxic than 
amphotericin B deoxycholate
  Liposomal (AmBiSome, Abelcet)
IV only
3.0–5.0 mg/kg daily
 
  Lipid complex (ABLC)
IV only
3.0–5.0 mg/kg daily
 
  Colloidal dispersion (ABCD)
IV only
3.0–5.0 mg/kg daily
Associated with frequent infusion reactions
Azolesb
 
 
 
  Posaconazole
IV and oral
300 mg/d (IV)
200 mg tid (oral)
  Fluconazole
IV and oral
400 mg/d
Most commonly used
  Voriconazole
IV and oral
400 mg/d
Multiple drug interactions, visual hallucinations, fluorosis, phototoxicity
Approved for candidemia in nonneutropenic patients
Echinocandins
 
 
Broad spectrum against Candida species; approved for disseminated 
candidiasis; less toxic than amphotericin B formulations
  Caspofungin
IV only
50 mg/d
 
  Anidulafungin
IV only
100 mg/d
 
  Micafungin
  Rezafungin
IV only
IV only
100 mg/d
400 mg loading dose, 200 mg 
once weekly thereafter
aFor loading doses and adjustments in renal failure, see Pappas PG et al: Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious 
Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 62:e1, 2016. The recommended duration of therapy is 2 weeks beyond the last positive blood culture and the resolution of signs 
and symptoms of infection. bAlthough ketoconazole is approved for the treatment of disseminated candidiasis, it has been replaced by the newer agents listed in this table. 
Posaconazole has been approved for prophylaxis in neutropenic patients and for oropharyngeal candidiasis.
present, it is best to remove or replace the device whenever feasible. 
Moreover, an infectious disease consultation is recommended as it 
has been associated with improved patient outcomes.
The drugs used for the treatment of candidemia and suspected 
disseminated candidiasis are listed in Table 222-4. Various lipid 
formulations of amphotericin B, four echinocandins, the azoles 
fluconazole and voriconazole, and in some instances, the newer 
triazole posaconazole are used; no agent within a given class has 
been clearly identified as superior to the others. Most institutions 
choose an agent from each class on the basis of their own specific 
microbial epidemiology, strategies to minimize toxicities, and cost 
considerations. An echinocandin is the first choice of treatment. 
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved 
the new-generation echinocandin rezafungin for the treatment of 
candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adult patients; rezafungin 
has a prolonged half-life, which allows for once-weekly 200-mg dos­
ing following a 400-mg front-loading dose. Echinocandin treatment 
continues until sensitivities or speciation is determined. In stable 
patients, many centers then switch to fluconazole if a sensitive strain 
is identified and there is no evidence of hematogenous dissemina­
tion. For hemodynamically unstable or neutropenic patients, initial 
treatment with echinocandins is warranted, and once the clinical 
response has been assessed and the pathogen specifically identified, 
the regimen can be altered according to the sensitivities. At present, 
the vast majority of C. albicans isolates are sensitive to fluconazole. 
Isolates of C. glabrata and C. krusei are less sensitive to fluconazole 
and more sensitive to polyenes and echinocandins. C. parapsilosis 
is less sensitive to echinocandins in vitro; however, this lesser sen­
sitivity is considered clinically insignificant. Posaconazole has been 
approved for prophylaxis, including against Candida, in neutropenic 
patients. Itraconazole is rarely used for Candida nowadays, and isa­
vuconazole is not recommended for this indication.
Antifungal drug resistance is one of the hallmarks of C. auris 
infections. Some C. auris strains have multidrug resistance with 
elevated minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to all three 
major antifungal classes—azoles, echinocandins, and polyenes—
resulting in limited treatment options. A CDC study reported 
antifungal resistance in C. auris strains obtained from 54 patients 

Approved for prophylaxis
 
CHAPTER 222
in India, Pakistan, South Africa, and Venezuela: 93% were resistant 
to fluconazole, 35% to amphotericin B, and 7% to echinocandins; 
41% of the tested strains were resistant to two antifungal classes, 
and, alarmingly, 4% of the tested strains were resistant to all three 
classes of antifungal drugs. A 2023 CDC report indicated that rates 
of C. auris echinocandin resistance tripled in 2021 compared to the 
prior 2 years. Almost all C. auris strains that have been identified 
have elevated MICs for fluconazole with variable susceptibilities to 
other triazoles (Table 222-5), associated with mutations in ERG11encoded lanosterol demethylase and/or overexpression of drug 
transporters/efflux pumps.
Candidiasis
Due to the high rates of azole resistance among C. auris strains, 
the use of echinocandins is recommended as first-line therapy for 

C. auris infection. By contrast, the CDC discourages the use of 
antifungal drugs for the treatment of colonization of C. auris in the 
absence of invasive or bloodstream infection. A history of patient 
travel or residence in a health care or nursing facility with a known 
TABLE 222-5  Typical MICs of Available Antifungal Drugs for C. auris
TENTATIVE 
RESISTANCE 
BREAKPOINTSa
MIC RANGE, μg/mL
DRUG
MIC
MIC50
MIC90
Amphotericin B
≥2
0.06–8
0.5–1
2–4
Fluconazole
≥32
0.12–≥64
≥64
≥64
Itraconazole
N/A
0.032–2
0.06–0.5
0.25–1
Voriconazole
N/A
0.032–16
0.5–2
2–8
Posaconazole
N/A
0.015–16
0.016–0.5
0.125–2
Isavuconazole
N/A
0.015–4
0.125–0.25
0.5–2
Caspofungin
≥2
0.03–16
0.25–1
1–2
Anidulafungin
≥4
0.015–16
0.125–0.5
0.5–1
Micafungin
≥4
0.015–8
0.125–0.25
0.25–2
aTentative resistance breakpoints per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC) (www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-antifungal.html).
Abbreviations: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; N/A, not available.
Source: Adapted from CDC: Antifungal susceptibility testing and interpretation. 
Available at: www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-antifungal.html.

TABLE 222-6  List of CDC-Recommended Echinocandin Doses for the 
Treatment of C. auris Infections
CHILDREN 

(>2 MONTHS)
INFANTS 

(<2 MONTHS)
DRUG
ADULTS
Caspofungin
Loading dose 
70 mg IV, then 
50 mg IV daily
Loading dose 70 mg/m2 per 
day IV, then 50 mg/m2 per 
day IV
25 mg/m2 per 
day IV
Anidulafungin
Loading dose 
200 mg IV, then 
100 mg IV daily
Not approved for use in 
children
Not approved for 
use in children
Micafungin
100 mg IV daily
2 mg/kg per day IV with 
option to increase to 4 mg/
kg per day IV in children at 
least 40 kg
10 mg/kg per 
day IV
Abbreviation: CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Source: Adapted from CDC: Treatment and management of infections and colonization. 
Available at: www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-treatment.html.
outbreak of C. auris infection, as well as drug susceptibility data of 
identified strains, act as a guide for the effective choice of treatment 
of invasive and bloodstream infections. C. auris is known to develop 
antibiotic resistance during treatment. Therefore, the emergence of 
antifungal resistance should be closely monitored with follow-up cul­
tures and repeat susceptibility testing. Antibiotic stewardship should 
be implemented to ameliorate the risk of development of drug resis­
tance. Patients may remain colonized with C. auris during or after the 
successful treatment of invasive C. auris infection. Therefore, infec­
tion control measures should be implemented throughout patient 
care. Table 222-6 outlines CDC-recommended echinocandin doses 
for the initial antifungal treatment for C. auris infections.
PART 5
Infectious Diseases
In cases of echinocandin resistance, liposomal amphotericin 
B (5 mg/kg per day) can be considered. For neonates and infants 
(<2 months old), amphotericin B deoxycholate (1 mg/kg per day) 
treatment can be initiated. If this fails, liposomal amphotericin B 
(5 mg/kg per day) can be given. In very severe cases, if all treat­
ment options fail, echinocandins per CDC recommendations can 
be given (Table 222-6). Other considerations for C. auris infection 
management can be referenced from the 2016 Infectious Diseases 
Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Man­
agement of Candidiasis.
Some generalizations exist regarding the management of specific 
Candida infections. Recovery of Candida from sputum is almost 
never indicative of underlying pulmonary candidiasis and does not 
by itself warrant antifungal treatment. Similarly, Candida in the 
urine of a patient with an indwelling bladder catheter may represent 
colonization only, rather than bladder or kidney infection. However, 
the threshold for systemic treatment is lower in general in severely 
ill patients in this category since it is impossible to distinguish colo­
nization from lower or upper urinary tract infection. If the isolate is 

C. albicans, most clinicians use oral fluconazole rather than a bladder 
washout with amphotericin B, which was more commonly used in 
the past. Although echinocandins are poorly excreted into the urine, 
they may be an option, especially for non-albicans isolates. The doses 
and duration are the same as for disseminated candidiasis. The sig­
nificance of the recovery of Candida from abdominal drains in post­
operative patients is unclear, but again, the threshold for treatment 
is generally low because most of the affected patients have been sub­
jected to risk factors predisposing them to disseminated candidiasis. 
In addition, there has been a considerable increase in the recognition 
and diagnosis of intraabdominal candidiasis.
Removal of the infected valve and long-term antifungal admin­
istration constitute appropriate treatment for Candida endocardi­
tis. Although definitive studies are not available, patients usually are 
treated for weeks with a systemic antifungal agent (Table 222-4) and 
then given chronic suppressive therapy for months or years (sometimes 
indefinitely) with an oral azole (usually fluconazole at 400–800 mg/d).
Hematogenous Candida endophthalmitis is a special problem 
requiring ophthalmologic consultation. When lesions are expanding 

or are threatening the macula, an IV polyene combined with flucy­
tosine (25 mg/kg four times daily) has been the regimen of choice, 
although comparative studies with other regimens have not yet been 
reported. As more data on the newer triazoles (e.g., voriconazole) 
and the echinocandins become available, new strategies involving 
these agents are developing, although it is important to note that 
echinocandins exhibit low penetration in ocular tissue. Of para­
mount importance is the decision to perform a partial vitrectomy. 
This procedure debulks the infection and can preserve sight, which 
may otherwise be lost due to vitreal scarring. All patients with can­
didemia should undergo ophthalmologic examination because of the 
relatively high frequency of this ocular complication (up to 15–20% 
in some case series). This examination can detect a developing eye 
lesion early in its course; in addition, identification of a lesion signi­
fies a probability of ~90% of deep-organ abscesses and may prompt 
prolongation of therapy for candidemia beyond the recommended 
2 weeks after the last positive blood culture. Although the basis for 
the consensus is a very small data set, the recommended treatment 
for Candida meningitis is a polyene (Table 222-4) plus flucytosine 
(25 mg/kg four times daily). Development of Candida meningo­
encephalitis in an otherwise immunocompetent individual should 
raise suspicion for deficiency in the C-type lectin receptor adaptor 
molecule CARD9 and should prompt genetic testing to rule out this 
monogenic disorder. Successful treatment of Candida-infected pros­
thetic material (e.g., an artificial joint) nearly always requires removal 
of the infected material followed by long-term administration of an 
antifungal agent selected on the basis of the isolate’s sensitivity and 
the logistics of administration.
■
■PROPHYLAXIS
The use of antifungal agents to prevent Candida infections has been 
controversial, but some general principles have emerged. Most centers 
administer prophylactic fluconazole (400 mg/d) to recipients of alloge­
neic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. High-risk liver transplant 
recipients are also given fluconazole prophylaxis in most centers. The 
use of prophylaxis for neutropenic patients has varied considerably 
from center to center; many centers that elect to give prophylaxis to this 
population use either fluconazole (200–400 mg/d) or a lipid formula­
tion of amphotericin B (AmBisome, 1–2 mg/d). Caspofungin (50 mg/d) 
also has been used. Posaconazole (200 mg three times daily) has been 
approved by the FDA for prophylaxis in neutropenic patients; it is gain­
ing in popularity and may replace fluconazole in settings when mold 
activity is desired.
Prophylaxis is sometimes given to surgical patients at very high 
risk for candidiasis. The widespread use of prophylaxis for nearly all 
patients in general surgical or medical intensive care units is not—and 
should not be—a common practice for three reasons: (1) the incidence 
of disseminated candidiasis is relatively low, (2) the cost–benefit ratio is 
suboptimal, and (3) increased resistance with widespread prophylaxis 
is a valid concern.
Prophylaxis for oropharyngeal or esophageal candidiasis in HIVinfected patients is not recommended unless there are frequent 
recurrences.
■
■FURTHER READING
Lionakis MS, Edwards JE jr: Candida species, in Mandell, Douglas, 
and Bennett’s Principles of Infectious Diseases, 10th ed. Blaser MJ 
et al (eds). Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2025.
Pappas PG et al: Invasive candidiasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 62:e1, 2018.
Pechacek J, Lionakis MS: Host defense mechanisms against Candida 
auris. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 21:1087, 2023.
Proctor DM et al: Integrated genomic, epidemiologic investigation 
of Candida auris skin colonization in a skilled nursing facility. Nat 
Med 27:1401, 2021.
Santana DJ et al: A Candida auris-specific adhesin, Scf1, governs sur­
face association, colonization, and virulence. Science 381:1461, 2023.
Tsai SV et al: Burden of candidemia in the United States, 2017. Clin 
Infect Dis 71:e449, 2020.