# 38 - 465 Nicotine Addiction

### 465 Nicotine Addiction

as a once-per-month 380-mg injection. By blocking opioid recep­
tors, naltrexone decreases activity in the dopamine-rich ventral 
tegmental reward system and decreases the feeling of pleasure if 
alcohol is imbibed. A second medication, acamprosate (Campral) 
(~2 g/d divided into three oral doses), has similar modest effects. 
Acamprosate inhibits NMDA receptors, decreasing mild symptoms 
of protracted withdrawal. Several trials of combined naltrexone and 
acamprosate have reported that the combination is well tolerated, 
and the efficacy might be superior to either drug alone, although not 
all studies agree.
It is more difficult to establish the asset-to-liability ratio of a 
third drug, disulfiram, an ALDH inhibitor, used clinically at 
doses of 250 mg/d, a dose selected to avoid the side effects of the 
more effective 500 mg/d regimen. This drug produces vomiting and 
autonomic nervous system instability after drinking as a result of 
rapidly rising blood levels of acetaldehyde. This reaction to alcohol 
can be dangerous, especially for patients with heart disease, stroke, 
diabetes mellitus, or hypertension. The drug itself carries potential 
risks of temporary depressive or psychotic symptoms, peripheral 
neuropathy, and liver damage. Disulfiram is best given under super­
vision by someone (such as a spouse), especially during high-risk 
drinking situations (such as the Christmas holidays).
Regarding other medications, a 16-week, placebo-controlled trial 
in patients with histories of relatively severe acute withdrawal syn­
dromes reported good outcomes during the rehabilitation phase with 
another depressant medication (gabapentin 1200 mg/d), but side 
effects were considerable; those results have not yet been replicated, 
and gabapentin can itself be misused. Additional drugs under inves­
tigation include another opioid antagonist, nalmefene; the nicotinic 
receptor agonist varenicline; the serotonin antagonist ondansetron; 
the α-adrenergic agonist prazosin, especially in combination with 
naltrexone; the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen; the anticonvul­
sant topiramate; ibudilast in individuals with low-intensity alcohol 
responses; and possible enhanced outcomes when talk therapies 
are combined with ketamine or psilocybin sessions. However, it is 
important to emphasize that currently there are insufficient data to 
determine the asset-to-liability ratio for these medications in treating 
alcohol use disorders, and therefore, there is insufficient support for 
the routine use of these medications in clinical settings.
■
■GLOBAL CONSIDERATIONS
As described above, rates of alcohol use disorders differ across sex, 
age, ethnicity, and country. There are also differences across countries 
regarding the definition of a standard drink (e.g., 10–12 g of ethanol in 
the United States and 8 g in the United Kingdom) and the definition of 
being legally drunk. The preferred alcoholic beverage also varies across 
groups, even within countries. That said, regardless of sex, ethnicity, or 
country, the actual drug in the drink is still ethanol, and the risks for 
problems, course of alcohol use disorders, and approaches to treatment 
are similar across the world.
■
■FURTHER READING
Bogenschutz MP et al: Percentage of heavy drinking days following 
psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy vs placebo in the treatment of 
adult patients with alcohol use disorder: A randomized clinical trial. 
JAMA Psychiatry 79:953, 2022.
Finn SW et al: Treatment of alcohol dependence in primary care com­
pared with outpatient specialist treatment: Twelve-month follow-up 
of a randomized controlled trial, with trajectories of change. J Stud 
Alcohol Drugs 81:300, 2020.
Lai D et al: Evaluating risk for alcohol use disorder: Polygenic risk 
scores and family history. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 46:374, 2022.
Livne O et al: Agreement between DSM-5 and DSM-IV measures of 
substance use disorders in a sample of adult substance users. Drug 
Alcohol Depend 227:108958, 2021.
Mattle A et al: Gabapentin to treat acute alcohol withdrawal in 
hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug 
Alcohol Depend 241:109671, 2022.

McPheeters M et al: Pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder: A sys­

tematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 330:1653, 2023.
Meredith LR et al: The effect of neuroimmune modulation on subjec­
tive response to alcohol in the natural environment. Alcohol Clin Exp 
Res 46:879, 2022.
Schuckit MA et al: The low level of response to alcohol-based heavy 
drinking prevention program: One-year follow-up. J Stud Alcohol 
Drugs 77:25, 2016.
Witkiewitz K et al: Can alcohol use disorder recovery include some 
heavy drinking? A replication and extension up to 9 years following 
treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 44:1862, 2020.
Witt SH et al: Acute alcohol withdrawal and recovery in men lead to 
profound changes in DNA methylation profiles: A longitudinal clini­
cal study. Addiction 115:2034, 2020.
Wood E et al: Canadian guideline for the clinical management of highrisk drinking and alcohol use disorder. CMAJ 195:E1364, 2023.
CHAPTER 465
David M. Burns

Nicotine Addiction
Nicotine Addiction
Ingestion of nicotine in any form (combusted or heated tobacco leaf, 
oral use, nicotine pouches, or inhaled by vaping nicotine or nicotine 
salt) can create and sustain addiction if used with sufficient intensity 
for a sufficient duration. Addicted users of nicotine regulate their 
nicotine intake by adjusting the frequency and intensity of their 
tobacco use, both to obtain the desired psychoactive effects and 
avoid withdrawal. While nicotine does cause some disease processes 
including complications of pregnancy, the vast majority of the diseases 
produced by nicotine addiction result from repetitive exposure to the 
carcinogens and other toxicants in various nicotine containing prod­
ucts. These exposures produce incremental changes that accumulate 
to progress toward disease, but it is the addiction to nicotine that 
causes the long-term, multiple times per day exposures to these agents 
needed to create sufficient damage to manifest as cancer, heart, and 
lung disease.
Over the last decade, there have been major shifts in product use, 
with about 40% of the nicotine delivery products being noncombusted 
and non-tobacco-leaf formulations. This shift has made practitioner 
advice about nicotine addiction more complicated, in part because 
many of the noncombusted products offer the potential to deliver 
nicotine sufficient to satisfy addiction, but with dramatic reductions in 
most of the toxic constituents found in smoke. Substantial reduction in 
disease risk can be achieved with the use of nicotine “vaping” products 
to aid cessation success for combusted cigarette smokers, and their 
use is likely to provide meaningful disease reduction with long-term 
complete substitution for combusted cigarette smoking even without 
breaking nicotine addiction.
Nicotine offers little or no benefit for the nonaddicted individual, 
but regular use of inhaled nicotine can produce a powerful addiction 
that is difficult to break and expensive to sustain. Any use of nicotine 
earlier in life predicts a greater use of some nicotine product later in 
life. For the practitioner, despite the likelihood of much lower disease 
risks compared to combusted cigarette use, it is hard to justify, or 
ignore, high-frequency use of noncombusted inhaled nicotine prod­
ucts in recommendations to patients who have never used combusted 
tobacco products.
THE PROCESS OF NICOTINE ADDICTION
When nicotine reaches the brain, it reversibly attaches to nicotinic 
acetylcholine receptors, which are particularly active in brain networks 
involved in depression, joy, excitement, and happiness. With prolonged

high exposure to nicotine, nicotinic receptors are upregulated on brain 
cells. For most individuals, daily nicotine use is needed to produce 
changes in the brain that are the hallmark of addiction. The strength 
of addiction, and the speed with which it can develop, are influenced 
by the frequency of use and concentration of arterial levels of nico­
tine reaching the brain, which can vary widely with use of different 
products.

As the time since last cigarette becomes longer, nicotine levels in the 
blood drop, and nicotine detaches from the receptors, leaving them 
increasingly uncovered. Without high levels of nicotine attaching to 
these receptors, addicted smokers no longer feel “normal,” creating a 
compulsive need for the next dose of nicotine. Addicted individuals 
perceive increasing withdrawal symptoms with increasing duration of 
abstinence, which can persist for 4–6 weeks.
For the practicing clinician, the diagnosis of nicotine addiction is 
straightforward and is manifest by the patient’s loss of control over their 
next use of nicotine-containing products. The individual’s need for the 
next dose of nicotine can be satisfied by the use of multiple products 
at different times. The loss of control is demonstrated by a history of 
daily nicotine use coupled with behaviors such as high numbers of uses 
per day, use shortly after waking in the morning, craving after periods 
of abstinence, and/or failure of past cessation efforts, among others.
PART 13
Neurologic Disorders
Several genes have been associated with nicotine addiction. Some 
reduce the clearance of nicotine, and others have been associated with 
an increased likelihood of becoming dependent on tobacco and other 
drugs or a higher incidence of depression. It is likely that genetic sus­
ceptibility can influence the probability that adolescent experimenta­
tion with tobacco will lead to addiction as an adult. However, rates of 
smoking cessation have increased, and rates of nicotine addiction have 
decreased dramatically since the mid-1950s, suggesting that factors 
other than genetics are more important influences for tobacco use.
In tobacco smoke or vaping aerosol, the fraction of nicotine pres­
ent in the unprotonated (freebase) form is greater at alkaline pH, and 
unprotonated nicotine is more easily absorbed into the bloodstream 
across the oral mucosa. However, high concentrations of unprotonated 
nicotine are irritating to the airway, reducing the tendency to inhale, 
limiting the amount of nicotine users will tolerate in the aerosol and 
slowing the rate of rise in nicotine blood levels. Products delivering 
nicotine that are highly addictive (cigarettes and aerosols of nicotine 
salts) are able to deliver high doses of nicotine and rapid rises in arterial 
blood concentration by producing aerosols that are mildly acidic in the 
mouth, reducing the irritation that inhibits inhalation. However, as the 
particles are inhaled into the lung, the pH of the smoke rapidly changes 

Per-capita consumption 18+
Male lung cancer death rate
Female lung cancer death rate

Per-capita consumption 18+

FIGURE 465-1  Changes in per-capita consumption and lung cancer death rates from 1900 to 2023.

to the more alkaline pH of the blood (~7.4), increasing the fraction of 
readily absorbable unprotonated nicotine present in the alveoli. The 
high rate of blood flow through the alveoli rapidly removes the unpro­
tonated nicotine, increasing conversion of the protonated nicotine or 
the nicotine salt to release the unprotonated form and allowing most 
of the nicotine in the aerosol to be absorbed into the bloodstream. The 
resulting rapid rise in arterial blood nicotine levels reaching the brain 
makes cigarettes and nicotine salt vaping devices more addictive, and 
more able to satisfy addiction, compared with other forms of nicotine 
delivery.
TRENDS IN NICOTINE PRODUCT USE
Manufactured cigarettes have been the dominant form of nicotine 
exposure over the last 100 years. Figure 465-1 presents the rise and 
decline in U.S. per-capita consumption (total cigarettes sold divided 
by the U.S. population over age 18) since 1900, together with the 
rise and subsequent fall of the male and female lung cancer death 
rates resulting from that consumption. The figure demonstrates the 
enormous success of tobacco control efforts in changing a human 
risk behavior, with current adult cigarette smoking prevalence now 
approaching 10%.
Among high school seniors, any cigarette use in the last 30 days has 
declined from 31% in 2000 to 2.9% in 2023, with only 0.7% smoking 
daily. As these post-2000 high school students aged into their 20s, their 
smoking initiation rates did not increase substantially, and only 5% 
of 18- to 24-year-old adults currently smoke. Unfortunately, smoking 
prevalence rates among those over age 40, the population more likely to 
develop disease, have declined more slowly. In addition, the population 
continuing to smoke has shifted heavily toward socially disadvantaged 
groups, indicating that the need for health care–based smoking inter­
ventions remains a priority.
A vast array of devices to deliver nicotine without smoke have been 
introduced over the last decade. These include devices, many sold 
without U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, that 
aerosolize nicotine solution or nicotine salts, or deliver nicotine as 
strips or flavored nicotine pouches for oral use. With the exception of 
vaping, very limited data are available on patterns of use for most of 
these products in the United States.
For vaping among adolescents, any use in the last 30 days peaked 
at about 25% in high school seniors in 2019 and declined to about 
17% in 2023 with daily use at about 5.8% in 2023. The dramatic fall 
in combusted cigarette use over the past 2 decades among adolescents 
resulted from changes in the regulation of cigarette advertising and 

Lung cancer death rate per 100,000

Year

the increasing social stigma associated with cigarette smoking. The 
introduction of vaping products as substitute sources of nicotine had 
little effect on the reduction in adolescent cigarette smoking, and the 
availability of vaping products has not increased adolescent smoking 
prevalence.
For adults, about 5% report using e-cigarettes some days or every 
day, with 11% of the 18–24 group reporting at least some days. Rea­
sons for using e-cigarettes may include the following: for recreation, to 
sustain addiction, or to attempt to quit cigarette smoking. A substantial 
proportion of those using e-cigarettes for cessation report use of both 
e-cigarettes and combusted cigarettes interchangeably, called dual use.
In contrast to the United States, tobacco consumption in many other 
countries remains high, particularly among lesser developed countries. 
Worldwide tobacco consumption recently declined slightly for the first 
time after a persistent rise over the recent decades.
Changes in cost and relative rates of taxation for different tobacco 
products has resulted in an increase in smoking of cigars and “roll your 
own” cigarettes, but past recommendations about lower risk with use of 
cigars and pipe tobacco no longer apply. Most cigars are now manufac­
tured in much the same way as cigarettes with small changes in weight 
to qualify for lower tax rates, and most pipe tobacco is now used for “roll 
your own” cigarettes also because of lower tax rates. As a result, smok­
ing these products currently has risks similar to smoking manufactured 
cigarettes. Practitioners should ask about their use and should not rec­
ommend them as lower-risk forms of satisfying nicotine addiction.
DISEASE MANIFESTATIONS OF CIGARETTE 
SMOKING
Approximately 40% of cigarette smokers will die prematurely due to 
cigarette smoking unless they are able to quit. The major diseases 
caused by cigarette smoking are listed in Table 465-1. The ratio of 
smoking-related disease rates in smokers compared to never smokers 
(relative risk) increases with advancing age for most cancers and for 
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Relative risk declines 
with advancing age for cardiovascular diseases due to the increas­
ing contribution of other risk factors to cardiovascular disease as age 
advances. Nevertheless, even for cardiovascular disease, the absolute 
difference in mortality rate between smokers and never smokers, called 
excess death rate, continues to increase with advancing age, as one 
would expect from a process of cumulative injury.
■
■CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Cigarette smokers are more likely than nonsmokers to develop both 
large-vessel atherosclerosis and small-vessel disease. Approximately 
90% of peripheral vascular disease in the nondiabetic population can 
be attributed to cigarette smoking, as can ~50% of aortic aneurysms. 
In contrast, 24% of coronary artery disease and ~11% of ischemic 
and hemorrhagic strokes are attributed to cigarette smoking. There 
is a multiplicative interaction between cigarette smoking and other 
cardiac risk factors such that the increment in risk produced by smok­
ing among individuals with hypertension or elevated serum lipids is 
substantially greater than the increment in risk produced by smoking 
for individuals without these risk factors.
In addition to its role in promoting atherosclerosis, cigarette smok­
ing also increases the likelihood of myocardial infarction and sudden 
cardiac death by promoting platelet aggregation and vascular occlu­
sion. Reversal of these effects on coagulation may explain the rapid 
benefit of smoking cessation for a new coronary event demonstrable 
among those who have survived a first myocardial infarction. This 
effect may also explain the substantially higher rates of graft occlusion 
among continuing smokers following vascular bypass surgery for cardiac 
or peripheral vascular disease.
Cessation of cigarette smoking reduces the risk of a second coronary 
event within 6–12 months. Rates of first myocardial infarction and 
death from coronary heart disease decline within 2–4 years following 
cessation among those with no prior cardiovascular history. After 15 years 
of abstinence, the risk of stroke, a new myocardial infarction, and death 
from coronary heart disease in former smokers is similar to that for 
those who have never smoked.

TABLE 465-1  Relative Risks for Current Smokers of Cigarettes
AGE
35–44
45–64
65–74
≥75
Males
Lung cancer
14.33
19.03
28.29
22.51
Coronary heart disease
3.88
2.99
2.76
1.98
Cerebrovascular disease
2.17
1.48
1.23
1.12
Other vascular diseases
 
 
7.25
4.93
Chronic obstructive pulmonary 
disease (COPD)
 
 
29.69
23.01
All causes
2.55
2.97
3.02
2.40
Females
Lung cancer
13.30
18.95
23.65
23.08
Other tobacco-related cancers
1.28
2.08
2.06
1.93
Coronary heart disease
4.98
3.25
3.29
2.25
CHAPTER 465
Cerebrovascular disease
2.27
1.70
1.24
1.10
Other vascular diseases
 
 
6.81
5.77
COPD
 
 
38.89
20.96
All causes
1.79
2.63
2.87
2.47
Relative Risks for Selected Other Cancers
Nicotine Addiction
Other cancers
Male
 
Female
 
Larynx
14.6
 

Lip, oral cavity, pharynx
10.9
 
5.1
 
Esophagus
6.8
 
7.8
 
Bladder
3.3
 
2.2
 
Kidney
2.7
 
1.3
 
Pancreas
2.3
 
2.3
 
Stomach

1.4
 
Liver
1.7
 
1.7
 
Colorectal
1.2
 
1.2
 
Cervix
 
 
1.6
 
Acute myeloid leukemia
1.4
 
1.4
 
■
■CANCER
Tobacco smoking causes cancer of the lung; lip; oral cavity; naso-, 
oro-, and hypopharynx; nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses; larynx; 
esophagus; stomach; pancreas; liver (hepatocellular); colon and rec­
tum; kidney (body and pelvis); ureter; urinary bladder; uterine cervix; 
and acute myeloid leukemia. There does not appear to be a causal link 
between cigarette smoking and cancer of the endometrium, and there 
is a lower risk of uterine cancer among postmenopausal women who 
smoke. The risks of cancer increase linearly with the increasing num­
ber of cigarettes smoked per day and logarithmically with increasing 
duration of smoking. Additionally, there are synergistic interactions 
between cigarette smoking and alcohol use for cancer of the oral cavity 
and esophagus. Several occupational exposures synergistically increase 
lung cancer risk among cigarette smokers, most notably occupational 
asbestos and radon exposure.
Cessation of cigarette smoking reduces the risk of developing cancer 
relative to continuing smoking after about 4 years of abstinence, but 
even 20 years after cessation, there is a persistent three- to fourfold 
increased risk of developing lung cancer compared to those who have 
never smoked.
■
■RESPIRATORY DISEASE
Cigarette smoking is responsible for 80% of COPD. Within 1–2 years 
of beginning to smoke regularly, many young smokers will develop 
inflammatory changes in their small airways, although lung function 
measures of these changes do not predict subsequent development of 
chronic airflow obstruction. Chronic mucous hyperplasia of the larger 
airways results in a chronic productive cough in as many as 80% of 
smokers >60 years of age. Chronic inflammation and narrowing of the

small airways, and/or enzymatic digestion of alveolar walls resulting 
in pulmonary emphysema, reduce expiratory airflow sufficiently to 
produce clinical symptoms of respiratory limitation in ~15–25% of 
smokers.

Changes in the small airways of young smokers will reverse after 
1–2 years of abstinence. There is also a small increase in measures of 
expiratory airflow following smoking cessation among many individu­
als who have already developed chronic airflow obstruction, but the 
major change following cessation is a slowing of the rate of decline in 
lung function with advancing age rather than a return of lung function 
toward normal.
■
■PREGNANCY
Cigarette smoking is associated with several maternal complications of 
pregnancy: premature rupture of membranes, abruptio placentae, and 
placenta previa. There is also a small increase in the risk of spontane­
ous abortion among smokers. Infants of smoking mothers are more 
likely to experience preterm delivery, have a higher perinatal mortality 
rate, be small for their gestational age, and have higher rates of infant 
respiratory distress syndrome. They are more likely to die of sudden 
infant death syndrome and appear to have a developmental lag for at 
least the first several years of life. Since it is likely that some of these 
pregnancy-related risks are caused or enhanced by nicotine, vaping and 
oral use of nicotine remain a concern in pregnancy except as a strategy 
to abstain from cigarette smoking.
PART 13
Neurologic Disorders
■
■OTHER CONDITIONS
Smoking delays healing of peptic ulcers and increases the risk of devel­
oping periodontal disease, diabetes, active tuberculosis, rheumatoid 
arthritis, osteoporosis, senile cataracts, and neovascular and atrophic 
forms of macular degeneration. It results in premature menopause, 
wrinkling of the skin, gallstones, cholecystitis in women, and male 
impotence. Patients who continue to smoke during treatment for can­
cer with chemotherapy or radiation have poorer outcomes and reduced 
survival.
■
■ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
Long-term exposure to environmental tobacco smoke increases the 
risk of lung cancer and coronary artery disease among nonsmokers. 
It also increases the incidence of respiratory infections, chronic otitis 
media, and asthma in children, and it causes exacerbation of asthma 
in children.
LOWER TAR AND NICOTINE CIGARETTES
Filtered cigarettes with lower machine-measured yields of tar and nico­
tine commonly use ventilation holes in the filters and other engineer­
ing designs to artificially lower the machine measurements. Smokers 
compensate for the lowered nicotine delivery resulting from these 
design changes by changing the manner in which they puff on the ciga­
rette or the number of cigarettes smoked per day to restore their level 
of nicotine intake to that needed to satisfy their addiction. As a result, 
actual tar and nicotine deliveries to smokers are not reduced with use 
of these products, negating any reduction in disease risks from switch­
ing to these products.
The amount of carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamines in the 
tobacco used in cigarettes has increased over time, and cigarette design 
changes that reduce machine-measured tar and nicotine also lead 
to deeper inhalation of the smoke in the lung, presenting increased 
amounts of the more carcinogenic smoke to the alveolar portions of 
the lung. These changes increase the risk of adenocarcinoma of the 
lung above that produced by smoking older nonfiltered cigarettes. The 
changes in cigarette design and composition of cigarettes over the past 
six decades are the cause of the increase in rates of adenocarcinoma of 
the lung observed over the past half century, and the increased adeno­
carcinoma rate has increased total lung cancer rates, as there has not 
been a decline in the risk of other cell types with the changes in ciga­
rette design. An increased risk for COPD may also be present. There 
has been no increase in risk of all lung cancer or adenocarcinoma of the 
lung over the same period among never smokers.

PHARMACOLOGIC INTERACTIONS
Cigarette smoking may interact with a variety of other drugs. Cigarette 
smoking induces the cytochrome P450 system, which may alter the 
metabolic clearance of drugs such as warfarin. This may result in inad­
equate serum levels in smokers as outpatients when the dosage is estab­
lished in the hospital under nonsmoking conditions. Correspondingly, 
serum levels may rise when smokers are hospitalized and not allowed 
to smoke. Smokers may also have higher first-pass clearance for drugs 
such as lidocaine, and the stimulant effects of nicotine may reduce the 
effect of benzodiazepines or beta blockers.
OTHER FORMS OF TOBACCO USE
Other major forms of tobacco use are loose moist snuff or packets 
deposited between the cheek and gum and chewing tobacco. Oral 
tobacco use leads to gum disease and can result in oral and pancreatic 
cancer. There are dramatically higher risks evident for products used in 
Africa or Asia as, including for heart disease, compared to those used 
in the United States and Europe.
NICOTINE AEROSOLS
A continually expanding array of devices and oral formulations that 
deliver nicotine in quantities capable of creating and sustaining addic­
tion are available. Many of these devices deliver levels of nicotine 
comparable to a cigarette, and different concentrations of nicotine are 
often offered. Nicotine salt aerosols use mild acids to facilitate inhala­
tion of the aerosol and can deliver very high amounts of nicotine even 
with novice users, potentially enhancing their addictiveness compared 
to devices that deliver solutions of nicotine. Nicotine intake is higher 
for users of devices delivering nicotine salts, and they report a greater 
frequency of symptoms of dependence with abstinence.
Biomarker evidence on exposure to smoke toxicants demonstrates 
markedly lower exposures among those using e-cigarettes exclusively 
compared to cigarette smokers, suggesting that they have less disease 
risk with use. However, both biomarker and behavioral evidence dem­
onstrate the capacity for these devices to create and sustain addiction. 
The long-term rates with which adults addicted to nicotine vaping quit 
nicotine completely or migrate to or relapse back to combusted prod­
uct use as they age remain to be determined.
There is convincing randomized controlled cessation trial evi­
dence that the use of e-cigarettes that deliver sufficient nicotine are 
as effective as other nicotine-replacement or varenicline medications 
in achieving sustained abstinence from cigarettes, but a meaningful 
proportion of those who achieve abstinence still use e-cigarettes at 
12-month follow-up, suggesting continued nicotine addiction. Rates of 
longer-term relapse back to smoking among individuals with persistent 
nicotine addiction remain to be examined.
An additional concern is that evidence on e-cigarette use in the 
United States shows that approximately one-half of adult e-cigarette 
users continue to also smoke conventional cigarettes, negating the ben­
efits of reduced toxicant exposure and successful abstinence.
Refillable or reloadable e-cigarette devices can be used to aerosolize 
a variety of liquids other than those provided by the manufacturer. 
Disposable “pods” and liquids for these devices can be purchased from 
the manufacturer but are also available from other sources that may 
use poor-quality manufacturing practices and control of contaminants. 
They may also contain marijuana oils, other drugs, and flavors not 
evaluated for potential lung injury with inhalation.
CESSATION
The process of stopping smoking is commonly a cyclical one, with 
the smoker sometimes making multiple attempts to quit, and failing, 
before finally being successful. Approximately 70–80% of smokers 
would like to quit smoking. More than one-half of current cigarette 
smokers attempted to quit in the last year, but only 6% quit for 

6 months, and only 3% remain abstinent for 2 years. Clinician-based 
smoking interventions should repeatedly encourage smokers to try to 
quit and to use different forms of cessation assistance with each new 
cessation attempt.

Advice from a clinician to quit smoking, particularly at the time of 
an acute illness, is a powerful trigger for cessation attempts, with up to 
half of patients who are advised to quit making a cessation effort.
CLINICIAN INTERVENTIONS (TABLE 465-2)
The shift in the nicotine market to products containing nicotine but 
not tobacco, and particularly to aerosolized nicotine salt products, has 
complicated provider diagnosis and treatment recommendations. Two 
considerations should guide this process. First, assessment of nicotine 
addiction should include the cumulative number of episodes of use for 
all nicotine products used regularly when considering the intensity of 
nicotine ingestion. This is important particularly when there is varia­
tion in the type of product used from day to day. Inquiries about cigar 
and roll your own use, as well as vaping and oral nicotine products, are 
necessary. It is the frequency of any nicotine dosing, not the product 
source, that creates and sustains addiction.
Second, it is the other toxicants carried along with the nicotine 
that cause the majority of the disease risk, so eliminating the smoke 
intake can have benefits even in the presence of continued addiction 
to nicotine.
All patients should be asked the total daily frequency with which 
they use any nicotine product, how long they have used at least one 
nicotine product regularly, their past experience with quitting, and 
whether they are currently interested in quitting.
The goal is to identify whether the individual has a pattern of use 
that demonstrates a compulsive need for the next dose of nicotine. The 
number of episodes of smoking or vaping per day, how they are spaced 
during the day, as well as use of nicotine smoking within 30 min of 
waking are helpful measures of the intensity of nicotine addiction.
Even those who are not interested in quitting should be encouraged 
and motivated to quit by providing a clear, strong, and personalized 
message by the clinician that smoking cigarettes is an important health 
concern and that vaping can be addicting. Those uninterested indi­
viduals should be told that assistance is available if they become inter­
ested in quitting in the future. Many of those not currently expressing 
an interest in quitting may nevertheless make an attempt to quit in the 
subsequent year.
TABLE 465-2  Clinical Practice Guidelines
Physician Actions
Ask: Systematically identify all tobacco and nicotine use at every visit
Advise: Strongly urge all smokers to quit
Identify smokers willing to quit
Assist the patient in quitting
Arrange follow-up contact
Effective Pharmacologic Interventionsa
First-line therapies
  Nicotine gum (1.5)
  Nicotine patch (1.9)
  Nicotine nasal inhaler (2.3)
  Nicotine oral inhaler (2.1)
  Nicotine lozenge (2 mg: 2.0, 4 mg: 2.8)
  Bupropion (2.0)
  Varenicline (3.1)
Other Effective Interventionsa
Physician or other medical personnel counseling (10 min) (1.84)
Intensive group smoking cessation programs (at least 4–7 sessions of 20- to 
30-min duration lasting at least 2 and preferably 8 weeks) (1.3)
Intensive individual counseling (1.7)
Systemwide cessation tracking and assistance (5)
Telephone counseling (1.6)
Exclusive E-cigarette use (3.0)
aNumerical value following the intervention is the multiple for cessation success 
compared to no intervention.

For those interested in quitting, a quit date should be negotiated, 
usually not the day of the visit but within the next few weeks. A followup contact by office staff around the time of the quit date should be 
provided. There is a relationship between the amount of assistance a 
patient is willing to accept and the success of the cessation attempt.

Building smoking cessation as a priority into health care delivery 
systems by including systemwide tracking of smoking status, prompt­
ing of practitioners to ask about smoking and interest in cessation, 
system-based outreach to smokers to offer cessation assistance and 
programs between visits, and tracking of cessation outcomes can 
dramatically enhance sustained abstinence, with 12-month abstinence 
rates as high as 25%.
There are a variety of cessation products listed in Table 465-2, 
including over-the-counter nicotine patches, gum, and lozenges, as 
well as nicotine nasal and oral inhalers available by prescription. These 
products can be used for up to 3–6 months, and some products are 
formulated to allow a gradual step-down in dosage with increasing 
duration of smoking abstinence. Antidepressants such as bupropion 
(300 mg in divided doses for up to 6 months) have also been shown to 
be effective, as has varenicline, a partial agonist for the nicotinic ace­
tylcholine receptor (initial dose 0.5 mg daily increasing to 1 mg twice 
daily at day 8; treatment duration up to 6 months). Combined use of 
nicotine-replacement therapy (NRT) and antidepressants, as well as the 
use of gum or lozenges for acute cravings in patients using patches, can 
increase cessation outcomes.
CHAPTER 465
Nicotine Addiction
Pretreatment with antidepressants or varenicline is recommended 
for 1–2 weeks prior to the quit date. Pretreatment with nicotine patches 
for 2 weeks prior to a cessation date is also useful. Longer duration 
of nicotine replacement as a maintenance therapy for those who are 
unsuccessful in quitting with a shorter duration of use is a useful 
strategy. NRT is provided in different dosages, with higher doses being 
recommended for more intense smokers. Antidepressants are more 
effective among smokers with a history of depression symptoms.
Current recommendations are to offer pharmacologic treatment, 
usually with nicotine patches or varenicline, to all who will accept it, 
and to provide counseling and other support as a part of the cessation 
attempt. Cessation advice alone by clinicians or their staff is likely to 
increase success compared with no intervention, but a more compre­
hensive approach with advice, pharmacologic assistance, and counsel­
ing can increase cessation success nearly threefold.
Data from multiple studies show that switching from cigarettes to 
exclusive use of e-cigarettes, particularly those with nicotine salts that 
deliver high doses of nicotine, is as or more effective in achieving smok­
ing abstinence compared to FDA-approved medications, and it may be 
more acceptable for some patients. It should be recommended only with 
a strong caution to avoid dual use. Dual use with combusted cigarettes 
is unlikely to lead to smoking cessation or long-term risk reduction.
Current recommendations suggest that FDA-approved cessation 
methods be tried initially, with aerosolized nicotine salt products rec­
ommended to those who fail initial attempts to quit, are quitting on 
their own, or are reluctant to use FDA-approved medications.
PREVENTION
Prevention of smoking initiation must begin early, preferably in the 
elementary school years. Practitioners who treat adolescents should be 
sensitive to the prevalence of this problem even in the preteen popula­
tion. Practitioners should ask all adolescents whether they have experi­
mented with nicotine or currently use nicotine products, reinforce the 
fact that most adolescents and adults do not smoke or use nicotine, 
and explain that all forms of nicotine intake can be both addictive and 
potentially harmful.
■
■FURTHER READING
Christen SE et al: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 
inhaled nicotine salt and free-base using an e-cigarette: A random­
ized crossover study. Nicotine Tob Res 10:ntae074, 2024.
Eisenberg MJ et al: Effect of e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counsel­
ing alone on smoking cessation: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 
324:1844, 2020.