# 17 - 10. Culture and mental health

# 10. Culture and mental health

© SPMM Course 
10. 
Culture and mental health 
 
Comparative psychiatry refers to the study of mental illness in different sociocultural 
settings; Kraepelin traveled to Southeast Asia and developed the concept of comparative 
psychiatry. This is now referred to as transcultural psychiatry. 
Two perspectives of cultural studies often discussed: 
 Emic perspective (emic view): Used to refer to the perspective of an individual from a 
specific cultural group about his own group. 
 Etic perspective (etic view): Refers to the perspective of an individual outside a 
specific cultural group about the studied group. The etic approach, for instance, involves 
applying Western psychiatric concepts en bloc into a different culture and uses it for 
diagnosis. This approach assumes 
1. Universality of illnesses 
2. Invariance of core symptoms 
3. Validity of diagnostic constructs 
 
Different views in etic / emic approaches: 
 
ETIC approach 
EMIC approach 
Diagnosis of mental 
illness 
Similar core symptoms in 
all cultures 
Linguistic and cultural 
variations 
acknowledged 
Classification 
system 
Common classificatory 
systems endorsed 
Locally derived systems 
endorsed 
Preferred 
measurement 
method 
Identical rating scales and 
measures across nations 
 
Preferred research 
method 
Quantitative methods 
emphasizing reliability are 
preferred 
Qualitative methods 
emphasizing cultural 
validity 
Treatment methods 
Biomedically driven 
Local belief driven 
Help seeking 
behaviour 
Provision of services most 
important 
Individual health belief 
and explanatory models 
most important 
 
Ethnicity is often defined by a set of cultural patterns (values, beliefs, roles, affective and 
cognitive styles, and norms), heritage, or ancestry shared by a social group of common 
national or geographic origin.

© SPMM Course 
Term 
Characters 
Determined by 
Perceived as 
Race 
Physical 
appearance 
Genetic 
Permanent 
Culture 
Behaviour & 
attitudes 
Upbringing 
(enculturation) 
and choice 
Changeable (see 
acculturation) 
Ethnicity 
Group identity 
Social; pressures, 
psychological 
need for 
identification 
Partially 
changeable 
(From Seminars in Gen Adult Psych 1e. Pg. 783) 
Acculturation refers to the process of cultural change that takes place when an individual or 
a group comes in continuous contact with a culturally distinct group. Acculturation can 
result from immigration and can occur in either direction – hosts can get accultured; as 
evident in certain places in times of Colonial rule. Four types are described according to the 
degree of retention and adoption of the two cultures at ethnocultural group level: 
Berry’s model of 
acculturation 
High degree of 
retention of culture of 
origin 
Low degree of retention of 
culture of origin 
High degree of 
adoption of new 
culture 
INTEGRATION 
ASSIMILATION 
Low degree of 
adoption of new 
culture 
SEPARATION 
MARGINALISATION 
 
 Assimilation: This refers to partial adaptation of a new culture (seen in migrants or 
refugees) without retaining or giving up all of one’s culture of origin completely. 
 Integration refers to both high retention of one’s own cultural values and high 
adoption of the practices of the new culture. 
 Separation refers to high retention of one’s own cultural values and low adoption of 
the practices of the new culture. 
 Marginalisation refers to both low retention of one’s own cultural values and low 
adoption of the practices of the new culture. These individuals get marginalized by 
members of both culture of origin and culture of adoption. 
When someone loses the identity of one’s culture of origin voluntarily e.g. upon immigration 
but does not assimilate or integrate, then the risk of loss of cultural identity and subsequent 
increase in mental illness are noted.

© SPMM Course 
Enculturation refers to culture being learnt through contact with family, friends, teachers 
and the media. This happens to everyone irrespective of migration. 
At a larger societal (as opposed to small group) level, Berry’s model is often mapped using 
the terms given below: 
Berry’s model of 
acculturation 
High degree of retention of 
individual culture 
identities 
Low degree of 
retention of individual 
culture identities 
High degree of 
relationship among 
various cultures 
MULTICULTURALISM 
MELTING POT 
Low degree of 
relationship among 
various cultures in the 
society 
SEGREGATION 
EXCLUSION 
 
Cultural bereavement refers to a self-limited grieving response developed by an individual 
on leaving his own culture. 
Cultural diffusion or syncretism refers to the spread of cultural traits (including psychiatric 
syndromes, treatment methods) through contacts across societies. This leads to creating 
innovations that are distinct from both groups. 
Sojourning refers to voluntary but brief exposure to different culture e.g. tourists, Peace 
Corps volunteers. Nostalgia or homesickness is common in sojourners and can be reduced by 
shortening length of stay, keeping in touch with family and friends at home and learning 
about a new culture before arrival. 
Segregation: This refers to removal of people from communities and placing them in an 
artificial community, which is more or less an institution. Goffman described 5 types of 
segregation: 
1. Incapable harmless – orphanages and old age homes 
2. Ill but threat to society – mental hospitals 
3. Not ill, threat to society with malice – prisons 
4. Occupation related – military barracks, boarding schools 
5. Retreat from the world – monasteries, convents. 
 
What happens when a family emigrates?

© SPMM Course 
1. 
The elderly often find difficult to adapt and change – rejection of new culture 
happens 
2. 
Complete assimilation is seen in young children 
3. 
A bicultural pattern is seen among young adults in working age – at work they 
adapt to new culture, but at home they remain attached to the culture of origin. 
 
Function of culture in psychiatric practice 
The five elements of cultural formulation (American Psychiatric Association, 2002) 
1. The cultural identity of the individual 
2. Cultural explanations of the individual’s illness 
3. The influence of the patient’s psychosocial environment and level of functioning within 
it 
4. Cultural elements in the patient–professional relationship (this requires the psychiatrist 
to be knowledgeable of her own cultural values and beliefs) 
5. The use of cultural assessment in deciding diagnosis and care. 
The concept of explanatory models 
 Patients’ explanatory models are not fixed and are influenced by the circumstances of 
their symptoms, age, gender, educational attainment, time point and context of 
assessment and importantly their cultural beliefs. 
 Explanatory models themselves can influence a physician’s assessments. 
 The process of exploring patient’s identity and explanatory model ensures improved 
understanding and informs the successful negotiation of different worldviews. This 
exploration does not require psychiatrists to enter into another culture as a participant 
observer. 
Idioms of distress 
Culture as an explanatory tool: This allows description of non-pathological 
behaviours in the context of one’s culture. 
Culture as a pathoplastic agent: This allows description of psychopathology that 
result from cultural practices. 
Culture as a diagnostic factor: This allows culture-specific, unique diagnostic 
framework e.g. culture-bound disorders 
Culture as a service instrument: This allows utilization of cultural knowledge in 
service delivery and resource distribution.

© SPMM Course 
Idioms are well-structured and codified way expressing thoughts via language. Idioms in 
one language cannot be translated as such to another – they lose their meaning out of context. 
In cultural psychiatry, idioms of distress refer to somatic symptoms that serve as a code for 
expressing one’s mental distress in some cultures. 
Models of care in cultural psychiatry: 
Culturally sensitive care could be delivered using various models. Some of these include 
1. 
Ethnic minority services: Separate services are set up for the growing minority 
population, but there is a risk of organizational marginalization in such models. 
2. 
Cultural consultation model: This has been tested in Canada. It consists of a 
specialized multidisciplinary team which provides consultations to other clinical 
teams, sometimes to the families directly. They do not provide direct patient care. 
3. 
Melting pot model: In this model, institutional factors promoting inequalities 
are addressed. Culture is not perceived as a problem area that needs special resources. 
Instead, mainstream services are commonly enriched by responding to all cultural 
groups’ needs. This guarantees equality of access in care. (Melting pot refers to 
regions or countries that accommodate other cultures in huge numbers, eventually 
paving way for a high degree of admixture and cultural mosaicism, e.g., United 
States). 
4. 
A hedge-your-bets approach: Following both prescribed medication and ethnic, 
spiritual therapy may be the best hope for securing adherence. This encourages 
honest discussion with family and maintaining religious affiliations.