23 - Landmark publications relevant for critique o
Landmark publications relevant for critique on ethics
© SPMM Course The informative model. The doctor is seen as a dispenser of information. Here the choice is left wholly up to the patient. May be useful in one-off consultations, but may not work well if strictly followed on long-term professional relationship. The interpretive model. Here the doctor will be treating the patient for a long time and might know his/her patient well and understand the circumstances of their microenvironment. Here shared decision-making is established. The deliberative model. The doctor here may act as a friend or counselor to the patient, where information dispensing is coupled with advice on a course of action. This is commonly used to enable lifestyle modification and to address maladaptive coping. 4. Other terms used: Direct Ethics is about the action taken. To determine what ethical behaviour is, we should assess the act -- what has been done. Indirect Ethics is about the actor -- the nature of the individual choosing those actions. The main concern here is the formation of character by a moral agent (a person). Pragmatic ethics: Emphasis is on achieving success, on reaching a goal with relatively little concern for how that success is achieved. Humanistic ethics: Emphasis is on doing what's best for society. This dominates ethical theory overwhelmingly; according to humanism, ethics is held as a virtue, with its goal being social improvement rather than personal success. Although some actions are always wrong (murder, for instance), in most cases, ethical behaviour lies between extremes, along a range between excess and deficiency. This is the idea of the golden mean of Aristotle. Landmark publications relevant for critique on ethics Nuremberg Code 1974: Code of ethics following the Nuremberg Trials (post-World War II Trial concerning doctors experimenting on people detained in concentration camps). According to Nuremberg Code, human experimentation can be carried out only if Voluntary consent is given Research is intended for common good of the society Avoidance of unnecessary pain and suffering is guaranteed for the subjects Subject has liberty to withdraw at any point Qualified researchers undertake research Scientist must terminate a study if more harm is being caused than expected to the subjects
No comments to display
No comments to display