# Preface

# Preface

Preface
Changes in medicine
The Oxford Textbook of Medicine is published online and has been 
regularly updated for many years, but the production of a new and 
very substantially updated edition provides a moment when it is nat-
ural and proper to reflect on what has changed in medicine—​and 
what has not—​in recent years. In the context of burgeoning social 
changes and inequality across the world, we have cause to weigh and 
consider exactly what modern medicine has to offer patients and 
their doctors. Here we reflect on aspects of Medicine that are chan-
ging rapidly and set out a vision for this in the sixth edition of the 
Oxford Textbook of Medicine.
Demand, capacity, magic solutions, and 
the need for perspective
Within all healthcare systems, in rich and poor nations alike, 
most physicians feel the inexorable rise in demand and are strug-
gling to provide adequate ‘capacity’—​the term commonly applied 
by healthcare managers charged with the impossible task of con-
straining expenditure while serving political masters who, almost 
without exception, promise more and more and blame inefficiency 
and ‘unwarranted variation’ for the failure to deliver. In response 
to the difficulties, claims are made that some new technological 
advance, be it sequencing of patients’ genomes, healthcare apps, 
the application of artificial intelligence or ‘Quality Improvement’ 
methodology, will provide the solutions. In the Oxford Textbook of 
Medicine, we do not shy away from these aspects and have several 
new chapters that consider how rich and ‘resource-​poor’ countries 
might best invest their revenues on health.
It is often very hard for practising physicians, who care for patients 
as individuals, to maintain their bearings within the unfamiliar and 
depersonalized world of modern healthcare management. Many are 
left wondering whether those who organize health services ‘live on 
this planet’, or ‘did any working doctor check out that latest directive 
from above?’. When clinical outcomes that really matter are diffi-
cult to quantify, doctors find themselves and their services judged by 
spurious measures of ‘productivity’ in the process of healthcare ‘de-
livery’. Unrealistic and often clinically irrelevant targets might drive 
the thinking of the insurers, managers, and politicians, but who 
can determine the human and clinical value of the care provided? 
Timeliness of care is important and sometimes crucial for salutary 
outcomes, but disaster strikes when clock-​driven targets are blindly 
pursued for all patients irrespective of clinical urgency and to the ex-
clusion of all else, including patients with greater clinical need.
In the morass created by financial constraints and zealous pol-
itical control of health services exercised by those without clinical 
responsibility, it is rare for doctors be able to stand back and perceive 
genuine improvements. However, it is certainly true that today we 
have greater potential to prevent and treat disease and to maintain 
health than ever before. It is our hope that the Oxford Textbook of 
Medicine will inform doctors about these changes and provide good 
guidance as to how they can be translated into clinical practice.
Advances in biomedical sciences
We seek to embody advances in understanding and practice that 
have arisen through scientific research. In the ten years since 
publication of the last edition of this book there has been spec-
tacular progress in the application of science in medicine, espe-
cially the understanding of genomics and molecular cell biology. 
These include: in diagnostics, non-​invasive prenatal diagnosis of 
chromosome abnormalities and monogenic disease by sampling 
maternal plasma for cell-​free fetal DNA, a technique which also 
holds promise for screening and monitoring of cancers; in meta-
bolic disease, the introduction of molecular therapies that address 
the defective chloride transport in cystic fibrosis; in oncology, in-
creased understanding of cancer immunity leading to the develop-
ment of immunotherapies for cancers.
Our authors include the very best in their fields. The founding 
editor and author in this edition, the late David Weatherall, was 
a recipient of the Lasker-​Koshland Special Achievement Award 
in Medical Science. Two new authors have received the Nobel 
Prize recently—​Professor Tu Youyou the 2015 prize for Medicine 
or Physiology, and Sir Greg Winter the 2018 prize for Chemistry. 
Another new author, Professor Y.M. Dennis Lo, was one of two 
winners of China’s inaugural Future Science Prize in 2016.
Beyond scientific development, the introduction of new technolo-
gies into practice typically leads to a sequence of events including 
initial ‘hype’ from many in the field, with extravagant claims of po-
tential benefit. After an interval, these claims are followed by a more 
realistic assessment of what the technology can—​and cannot—​
provide. Frequently, this familiar pattern is driven by powerful com-
mercial influences which can corrupt thinking in a manner that 
generates a climate in which those with views contrary to the big 
battalions are inevitably marginalized. In this edition of the Oxford 
Textbook of Medicine we have strived to bring an authentic perspec-
tive and realism to recommendations for treatment. We sense, for in-
stance, that the excitement generated by the sequencing of patients’ 
genomes continues to increase, but that this trajectory is flattening 
and expectations becoming more realistic. For patients very likely 
to have genetic disorders, diagnoses can be made for a proportion 
that was unimaginable until recently, but for most patients with the 
degenerative and/​or polygenic diseases that are the greatest burden 


Preface
viii
to health, evidence of clinical benefit from genome sequencing re-
mains elusive.
Beyond the progress in genomics and cell biology there has been 
immense interest in bioinformatics and, especially with the enthu-
siasm of major biomedical charities such as The Wellcome Trust, 
for ‘big data’, and the opportunities that these bring to the practice 
of medicine. However, while there are plentiful examples of gen-
omics and cell biology having been translated productively from the 
bench to the bedside, with enormous benefit to patients, examples 
of transforming clinical impact from big data and bioinformatics 
are sparse. But examples there are, such as in the analysis of out-
breaks of the scourges Clostridium difficile and methicillin-​resistant 
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). These discoveries give hope for the 
future as we learn which problems are tractable with this type of 
approach and which are not.
Clinical skill
Until recently, it would have been, to paraphrase Thomas Jefferson, 
regarded as self-​evident that the key requirements of a good phys-
ician are the ability and will to obtain an informative history, carry 
out a thorough physical examination, formulate a relevant differ-
ential diagnosis, instigate appropriate investigations, advise and 
administer correct treatment, including best efforts to relieve symp-
toms in all cases. These skills, and the commitment to use them, 
are often forgotten when healthcare is described in the commercial 
terms of demand and capacity.
While advances in biomedical sciences have dramatically im-
proved the outcome for some diseases, and Paul Erhlich’s century-​
old magische Kugel (magic bullet) has whetted our appetite for 
wonder, it is prudent to recall Thomas Szasz: ‘Formerly, when reli-
gion was strong and science weak, men mistook magic for medicine; 
now, when science is strong and religion weak, men mistake medi-
cine for magic’. The term ‘personalized’ medicine imputes remark-
able and as yet unproven powers, excepting in a very few cases, to 
gene sequencing and molecular therapies, while the patient wants 
to be treated as a person. It is also alarming to us that some medical 
curricula increasingly focus on process, ‘behaviours’, and ‘communi-
cation skills’, to the detriment of medical content or mature guidance 
and attitudes to lifelong learning. There is a tendency to forget the 
very essence of being, and how to become, a physician in the time-​
honoured understanding of the role.
In the Oxford Textbook of Medicine we unashamedly emphasize 
the primacy of history, examination, differential diagnosis, investi-
gation, and treatment. Without a firm grasp of these essentials the 
doctor cannot provide good care for patients, and nor can anyone 
else. Furthermore, having a firm understanding of clinical context 
and a well-​informed clinical perspective is an essential prerequisite 
for driving biomedical research into avenues that really matter.
The broader context of health and disease
The world has become a smaller place. We are now in an era when 
many regard not having a smartphone as an index of deprivation. 
An event that has happened on a different continent can, as a re-
sult of social media, become known to millions of people within 
hours—​the term ‘viral’ has been rightfully translated from commu-
nicable illness to global phenomenon. Narratives transmitted in this 
way often concern disasters, wars, and disease, and they are typically 
handled by the media in a sensationalized and superficial manner.
One hundred and fifty years ago, Darwin’s 1859 masterpiece on 
evolution was entitled ‘On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural 
Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for 
Life’. The ‘less favoured’ undoubtedly have poorer health outcomes, 
due largely to the persistent social ill of inequality, in poor as well as 
ostensibly rich countries. Continuing the tradition of previous edi-
tions, we have contributions that discuss the impact of social deter-
minants of health, also thoughtful chapters on human disasters (by 
another Nobel laureate, Prof Amartya Sen), and the practical and 
critically important aspects of humanitarian medicine. In addition, 
the modern problems of pollution and climate change are exam-
ined. We contend that all doctors would benefit from reading these 
chapters.
Patients and their expectations
There are continuing changes in patients’ expectations, particularly 
those of articulate patients suffering from long-​term conditions and 
residing in countries with a rich provision of healthcare. A paternal-
istic medical approach is no longer acceptable, and several patients 
have contributed greatly to the book by taking the opportunity to tell 
us how they think doctors should behave towards them and care for 
them. However, we are very aware that one size does not fit all, and 
that many patients want a doctor who will give them clear recom-
mendations and not keep repeating a bewildering (to the patient) 
variety of options and ask them to choose. The mature and able 
physician will be alert and sensitive to those patients who want this 
and will provide them with clear advice, and we have endeavoured to 
ensure that the Oxford Textbook of Medicine will assist.
Access to medical knowledge
The ever-​expanding world of the smartphone and tablet device gives 
patients, families, doctors, and other healthcare professionals ready 
access to more information about medicine than all but a very few 
would have thought possible a decade ago. This has many benefits 
but often leaves users of the internet thoroughly perplexed, and some 
desperate people vulnerable to online quackery. Those wanting de-
tails of particular studies will naturally refer to the original literature. 
Those wanting in-​depth reviews of particular subjects can refer to 
diverse resources: these are typically good at apprising the reader of 
plentiful options for investigation, diagnosis, or management, but 
often leave them uncertain of what a clinically experienced expert 
in the field would actually recommend. In the sections that form the 
bulk of the Oxford Textbook of Medicine, we have selected experts 
with specific clinical experience and given them this task, and we 
contend that they have met the challenge.
Acknowledgements
The Oxford Textbook of Medicine is a large undertaking: this edition, 
the most substantial so far, comprises 647 chapters and covers 6654 
printed pages, and its production has required an extraordinary co-
ordination of effort from many quarters. In darker moments the edi-
tors feared that the process would never end, but as we have read 
and edited the chapters along the way, we have experienced the joy 
of learning a huge amount of medicine, often in fields far removed 
from our own. For this we are very grateful to our contributors, 
including those whose submissions were delayed!


Preface
ix
We wish to make particular acknowledgement of our friend and 
senior colleague, David Warrell, an editor from the first edition of 
this textbook, senior editor of the fourth and fifth editions, and au-
thor in this edition. We and our readers, notably those seeking in-
formation on tropical diseases and especially any who have been 
bitten by snakes, about which his knowledge is truly prodigious, 
owe him a great debt.
We thank Helen Liepman, with whom we remain good friends: she 
has overseen and directed matters at Oxford University Press and 
coped in a steadfastly pleasant and professional way with expres-
sions of editorial frustration caused by our failure to understand a 
publishing process that at times seemed to be Byzantine in its com-
plexity, as might perhaps be expected in an ancient university. We 
also thank Anna Kirton, Jamie Oates, and Jess White at Oxford 
University Press for their considerable efforts on behalf of the book. 
Finally, we record that the editors’ personal lives have remained 
calm, and we are very grateful to Helen, Jenny, and Sue for their in-
dulgence of our bizarre editorial pursuit.
John D. Firth
Christopher P. Conlon
Timothy M. Cox




Section editors
Jon G. Ayres  Emeritus Professor of Environmental  
and Respiratory Medicine, University of Birmingham, 
Birmingham, UK
Section 10: Environmental medicine, occupational medicine, and 
poisoning
Christopher P. Conlon  Professor of Infectious Diseases, Nuffield 
Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Section 1: Patients and their treatment; Section 2: Background 
to medicine; Section 3: Cell biology; Section 4: Immunological 
mechanisms; Section 5: Principles of clinical oncology; Section 
8: Infectious diseases; Section 25: Disorders of the eye; Section 
29: Biochemistry in medicine
Cyrus Cooper  MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University 
of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical 
Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Section 20: Disorders of the skeleton
Timothy M. Cox  Professor of Medicine Emeritus, Director 
of Research, University of Cambridge; Honorary Consultant 
Physician, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
Section 1: Patients and their treatment; Section 2: Background 
to medicine; Section 3: Cell biology; Section 4: Immunological 
mechanisms; Section 5: Principles of clinical oncology; Section 
12: Metabolic disorders
Jeremy Dwight  Previously John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
Section 16: Cardiovascular disorders
Simon Finfer  Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care 
Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, and The George 
Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, 
Sydney, Australia
Section 17: Critical care medicine
John D. Firth  Consultant Physician and Nephrologist, 
Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
Section 1: Patients and their treatment; Section 2: Background 
to medicine; Section 3: Cell biology; Section 4: Immunological 
mechanisms; Section 5: Principles of clinical oncology; Section 
21: Disorders of the kidney and urinary tract; Section 27: Forensic 
medicine; Section 28: Sport and exercise medicine; Section 
30: Acute medicine
Mark Gurnell  University of Cambridge Medical School, 
Cambridge, UK
Section 13: Endocrine disorders
Chris Hatton  Cancer and Haematology Centre, Churchill 
Hospital, Oxford, UK
Section 22: Haematological disorders
Deborah Hay  Honorary Consultant Haematologist, Nuffield 
Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Section 22: Haematological disorders
Roderick J. Hay  King’s College London, London, UK
Section 23: Disorders of the skin
Christopher Kennard  Nuffield Department of Clinical 
Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Section 24: Neurological disorders
Finbarr C. Martin  Population Health Sciences, King’s College 
London, London, UK
Section 6: Old age medicine
Catherine Nelson-Piercy  Obstetric Medicine, Women’s 
Health Academic Centre, King’s Health Partners, King’s College 
London, London, UK
Section 14: Medical disorders in pregnancy
Jack Satsangi  Oxford Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield 
Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Section 15: Gastroenterological disorders
Pallav L. Shah  Imperial College London, London, UK
Section 18: Respiratory disorders
Michael Sharpe  Psychological Medicine Research, University of 
Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
Section 26: Psychiatric and drug-related disorders
Jackie Sherrard  Wycombe General Hospital, High Wycombe, 
Bucks, UK
Section 9: Sexually transmitted diseases
Richard A. Watts  Department of Rheumatology, Ipswich 
Hospital, Ipswich, UK; Norwich Medical School, University of 
East Anglia, Norwich, UK
Section 19: Rheumatological disorders
Bee Wee  Associate Professor of Palliative Care, University of 
Oxford, Oxford, UK
Section 7: Pain and palliative care
Katherine Younger  School of Biological and Health Sciences, 
Technological University Dublin, Ireland
Section 11: Nutrition