# 27 - 355 Cirrhosis and Its Complications

### 355 Cirrhosis and Its Complications

Cusi K et al: American Association of Clinical Endocrinology clinical 

practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic 
fatty liver disease in primary care and endocrinology clinical settings: 
Co-sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver 
Diseases (AASLD). Endocr Pract 28:528, 2022.
Diehl AM, Day CSC: Cause, pathogenesis, and treatment of nonalco­
holic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med 377:2063, 2017.
European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) et al: 
EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management 
of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 64:1388, 2016.
Harrison SA et al: A phase 3, randomized, controlled trial of resmeti­
rom in NASH with liver fibrosis. N Engl J Med 390:497, 2024.
Kanwal F et al: Clinical care pathway for the risk stratification and 
management of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastro­
enterology 161:1657, 2021.
Rinella ME et al: AASLD practice guidance on the clinical assessment 
and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 
77:1797, 2023.
Vos MB et al: NASPGHAN clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis 
and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: Recom­
mendations from the Expert Committee on NAFLD (ECON) and the 
North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology 
and Nutrition (NASPGHAN). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 64:319, 
2017.
Younossi ZM et al: The global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty 
liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): A 
systematic review. Hepatology 77:1335, 2023.
PART 10
Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
Alex S. Befeler, Bruce R. Bacon

Cirrhosis and Its 

Complications
Cirrhosis is a condition that is defined histopathologically and has a 
variety of clinical manifestations and complications, some of which can 
be life-threatening. In the past, it has been thought that cirrhosis was 
never reversible; however, it has become apparent that when the under­
lying insult that has caused the cirrhosis has been removed, there can 
be reversal of fibrosis. This is most apparent with the successful treat­
ment of chronic hepatitis C; however, reversal of fibrosis is also seen in 
patients with hemochromatosis after iron removal and in patients with 
alcohol-associated liver disease who have discontinued alcohol use.
Regardless of the cause of cirrhosis, the pathologic features consist 
of the development of fibrosis to the point that there is architectural 
distortion with the formation of regenerative nodules. This results in a 
decrease in hepatocellular mass, and thus function, and an alteration of 
blood flow. The induction of fibrosis occurs with activation of hepatic 
stellate cells, resulting in the formation of increased amounts of col­
lagen and other components of the extracellular matrix.
Clinical features of cirrhosis are the result of pathologic changes and 
mirror the severity of the liver disease. Most hepatic pathologists pro­
vide an assessment of grading and staging when evaluating liver biopsy 
samples. These schemes vary between disease states and have been 
developed for most conditions, including chronic viral hepatitis, non­
alcoholic fatty liver disease, and primary biliary cholangitis. Advanced 
fibrosis usually includes bridging fibrosis with nodularity designated as 
stage 3 and cirrhosis designated as stage 4. Patients who have cirrhosis 
have varying degrees of liver function, and clinicians need to differen­
tiate between those who have stable, compensated cirrhosis and those 
who have decompensated cirrhosis. Patients who have developed 
ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding are classified as 

TABLE 355-1  Causes of Cirrhosis
Alcohol
Cardiac cirrhosis
Chronic viral hepatitis
Inherited metabolic liver disease
  Hepatitis B
  Hemochromatosis
  Hepatitis C
  Wilson’s disease
Autoimmune hepatitis
  α1 Antitrypsin deficiency
Metabolic dysfunction-associated 
steatohepatitis
  Cystic fibrosis
Biliary cirrhosis
Cryptogenic cirrhosis
  Primary biliary cholangitis
 
  Primary sclerosing cholangitis
  Autoimmune cholangiopathy
 
decompensated. They should be considered for liver transplantation, 
particularly if the decompensations are poorly controlled. Many of the 
complications of cirrhosis will require specific therapy. Portal hypertension 
is a significant complicating feature of decompensated cirrhosis and is 
responsible for the development of ascites and bleeding from esopha­
gogastric varices. Loss of hepatocellular function results in jaundice, 
coagulation disorders, and hypoalbuminemia and contributes to the 
causes of portosystemic encephalopathy. The complications of cirrho­
sis are basically the same regardless of the etiology. Nonetheless, it is 
useful to classify patients by the cause of their liver disease (Table 355-1); 
patients can be divided into broad groups, including those with alcoholassociated cirrhosis, cirrhosis due to chronic viral hepatitis, biliary 
cirrhosis, metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (the 
new consensus term for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease), and other, less 
common causes, such as cardiac cirrhosis, cryptogenic cirrhosis, and 
other miscellaneous causes.
ALCOHOL-ASSOCIATED CIRRHOSIS
Excessive chronic alcohol use can cause several different types of 
chronic liver disease, including alcohol-associated fatty liver, alcoholic 
hepatitis, and alcohol-associated cirrhosis. Furthermore, use of exces­
sive alcohol can contribute to liver damage in patients with other 
liver diseases, such as hepatitis C, hemochromatosis, and metabolic 
dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease. Chronic alcohol use can 
produce fibrosis in the absence of accompanying inflammation and/
or necrosis. Fibrosis can be centrilobular, pericellular, or periportal. 
When fibrosis reaches a certain degree, there is disruption of the nor­
mal liver architecture and replacement of liver cells by regenerative 
nodules. In alcohol-associated cirrhosis, the nodules are usually <3 mm 
in diameter; this form of cirrhosis is referred to as micronodular. With 
cessation of alcohol use, larger nodules may form, resulting in a mixed 
micronodular and macronodular cirrhosis.
Pathogenesis 
Alcohol is the most commonly used drug in the 
United States, and >70% of adults drink alcohol each year. Twenty 
percent have had a binge within the past month, and >7% of adults 
regularly consume more than four or five drinks five or more times 
a month. Unfortunately, >14 million adults in the United States meet 
the diagnostic criteria for alcohol use disorder. In the United States, 
chronic liver disease is the tenth most common cause of death in 
adults, and alcohol-associated cirrhosis accounts for ~48% of deaths 
due to cirrhosis.
Ethanol is mainly absorbed by the small intestine and, to a lesser 
degree, through the stomach. Gastric alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) 
initiates alcohol metabolism. Three enzyme systems account for 
metabolism of alcohol in the liver. These include cytosolic ADH, the 
microsomal ethanol oxidizing system (MEOS) utilizing the induc­
ible cytochrome P450 CYP2E1, and peroxisomal catalase. Normally 
the majority of ethanol oxidation occurs via ADH to form acetaldehyde, 
which is a highly reactive molecule that may have multiple effects. The 
MEOS pathway in chronic alcohol use causes induction of CYP2E1, 
which leads to generation of reactive oxygen species and produces 
more acetaldehyde. Ultimately, acetaldehyde is metabolized to acetate

by aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). Intake of ethanol increases intra­
cellular accumulation of triglycerides by increasing fatty acid uptake 
and by reducing fatty acid oxidation and lipoprotein secretion. Protein 
synthesis, glycosylation, and secretion are impaired. Oxidative damage 
to hepatocyte membranes occurs due to the formation of reactive oxy­
gen species; acetaldehyde is a highly reactive molecule that combines 
with proteins and nucleic acids to form acetaldehyde adducts. These 
adducts may interfere with specific enzyme activities, including micro­
tubular formation and hepatic protein trafficking. With acetaldehydemediated hepatocyte damage, certain reactive oxygen species can result 
in Kupffer cell activation. As a result, profibrogenic cytokines are pro­
duced that initiate and perpetuate stellate cell activation, with the resul­
tant production of excess collagen and extracellular matrix. Connective 
tissue appears in both periportal and pericentral zones and eventually 
connects portal triads with central veins forming regenerative nodules. 
Hepatocyte loss occurs, and with increased collagen production and 
deposition, together with continuing hepatocyte destruction, the liver 
contracts and shrinks in size. This process generally takes from years 
to decades to occur and requires repeated insults.
Clinical Features 
The diagnosis of alcohol-associated liver disease 
requires an accurate history regarding both amount (>2 drinks per day 
in women and >3 drinks per day in men) and duration (>12 months) of 
alcohol consumption. Patients with alcohol-associated liver disease can 
present with nonspecific symptoms such as vague right upper quad­
rant abdominal pain, fever, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, 
and malaise. Alternatively, they may present with complications of 
chronic liver disease, including ascites, edema, upper gastrointestinal 
(GI) hemorrhage, jaundice, or encephalopathy. Many cases present 
incidentally at the time of autopsy or elective surgery. Other patients 
may be identified during an evaluation of routine laboratory studies 
that are found to be abnormal. On physical examination, the liver and 
spleen may be enlarged, with the liver edge being firm and nodular. 
Other frequent findings include scleral icterus, palmar erythema 
(Fig. 355-1), spider angiomas (Fig. 355-2), parotid gland enlargement, 
digital clubbing, muscle wasting, edema, and ascites. Men may have 
decreased body hair, gynecomastia, and testicular atrophy, which may 
be a consequence of hormonal abnormalities or a direct toxic effect 
of alcohol on the testes. In women with advanced disease, menstrual 
irregularities usually occur including amenorrhea. These changes are 
often reversible following cessation of alcohol ingestion.
Laboratory tests may be completely normal in patients with early 
compensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis. Alternatively, in advanced 
liver disease, many abnormalities usually are present. Patients may be 
anemic from chronic GI blood loss, nutritional deficiencies, or hyper­
splenism or as a direct suppressive effect of alcohol on the bone marrow. 
A unique form of hemolytic anemia (with spur cells and acanthocytes) 
called Zieve’s syndrome can occur in patients with severe alcoholic 
hepatitis. Platelet counts are often reduced early in the disease, reflec­
tive of portal hypertension with hypersplenism. Serum total bilirubin 
FIGURE 355-1  Palmar erythema. This figure shows palmar erythema in a patient 
with alcohol-associated cirrhosis. The erythema is peripheral over the palm with 
central pallor.

FIGURE 355-2  Spider angioma. This figure shows a spider angioma in a patient with 
hepatitis C cirrhosis. With release of central compression, the arteriole fills from the 
center and spreads out peripherally.
can be normal or elevated with advanced disease. Prothrombin times 
are often prolonged and usually do not respond to administration of 
parenteral vitamin K. Serum sodium levels are usually normal unless 
patients have ascites and then can be depressed, largely due to ingestion 
of excess free water. Serum alanine and aspartate aminotransferases 
(ALT, AST) are typically elevated but <400 IU/mL, with AST levels being 
higher than ALT levels, usually by a 2:1 ratio, particularly in patients 
who continue to drink.
CHAPTER 355
Diagnosis 
Patients who have any of the above-mentioned clinical 
features, physical examination findings, or laboratory studies in the 
setting of chronic alcohol consumption should be considered to have 
alcohol-associated liver disease. Furthermore, other forms of chronic 
liver disease (e.g., chronic viral hepatitis or metabolic or autoimmune 
liver diseases) must be considered or ruled out, or if present, an esti­
mate of relative causality along with the alcohol use should be deter­
mined. Liver biopsy can be helpful to confirm a diagnosis but generally 
is not performed unless there is a suspicion of an alternative diagnosis.
Cirrhosis and Its Complications 
In patients who have had complications of cirrhosis and who con­
tinue to drink, there is a <50% 5-year survival. In contrast, in patients 
who remain abstinent, the prognosis is significantly improved, particu­
larly when they have resolution of liver complications; however, some 
individuals who remain abstinent do not improve and liver transplan­
tation is a viable option.
TREATMENT
Alcohol-Associated Cirrhosis and 

Alcoholic Hepatitis
Abstinence is the cornerstone of therapy for patients with alcoholassociated liver disease. New clinically available biomarkers of 
recent alcohol consumption such as phosphatidylethanol (Peth) 
can be helpful in evaluating abstinence. In addition, patients require 
good nutrition and long-term medical supervision to manage 
underlying complications that may develop. Complications such 
as the development of ascites and edema, variceal hemorrhage, or 
portosystemic encephalopathy all require specific management and 
treatment. Liver transplantation can be an effective long-term treat­
ment in those who have been deemed a low enough risk for alcohol 
relapse and do not respond to other treatments.
Glucocorticoids are occasionally used in patients with severe 
alcoholic hepatitis in the absence of infection. Short-term sur­
vival has been shown to be improved in certain studies and 
meta-analysis, although 6-month survival is more dependent on 
abstinence. Treatment is restricted to patients with a discriminant 
function (DF) value of >32. The DF is calculated as the serum 
total bilirubin plus the difference in the patient’s prothrombin time

compared to upper limit of control (in seconds) multiplied by 4.6. 
Failure to improve total bilirubin after 7 days predicts treatment 
failure, and glucocorticoids can be stopped; otherwise, they are 
continued for 28 days.

There is modest evidence that intravenous N-acetylcysteine plus 
glucocorticoids may have a short-term survival benefit in alcoholic 
hepatitis if the DF is >32. Other therapies including oral pentoxifyl­
line, inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, anabolic steroids, 
propylthiouracil, antioxidants, colchicine, and penicillamine have 
not shown clear-cut benefits and are not recommended. A variety 
of nutritional therapies have been tried, both parenteral and enteral 
feedings; however, there is no clear evidence of improved survival. 
There is evidence that persons who consume >21.5 kcal/kg body 
weight per day have better survival, so achieving better caloric 
intake is recommended. Finally, in highly selected patients with 
good social support structure who fail other treatments for alco­
holic hepatitis, early liver transplant can be an effective treatment.
Cessation of alcohol use is key. Recent experience with medica­
tions that reduce craving for alcohol, such as acamprosate calcium 
and baclofen, have been favorable. Patients may take other neces­
sary medications even in the presence of cirrhosis. Acetaminophen 
use is often discouraged in patients with liver disease; however, if 
no more than 2 g of acetaminophen per day are consumed, there 
generally are no problems unless there is active alcohol use.
■
■CIRRHOSIS DUE TO CHRONIC VIRAL 

HEPATITIS B OR C
Of patients exposed to the hepatitis C virus (HCV), ~80% develop 
chronic hepatitis C, and of those, ~20–30% will develop cirrhosis over 
20–30 years. Many of these patients have had concomitant alcohol 
use, and the true incidence of cirrhosis due to hepatitis C alone is 
unknown. It is expected that an even higher percentage will go on to 
develop cirrhosis over longer periods of time. In the United States, 
~5–6 million people have been exposed to HCV, and ~4–5 million are 
chronically viremic. Worldwide, ~170 million individuals have hepa­
titis C, with some areas of the world (e.g., Egypt) having up to 15% 
of the population infected. HCV is a noncytopathic virus, and liver 
damage is probably immune-mediated. Progression of liver disease 
due to chronic hepatitis C is characterized by portal-based fibrosis with 
bridging fibrosis and nodularity developing, ultimately culminating in 
the development of cirrhosis. In cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C, 
the liver is small and shrunken with characteristic features of a mixed 
micro- and macronodular cirrhosis seen on liver biopsy. In addition, an 
inflammatory infiltrate is found in portal areas with interface hepatitis 
and occasionally some lobular hepatocellular injury and inflammation. 
In patients with HCV genotype 3, steatosis is often present.
PART 10
Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
Similar findings are seen in patients with cirrhosis due to chronic 
hepatitis B. Of adult patients exposed to hepatitis B, ~5% develop 
chronic hepatitis B, and ~20% of those patients will go on to develop 
cirrhosis. Special stains for hepatitis B core (HBc) and hepatitis B 
surface (HBs) antigen will be positive, and ground-glass hepatocytes 
signify HBs antigen (HBsAg) may be present. In the United States, 
there are ~2 million carriers of hepatitis B, whereas in other parts of 
the world where hepatitis B virus (HBV) is endemic (i.e., Asia, Southeast 
Asia, sub-Saharan Africa), up to 15% of the population may be 
infected, having acquired the infection vertically at the time of birth. 
Thus, >300–400 million individuals are thought to have hepatitis B 
worldwide. Approximately 25% of these individuals may ultimately 
develop cirrhosis.
Clinical Features and Diagnosis 
Patients with cirrhosis due to 
either chronic hepatitis C or B can present with the usual symptoms 
and signs of chronic liver disease. Fatigue, malaise, vague right upper 
quadrant pain, and laboratory abnormalities are frequent presenting 
features. Diagnosis requires a thorough laboratory evaluation, includ­
ing quantitative HCV RNA testing and analysis for HCV genotype, or 
hepatitis B serologies to include HBsAg, HBeAg (hepatitis B e antigen), 
anti-HBe, and quantitative HBV DNA levels.

TREATMENT
Cirrhosis due to Chronic Viral Hepatitis B or C
Management of complications of cirrhosis revolves around spe­
cific therapy for treatment of whatever complications occur (e.g., 
esophageal variceal hemorrhage, development of ascites and edema, 
or encephalopathy). In patients with chronic hepatitis B, numerous 
studies have shown beneficial effects of antiviral therapy, which 
is effective at viral suppression, as evidenced by reducing amino­
transferase levels and HBV DNA levels and improving histology by 
reducing inflammation and fibrosis. Several clinical trials and case 
series have demonstrated that patients with decompensated liver 
disease can become compensated with the use of antiviral therapy 
directed against hepatitis B. Currently available therapy includes 
lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir, with the 
latter two strongly preferred because of reduced risk of viral resis­
tance. Interferon α can also be used for treating hepatitis B, but it 
should not be used in cirrhotics (see Chap. 352).
Treatment of patients with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C with 
direct-acting antiviral protocols is highly successful (>95% cure 
rate), well tolerated, and usually of short duration (8–12 weeks) 
(see Chap. 352).
CIRRHOSIS FROM AUTOIMMUNE 
HEPATITIS AND METABOLIC 
DYSFUNCTION–ASSOCIATED 

STEATOTIC LIVER DISEASE
Other causes of posthepatitic cirrhosis include autoimmune hepatitis 
(AIH) and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH), 
which was previously called nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Many patients 
with AIH present with cirrhosis that is already established. Typically, 
these patients will not benefit from immunosuppressive therapy with 
glucocorticoids or azathioprine because the AIH is “burned out.” In 
this situation, liver biopsy does not show a significant inflammatory 
infiltrate. Diagnosis in this setting requires positive autoimmune 
markers such as antinuclear antibody (ANA) or anti-smooth-muscle 
antibody (ASMA). When patients with AIH present with cirrhosis and 
active inflammation accompanied by elevated liver enzymes, there can 
be considerable benefit from the use of immunosuppressive therapy.
Patients with MASH are increasingly being found to have pro­
gressed to cirrhosis. With the epidemic of obesity that continues in 
Western countries, more and more patients are identified with meta­
bolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (Chap. 354). Of 
these, a significant subset has MASH and can progress to increased 
fibrosis and cirrhosis. Over the past several years, it has been increas­
ingly recognized that many patients who were thought to have crypto­
genic cirrhosis in fact have MASH. As their cirrhosis progresses, they 
become catabolic and then lose the telltale signs of steatosis seen on 
biopsy. Management of complications of cirrhosis due to either AIH or 
MASH is similar to that for other forms of cirrhosis.
■
■BILIARY CIRRHOSIS
Biliary cirrhosis has pathologic features that are different from either 
alcohol-associated cirrhosis or posthepatitic cirrhosis, yet the manifes­
tations of end-stage liver disease are the same. Cholestatic liver disease 
may result from necroinflammatory lesions, congenital or metabolic 
processes, or external bile duct compression. Thus, two broad catego­
ries reflect the anatomic sites of abnormal bile retention: intrahepatic 
and extrahepatic. The distinction is important for obvious therapeutic 
reasons. Extrahepatic obstruction may benefit from surgical or endo­
scopic biliary tract decompression, whereas intrahepatic cholestatic 
processes will not improve with such interventions and require a dif­
ferent approach.
The major causes of chronic cholestatic syndromes are primary 
biliary cholangitis (PBC), autoimmune cholangitis (AIC), primary 
sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and idiopathic adulthood ductopenia. 
These syndromes are usually clinically distinguished from each other

by antibody testing, cholangiographic findings, and clinical presenta­
tion. However, they all share the histopathologic features of chronic 
cholestasis, including cholate stasis; copper deposition; xanthomatous 
transformation of hepatocytes; and irregular, so-called biliary fibro­
sis. In addition, there may be chronic portal inflammation, interface 
activity, and chronic lobular inflammation. Ductopenia is a result of 
progressive disease as patients develop cirrhosis.
■
■PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS
PBC is seen in about 100–200 individuals per million, with a strong 
female preponderance and a median age of ~50 years at the time of 
diagnosis. The cause of PBC is unknown; it is characterized by portal 
inflammation and necrosis of cholangiocytes in small- and mediumsized bile ducts. Cholestatic features prevail, and biliary cirrhosis is 
characterized by an elevated bilirubin level and progressive liver fail­
ure. Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with 
decompensated cirrhosis due to PBC.
Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs) are present in ~95% of 
patients with PBC. These autoantibodies recognize lipoic acid on the 
inner mitochondrial membrane proteins that are enzymes of the pyru­
vate dehydrogenase complex (PDC), the branched-chain 2-oxoacid 
dehydrogenase complex, and the 2-oxogluterate dehydrogenase com­
plex. These autoantibodies are not pathogenic, but rather are useful 
markers for making a diagnosis.
Pathology 
Histopathologic analysis identifies four distinct stages of 
the disease as it progresses. The earliest lesion is termed chronic non­
suppurative destructive cholangitis and is a necrotizing inflammatory 
process of the portal tracts. Medium and small bile ducts are infiltrated 
with lymphocytes and undergo duct destruction. Mild fibrosis and 
sometimes bile stasis can occur. With progression, the inflammatory 
infiltrate becomes less prominent, but the number of bile ducts is 
reduced and there is proliferation of smaller bile ductules. Increased 
fibrosis ensues with the expansion of periportal fibrosis to bridging fibro­
sis. Finally, cirrhosis, which may be micronodular or macronodular, 
develops.
Clinical Features 
Currently, most patients with PBC are middleaged women diagnosed well before the end-stage manifestations of 
the disease are present, and as such, most patients are asymptomatic. 
When symptoms are present, they most prominently include a sig­
nificant degree of fatigue out of proportion to either the severity of 
the liver disease or the age of the patient. Pruritus is seen in ~50% of 
patients at the time of diagnosis, and it can be debilitating. It might be 
intermittent and usually is most bothersome in the evening. In some 
patients, pruritus can develop toward the end of pregnancy and can 
be mistaken for cholestasis of pregnancy. Pruritus that presents prior 
to the development of jaundice indicates severe disease and a poor 
prognosis.
Physical examination can show jaundice and other complications 
of chronic liver disease including hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, ascites, 
and edema. Other features that are unique to PBC include hyperpig­
mentation, xanthelasma, and xanthomata, which are related to altered 
cholesterol metabolism. Hyperpigmentation is evident on the trunk 
and the arms and is seen in areas of exfoliation and lichenification 
associated with progressive scratching related to the pruritus. Bone 
pain resulting from osteopenia or osteoporosis is occasionally seen at 
diagnosis.
Laboratory Findings 
Laboratory findings in PBC show choles­
tatic liver enzyme abnormalities with an elevation in γ-glutamyl trans­
peptidase and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) along with mild elevations 
in aminotransferases (ALT and AST). Immunoglobulins, particularly 
IgM, are typically increased. Hyperbilirubinemia usually is seen once 
cirrhosis has developed. Thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia 
may be seen in patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism. 
Liver biopsy shows characteristic features as described above and 
should be evident to any experienced hepatopathologist. Up to 10% of 
patients with characteristic PBC will have features of AIH (moderate 
to severe interphase hepatitis on biopsy, elevated ALT >5× the upper 

limit of normal, and elevated IgG levels) as well and are defined as 
having “overlap” syndrome. These patients are usually treated as PBC 
patients and progress to cirrhosis with the same frequency as typical 
PBC patients. Some patients require immunosuppressive medications 
as well.

Diagnosis 
PBC should be considered in patients with chronic cho­
lestatic liver enzyme abnormalities. AMA testing may be negative in as 
many as 5–10% of patients with PBC. These patients usually are posi­
tive for other PBC-specific autoantibodies including sp100 or gp210, 
although these tests are not universally available. Liver biopsy is most 
important in this setting of AMA-negative PBC. In patients who are 
AMA negative with cholestatic liver enzymes, PSC should be ruled out 
by way of cholangiography.
TREATMENT
Primary Biliary Cholangitis
Treatment of the typical manifestations of cirrhosis is no different 
for PBC than for other forms of cirrhosis. Ursodeoxycholic acid 
(UDCA) has been shown to improve both biochemical and histo­
logic features of the disease, thus slowing but not reversing or cur­
ing the disease. Improvement is greatest when therapy is initiated 
early; the likelihood of significant improvement with UDCA is low 
in patients with PBC who present with manifestations of cirrhosis. 
UDCA is given in doses of 13–15 mg/kg per d; the medication 
is usually well tolerated, although some patients have worsening 
pruritus with initiation of therapy. A small proportion of patients 
may have diarrhea or headache as a side effect of the drug. About 
30–40% of patients with PBC do not have a satisfactory response 
to UDCA; more than half of these patients will have signifi­
cant improvement with obeticholic acid, elafibranor or seladelpar 
though these medication should be avoided in the setting of cir­
rhosis with portal hypertension or decompensation. Patients with 
PBC require long-term follow-up by a physician experienced with 
the disease. Certain patients may need to be considered for liver 
transplantation should their liver disease decompensate.
CHAPTER 355
Cirrhosis and Its Complications 
The main symptoms of PBC are fatigue and pruritus. Several 
therapies have been tried for treatment of fatigue, but none of them 
has been successful; frequent naps should be encouraged. Pruri­
tus is treated with antihistamines, narcotic receptor antagonists 
(naltrexone), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and rifampin. 
Cholestyramine, a bile salt–sequestering agent, has been helpful in 
some patients but is somewhat tedious and difficult to take. Plasma­
pheresis has been used rarely in patients with severe intractable pru­
ritus. There is an increased incidence of osteopenia and osteoporosis 
in patients with cholestatic liver disease, and bone density testing 
should be performed. Oral calcium and vitamin D are also recom­
mended. Treatment with a bisphosphonate should be instituted 
when bone disease is identified. Screening for fat-soluble vitamin 
deficiency (A, D, E, K) should done if total bilirubin is >2 mg/dL.
■
■PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS
As in PBC, the cause of PSC remains unknown. PSC is a chronic cho­
lestatic syndrome that is characterized by diffuse inflammation and 
fibrosis involving the entire biliary tree, resulting in chronic cholestasis. 
This pathologic process ultimately results in obliteration of both the 
intra- and extrahepatic biliary tree, leading to biliary cirrhosis, portal 
hypertension, and liver failure. The cause of PSC remains unknown 
despite extensive investigation into various mechanisms related to bac­
terial and viral infections, toxins, genetic predisposition, and immuno­
logic mechanisms, all of which have been postulated to contribute to 
the pathogenesis and progression of this syndrome.
Liver biopsy changes in PSC are not pathognomonic, and estab­
lishing the diagnosis of PSC must involve imaging of the biliary tree. 
Pathologic changes occurring in PSC show bile duct proliferation as 
well as ductopenia and fibrous cholangitis (pericholangitis). Periductal 
fibrosis is occasionally seen on biopsy specimens and can be quite

helpful in making the diagnosis. As the disease progresses, biliary cir­
rhosis is the end-stage manifestation of PSC.

Clinical Features 
The usual clinical features of PSC are those found 
in cholestatic liver disease, with fatigue, pruritus, steatorrhea, deficien­
cies of fat-soluble vitamins, and the associated consequences. As in PBC, 
the fatigue is profound and nonspecific. Pruritus can often be debilitating 
and is related to the cholestasis. The severity of pruritus does not cor­
relate with the severity of the disease. Metabolic bone disease, as seen in 
PBC, can occur with PSC and should be treated (see above).
Laboratory Findings 
Patients with PSC typically are identified 
during an evaluation of abnormal liver enzymes. Most patients have at 
least a twofold increase in ALP and may have elevated aminotransfer­
ases as well. Albumin levels may be decreased, and prothrombin times 
can be prolonged at the time of diagnosis. Some degree of correction 
of a prolonged prothrombin time may occur with parenteral vitamin K. 
A small subset of patients has aminotransferase elevations >5× the 
upper limit of normal and may have features of AIH on biopsy indicat­
ing an overlap syndrome between PSC and AIH. Autoantibodies are 
frequently positive in patients with the overlap syndrome but are typi­
cally negative in patients who only have PSC. One autoantibody, the 
perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA), is positive 
in ~65% of patients with PSC. Sixty to eighty percent of patients with 
PSC have inflammatory bowel disease, predominately ulcerative colitis 
(UC); thus, a colonoscopy is recommended at diagnosis.
Diagnosis 
The definitive diagnosis of PSC requires cholangio­
graphic imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic 
resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the imaging tech­
nique of choice for initial evaluation. Endoscopic retrograde cholan­
giopancreatography (ERCP) can be considered if the MRCP provided 
suboptimal images or if there is newly elevated total bilirubin or MRCP 
evidence of a dominant stricture. Typical cholangiographic findings in 
PSC are multifocal stricturing and beading involving both the intrahe­
patic and extrahepatic biliary tree. These strictures are typically short 
and with intervening segments of normal or slightly dilated bile ducts 
that are distributed diffusely, producing the classic beaded appearance. 
The gallbladder and cystic duct can be involved in up to 15% of cases. 
Gradually, biliary cirrhosis develops, and patients will progress to 
decompensated liver disease with manifestations of ascites, esophageal 
variceal hemorrhage, and encephalopathy.
PART 10
Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
TREATMENT
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
There is no specific proven treatment for PSC. Some clinicians 
use UDCA at “PBC dosages” of 13–15 mg/kg per d with anecdotal 
improvement, although no study has shown convincing evidence of 
clinical benefit. A study of high-dose (28–30 mg/kg per d) UDCA 
found it to be harmful. Endoscopic dilatation of dominant strictures 
can be helpful, but the ultimate treatment is liver transplantation 
when decompensated cirrhosis develops. Episodes of cholangitis 
should be treated with antibiotics and can be an indication for liver 
transplantation. A dreaded complication of PSC is the development 
of cholangiocarcinoma, which is a relative contraindication to liver 
transplantation.
■
■CARDIAC CIRRHOSIS
Definition 
Patients with long-standing right-sided congestive heart 
failure may develop chronic liver injury from congestive hepatopa­
thy sometimes resulting in cardiac cirrhosis. This is an increasingly 
uncommon, if not rare, cause of chronic liver disease given the 
advances made in the care of patients with heart failure, particularly 
valvular heart disease, but there has been an increase in patients with 
congenital heart disease particularly after the Fontan operation.
Etiology and Pathology 
In the case of long-term right-sided 
heart failure, there is an elevated venous pressure transmitted via the 

inferior vena cava and hepatic veins to the sinusoids of the liver, which 
become dilated and engorged with blood. The liver becomes enlarged 
and swollen, and with long-term passive congestion and relative isch­
emia due to poor circulation, centrilobular hepatocytes can become 
necrotic, leading to pericentral fibrosis. This fibrotic pattern can extend 
to the periphery of the lobule outward until a unique pattern of fibrosis 
causing cirrhosis can occur.
Clinical Features 
Patients typically have signs of congestive heart 
failure and will manifest an enlarged firm liver on physical examina­
tion. ALP levels are characteristically elevated, and aminotransferases 
may be normal or slightly increased, with AST usually higher than 
ALT. It is unlikely that patients will develop variceal hemorrhage or 
encephalopathy.
Diagnosis 
The diagnosis is usually made in someone with clear-cut 
cardiac disease who has an elevated ALP and an enlarged liver. Liver 
biopsy shows a pattern of fibrosis that can be recognized by an experi­
enced hepatopathologist. Differentiation from Budd-Chiari syndrome 
(BCS) can be made by seeing extravasation of red blood cells in BCS, 
but not in cardiac hepatopathy. Venoocclusive disease, now termed 
sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS), can also affect hepatic outflow 
and has characteristic features on liver biopsy. SOS can be seen under 
the circumstances of conditioning for bone marrow transplant with 
radiation and chemotherapy; it can also be seen with the ingestion of 
certain herbal teas as well as pyrrolizidine alkaloids. This is typically 
seen in Caribbean countries and rarely in the United States. Treatment 
is based on management of the underlying cardiac disease.
OTHER TYPES OF CIRRHOSIS
There are several other less common causes of chronic liver disease that 
can progress to cirrhosis. These include inherited metabolic liver dis­
eases such as hemochromatosis, Wilson’s disease, α1 antitrypsin (α1AT) 
deficiency, and cystic fibrosis. For these disorders, the manifestations 
of cirrhosis are similar, with some minor variations, to those seen in 
other patients with other causes of cirrhosis.
Hemochromatosis is an inherited disorder of iron metabolism that 
results in a progressive increase in hepatic iron deposition, which, over 
time, can lead to a portal-based fibrosis progressing to cirrhosis, liver 
failure, and hepatocellular cancer. While the frequency of hemochro­
matosis is relatively common, with genetic susceptibility occurring in 
1 in 250 individuals, the frequency of end-stage manifestations due to 
the disease is relatively low, and <5% of those patients who are geno­
typically susceptible will go on to develop severe liver disease from 
hemochromatosis. Diagnosis is made with serum iron studies showing 
an elevated transferrin saturation and an elevated ferritin level, along 
with abnormalities identified by HFE mutation analysis. Treatment is 
straightforward, with regular therapeutic phlebotomy.
Wilson’s disease is an inherited disorder of copper homeostasis with 
failure to excrete excess amounts of copper, leading to an accumulation 
in the liver. This disorder is relatively uncommon, affecting 1 in 30,000 
individuals. Wilson’s disease typically affects adolescents and young 
adults. Prompt diagnosis before end-stage manifestations become 
irreversible can lead to significant clinical improvement. Diagnosis 
requires determination of ceruloplasmin levels, which are low; 24-h 
urine copper levels, which are elevated; typical physical examination 
findings, including Kayser-Fleischer corneal rings; and character­
istic liver biopsy findings. Treatment consists of copper-chelating 
medications.
α1AT deficiency results from an inherited disorder that causes abnor­
mal folding of the α1AT protein, resulting in failure of secretion of that 
protein from the liver. It is unknown how the retained protein leads to 
liver disease. Patients with α1AT deficiency at greatest risk for develop­
ing chronic liver disease have the ZZ phenotype, but only ~10–20% of 
such individuals will develop chronic liver disease. Diagnosis is made 
by determining α1AT levels and phenotype. Characteristic periodic 
acid–Schiff (PAS)–positive, diastase-resistant globules are seen on liver 
biopsy. The only effective treatment is liver transplantation, which is 
curative.

TABLE 355-2  Complications of Cirrhosis
Portal hypertension
Coagulopathy
  Gastroesophageal varices
  Factor deficiency
  Portal hypertensive gastropathy
  Fibrinolysis
  Splenomegaly, hypersplenism
  Thrombocytopenia
  Ascites
Bone disease
   Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
  Osteopenia
Acute kidney injury-hepatorenal syndrome
  Osteoporosis
Chronic kidney disease-hepatorenal syndrome
  Osteomalacia
 
Hematologic abnormalities
Hepatic encephalopathy
  Anemia
Hepatopulmonary syndrome
  Hemolysis
Portopulmonary hypertension
  Thrombocytopenia
Malnutrition
  Neutropenia
Cystic fibrosis is an uncommon inherited disorder affecting whites 
of northern European descent. A biliary-type cirrhosis can occur, and 
some patients derive benefit from the chronic use of UDCA.
MAJOR COMPLICATIONS OF CIRRHOSIS
These include gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage, splenomegaly, 
ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis 
(SBP), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), and hepatocellular carcinoma 
(Table 355-2). There are also more rare complications in the pulmo­
nary system including hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmo­
nary hypertension.
■
■PORTAL HYPERTENSION
Portal hypertension is defined as the elevation of the hepatic venous 
pressure gradient (HVPG) to >5 mmHg. The portal venous system 
normally drains blood from most of the GI tract including the stom­
ach, small and large intestines, spleen, pancreas, and gallbladder. 
Portal hypertension is caused by a combination of two simultaneously 
occurring hemodynamic processes: (1) increased intrahepatic resis­
tance to the passage of blood flow through the liver due to cirrhosis, 
regenerative nodules, and microthrombi, and (2) increased splanchnic 
blood flow secondary to vasodilation within the splanchnic vascular 
bed. In more advanced stages, there is also activation of neurohumoral 
responses and vasoconstrictive systems resulting in sodium and water 
retention, increased blood volume, and hyperdynamic circulatory 
system producing more portal hypertension. There is usually an initial 
stage of compensated cirrhosis with HVPG between 5 and 10 mmHg 
that can be asymptomatic and last for ≥10 years, but when clinically 
significant portal hypertension (CSPH) develops (defined as a HVPG 
≥10 mmHg), there is substantial risk of decompensation with variceal 
bleeding, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy. With decompensation, 
median mortality is <2 years.
The causes of portal hypertension are usually subcategorized as 
prehepatic, intrahepatic, and posthepatic (Table 355-3). Prehepatic 
causes of portal hypertension are those affecting the portal venous 
system before it enters the liver; they include portal vein thrombosis 
and splenic vein thrombosis. Posthepatic causes encompass those 
affecting the hepatic veins and venous drainage to the heart; they 
include BCS and chronic right-sided cardiac congestion. Intrahepatic 
causes account for >95% of cases of portal hypertension and are rep­
resented by the major forms of cirrhosis. Intrahepatic causes of portal 
hypertension can be further subdivided into presinusoidal, sinusoidal, 
and postsinusoidal causes. Postsinusoidal causes include venoocclusive 
disease, whereas presinusoidal causes include congenital hepatic fibro­
sis and schistosomiasis. Sinusoidal causes are related to cirrhosis from 
various causes.
Cirrhosis is overwhelmingly the most common cause of portal 
hypertension in the United States. Portal vein thrombosis may contrib­
ute to portal hypertension and is most often associated with cirrhosis 
but may be idiopathic or can occur in association with infection, pan­
creatitis, or abdominal trauma. Coagulation disorders that can lead 

TABLE 355-3  Classification of Portal Hypertension
Prehepatic
  Portal vein thrombosis
  Splenic vein thrombosis
  Massive splenomegaly (Banti’s syndrome)
Hepatic
  Presinusoidal
    Schistosomiasis
    Congenital hepatic fibrosis
  Sinusoidal
    Cirrhosis—many causes
    Alcoholic hepatitis
  Postsinusoidal
    Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction (venoocclusive syndrome)
Posthepatic
  Budd-Chiari syndrome
  Inferior vena caval webs
  Cardiac causes
    Restrictive cardiomyopathy
    Constrictive pericarditis
    Severe congestive heart failure
to the development of portal vein thrombosis include polycythemia 
vera; essential thrombocytosis; deficiencies in protein C, protein S, 
antithrombin III, and factor V Leiden; and abnormalities in the generegulating prothrombin production. Some patients may have a sub­
clinical myeloproliferative disorder.
CHAPTER 355
Clinical Features 
The three primary complications of portal 
hypertension are gastroesophageal varices with hemorrhage, ascites, 
and hypersplenism. Thus, patients may present with upper GI bleed­
ing, which, on endoscopy, is found to be due to esophageal or gastric 
varices; with the development of ascites along with peripheral edema; 
or with an enlarged spleen with associated reduction in platelets and 
white blood cells on routine laboratory testing.
Cirrhosis and Its Complications 
ESOPHAGEAL VARICES  Variceal hemorrhage is an immediate lifethreatening problem with a 20–30% mortality rate associated with 
each episode of bleeding. Over the past decade, it has become common 
practice to screen known cirrhotics with endoscopy to look for esopha­
geal varices. Such screening studies have shown that approximately 
one-third of patients with histologically confirmed cirrhosis have vari­
ces. Approximately 5–15% of cirrhotics per year develop varices, and 
it is estimated that the majority of patients with cirrhosis will develop 
varices over their lifetimes. Furthermore, it is anticipated that roughly 
one-third of patients with varices will develop bleeding. Several fac­
tors predict the risk of bleeding, including the severity of cirrhosis 
(Child-Pugh class, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] score); 
the height of wedged-hepatic vein pressure; the size of the varix; the 
location of the varix; and certain endoscopic stigmata, including red 
wale signs, hematocystic spots, diffuse erythema, bluish color, cherry 
red spots, or white-nipple spots. Patients with tense ascites are also at 
increased risk for bleeding from varices.
Diagnosis 
In patients with cirrhosis who are being followed chroni­
cally, the development of portal hypertension is usually revealed by the 
presence of thrombocytopenia; the appearance of an enlarged spleen; 
or the development of ascites, encephalopathy, and/or esophageal 
varices with or without bleeding. In previously undiagnosed patients, 
any of these features should prompt further evaluation to determine 
the presence of portal hypertension and liver disease. Varices should 
be identified by endoscopy. Contrasted-enhanced abdominal imaging, 
either by computed tomography (CT) or MRI, can be helpful in dem­
onstrating a nodular liver and in finding changes of portal hyperten­
sion with intraabdominal collateral circulation. Rarely, the HVPG is

measured by interventional radiology. Patients with a gradient 
>12 mmHg are at risk for variceal hemorrhage.

TREATMENT
Variceal Hemorrhage
Treatment for esophageal varices as a complication of portal hyper­
tension is divided into two main categories: (1) primary prophylaxis 
and (2) prevention of rebleeding once there has been an initial vari­
ceal hemorrhage. Primary prophylaxis requires routine surveillance 
by endoscopy. Upper endoscopies are recommended at diagnosis of 
compensated cirrhosis and then every 2 years if the liver disease is 
active or every 3 years if inactive (alcohol cessation, viral hepatitis 
eradication). In the absence of thrombocytopenia and with a liver 
stiffness by transient elastography <20 kPa, high-risk varices are 
rare and thus screening is not needed. Endoscopy is also recom­
mended at the time of hepatic decompensation. Once varices that 
are at increased risk for bleeding are identified, usually defined as 
medium or large varices or small varices with high-risk stigmata or 
in decompensated cirrhosis, primary prophylaxis can be achieved 
either through traditional nonselective beta blockade (NSBB) (pro­
pranolol or nadolol) titrated with a goal heart rate of 55–60 beats/
min with systolic blood pressure >90 mmHg or by variceal band 
ligation. Carvedilol is becoming the NSBB of choice. Given its addi­
tional anti-α1-adrenergic vasodilating properties, it more effectively 
lowers portal pressure, lacks the need for heart rate goals, and has 
emerging data that suggest it can prevent hepatic decompensation 
and improve survival in persons with CSPH.
PART 10
Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) has been compared to tradi­
tional NSBB and carvedilol for primary prophylaxis against variceal 
bleeding, and EVL appears to have equivalent efficacy at preventing 
bleeding. NSBBs, especially carvedilol, are generally recommended 
as first-line treatment for primary prophylaxis of bleeding if toler­
ated, given their additional benefits. Once primary prophylaxis 
has been initiated, repeat endoscopy for surveillance of varices is 
unnecessary.
The approach to patients once they have had a variceal bleed is 
first to treat the acute bleed, which can be life-threatening, and then 
to prevent further bleeding. Treatment of acute bleeding requires 
both fluid and red blood cell replacement to stabilize hemodynam­
ics. A randomized trial of restricted transfusion starting when 
hemoglobin is <7 g/dL with a goal hemoglobin of 7–9 g/dL, com­
pared to a more liberal strategy, resulted in reduced early rebleeding 
and mortality. This strategy is recommended, although adjustments 
should be made based on cardiac risks and hemodynamics. Correct­
ing an elevated prothrombin time with fresh frozen plasma is not 
recommended unless there is evidence of coagulopathy (bleeding at 
other sites such as IV lines). The use of vasoconstricting agents, usu­
ally somatostatin or octreotide, has been shown to improve initial 
bleeding control and reduce transfusion requirements and all-cause 
mortality. Prophylactic antibiotics, usually with ceftriaxone, started 
prior to endoscopy result in reduced infections, recurrent bleeding, 
and mortality. Balloon tamponade (Sengstaken-Blakemore tube or 
Minnesota tube) or placement of self-expandable metal stents can 
be used in patients who need stabilization prior to endoscopic 
therapy or as a bridge to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic 
shunt (TIPS) after endoscopic failure. Control of bleeding can be 
achieved in the vast majority of cases; however, bleeding recurs in 
the majority of patients if definitive endoscopic therapy has not been 
instituted. Upper endoscopy is used as first-line treatment to diag­
nose the cause of the bleeding and to control bleeding acutely with 
EVL. When esophageal varices extend into the proximal stomach or 
the bleeding varices are entirely within the stomach, band ligation 
is often unsuccessful. In these situations, consideration for a TIPS 
should be made. This technique creates a portosystemic shunt by 
a percutaneous approach using an expandable metal stent, which 
is advanced under angiographic guidance to the hepatic veins and 
then through the substance of the liver to create a direct portocaval 

Recurrent acute bleeding
Endoscopic therapy
+
Pharmacologic therapy
Control of bleeding
Decompensated cirrhosis
Child’s class B or C
Compensated cirrhosis
Child’s class A
Transplant evaluation
TIPS
Endoscopic therapy or
beta blockers
Consider liver
transplantation
evaluation
Consider TIPS
Liver transplantation
FIGURE 355-3  Management of recurrent variceal hemorrhage. This algorithm 
describes an approach to management of patients who have recurrent bleeding 
from esophageal varices. Initial therapy is generally with endoscopic therapy often 
supplemented by pharmacologic therapy. With control of bleeding, a decision 
needs to be made as to whether patients should go on to transjugular intrahepatic 
portosystemic shunt (TIPS; if they are Child’s class A) or if they should have TIPS 
and be considered for transplant (if they are Child’s class B or C).
shunt. Encephalopathy can occur in as many as 20% of patients 
after TIPS and is particularly problematic in elderly patients and in 
patients with preexisting encephalopathy. TIPS is usually reserved 
for individuals who fail or are unable to receive endoscopic therapy, 
although there is emerging evidence that patients who are highly 
selected to be at high risk for rebleeding may also benefit. TIPS can 
sometimes be used as a bridge to transplantation, and all patients 
requiring TIPS should be considered for transplant evaluation. Some 
gastric varices are associated with a splenorenal shunt and can be 
effectively treated with a balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous 
obliteration (BRTO) of varices sometimes in combination with a 
TIPS. Prevention of further bleeding is usually accomplished with 
repeated variceal band ligation until varices are obliterated in com­
bination with NSBB. If recurrent variceal bleeding occurs, then TIPS 
should be performed for long-term prevention of bleeding. Once a 
TIPS has been performed, there is no need for further endoscopies 
for variceal surveillance; however, the TIPS should be periodically 
monitored with Doppler ultrasound for stenosis (Fig. 355-3).
■
■PORTAL HYPERTENSIVE GASTROPATHY
Portal hypertensive gastropathy can cause both acute clinical GI bleed­
ing and chronic bleeding resulting in iron-deficiency anemia. It is 
associated with all causes of portal hypertension and is diagnosed by 
characteristic endoscopy findings showing a snakeskin-like mosaic 
pattern of gastric mucosa often with central red or brown spots. When 
there is bleeding, treatment is with NSBB and iron repletion. Refrac­
tory bleeding may respond to TIPS.
■
■SPLENOMEGALY AND HYPERSPLENISM
Congestive splenomegaly with hypersplenism is common in patients 
with portal hypertension and is usually the first indication of portal 
hypertension. Clinical features include the presence of an enlarged 
spleen on physical examination and the development of thrombocy­
topenia and leukopenia in patients who have cirrhosis. Some patients 
will have significant left-sided and left upper quadrant abdominal pain

related to an enlarged spleen. Splenomegaly itself usually requires no 
specific treatment.
■
■ASCITES
Definition 
Ascites is the accumulation of fluid within the peri­
toneal cavity. Overwhelmingly, the most common cause of ascites is 
portal hypertension related to cirrhosis; however, clinicians should 
remember that malignant, infectious, and cardiac causes of ascites can 
be present as well, and careful differentiation of these other causes is 
obviously important for patient care.
Pathogenesis 
The presence of portal hypertension contributes to 
the development of ascites in patients who have cirrhosis (Fig. 355-4). 
There is an increase in intrahepatic resistance, causing increased portal 
pressure, but there is also vasodilation of the splanchnic arterial system, 
which, in turn, results in an increase in portal venous inflow. Both 
abnormalities result in increased production of splanchnic lymph. 
Vasodilating factors such as nitric oxide are responsible for the vasodi­
latory effect. There is activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone 
system with the development of hyperaldosteronism and activation 
of the sympathetic nervous system as a consequence of a homeostatic 
response caused by underfilling of the arterial circulation secondary to 
arterial vasodilation in the splanchnic vascular bed. The renal effects 
of increased aldosterone and activation of the sympathetic nervous sys­
tem lead to sodium retention causing fluid accumulation and expan­
sion of the extracellular fluid volume, resulting in peripheral edema 
and ascites. Because the retained fluid is constantly leaking out of the 
intravascular compartment into the peritoneal cavity, the sensation of 
vascular filling is not achieved, and the process continues. Hypoalbu­
minemia from decreased synthetic function in a cirrhotic liver results 
in reduced plasma oncotic pressure and contributes to the loss of fluid 
from the vascular compartment into the peritoneal cavity.
Clinical Features 
Patients typically note an increase in abdominal 
girth that is often accompanied by peripheral edema. The development 
of ascites is often insidious, and it is surprising that some patients wait 
so long and become so distended before seeking medical attention. 
Patients usually have at least 1–2 L of fluid in the abdomen before they 
are aware that there is an increase. If ascitic fluid is massive, respiratory 
function can be compromised, causing dyspnea. Hepatic hydrothorax 
may also contribute to respiratory symptoms. Patients with massive 
ascites are often malnourished and have muscle wasting and excessive 
fatigue and weakness.
Diagnosis 
Diagnosis of ascites is by physical examination and is 
often aided by abdominal imaging. Patients will have bulging flanks 
Cirrhosis
Portal hypertension
Splanchnic vasodilation
↑ Splanchnic pressure
Arterial underfilling
Lymph formation
Activation of 
vasoconstrictors and
antinatriuretic factors*
Formation of ascites
Sodium retention
Plasma volume
expansion
FIGURE 355-4  Development of ascites in cirrhosis. This flow diagram illustrates the 
importance of portal hypertension with splanchnic vasodilation in the development 
of ascites. *Antinatriuretic factors include the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone 
system and the sympathetic nervous system.

and may have a fluid wave or the presence of shifting dullness. This is 
determined by taking patients from a supine position to lying on either 
their left or right side and noting the movement of the dullness to per­
cussion. Subtle amounts of ascites can be detected by ultrasound or CT 
scanning. Hepatic hydrothorax is more common on the right side and 
implicates a rent in the diaphragm with free flow of ascitic fluid into 
the thoracic cavity.

When patients present with ascites for the first time, it is recom­
mended that a diagnostic paracentesis be performed to characterize 
the fluid. This should include the determination of total protein and 
albumin content, blood cell counts with differential, and cultures. In 
the appropriate setting, amylase may be measured and cytology per­
formed. In patients with cirrhosis, the protein concentration of the 
ascitic fluid is low, usually <2.5 g/dL. The serum ascites-to-albumin 
gradient (SAAG), calculated by subtracting the fluid albumin level 
from the serum albumin level, has replaced the description of exuda­
tive or transudative fluid. When the SAAG is >1.1 g/dL, the cause of 
the ascites is most likely due to portal hypertension; this is usually 
in the setting of cirrhosis. Cardiac ascites can be identified by SAAG 
>1.1 g/dL and ascites protein >2.5g/dL. When the SAAG is <1.1 g/dL, 
infectious or malignant causes of ascites should be considered. When 
ascitic fluid protein is very low, <1.5 g/dL, patients are at increased risk 
for developing SBP. A high level of red blood cells in the ascitic fluid 
usually signifies a traumatic tap but can also rarely occur with hepato­
cellular cancer or a ruptured omental varix. When the absolute level of 
polymorphonuclear leukocytes is >250/μL, infection is likely.
TREATMENT
Ascites
CHAPTER 355
Patients with small amounts of ascites can usually be managed 
with dietary sodium restriction alone. Most average diets in the 
United States contain 6–8 g of sodium per day, and if patients eat at 
restaurants or fast-food outlets, the amount of sodium in their diet 
can exceed this amount. Thus, it is often extremely difficult to get 
patients to change their dietary habits to ingest 2 g of sodium per 
day, equivalent to slightly more than three-quarters of a teaspoon 
of salt, which is the recommended amount. Sodium educational 
pamphlets are helpful. Often, a simple recommendation is to eat 
fresh or frozen foods, avoiding canned or processed foods. When 
a moderate amount of ascites is present, diuretic therapy is usually 
necessary. Traditionally, spironolactone at 100 mg/d as a single dose 
is started, and furosemide may be added at 40 mg/d, particularly in 
patients who have peripheral edema. Failure of the diuretics sug­
gests that patients may not be compliant with a low-sodium diet. 
If compliance is confirmed and ascitic fluid is not being mobilized, 
there should be incremental increases in spironolactone to a maxi­
mum of 400 mg/d and furosemide to 160 mg/d. If a large amount 
of ascites is still present on diuretics in patients who are compliant 
with a low-sodium diet, then they are defined as having refractory 
ascites, and alternative treatment modalities including repeated 
large-volume paracentesis (LVP) or a TIPS procedure should be 
considered (Fig. 355-5). After LVP of ≥5 L, IV 25% albumin at 
a dose of 6–8 g/L of removed ascites should be given to prevent 
circulatory dysfunction. Multiple studies have shown that TIPS, 
although effective at managing the ascites, does not improve sur­
vival. Unfortunately, TIPS is often associated with an increased 
frequency of hepatic encephalopathy and must be considered care­
fully on a case-by-case basis. The prognosis for patients with cir­
rhosis with ascites is poor, and some studies have shown that <50% 
of patients survive 2 years after the onset of ascites. Thus, there 
should be consideration for liver transplantation in patients with 
ascites. Patients with cirrhosis and ascites are at increased risk for 
renal failure from certain medications including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and aminoglycosides; therefore, these medica­
tions should generally be avoided. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 
inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers should be used cau­
tiously with close monitoring of blood pressure and renal function.
Cirrhosis and Its Complications

Highly symptomatic ascites
Large-volume paracentesis (LVP) + albumin
Dietary sodium restriction + diuretics
Ascites reaccumulation
Consider TIPS
Continue LVP with
albumin as needed
Consider liver
transplantation
FIGURE 355-5  Treatment of refractory ascites. In patients who develop azotemia 
in the course of receiving diuretics in the management of their ascites, some will 
require repeated large-volume paracentesis (LVP), some may be considered for 
transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and some would be good 
candidates for liver transplantation. These decisions are all individualized.
■
■SPONTANEOUS BACTERIAL PERITONITIS
SBP is a common and severe complication of ascites characterized by 
spontaneous infection of the ascitic fluid without an intraabdominal 
source. In hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites, SBP can 
occur in up to 30% of individuals and can have a 25% in-hospital 
mortality rate. Bacterial translocation is the presumed mechanism for 
development of SBP, with gut flora traversing the intestine into mes­
enteric lymph nodes, leading to bacteremia and seeding of the ascitic 
fluid. The most common organisms are Escherichia coli and other gut 
bacteria; however, gram-positive bacteria, including Streptococcus 
viridans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus spp., can also be 
found. If more than two organisms are identified, secondary bacte­
rial peritonitis due to a perforated viscus should be considered. The 
diagnosis of SBP is made when the fluid sample has an absolute neu­
trophil count >250/μL. Bedside cultures should be obtained by direct 
injection of ascitic fluid into blood culture bottles. Patients with ascites 
may present with fever, altered mental status, elevated white blood cell 
count, abdominal pain or discomfort, and acute kidney injury, or they 
may present without any of these features. Therefore, it is necessary 
to have a high degree of clinical suspicion, and peritoneal taps are 
recommended for cirrhosis patients hospitalized with ascites and cir­
rhosis complications or signs of infection. Treatment is commonly with 
intravenous third-generation cephalosporin for 5 days. In addition, 
intravenous albumin (1.5 g/kg body weight on day 1 and 1.0 g/kg on 
day 3) has been shown to reduce the risk of renal failure and to improve 
survival. In patients with variceal hemorrhage, the frequency of SBP is 
significantly increased, and prophylaxis against SBP is recommended 
at presentation with upper GI bleeding. Furthermore, in patients who 
have had an episode of SBP and recovered, quinolone antibiotic pro­
phylaxis should be given to prevent recurrent SBP.
PART 10
Disorders of the Gastrointestinal System
■
■HEPATORENAL SYNDROME
HRS is a form of functional renal failure without renal pathology that 
occurs in ~10% of patients with advanced cirrhosis or acute liver failure. 
There are marked disturbances in the arterial renal circulation in patients 
with HRS; these include an increase in vascular resistance accompanied 
by a reduction in systemic vascular resistance. The reason for renal vaso­
constriction is most likely multifactorial and is poorly understood. The 
diagnosis is made usually in the presence of a large amount of ascites in 
patients who have a stepwise progressive increase in creatinine. Acute 
kidney injury (AKI) is defined by a 0.3-mg/dL rise in creatinine over 
48 h or a 50% rise in creatinine from baseline. HRS-AKI, the new term 
for type 1 HRS, is characterized by a progressive rapid impairment in 
renal function. Type 2 HRS, now termed HRS–chronic kidney disease 
(CKD), is characterized by a reduction in glomerular filtration rate with 
an elevation of serum creatinine level, but it is stable and is associated 
with a better outcome than that of type 1 HRS.

HRS-AKI requires exclusion of other causes of acute renal failure, 
most notably volume depletion. Diuretics should be stopped, and 
infusion of albumin 1 g/kg per d for 48 h without significant improve­
ments is required. Other causes of AKI, including intrinsic (acute 
tubular necrosis, acute interstitial nephritis, and glomerulonephritis) 
and obstructive kidney disease, should be excluded. Treatment is 
with vasoconstrictors such as terlipressin or, if not available, low-dose 
norepinephrine, which requires intensive care unit monitoring. Mido­
drine, an α-agonist, along with octreotide and intravenous albumin 
are also commonly used in the United States but are now third line. If 
treatment fails, then renal replacement therapy can be initiated. The 
best therapy for HRS is liver transplantation; recovery of renal function 
is typical in this setting. In patients with either AKI-HRS or CKD-HRS, 
the prognosis is poor unless transplant can be achieved.
■
■HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
Hepatic encephalopathy is a serious complication of chronic liver 
disease and is broadly defined as an alteration in mental status and 
cognitive function occurring as a consequence of liver failure. In severe 
acute liver injury, the development of encephalopathy is a requirement 
for a diagnosis of acute liver failure and can be seen in association 
with life-threatening brain edema, which is not a feature in chronic 
liver disease. Hepatic encephalopathy is much more commonly seen 
in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut-derived neurotoxins that are 
not removed by the liver because of vascular shunting and decreased 
hepatic mass reach the brain and cause the symptoms known as hepatic 
encephalopathy. Ammonia levels are typically elevated, but the correla­
tion between severity of liver disease and height of ammonia levels is 
often poor, and most hepatologists do not rely on ammonia levels to 
make a diagnosis or follow clinical progress. Other compounds and 
metabolites that may contribute to the development of encephalopathy 
include certain false neurotransmitters and mercaptans.
Clinical Features 
In acute liver failure, changes in mental status can 
occur rapidly. Brain edema can be seen in these patients, with severe 
encephalopathy associated with swelling of the gray matter. Cerebral 
herniation is a feared complication of brain edema in acute liver failure, 
and treatment to decrease edema is with hypertonic saline or mannitol.
In patients with cirrhosis, encephalopathy is often found as a result 
of precipitating events such as volume depletion, gastrointestinal 
bleeding, hyponatremia, infection, or constipation. Patients may be 
confused or exhibit a change in personality. They may be quite violent 
and difficult to manage; alternatively, patients may be very sleepy and 
difficult to rouse. If patients have ascites, this should be tapped to rule 
out infection. Evidence of GI bleeding should be sought, and patients 
should be appropriately hydrated. Electrolytes should be measured, 
and abnormalities corrected. In patients presenting with encepha­
lopathy, asterixis is often present. Asterixis can be elicited by having 
patients extend their arms and bend their wrists back. Patients who are 
encephalopathic have a “liver flap”—that is, a sudden forward move­
ment of the wrist. This requires patients to be able to cooperate with 
the examiner. Alternative causes for altered mental status should also 
be considered.
The diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy is clinical and requires 
an experienced clinician to recognize and put together all the various 
features. Often when patients have encephalopathy for the first time, 
they (and/or their caregivers) are unaware of what is transpiring, but 
once they have been through the experience, they can identify when 
this is developing in subsequent situations and can often self-medicate 
to prevent the development or worsening of encephalopathy.
TREATMENT
Hepatic Encephalopathy
Treatment is multifactorial and includes management of the abovementioned precipitating factors. Sometimes hydration and correc­
tion of electrolyte imbalance are all that is necessary. In the past, 
restriction of dietary protein was used; however, the negative impact 
of that maneuver on overall nutrition is thought to outweigh the

benefit, and it is thus strongly discouraged. The mainstay of treat­
ment for encephalopathy is to use lactulose, a nonabsorbable disac­
charide, which results in colonic acidification. Catharsis ensues, 
contributing to the elimination of nitrogenous products in the gut 
that are responsible for the development of encephalopathy. The 
goal of lactulose therapy is to promote two to three soft stools per 
day. Patients are asked to titrate their amount of ingested lactulose 
to achieve the desired effect. Lactulose is usually continued after the 
initial episode of encephalopathy. Poorly absorbed antibiotics are 
often used as adjunctive therapies for patients who have a difficult 
time with lactulose or in those with recurrent episodes. Rifaximin 
has replaced neomycin and metronidazole (because of their signifi­
cant toxicity). The dose is 550 mg twice daily and is very effective 
in preventing recurrent encephalopathy. In patients with recurrent 
symptoms despite treatment, closure of large portosystemic shunts 
can be helpful. Zinc supplementation is sometimes helpful and is 
relatively harmless. The development of encephalopathy in patients 
with chronic liver disease is a poor prognostic sign, but this compli­
cation can be managed in the vast majority of patients.
■
■ACUTE-ON-CHRONIC LIVER FAILURE
Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a recently recognized clinical 
syndrome that is characterized by acutely decompensating cirrhosis 
with associated failure of one or more organ systems, including liver, 
kidneys, brain, lung, circulatory system, and coagulation. It occurs in 
the setting of chronic liver disease almost always with cirrhosis and is a 
major cause of mortality in persons with cirrhosis. ACLF is precipitated 
by either direct injury to the liver (most commonly from alcoholic 
hepatitis and less often from new or flaring viral hepatitis, autoim­
mune hepatitis, or drug-induced liver injury) or systemic effects (most 
commonly bacterial or fungal infection and less often GI bleeding or 
the postoperative state), resulting in a marked systemic inflammatory 
response followed by organ failure and is analogous to sepsis syndrome. 
Mortality at 28 days ranges from 20 to 70% and increases with the 
number of organ failures. Clinicians should search for and treat pre­
cipitating causes of ACLF, determine if intensive care unit (ICU) care 
is needed, and consider immediate referral for liver transplantation. 
Complications of cirrhosis should be treated as described elsewhere 
in this chapter. If after 3–7 days of ICU support, there continue to be 
four or more organ failures and liver transplantation is not an option, 
consideration for a transition to palliative care is recommended.
■
■LIVER-LUNG SYNDROMES
Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is characterized by arterial hypox­
emia in a patient with cirrhosis without significant lung disease. The 
liver disease causes intrapulmonary vascular dilations, resulting in 
blood shunting past alveoli and significant ventilation-perfusion mis­
match. Clinical symptoms include dyspnea and platypnea. HPS is com­
mon, occurring in 4–32% of patients with cirrhosis; however, it is often 
mild. Diagnosis involves demonstrating hypoxemia, without evidence 
of significant lung disease, and shunt on bubble echocardiography. 
Treatment is with oxygen supplementation and liver transplantation.
Portopulmonary hypertension (PPHT) is pulmonary hyperten­
sion in a patient with portal hypertension. The portal hypertension 
results in the production of vasoconstrictor substances that affect the 
pulmonary artery. Many patients are asymptomatic, especially early 
in the disease; however, they later can develop dyspnea on exertion 
and fatigue. PPHT is rare, occurring in ~5% of patients with advanced 
cirrhosis. Diagnosis includes initial identification on echocardiogram 
and confirmation on right heart catheterization showing elevated mean 
pulmonary artery pressure, elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, 
and normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Prognosis is poor, 
although liver transplantation after effective reduction in pulmonary 
artery pressure with vasodilatory medications can be effective.
■
■MALNUTRITION IN CIRRHOSIS
Because the liver is principally involved in the regulation of protein 
and energy metabolism in the body, patients with decompensated 

cirrhosis often develop malnutrition, insufficient intake of nutrients, 
which manifests clinically as sarcopenia, a loss in muscle mass and 
function resulting in frailty, decreased physical reserve, and increased 
susceptibility to health stressors. In the setting of cirrhosis and subse­
quent hepatic decompensation, patients become more catabolic with 
increased energy needs but often have decreased caloric intake due 
to anorexia, early satiety, ascites, restrictive diets (low sodium, potas­
sium, and fluid) and hepatic encephalopathy. Obesity and edema may 
mask underlying sarcopenia. Lack of physical activity can further 
exacerbate the sarcopenia and resulting frailty. Sarcopenia and frailty 
have been associated with increased resource utilization and risk of 
death and poorer quality of life. Guidelines recommend (1) educa­
tion for patients and families both with asymptomatic compensated 
and symptomatic decompensated cirrhosis on appropriate nutritional 
intake (both calories and protein) and the benefits of regular exercise; 
(2) periodic clinical assessments for malnutrition, sarcopenia, and 
frailty with increasing frequency as the patient decompensates; and (3) 
early referrals to registered dietician and physical therapy to develop a 
personalized therapeutic plan. Generally, patients with cirrhosis should 
consume 35 kcal/kg per d based on actual weight with estimated dis­
counting for edema and ascites and 1.2–1.5 g/kg per d of protein based 
upon ideal body weight. Caloric intake goals should be reduced for 
patients with body mass index over 35 kg/m2. Multiple small meals are 
recommended throughout waking hours to minimize muscle wasting 
during the fasted state. Relaxation in sodium restriction should be 
considered in those who are not meeting caloric intake goals. Optimi­
zation of care for hepatic encephalopathy and ascites is also beneficial. 
General exercise recommendations include 150–300 min of aerobic 
exercise a week and 2 days of muscle-strengthening exercises per week, 
though these recommendations should be tailored, particularly in 
decompensated cirrhosis.

CHAPTER 355
■
■ABNORMALITIES IN COAGULATION
Coagulation disorders in cirrhosis are poorly understood, and typical 
clinical measures of coagulation, such as the prothrombin time and 
international normalized ratio, are not reliable measures of clotting 
ability. There is decreased synthesis of both pro- and anticoagulant fac­
tors and thus some rebalancing in coagulation; however, the coagula­
tion cascade can easily tip toward thrombosis or bleeding. In addition, 
patients may have thrombocytopenia from hypersplenism due to portal 
hypertension and some platelet dysfunction, which is counterbalanced 
with increased von Willebrand factor. Adequate thrombin formation 
can occur with platelet levels from cirrhosis patients >50,000–60,000/L. 
Synthesis of vitamin K–dependent clotting factors II, VII, IX, and X 
is diminished in patients with chronic cholestatic syndromes because 
absorption of vitamin K requires good bile flow. Intravenous or intra­
muscular vitamin K can quickly correct this abnormality. Overall, the 
status of coagulation in a cirrhotic patient needs to be judged clinically 
rather than relying on current laboratory tests. Standard prophylaxis 
for deep venous thrombosis when hospitalized is generally recom­
mended. Routine correction of international normalized ratio before 
procedures or with variceal bleeding is generally not required.
Cirrhosis and Its Complications 
■
■BONE DISEASE IN CIRRHOSIS
Osteoporosis is common in patients with chronic cholestatic liver 
disease because of malabsorption of vitamin D and decreased calcium 
ingestion. The rate of bone resorption exceeds that of new bone forma­
tion in patients with cirrhosis, resulting in bone loss. Dual-energy x-ray 
absorptiometry (DEXA) is a useful method for determining osteopo­
rosis or osteopenia. When a DEXA scan shows osteoporosis, treatment 
with bisphosphonates is effective.
■
■HEMATOLOGIC ABNORMALITIES IN CIRRHOSIS
Numerous hematologic manifestations of cirrhosis are present, includ­
ing anemia from a variety of causes including hypersplenism, hemoly­
sis, iron deficiency, and perhaps folate deficiency from malnutrition. 
Macrocytosis is a common abnormality in red blood cell morphology 
seen in patients with chronic liver disease, and neutropenia may be a 
result of hypersplenism.