# 12 - 342 Acute Appendicitis and Peritonitis

### 342 Acute Appendicitis and Peritonitis

Danny O. Jacobs

Acute Appendicitis and 
Peritonitis
ACUTE APPENDICITIS
■
■INCIDENCE AND EPIDEMIOLOGY
Acute appendicitis is the most common acute general surgery emer­
gency affecting the abdomen, with a rate of ~10–11 cases per 10,000 
people annually over the past several decades affecting biological males 
and females equivalently. Appendicitis still occurs most commonly in 
10- to 19-year-olds, although the worldwide incidence and average 
age at diagnosis appear to be increasing gradually, whereas disability 
from complications and mortality appear to be decreasing. Significant 
differences in geographic risk variation are noted in the United States 
and worldwide.
The risk of perforation is ~10–20% and is a significant cause of 
excess morbidity for all patients, but the risk appears to be signifi­
cantly higher in patients <5 or >65 years of age. Patients with higher 
socioeconomic status appear to have lower risk of appendicitis with or 
without perforation. It is also important to note that the incidence of 
appendiceal tumors also appears to be increasing.
How best to manage patients who present with an appendiceal 
mass and small localized abscess without perforation is controversial, 
especially whether interval or immediate appendectomy should be per­
formed when both can be appropriate depending on the clinical details.
PART 10
Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
■
■PATHOGENESIS OF APPENDICITIS AND 
APPENDICEAL PERFORATION
Appendicitis was first described in 1886 by Reginald Fitz. Its etiology is 
still not completely understood. Fecaliths, incompletely digested food 
residue, lymphoid hyperplasia, intraluminal scarring, tumors, bacteria, 
viruses, and inflammatory bowel disease have all been associated with 
inflammation of the appendix with potentially different outcomes 
depending on pathogenesis.
Although not proven, obstruction of the appendiceal lumen is 
believed to be an important step in the development of appendicitis—
at least in some cases. Here, obstruction leads to bacterial overgrowth 
and luminal distension, with an increase in intraluminal pressure that 
can inhibit the flow of lymph and blood. Then, vascular thrombosis 
and ischemic necrosis with perforation of the distal appendix may 
occur. For this reason, perforation that occurs near the base of the 
appendix should raise concerns about another disease process. Most 
patients who will perforate do so before they are evaluated by surgeons.
Appendiceal fecaliths (or appendicoliths) are found in ~50% of 
patients with gangrenous appendicitis who perforate but are rarely 
identified in those who have simpler disease. This suggests that the 
underlying pathophysiologic processes are different. Uncomplicated 
appendicitis (e.g., without gangrenous necrosis, appendicoliths, perfo­
ration, or tumors) does not always progress to perforation. It appears 
that at least some cases of simple acute appendicitis may temporarily 
resolve or be managed with antibiotic therapy, although at least onethird will require subsequent appendectomy. Nevertheless, appen­
dicitis does not invariably progress to perforation, and the use of 
nonoperative therapies to treat uncomplicated appendicitis continues 
to be studied intensively.
These findings highlight the importance of clinical decision-making 
and risk assessment when deciding and discussing treatment options 
with patients who presumably have simple disease, for example, decid­
ing who is an appropriate candidate for nonoperative management 
and who is not without bias. The latter is especially pertinent given the 
difficulty in assessing which patients might progress to perforation and 
which will not.
When perforation occurs, the resultant leak may be contained by 
the omentum or other surrounding tissues to form an abscess. Free 

TABLE 342-1  Some Conditions That Mimic Appendicitis
Crohn’s disease
Cholecystitis or other gallbladder disease
COVID-19 infection occasionally co-incident
Diverticulitis
Ectopic pregnancy
Endometriosis
Gastroenteritis or colitis
Gastric or duodenal ulceration
Hepatitis
Kidney disease, including nephrolithiasis
Liver abscess
Meckel’s diverticulitis
Mittelschmerz
Mesenteric adenitis
Omental torsion
Pancreatitis
Lower lobe pneumonia
Pelvic inflammatory disease
Ruptured ovarian cyst or other 
cystic disease of the ovaries
Small-bowel obstruction
Urinary tract infection
perforation normally causes severe peritonitis. These patients may also 
develop infective suppurative thrombosis of the portal vein and its 
tributaries along with intrahepatic abscesses. The prognosis of the very 
unfortunate patients who develop this rare but dreaded complication 
is very poor.
■
■CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
Improved diagnosis, supportive care, and surgical interventions are 
likely responsible for the remarkable decrease in the risk of mortal­
ity from simple appendicitis to currently <1%. Nevertheless, it is still 
important to identify patients who might have appendicitis as early 
as possible. Patients who have persistent symptoms that have not 
improved over 48 h may be more likely to perforate or develop other 
complications.
Appendicitis should be included in the differential diagnosis of 
abdominal pain for every patient in any age group unless it is certain 
that the organ has been previously removed (Table 342-1).
The appendix’s anatomic location, which varies, may directly influ­
ence how the patient presents. Where the appendix can be “found” 
ranges from local differences in how the appendiceal body and tip 
lie relative to its attachment to the cecum (Figs. 342-1 and 342-2), to 
where the appendix is actually situated in the peritoneal cavity—for 
example, from its typical location in the right lower quadrant, to the 
pelvis, right flank, right upper quadrant (as may be observed during 
pregnancy), or even the left side of the abdomen for patients with mal­
rotation or who have severely redundant colons.
Because the differential diagnosis of appendicitis is so extensive, 
deciding if a patient has appendicitis can be difficult (Table 342-2). 
Many patients may not present with the classically described history or 
physical findings, and some may not have any abdominal discomfort 
early in the disease process. Soliciting an appropriate history requires 
detecting and evaluating symptoms that might suggest alternative 
diagnoses.
0.5%
64%
1%
32%
2%
FIGURE 342-1  Regional anatomic variations of the appendix.

FIGURE 342-2  Locations of the appendix and cecum.
What is the classic history? Nonspecific complaints occur first. 
Patients may notice changes in bowel habits or malaise and vague, 
perhaps intermittent, crampy abdominal pain in the epigastric or peri­
umbilical region. The pain subsequently migrates to the right lower 
quadrant over 12–24 h, where it is sharper and can be definitively local­
ized as transmural inflammation when the appendix irritates the pari­
etal peritoneum. Parietal peritoneal irritation may be associated with 
local muscle rigidity and stiffness. Patients with appendicitis will most 
often observe that their nausea, if present, followed the development of 
abdominal pain, which can help distinguish them from patients with 
gastroenteritis, for example, in whom nausea occurs first. Emesis, if 
present, also occurs after the onset of pain and is typically mild and 
scant. Thus, timing of the onset of symptoms and the characteristics 
of the patient’s pain and any associated findings must be rigorously 
assessed. Anorexia is so common that the diagnosis of appendicitis 
should be questioned in its absence.
Arriving at the correct diagnosis is even more challenging when 
the appendix is not located in the right lower quadrant, in women of 
childbearing age, and in the very young or elderly. Because the differ­
ential diagnosis of appendicitis is so broad, often the key question to 
answer expeditiously is whether the patient has appendicitis or some 
other condition that requires immediate operative intervention. A 
major concern is that the likelihood of a delay in diagnosis is greater 
TABLE 342-2  Relative Frequency of Common Presenting Symptoms
SYMPTOMS
FREQUENCY
Abdominal pain
>95%
Anorexia
>70%
Constipation
4–16%
Diarrhea
4–16%
Fever
10–20%
Migration of pain to right lower 
quadrant
50–60%
Nausea
>65%
Vomiting
50–75%

TABLE 342-3  Relative Frequency of Some Presenting Signs
SIGNS
FREQUENCY
Abdominal tenderness
>95%
Right lower quadrant tenderness
>90%
Rebound tenderness
30–70%
Rectal tenderness
30–40%
Cervical motion tenderness
30%
Rigidity
~10%
Psoas sign
3–5%
Obturator sign
5–10%
Rovsing’s sign
5%
Palpable mass
<5%
if the appendix is unusually positioned. All patients should undergo a 
rectal examination. An inflamed appendix located behind the cecum 
or below the pelvic brim may prompt very little tenderness of the ante­
rior abdominal wall.
Patients with pelvic appendicitis are more likely to present with 
dysuria, urinary frequency, diarrhea, or tenesmus. They may only 
experience pain in the suprapubic region on palpation or on rectal 
or pelvic examination. A pelvic examination in women is mandatory 
to rule out conditions affecting urogynecologic organs that can cause 
abdominal pain and mimic appendicitis such as pelvic inflammatory 
disease, ectopic pregnancy, and ovarian torsion. None of the currently 
available decision tools yet appear to be able to circumvent or obviate 
the need for expert clinical opinion. The relative frequencies of some 
presenting signs are displayed in Table 342-3.
CHAPTER 342
Patients with simple appendicitis normally only appear mildly ill 
with a pulse and temperature that are usually only slightly above nor­
mal. The provider should be concerned about other disease processes 
beside appendicitis or the presence of complications such as perfora­
tion, phlegmon, or abscess formation if the temperature is >38.3°C 
(~101°F) and if there are rigors.
Acute Appendicitis and Peritonitis
Patients with appendicitis will be found to lie quite still to avoid 
peritoneal irritation caused by movement, and some will report dis­
comfort caused by a bumpy car ride on the way to the hospital or clinic, 
coughing, sneezing, or other actions that replicate a Valsalva maneuver. 
The entire abdomen should be examined systematically starting in an 
area where the patient does not report discomfort if possible. Clas­
sically, maximal tenderness is identified where the appendix is most 
often located—in the right lower quadrant at or near McBurney’s point, 
which is approximately one-third of the way along a line originating at 
the anterior iliac spine and running to the umbilicus. Gentle pressure 
in the left lower quadrant may elicit pain in the right lower quadrant 
if the appendix is located there. This is Rovsing’s sign (Table 342-4). 
Evidence of parietal peritoneal irritation is often best elicited by gentle 
abdominal percussion, jiggling the patient’s gurney or bed, or mildly 
bumping the feet.
Atypical presentation and pain patterns are common, especially in 
the very old or the very young. Diagnosing appendicitis in children can 
be especially challenging because they tend to respond so dramatically 
to stimulation and obtaining an accurate history may be difficult. In 
addition, it is important to remember that the smaller omentum found 
in children may be less likely to wall off an appendiceal perforation. 
Observing the child in a quiet surrounding may be helpful.
TABLE 342-4  Classic Signs of Appendicitis in Patients with Abdominal 
Pain
MANEUVER
FINDINGS
Rovsing’s sign
Palpating in the left lower quadrant causes pain in the right 
lower quadrant
Obturator sign
Internal rotation of the hip causes pain, suggesting the 
possibility of an inflamed appendix located in the pelvis
Iliopsoas sign
Extending the right hip causes pain along posterolateral 
back and hip, suggesting retrocecal appendicitis

Signs and symptoms of appendicitis can be subtle in the elderly who 
may not react as vigorously to appendicitis as younger people. Pain, if 
noticed, may be minimal and have originated in the right lower quad­
rant or, otherwise, where the appendix is located. It may never have 
been noticed to be intermittent, or there may only be significant dis­
comfort with deep palpation. Nausea, anorexia, and emesis may be the 
predominant complaints. The rare patient may even present with signs 
and symptoms of distal bowel obstruction secondary to appendiceal 
inflammation and phlegmon or abscess formation.

■
■LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory testing does not identify patients with appendicitis. The 
white blood cell count is only mildly to moderately elevated in ~70% 
of patients with simple appendicitis (with a leukocytosis of 10,000–
18,000 cells/μL). A “left shift” toward immature polymorphonuclear 
leukocytes is present in >95% of cases. A sickle cell preparation may 
be prudent to obtain in those of African, Spanish, Mediterranean, or 
Indian ancestry. Serum amylase and lipase levels should be measured.
Urinalysis is indicated to help exclude genitourinary conditions that 
may mimic acute appendicitis, but a few red or white blood cells may 
be present as a nonspecific finding. An inflamed appendix that abuts 
the ureter or bladder may cause sterile pyuria or hematuria. Every 
woman of childbearing age should have a pregnancy test. Cervical cul­
tures are indicated if pelvic inflammatory disease is suspected. Anemia 
and guaiac-positive stools should raise concern about the presence of 
other diseases or complications such as cancer.
■
■IMAGING
Plain films of the abdomen are rarely helpful and so are not routinely 
obtained unless the clinician is worried about other conditions such as 
intestinal obstruction, perforated viscus, or ureterolithiasis. Less than 
5% of patients will present with an opaque fecalith in the right lower 
quadrant. The presence of a fecalith is not diagnostic of appendicitis, 
although its presence in an appropriate location where the patient com­
plains of pain is suggestive and is associated with a greater likelihood 
of complications.
PART 10
Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
The effectiveness of ultrasonography as a tool to diagnosis appen­
dicitis is highly operator dependent. Even in very skilled hands, the 
appendix may not be visualized. Its overall sensitivity is ~0.86, with a 
specificity of 0.81. Ultrasonography, especially intravaginal techniques, 
appears to be most useful for identifying pelvic pathology in women. 
Ultrasonographic findings suggesting the presence of appendicitis 
include wall thickening, an increased appendiceal diameter, and the 
presence of free fluid. Current practice in some institutions is to first 
perform ultrasonography and progress to other imaging studies only if 
the findings are equivocal or complications are suspected.
The sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) are 
at least 0.94 and 0.95, respectively. Thus, CT imaging, given its high 
negative predictive value, especially with the safe use of oral and intra­
venous contrast, may be helpful if the diagnosis is in doubt, although 
studies performed early in the course of disease may not have any typi­
cal radiographic findings. Overall, in patients in whom the diagnosis 
is uncertain, delaying operation at the time of presentation to obtain 
CT does not appear to increase the risk of perforation. CT scanning 
is a superior method for assessing the severity of acute appendicitis in 
the absence of peritoneal findings indicative of perforation, abscess, or 
suspicion of an associated malignancy.
Suggestive findings on CT examination include dilatation >6 mm 
with wall thickening, a lumen that does not fill with enteric contrast, 
and fatty tissue stranding or air surrounding the appendix, which sug­
gests inflammation (Figs. 342-3 and 342-4). The presence of luminal 
air or contrast is not consistent with a diagnosis of appendicitis. Fur­
thermore, nonvisualization of the appendix is a nonspecific finding 
that should not be used to rule out the presence of appendiceal or 
periappendiceal inflammation.
■
■SPECIAL PATIENT POPULATIONS
Appendicitis is the most common extrauterine general surgical emer­
gency observed during pregnancy. Early symptoms of appendicitis such 
as nausea and anorexia may be overlooked. Diagnosing appendicitis 

FIGURE 342-3  Computed tomography with oral and intravenous contrast of acute 
appendicitis. There is thickening of the wall of the appendix and periappendiceal 
stranding (arrow).
in pregnant patients may be especially difficult because as the uterus 
enlarges the appendix may be pushed higher along the right flank even to 
the right upper quadrant or because the gravid uterus may obscure typi­
cal physical findings. Ultrasonography may facilitate early diagnosis. A 
high index of suspicion is required because of the effects of unrecognized 
and untreated appendicitis on the fetus. For example, the fetal mortality 
rate is four times greater (from 5 to 20%) in patients with perforation.
Immunocompromised patients may present with only mild tender­
ness and may have many other disease processes in their differential 
diagnosis, including atypical infections from mycobacteria, Cytomega­
lovirus, or other fungi. Enterocolitis is a concern and may be present 
in patients who present with abdominal pain, fever, and neutropenia 
due to chemotherapy. CT imaging may be very helpful, although it is 
important not to be overly cautious and delay operative intervention 
for those patients who are believed to have appendicitis.
TREATMENT
Acute Appendicitis
In the absence of contraindications, most patients who have 
strongly suggestive medical histories and physical examinations 
FIGURE 342-4  Appendiceal fecalith (arrow).

with supportive laboratory findings are candidates for appendec­
tomy. Certainly, in some instances, imaging studies are not manda­
tory but are often obtained before surgical consultation is requested. 
Imaging and close observation are appropriate in patients whose 
evaluations are suggestive but not convincing.
Of course, CT may accurately indicate the other intraabdomi­
nal processes that warrant intervention. Whenever the diagnosis 
is uncertain, it is prudent to observe the patient and repeat the 
abdominal examination over 6–8 h. Any evidence of progression is 
an indication for operation. Narcotics can be given to patients with 
severe discomfort after an initial, thorough examination.
All patients should be fully prepared for surgery and have any 
fluid and electrolyte abnormalities corrected. Either laparoscopic 
or open appendectomy is a satisfactory choice for patients with 
uncomplicated appendicitis, although most procedures are now 
performed in a minimally invasive fashion to the patient’s benefit 
in terms of recovery time and fewer overall potential complications. 
Endoscopic treatment for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis 
is being evaluated for efficacy.
Management of those who present with a mass representing a 
phlegmon or abscess can be more difficult. Such patients are most 
commonly treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, percutaneous 
drainage especially if an abscess is noted >3 cm in diameter, paren­
teral fluids, and bowel rest. If they appear to respond to conserva­
tive management, the appendix can then be more safely removed 
6–12 weeks later when inflammation has diminished.
A laparoscopic approach may also be useful when the exact 
diagnosis is uncertain. A laparoscopic approach may also facilitate 
exposure in those who are very obese. Absent complications, most 
patients can be discharged within 24–40 h of operation. The most 
common postoperative complications are fever and leukocytosis. 
Continuation of these findings beyond 5 days should raise concern 
for the presence of an intraabdominal abscess. The mortality rate 
for uncomplicated, nonperforated appendicitis is 0.1–0.5%, which 
approximates the overall risk of general anesthesia. The mortal­
ity rate for perforated appendicitis or other complicated disease 
is much higher, ranging from 3% overall to as high as 15% in the 
elderly.
ACUTE PERITONITIS
Acute peritonitis, or inflammation of the visceral and parietal perito­
neum, is most often but not always infectious in origin, resulting from 
perforation of a hollow viscus. This is called secondary peritonitis, as 
opposed to primary or spontaneous peritonitis, when a specific intraab­
dominal source cannot be identified. In either instance, the inflamma­
tion can be localized or diffuse.
■
■ETIOLOGY
Infective organisms may contaminate the peritoneal cavity after 
spillage from a hollow viscus, because of a penetrating wound of the 
abdominal wall, or because of the introduction of a foreign object like 
a peritoneal dialysis catheter or port that becomes infected. Secondary 
peritonitis most commonly results from perforation of the appendix, 
colonic diverticula, or the stomach and duodenum. It may also occur as 
a complication of bowel infarction or incarceration, cancer, inflamma­
tory bowel disease, and intestinal obstruction or volvulus. Conditions 
that may cause secondary bacterial peritonitis and their mechanisms 
are listed in Table 342-5. Over 90% of the cases of primary or sponta­
neous bacterial peritonitis occur in patients with ascites or hypopro­
teinemia (<1 g/L).
Aseptic peritonitis is most commonly caused by the abnormal 
presence of physiologic fluids such as gastric juice, bile, pancreatic 
enzymes, blood, or urine. It can also be caused by the effects of nor­
mally sterile foreign bodies such as surgical sponges or instruments. 
More rarely, it occurs as a complication of systemic diseases such as 
lupus erythematosus, porphyria, and familial Mediterranean fever. The 
chemical irritation caused by stomach acid and activated pancreatic 
enzymes is extreme, and secondary bacterial infection may occur.

TABLE 342-5  Conditions Leading to Secondary Bacterial Peritonitis
Bowel perforation
  Appendicitis
  Anastomotic leakage
  Adhesion
  Diverticulitis
  Iatrogenic (including endoscopic 
Perforation or leakage of other organs
  Biliary leakage (e.g., after liver 
biopsy)
  Cholecystitis
  Intraperitoneal bleeding
  Pancreatitis
  Salpingitis
  Urinary bladder
Loss of peritoneal integrity
  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy
  Iatrogenic (e.g., postoperative 
perforation)
  Ingested foreign body
  Inflammation
  Intussusception
  Neoplasms
  Obstruction
  Peptic ulcer disease
  Strangulated hernia
  Vascular (including ischemia or 
foreign body)
  Perinephric abscess
  Peritoneal dialysis or other 
indwelling devices
  Trauma
embolus)
  Trauma (blunt or penetrating)
■
■CLINICAL FEATURES
The cardinal signs and symptoms of peritonitis are acute, typically 
severe, abdominal pain with tenderness and fever. How patients’ com­
plaints of pain are manifested depends on their overall physical health 
and whether the inflammation is diffuse or localized. Elderly and 
immunosuppressed patients may not respond as aggressively to the 
irritation. Diffuse, generalized peritonitis is most often recognized as 
diffuse abdominal tenderness with guarding, rigidity, and other evidence 
of parietal peritoneal irritation. Physical findings may only be identified 
in a specific region of the abdomen if the intraperitoneal inflammatory 
process is limited or otherwise contained as may occur in patients with 
uncomplicated appendicitis or diverticulitis. Bowel sounds are usually 
absent to hypoactive but are not reliable as a physical finding.
CHAPTER 342
Acute Appendicitis and Peritonitis
Most patients present with tachycardia and signs of volume deple­
tion with hypotension. Laboratory testing typically reveals a significant 
leukocytosis, and patients may be severely acidotic. Radiographic stud­
ies may show dilatation of the bowel and associated bowel wall edema. 
Free air or other evidence of leakage requires attention and could 
represent a surgical emergency. In stable patients in whom ascites is 
present, diagnostic paracentesis is indicated, where the fluid is tested 
for protein and lactate dehydrogenase and the cell count is measured.
■
■THERAPY AND PROGNOSIS
Whereas mortality rates can be <10% for reasonably healthy patients 
with relatively uncomplicated, localized peritonitis, mortality rates 
>40% have been reported for the elderly or immunocompromised. 
Successful treatment depends on correcting any electrolyte abnormali­
ties, restoration of fluid volume and stabilization of the cardiovascular 
system, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and surgical correction of any 
underlying abnormalities.
Acknowledgment
The wisdom and expertise of Dr. William Silen are gratefully acknowl­
edged in this updated chapter on acute appendicitis and peritonitis.
■
■FURTHER READING
Andersson RE: Short-term complications and long-term morbidity 
of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in a national cohort. Br J 
Surg 101:1135, 2014.
Buckius MT et al: Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in 
the United States: Study period 1993–2008. J Surg Res 175:185, 2012.
CODA Collaborative: A randomized trial comparing antibiotics 
with appendectomy for appendicitis. N Engl J Med 383:1907, 2020.
Di Saverio S et al: Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 
2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg 
15:27, 2020.
Drake FT et al: Time to appendectomy and risk of perforation in acute 
appendicitis. JAMA Surg 149:837, 2014.